IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort

BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion associated with dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC). Annually, 1.8%, 10% and 73% of patients with atrophic gastritis, GIM and dysplasia progress to GC. While dyspepsia is associated with Helicobacter Pylori and active gastritis, GI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2022-09, Vol.71 (Suppl 2), p.A59-A59
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Si-Ying, Lee, Jonathan, Koh, Calvin J, Zhu, Feng, So, Jimmy, Ho, Khek-Yu, Srivastava, Supriya, Tsao, Stephen, Khor, Christopher, Fock, Kwong-Ming, Lim, Wee-Chian, Ling, Khoon-Lin, Ang, Tiing-Leong, Teh, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A59
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page A59
container_title Gut
container_volume 71
creator Tang, Si-Ying
Lee, Jonathan
Koh, Calvin J
Zhu, Feng
So, Jimmy
Ho, Khek-Yu
Srivastava, Supriya
Tsao, Stephen
Khor, Christopher
Fock, Kwong-Ming
Lim, Wee-Chian
Ling, Khoon-Lin
Ang, Tiing-Leong
Teh, Ming
description BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion associated with dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC). Annually, 1.8%, 10% and 73% of patients with atrophic gastritis, GIM and dysplasia progress to GC. While dyspepsia is associated with Helicobacter Pylori and active gastritis, GIM is not thought to be associated with specific symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between GIM and pre-endoscopy symptoms.Methods2874 participants underwent 7480 gastroscopies with updated Sydney System gastric mucosal sampling from January 2004 – December 2010 with GIM graded using the Operative Link in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging. Prior to each endoscopy, the participants completed a medical history interview reporting symptoms of dyspepsia, acid brash, heartburn, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, indigestion, loss of weight, loss of appetite, coffee ground vomitus and melena. Results were compiled and statistics calculated using R for chi-square and logistic regression analysis.ResultsGIM was present in 53.3% (n=3992) of the gastroscopies. One-third of the patients (37.1%, n=2781) were symptomatic prior to the endoscopy, with the most common symptoms being dyspepsia (n=1860, 24.9%), acid brash (n=838, 11.2%) and heartburn (n=520, 7%).Compared to controls, patients with GIM have lower proportions of symptoms (34.2% vs 39.8%, p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-IDDF.67
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711023872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2711023872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1137-e4574e10a8f84f174865ad88f93447a1f369bfbc6f7ef0a23148c4a249ab4c623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwBCyWmE39V9sZS0tLpUoMwBzdBLskyk-JnYpuXZDYecM-CQlFYrrLd4_O-RC6ZvSWMaFG6zbkVUE45ZwsZ7P5rdInaMCkMkRwY07RgFKmyVjL6BxdeJ9TSo2J2AB99fjv3-TuiVDOxGH_uQAfmizFWRWsD1kFBS5tgE0BPgNcwg5DCLZqIVjcWFe0H9jvyk2oS48P-28M3cfOZx7XDgMuoFlbXCfeNlsIWd3HbZrab2wasq3Faf1WN-ESnTkovL36u0P0Mr9_nj6Q1eNiOZ2sSNIt1cTKboRlFIwz0jEtjRrDqzEuElJqYE6oKHFJqpy2jgIXTJpUApcRJDJVXAzRzTG3q_DedvPivG6brpOPuWaMcmF0T42OVFLm_wCjca87PuqOe21x7y9WWvwAMaF3kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711023872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tang, Si-Ying ; Lee, Jonathan ; Koh, Calvin J ; Zhu, Feng ; So, Jimmy ; Ho, Khek-Yu ; Srivastava, Supriya ; Tsao, Stephen ; Khor, Christopher ; Fock, Kwong-Ming ; Lim, Wee-Chian ; Ling, Khoon-Lin ; Ang, Tiing-Leong ; Teh, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Si-Ying ; Lee, Jonathan ; Koh, Calvin J ; Zhu, Feng ; So, Jimmy ; Ho, Khek-Yu ; Srivastava, Supriya ; Tsao, Stephen ; Khor, Christopher ; Fock, Kwong-Ming ; Lim, Wee-Chian ; Ling, Khoon-Lin ; Ang, Tiing-Leong ; Teh, Ming</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion associated with dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC). Annually, 1.8%, 10% and 73% of patients with atrophic gastritis, GIM and dysplasia progress to GC. While dyspepsia is associated with