Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network

Land degradation can result in a loss of critical ecosystem services that we often seek to restore through re‐establishment of desired plant communities. Trait‐based approaches have the potential to target specific ecosystem services based on associations between the functional composition of plant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2022-09, Vol.36 (9), p.2317-2330
Hauptverfasser: Balazs, Kathleen R., Munson, Seth M., Butterfield, Bradley J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2330
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2317
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 36
creator Balazs, Kathleen R.
Munson, Seth M.
Butterfield, Bradley J.
description Land degradation can result in a loss of critical ecosystem services that we often seek to restore through re‐establishment of desired plant communities. Trait‐based approaches have the potential to target specific ecosystem services based on associations between the functional composition of plant communities and ecosystem properties that serve as indicators of those services. The effect of functional composition on ecosystem recovery may depend on the amount of restored plant biomass, itself a supporting service frequently targeted in restoration efforts. Yet, interactions between functional composition and biomass are not formally integrated into trait‐based analytical frameworks. We tested the hypothesis that functional composition of plant communities both drives, and interacts with, biomass production to influence indicators of soil functioning and weed suppression across a network of degraded dryland restoration experiments. This networked approach allowed us to identify generalized effects of functional composition on ecosystem recovery across a range of dryland climate conditions. Climate had a substantial effect on ecosystem indicators, with weed cover and soil surface stability increasing in more arid climates, water infiltration increasing with precipitation, and aggregate structure increasing with less freezing. After accounting for climate effects across study sites, we found significant effects of community‐weighted mean (CWM) trait values on biomass, particularly a positive effect of leaf carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio, and of CWM‐biomass interactions on other ecosystem indicators. Cover of exotic species was reduced in restored communities with a combination of low leaf dry matter content and high biomass, soil water infiltration increased with lower specific root length and high biomass, and soil aggregate stability increased with higher root dry matter content and high biomass, among other effects. Functional diversity had no significant effects on any ecosystem indicators. Synthesis: The influence of community functional composition on ecosystem properties increases with community biomass, particularly in disturbed or low productivity systems. This suggests that active management should not only focus on trait values that optimize individual ecosystem indicators but also how those functional strategies are complementary or counter to those that increase biomass. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog Read th
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.14129
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2709611710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2709611710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-8f51fdd1e3682591f1befb506aae8feec85567a9101a0d1f4f849de0529192ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFPwyAYxYnRxDk9eyXx3I2Plq4czbKpyRIveias_Ug621Kh3ewf4v8rXY1XuQAvv8fHe4TcA1tAWEuIUxHxJBYLSIDLCzL7Uy7JjPFURlmSxtfkxvsDY0wKzmfke9s3eVfaRlc0t3VrfTneqDW0rXTTjWLdN0FET2ssSt2Fw760tfaeojGYd54GA-bWD77Dmnp0xzJH6oJ0RDdQnTsbYB2grxZdWWPThXGFG8KEInC-s06fxzbYnaz7uCVXRlce7373OXnfbt7Wz9Hu9ell_biL8liMeYwAUxSAcZpxIcHAHs1esFRrzAxingmRrrQEBpoVYBKTJbJAJrgEybGI5-Rherd19rMP_1AH27vQhVd8xWQKsAIWqOVEnXM4NKoNIbQbFDA1dq_GptXYtDp3HxxicpzKCof_cLXdrCffD-8Bito</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709611710</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Balazs, Kathleen R. ; Munson, Seth M. ; Butterfield, Bradley J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balazs, Kathleen R. ; Munson, Seth M. ; Butterfield, Bradley J.</creatorcontrib><description>Land degradation can result in a loss of critical ecosystem services that we often seek to restore through re‐establishment of desired plant communities. Trait‐based approaches have the potential to target specific ecosystem services based on associations between the functional composition of plant communities and ecosystem properties that serve as indicators of those services. The effect of functional composition on ecosystem recovery may depend on the amount of restored plant biomass, itself a supporting service frequently targeted in restoration efforts. Yet, interactions between functional composition and biomass are not formally integrated into trait‐based analytical frameworks. We tested the hypothesis that functional composition of plant communities both drives, and interacts with, biomass production to influence indicators of soil functioning and weed suppression across a network of degraded dryland restoration experiments. This networked approach allowed us to identify generalized effects of functional composition on ecosystem recovery across a range of dryland climate conditions. Climate had a substantial effect on ecosystem indicators, with weed cover and soil surface stability increasing in more arid climates, water infiltration increasing with precipitation, and aggregate structure increasing with less freezing. After accounting for climate effects across study sites, we found significant effects of community‐weighted mean (CWM) trait values on biomass, particularly a positive effect of leaf carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio, and of CWM‐biomass interactions on other ecosystem indicators. Cover of exotic species was reduced in restored communities with a combination of low leaf dry matter content and high biomass, soil water infiltration increased with lower specific root length and high biomass, and soil aggregate stability increased with higher root dry matter content and high biomass, among other effects. Functional diversity had no significant effects on any ecosystem indicators. Synthesis: The influence of community functional composition on ecosystem properties increases with community biomass, particularly in disturbed or low productivity systems. This suggests that active management should not only focus on trait values that optimize individual ecosystem indicators but also how those functional strategies are complementary or counter to those that increase biomass. