Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation

Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of lightwave technology 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis, Ali, Muhsin, Guzman, Robinson, Lamela, Horacio, Carpintero, Guillermo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6070
container_issue 18
container_start_page 6064
container_title Journal of lightwave technology
container_volume 40
creator Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis
Ali, Muhsin
Guzman, Robinson
Lamela, Horacio
Carpintero, Guillermo
description Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2709159421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9827973</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2709159421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqXnATcD01j8kkcafjq9Ki0AruQibJ2KltUpMZRH-9U1pc3bs45174ADjHaIQxklfPk_mIIEJGFAvBmDwAA8yYyAjB9BAMEKc0E5zkx-AkpSVCOM8FH4D310Vog28MnHVVNndRL1xsf-F4CieN_0zXsAzrjY5NCh7euvbbOQ_vQletHNTewlnjP_q11DE2LsJpsN1Kt03wp-Co1qvkzvZzCN4e7uflUzZ5eRyXN5PMEInbzJq60DznrKZUVpYKlBd1URSW5VwTwhFjReVswaWojOFE1LVzjDIjKmuNzukQXO7ubmL46lxq1TJ00fcvVd-WmMm8FxgCtEuZGFKKrlab2Kx1_FEYqa2f6v3U1k_t_frKxa7SOOf-41IQLnvLP8o6a8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709159421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><description>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-8724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLTEDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptive optics ; Amplitude modulation ; communication systems ; Mach-Zehnder interferometers ; Mathematical analysis ; microwave photonics ; Modulation ; Optical fibers ; Optical modulation ; Optical pulses ; Optical transmitters ; optoelectronic devices ; Photoconductivity ; Photoelectric effect ; Photoelectric emission ; Photonics ; Pulse amplitude modulation ; sub-THz communication</subject><ispartof>Journal of lightwave technology, 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6665-3977 ; 0000-0003-2809-788X ; 0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9827973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,27911,27912,54745</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9827973$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamela, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><title>Journal of lightwave technology</title><addtitle>JLT</addtitle><description>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</description><subject>Adaptive optics</subject><subject>Amplitude modulation</subject><subject>communication systems</subject><subject>Mach-Zehnder interferometers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>microwave photonics</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Optical modulation</subject><subject>Optical pulses</subject><subject>Optical transmitters</subject><subject>optoelectronic devices</subject><subject>Photoconductivity</subject><subject>Photoelectric effect</subject><subject>Photoelectric emission</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Pulse amplitude modulation</subject><subject>sub-THz communication</subject><issn>0733-8724</issn><issn>1558-2213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqXnATcD01j8kkcafjq9Ki0AruQibJ2KltUpMZRH-9U1pc3bs45174ADjHaIQxklfPk_mIIEJGFAvBmDwAA8yYyAjB9BAMEKc0E5zkx-AkpSVCOM8FH4D310Vog28MnHVVNndRL1xsf-F4CieN_0zXsAzrjY5NCh7euvbbOQ_vQletHNTewlnjP_q11DE2LsJpsN1Kt03wp-Co1qvkzvZzCN4e7uflUzZ5eRyXN5PMEInbzJq60DznrKZUVpYKlBd1URSW5VwTwhFjReVswaWojOFE1LVzjDIjKmuNzukQXO7ubmL46lxq1TJ00fcvVd-WmMm8FxgCtEuZGFKKrlab2Kx1_FEYqa2f6v3U1k_t_frKxa7SOOf-41IQLnvLP8o6a8A</recordid><startdate>20220915</startdate><enddate>20220915</enddate><creator>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creator><creator>Ali, Muhsin</creator><creator>Guzman, Robinson</creator><creator>Lamela, Horacio</creator><creator>Carpintero, Guillermo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-3977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2809-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220915</creationdate><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><author>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptive optics</topic><topic>Amplitude modulation</topic><topic>communication systems</topic><topic>Mach-Zehnder interferometers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>microwave photonics</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Optical modulation</topic><topic>Optical pulses</topic><topic>Optical transmitters</topic><topic>optoelectronic devices</topic><topic>Photoconductivity</topic><topic>Photoelectric effect</topic><topic>Photoelectric emission</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Pulse amplitude modulation</topic><topic>sub-THz communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamela, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</au><au>Ali, Muhsin</au><au>Guzman, Robinson</au><au>Lamela, Horacio</au><au>Carpintero, Guillermo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle><stitle>JLT</stitle><date>2022-09-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>6064</spage><epage>6070</epage><pages>6064-6070</pages><issn>0733-8724</issn><eissn>1558-2213</eissn><coden>JLTEDG</coden><abstract>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-3977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2809-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0733-8724
ispartof Journal of lightwave technology, 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070
issn 0733-8724
1558-2213
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2709159421
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Adaptive optics
Amplitude modulation
communication systems
Mach-Zehnder interferometers
Mathematical analysis
microwave photonics
Modulation
Optical fibers
Optical modulation
Optical pulses
Optical transmitters
optoelectronic devices
Photoconductivity
Photoelectric effect
Photoelectric emission
Photonics
Pulse amplitude modulation
sub-THz communication
title Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photonic%20Sub-Terahertz%20IM%20Links:%20Comparison%20Between%20Double%20and%20Single%20Carrier%20Modulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20lightwave%20technology&rft.au=Gonzalez-Guerrero,%20Luis&rft.date=2022-09-15&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=6064&rft.epage=6070&rft.pages=6064-6070&rft.issn=0733-8724&rft.eissn=1558-2213&rft.coden=JLTEDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2709159421%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709159421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9827973&rfr_iscdi=true