Helicobacter Pylori and active gastritis, GIM is not thought to be associated with specific symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between GIM and pre-endoscopy symptoms.Methods2874 participants underwent 7480 gastroscopies with updated Sydney System gastric mucosal sampling from January 2004 – December 2010 with GIM graded using the Operative Link in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging. Prior to each endoscopy, the participants completed a medical history interview reporting symptoms of dyspepsia, acid brash, heartburn, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, indigestion, loss of weight, loss of appetite, coffee ground vomitus and melena. Results were compiled and statistics calculated using R for chi-square and logistic regression analysis.ResultsGIM was present in 53.3% (n=3992) of the gastroscopies. One-third of the patients (37.1%, n=2781) were symptomatic prior to the endoscopy, with the most common symptoms being dyspepsia (n=1860, 24.9%), acid brash (n=838, 11.2%) and heartburn (n=520, 7%).Compared to controls, patients with GIM have lower proportions of symptoms (34.2% vs 39.8%, p<0.01). Of note, patients with GIM reported significantly less acid brash (9.5% vs 12.7%, p<0.01) and heartburn (5.2% vs 8.5%, p<0.01) (IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table1), whereby H. pylori status was not significantly different in these subgroups.Abstract IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table 1Symptoms in patients with or without GIM Symptoms No GIM (%) GIM (%) Total (%) P-value Odds ratio (CI) Acid brash No 3484 (87.3) 3158 (90.5) 6642 (88.8) <0.001 0.72 (0.62–0.83) Yes 508 (12.7) 330 (9.5) 838 (11.2) Heartburn No 3653 (91.5) 3307 (94.8) 6960 (93.0) <0.001 0.59 (0.49 - 0.71) Yes 339 (8.5) 181 (5.2) 520 (7.0) Dysphagia No 3939 (98.7) 3462 (99.3) 7401 (98.9) 0.019 0.56 (0.35 - 0.89) Yes 53 (1.3) 26 (0.7) 79 (1.1) Nausea No 3868 (96.9) 3418 (98.0) 7286 (97.4) 0.004 0.64 (0.47 - 0.86) Yes 124 (3.1) 70 (2.0) 194 (2.6) Vomiting No 3963 (99.3) 3463 (99.3) 7426 (99.3) 1.000 0.99 (0.58 - 1.69) Yes 29 (0.7) 25 (0.7) 54 (0.7) Dyspepsia No 2932 (73.4) 2688 (77.1) 5620 (75.1) <0.001 0.82 (0.74 - 0.91) Yes 1060 (26.6) 800 (22.9) 1860 (24.9) Satiety No 3829 (95.9) 3365 (96.5) 7194 (96.2) 0.233 0.86 (0.68 - 1.09) Yes 163 (4.1) 123 (3.5) 286 (3.8) Indigestion No 3878 (97.1) 3420 (98.1) 7298 (97.6) 0.014 0.68 (0.50 - 0.92) Yes 114 (2.9) 68 (1.9) 182 (2.4) LOA No 3941 (98.7) 3463 (99.3) 7404 (99.0) 0.022 0.56 (0.34 - 0.92) Yes 51 (1.3) 25 (0.7) 76 (1.0) LOW No 3889 (97.4) 3425 (98.2) 7314 (97.8) 0.029 0.69 (0.51 - 0.95) Yes 103 (2.6) 63 (1.8) 166 (2.2) Coffeeground No 3986 (99.8) 3485 (99.9) 7471 (99.9) 0.641 0.57 (0.14 – 2.29) Yes 6 (0.2) 3 (0.1) 9 (0.1) Melena No 3967 (99.4) 3470 (99.5) 7437 (99.4) 0.634 0.82 (0.45 – 1.51) Yes 25 (0.6) 18 (0.5) 43 (0.6) Symptomatic No 2404 (60.2) 2295 (65.8) 4699 (62.8) <0.001 0.79 (0.72 -0.86) Yes 1588 (39.8) 1193 (34.2) 2781 (37.2) ConclusionsWe hypothesize that patients with intestinal metaplasia and atrophic gastritis may have less acid secretion, and correspondingly fewer reflux symptoms. Although many patients in clinical practice, are scoped for dyspepsia and reflux symptoms, our data suggest that patients with GIM are less likely to have these symptoms and yet harbour this pre-malignant condition of the stomach.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-IDDF.67</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Acids ; Appetite loss ; Basic Gastroenterology ; Coffee ; Dyspepsia ; Dysphagia ; Dysplasia ; Endoscopy ; Gastric cancer ; Gastric mucosa ; Gastritis ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Heart ; Helicobacter pylori ; Intestine ; Metaplasia ; Nausea ; Patients ; Satiety ; Statistical analysis ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>Gut, 2022-09, Vol.71 (Suppl 