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Arid climates ; Arid lands ; Arid zones ; Aridity ; biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning ; Biomass ; Climate ; Climate effects ; Climatic conditions ; Composition ; Dry matter ; dryland ; Ecosystem recovery ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental restoration ; Freezing ; Indicators ; Infiltration ; Introduced species ; Land degradation ; Land use ; Leaves ; Moisture content ; Plant biomass ; Plant communities ; Plant populations ; primary productivity ; Recovery ; Recovery of function ; restoration ; Service restoration ; Soil stability ; soil stability and erosion ; Soil water ; Surface stability ; Water infiltration ; weed suppression</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2022-09, Vol.36 (9), p.2317-2330</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2022 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2022 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-8f51fdd1e3682591f1befb506aae8feec85567a9101a0d1f4f849de0529192ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-8f51fdd1e3682591f1befb506aae8feec85567a9101a0d1f4f849de0529192ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0974-9811 ; 0000-0002-2736-6374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14129$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2435.14129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balazs, Kathleen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Seth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Land degradation can result in a loss of critical ecosystem services that we often seek to restore through re‐establishment of desired plant communities. Trait‐based approaches have the potential to target specific ecosystem services based on associations between the functional composition of plant communities and ecosystem properties that serve as indicators of those services. The effect of functional composition on ecosystem recovery may depend on the amount of restored plant biomass, itself a supporting service frequently targeted in restoration efforts. Yet, interactions between functional composition and biomass are not formally integrated into trait‐based analytical frameworks. We tested the hypothesis that functional composition of plant communities both drives, and interacts with, biomass production to influence indicators of soil functioning and weed suppression across a network of degraded dryland restoration experiments. This networked approach allowed us to identify generalized effects of functional composition on ecosystem recovery across a range of dryland climate conditions. Climate had a substantial effect on ecosystem indicators, with weed cover and soil surface stability increasing in more arid climates, water infiltration increasing with precipitation, and aggregate structure increasing with less freezing. After accounting for climate effects across study sites, we found significant effects of community‐weighted mean (CWM) trait values on biomass, particularly a positive effect of leaf carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio, and of CWM‐biomass interactions on other ecosystem indicators. Cover of exotic species was reduced in restored communities with a combination of low leaf dry matter content and high biomass, soil water infiltration increased with lower specific root length and high biomass, and soil aggregate stability increased with higher root dry matter content and high biomass, among other effects. Functional diversity had no significant effects on any ecosystem indicators. Synthesis: The influence of community functional composition on ecosystem properties increases with community biomass, particularly in disturbed or low productivity systems. This suggests that active management should not only focus on trait values that optimize individual ecosystem indicators but also how those functional strategies are complementary or counter to those that increase biomass. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</description><subject>Arid climates</subject><subject>Arid lands</subject><subject>Arid zones</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>dryland</subject><subject>Ecosystem recovery</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Plant biomass</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>primary productivity</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>restoration</subject><subject>Service restoration</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>soil stability and erosion</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Surface stability</subject><subject>Water infiltration</subject><subject>weed suppression</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFPwyAYxYnRxDk9eyXx3I2Plq4czbKpyRIveias_Ug621Kh3ewf4v8rXY1XuQAvv8fHe4TcA1tAWEuIUxHxJBYLSIDLCzL7Uy7JjPFURlmSxtfkxvsDY0wKzmfke9s3eVfaRlc0t3VrfTneqDW0rXTTjWLdN0FET2ssSt2Fw760tfaeojGYd54GA-bWD77Dmnp0xzJH6oJ0RDdQnTsbYB2grxZdWWPThXGFG8KEInC-s06fxzbYnaz7uCVXRlce7373OXnfbt7Wz9Hu9ell_biL8liMeYwAUxSAcZpxIcHAHs1esFRrzAxingmRrrQEBpoVYBKTJbJAJrgEybGI5-Rherd19rMP_1AH27vQhVd8xWQKsAIWqOVEnXM4NKoNIbQbFDA1dq_GptXYtDp3HxxicpzKCof_cLXdrCffD-8Bito</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Balazs, Kathleen R.