2), p.A59-A59</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Si-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Calvin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Khek-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khor, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fock, Kwong-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wee-Chian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Khoon-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Tiing-Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teh, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description><![CDATA[BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion associated with dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC). Annually, 1.8%, 10% and 73% of patients with atrophic gastritis, GIM and dysplasia progress to GC. While dyspepsia is associated with Helicobacter Pylori and active gastritis, GIM is not thought to be associated with specific symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between GIM and pre-endoscopy symptoms.Methods2874 participants underwent 7480 gastroscopies with updated Sydney System gastric mucosal sampling from January 2004 – December 2010 with GIM graded using the Operative Link in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging. Prior to each endoscopy, the participants completed a medical history interview reporting symptoms of dyspepsia, acid brash, heartburn, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, indigestion, loss of weight, loss of appetite, coffee ground vomitus and melena. Results were compiled and statistics calculated using R for chi-square and logistic regression analysis.ResultsGIM was present in 53.3% (n=3992) of the gastroscopies. One-third of the patients (37.1%, n=2781) were symptomatic prior to the endoscopy, with the most common symptoms being dyspepsia (n=1860, 24.9%), acid brash (n=838, 11.2%) and heartburn (n=520, 7%).Compared to controls, patients with GIM have lower proportions of symptoms (34.2% vs 39.8%, p<0.01). Of note, patients with GIM reported significantly less acid brash (9.5% vs 12.7%, p<0.01) and heartburn (5.2% vs 8.5%, p<0.01) (IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table1), whereby H. pylori status was not significantly different in these subgroups.Abstract IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table 1Symptoms in patients with or without GIM Symptoms No GIM (%) GIM (%) Total (%) P-value Odds ratio (CI) Acid brash No 3484 (87.3) 3158 (90.5) 6642 (88.8) <0.001 0.72 (0.62–0.83) Yes 508 (12.7) 330 (9.5) 838 (11.2) Heartburn No 3653 (91.5) 3307 (94.8) 6960 (93.0) <0.001 0.59 (0.49 - 0.71) Yes 339 (8.5) 181 (5.2) 520 (7.0) Dysphagia No 3939 (98.7) 3462 (99.3) 7401 (98.9) 0.019 0.56 (0.35 - 0.89) Yes 53 (1.3) 26 (0.7) 79 (1.1) Nausea No 3868 (96.9) 3418 (98.0) 7286 (97.4) 0.004 0.64 (0.47 - 0.86) Yes 124 (3.1) 70 (2.0) 194 (2.6) Vomiting No 3963 (99.3) 3463 (99.3) 7426 (99.3) 1.000 0.99 (0.58 - 1.69) Yes 29 (0.7) 25 (0.7) 54 (0.7) Dyspepsia No 2932 (73.4) 2688 (77.1) 5620 (75.1) <0.001 0.82 (0.74 - 0.91) Yes 1060 (26.6) 800 (22.9) 1860 (24.9) Satiety No 3829 (95.9) 3365 (96.5) 7194 (96.2) 0.233 0.86 (0.68 - 1.09) Yes 163 (4.1) 123 (3.5) 286 (3.8) Indigestion No 3878 (97.1) 3420 (98.1) 7298 (97.6) 0.014 0.68 (0.50 - 0.92) Yes 114 (2.9) 68 (1.9) 182 (2.4) LOA No 3941 (98.7) 3463 (99.3) 7404 (99.0) 0.022 0.56 (0.34 - 0.92) Yes 51 (1.3) 25 (0.7) 76 (1.0) LOW No 3889 (97.4) 3425 (98.2) 7314 (97.8) 0.029 0.69 (0.51 - 0.95) Yes 103 (2.6) 63 (1.8) 166 (2.2) Coffeeground No 3986 (99.8) 3485 (99.9) 7471 (99.9) 0.641 0.57 (0.14 – 2.29) Yes 6 (0.2) 3 (0.1) 9 (0.1) Melena No 3967 (99.4) 3470 (99.5) 7437 (99.4) 0.634 0.82 (0.45 – 1.51) Yes 25 (0.6) 18 (0.5) 43 (0.6) Symptomatic No 2404 (60.2) 2295 (65.8) 4699 (62.8) <0.001 0.79 (0.72 -0.86) Yes 1588 (39.8) 1193 (34.2) 2781 (37.2) ConclusionsWe hypothesize that patients with intestinal metaplasia and atrophic gastritis may have less acid secretion, and correspondingly fewer reflux symptoms. Although many patients in clinical practice, are scoped for dyspepsia and reflux symptoms, our data suggest that patients with GIM are less likely to have these symptoms and yet harbour this pre-malignant condition of the stomach.]]></description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Appetite loss</subject><subject>Basic Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Dyspepsia</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Dysplasia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastric mucosa</subject><subject>Gastritis</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Metaplasia</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Satiety</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwBCyWmE39V9sZS0tLpUoMwBzdBLskyk-JnYpuXZDYecM-CQlFYrrLd4_O-RC6ZvSWMaFG6zbkVUE45ZwsZ7P5rdInaMCkMkRwY07RgFKmyVjL6BxdeJ9TSo2J2AB99fjv3-TuiVDOxGH_uQAfmizFWRWsD1kFBS5tgE0BPgNcwg5DCLZqIVjcWFe0H9jvyk2oS48P-28M3cfOZx7XDgMuoFlbXCfeNlsIWd3HbZrab2wasq3Faf1WN-ESnTkovL36u0P0Mr9_nj6Q1eNiOZ2sSNIt1cTKboRlFIwz0jEtjRrDqzEuElJqYE6oKHFJqpy2jgIXTJpUApcRJDJVXAzRzTG3q_DedvPivG6brpOPuWaMcmF0T42OVFLm_wCjca87PuqOe21x7y9WWvwAMaF3kg</recordid><startdate>20220902</startdate><enddate>20220902</enddate><creator>Tang, Si-Ying</creator><creator>Lee, Jonathan</creator><creator>Koh, Calvin J</creator><creator>Zhu, Feng</creator><creator>So, Jimmy</creator><creator>Ho, Khek-Yu</creator><creator>Srivastava, Supriya</creator><creator>Tsao, Stephen</creator><creator>Khor, Christopher</creator><creator>Fock, Kwong-Ming</creator><creator>Lim, Wee-Chian</creator><creator>Ling, Khoon-Lin</creator><creator>Ang, Tiing-Leong</creator><creator>Teh, Ming</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220902</creationdate><title>IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort</title><author>Tang, Si-Ying ; Lee, Jonathan ; Koh, Calvin J ; Zhu, Feng ; So, Jimmy ; Ho, Khek-Yu ; Srivastava, Supriya ; Tsao, Stephen ; Khor, Christopher ; Fock, Kwong-Ming ; Lim, Wee-Chian ; Ling, Khoon-Lin ; Ang, Tiing-Leong ; Teh, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1137-e4574e10a8f84f174865ad88f93447a1f369bfbc6f7ef0a23148c4a249ab4c623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Appetite loss</topic><topic>Basic Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Dyspepsia</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Dysplasia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastric mucosa</topic><topic>Gastritis</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Metaplasia</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Satiety</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Si-Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Calvin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Jimmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Khek-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srivastava, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khor, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fock, Kwong-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Wee-Chian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Khoon-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ang, Tiing-Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teh, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Si-Ying</au><au>Lee, Jonathan</au><au>Koh, Calvin J</au><au>Zhu, Feng</au><au>So, Jimmy</au><au>Ho, Khek-Yu</au><au>Srivastava, Supriya</au><au>Tsao, Stephen</au><au>Khor, Christopher</au><au>Fock, Kwong-Ming</au><au>Lim, Wee-Chian</au><au>Ling, Khoon-Lin</au><au>Ang, Tiing-Leong</au><au>Teh, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><stitle>Gut</stitle><date>2022-09-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A59</spage><epage>A59</epage><pages>A59-A59</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion associated with dysplasia and gastric cancer (GC). Annually, 1.8%, 10% and 73% of patients with atrophic gastritis, GIM and dysplasia progress to GC. While dyspepsia is associated with Helicobacter Pylori and active gastritis, GIM is not thought to be associated with specific symptoms. The aim of the study is to evaluate the correlation between GIM and pre-endoscopy symptoms.Methods2874 participants underwent 7480 gastroscopies with updated Sydney System gastric mucosal sampling from January 2004 – December 2010 with GIM graded using the Operative Link in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging. Prior to each endoscopy, the participants completed a medical history interview reporting symptoms of dyspepsia, acid