</creator><creator>Munson, Seth M.</creator><creator>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-9811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-6374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network</title><author>Balazs, Kathleen R. ; Munson, Seth M. ; Butterfield, Bradley J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-8f51fdd1e3682591f1befb506aae8feec85567a9101a0d1f4f849de0529192ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arid climates</topic><topic>Arid lands</topic><topic>Arid zones</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>dryland</topic><topic>Ecosystem recovery</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Plant biomass</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>primary productivity</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>restoration</topic><topic>Service restoration</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>soil stability and erosion</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Surface stability</topic><topic>Water infiltration</topic><topic>weed suppression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balazs, Kathleen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Seth M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butterfield, Bradley J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balazs, Kathleen R.</au><au>Munson, Seth M.</au><au>Butterfield, Bradley J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2317</spage><epage>2330</epage><pages>2317-2330</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Land degradation can result in a loss of critical ecosystem services that we often seek to restore through re‐establishment of desired plant communities. Trait‐based approaches have the potential to target specific ecosystem services based on associations between the functional composition of plant communities and ecosystem properties that serve as indicators of those services. The effect of functional composition on ecosystem recovery may depend on the amount of restored plant biomass, itself a supporting service frequently targeted in restoration efforts. Yet, interactions between functional composition and biomass are not formally integrated into trait‐based analytical frameworks. We tested the hypothesis that functional composition of plant communities both drives, and interacts with, biomass production to influence indicators of soil functioning and weed suppression across a network of degraded dryland restoration experiments. This networked approach allowed us to identify generalized effects of functional composition on ecosystem recovery across a range of dryland climate conditions. Climate had a substantial effect on ecosystem indicators, with weed cover and soil surface stability increasing in more arid climates, water infiltration increasing with precipitation, and aggregate structure increasing with less freezing. After accounting for climate effects across study sites, we found significant effects of community‐weighted mean (CWM) trait values on biomass, particularly a positive effect of leaf carbon‐to‐nitrogen ratio, and of CWM‐biomass interactions on other ecosystem indicators. Cover of exotic species was reduced in restored communities with a combination of low leaf dry matter content and high biomass, soil water infiltration increased with lower specific root length and high biomass, and soil aggregate stability increased with higher root dry matter content and high biomass, among other effects. Functional diversity had no significant effects on any ecosystem indicators. Synthesis: The influence of community functional composition on ecosystem properties increases with community biomass, particularly in disturbed or low productivity systems. This suggests that active management should not only focus on trait values that optimize individual ecosystem indicators but also how those functional strategies are complementary or counter to those that increase biomass. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.14129</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0974-9811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-6374</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2022-09, Vol.36 (9), p.2317-2330
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2709611710
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Arid climates
Arid lands
Arid zones
Aridity
biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning
Biomass
Climate
Climate effects
Climatic conditions
Composition
Dry matter
dryland
Ecosystem recovery
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental restoration
Freezing
Indicators
Infiltration
Introduced species
Land degradation
Land use
Leaves
Moisture content
Plant biomass
Plant communities
Plant populations
primary productivity
Recovery
Recovery of function
restoration
Service restoration
Soil stability
soil stability and erosion
Soil water
Surface stability
Water infiltration
weed suppression
title Functional composition of plant communities mediates biomass effects on ecosystem service recovery across an experimental dryland restoration network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T14%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20composition%20of%20plant%20communities%20mediates%20biomass%20effects%20on%20ecosystem%20service%20recovery%20across%20an%20experimental%20dryland%20restoration%20network&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Balazs,%20Kathleen%20R.&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2317&rft.epage=2330&rft.pages=2317-2330&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.14129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709611710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709611710&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true