brash, heartburn, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, early satiety, indigestion, loss of weight, loss of appetite, coffee ground vomitus and melena. Results were compiled and statistics calculated using R for chi-square and logistic regression analysis.ResultsGIM was present in 53.3% (n=3992) of the gastroscopies. One-third of the patients (37.1%, n=2781) were symptomatic prior to the endoscopy, with the most common symptoms being dyspepsia (n=1860, 24.9%), acid brash (n=838, 11.2%) and heartburn (n=520, 7%).Compared to controls, patients with GIM have lower proportions of symptoms (34.2% vs 39.8%, p<0.01). Of note, patients with GIM reported significantly less acid brash (9.5% vs 12.7%, p<0.01) and heartburn (5.2% vs 8.5%, p<0.01) (IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table1), whereby H. pylori status was not significantly different in these subgroups.Abstract IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Table 1Symptoms in patients with or without GIM Symptoms No GIM (%) GIM (%) Total (%) P-value Odds ratio (CI) Acid brash No 3484 (87.3) 3158 (90.5) 6642 (88.8) <0.001 0.72 (0.62–0.83) Yes 508 (12.7) 330 (9.5) 838 (11.2) Heartburn No 3653 (91.5) 3307 (94.8) 6960 (93.0) <0.001 0.59 (0.49 - 0.71) Yes 339 (8.5) 181 (5.2) 520 (7.0) Dysphagia No 3939 (98.7) 3462 (99.3) 7401 (98.9) 0.019 0.56 (0.35 - 0.89) Yes 53 (1.3) 26 (0.7) 79 (1.1) Nausea No 3868 (96.9) 3418 (98.0) 7286 (97.4) 0.004 0.64 (0.47 - 0.86) Yes 124 (3.1) 70 (2.0) 194 (2.6) Vomiting No 3963 (99.3) 3463 (99.3) 7426 (99.3) 1.000 0.99 (0.58 - 1.69) Yes 29 (0.7) 25 (0.7) 54 (0.7) Dyspepsia No 2932 (73.4) 2688 (77.1) 5620 (75.1) <0.001 0.82 (0.74 - 0.91) Yes 1060 (26.6) 800 (22.9) 1860 (24.9) Satiety No 3829 (95.9) 3365 (96.5) 7194 (96.2) 0.233 0.86 (0.68 - 1.09) Yes 163 (4.1) 123 (3.5) 286 (3.8) Indigestion No 3878 (97.1) 3420 (98.1) 7298 (97.6) 0.014 0.68 (0.50 - 0.92) Yes 114 (2.9) 68 (1.9) 182 (2.4) LOA No 3941 (98.7) 3463 (99.3) 7404 (99.0) 0.022 0.56 (0.34 - 0.92) Yes 51 (1.3) 25 (0.7) 76 (1.0) LOW No 3889 (97.4) 3425 (98.2) 7314 (97.8) 0.029 0.69 (0.51 - 0.95) Yes 103 (2.6) 63 (1.8) 166 (2.2) Coffeeground No 3986 (99.8) 3485 (99.9) 7471 (99.9) 0.641 0.57 (0.14 – 2.29) Yes 6 (0.2) 3 (0.1) 9 (0.1) Melena No 3967 (99.4) 3470 (99.5) 7437 (99.4) 0.634 0.82 (0.45 – 1.51) Yes 25 (0.6) 18 (0.5) 43 (0.6) Symptomatic No 2404 (60.2) 2295 (65.8) 4699 (62.8) <0.001 0.79 (0.72 -0.86) Yes 1588 (39.8) 1193 (34.2) 2781 (37.2) ConclusionsWe hypothesize that patients with intestinal metaplasia and atrophic gastritis may have less acid secretion, and correspondingly fewer reflux symptoms. Although many patients in clinical practice, are scoped for dyspepsia and reflux symptoms, our data suggest that patients with GIM are less likely to have these symptoms and yet harbour this pre-malignant condition of the stomach.]]></abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><doi>10.1136/gutjnl-2022-IDDF.67</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 2022-09, Vol.71 (Suppl 2), p.A59-A59
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2711023872
source PubMed Central
subjects Acids
Appetite loss
Basic Gastroenterology
Coffee
Dyspepsia
Dysphagia
Dysplasia
Endoscopy
Gastric cancer
Gastric mucosa
Gastritis
Gastroesophageal reflux
Heart
Helicobacter pylori
Intestine
Metaplasia
Nausea
Patients
Satiety
Statistical analysis
Vomiting
title IDDF2022-ABS-0213 Gastric intestinal metaplasia may attenuate reflux symptoms – analysis of a large observational prospective cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=IDDF2022-ABS-0213%E2%80%85Gastric%20intestinal%20metaplasia%20may%20attenuate%20reflux%20symptoms%20%E2%80%93%20analysis%20of%20a%20large%20observational%20prospective%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Tang,%20Si-Ying&rft.date=2022-09-02&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A59&rft.epage=A59&rft.pages=A59-A59&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-IDDF.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2711023872%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711023872&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true