Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation
Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of lightwave technology 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6070 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 6064 |
container_title | Journal of lightwave technology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis Ali, Muhsin Guzman, Robinson Lamela, Horacio Carpintero, Guillermo |
description | Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2709159421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9827973</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2709159421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqXnATcD01j8kkcafjq9Ki0AruQibJ2KltUpMZRH-9U1pc3bs45174ADjHaIQxklfPk_mIIEJGFAvBmDwAA8yYyAjB9BAMEKc0E5zkx-AkpSVCOM8FH4D310Vog28MnHVVNndRL1xsf-F4CieN_0zXsAzrjY5NCh7euvbbOQ_vQletHNTewlnjP_q11DE2LsJpsN1Kt03wp-Co1qvkzvZzCN4e7uflUzZ5eRyXN5PMEInbzJq60DznrKZUVpYKlBd1URSW5VwTwhFjReVswaWojOFE1LVzjDIjKmuNzukQXO7ubmL46lxq1TJ00fcvVd-WmMm8FxgCtEuZGFKKrlab2Kx1_FEYqa2f6v3U1k_t_frKxa7SOOf-41IQLnvLP8o6a8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709159421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><description>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-8724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLTEDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptive optics ; Amplitude modulation ; communication systems ; Mach-Zehnder interferometers ; Mathematical analysis ; microwave photonics ; Modulation ; Optical fibers ; Optical modulation ; Optical pulses ; Optical transmitters ; optoelectronic devices ; Photoconductivity ; Photoelectric effect ; Photoelectric emission ; Photonics ; Pulse amplitude modulation ; sub-THz communication</subject><ispartof>Journal of lightwave technology, 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6665-3977 ; 0000-0003-2809-788X ; 0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9827973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,27911,27912,54745</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9827973$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamela, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><title>Journal of lightwave technology</title><addtitle>JLT</addtitle><description>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</description><subject>Adaptive optics</subject><subject>Amplitude modulation</subject><subject>communication systems</subject><subject>Mach-Zehnder interferometers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>microwave photonics</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Optical fibers</subject><subject>Optical modulation</subject><subject>Optical pulses</subject><subject>Optical transmitters</subject><subject>optoelectronic devices</subject><subject>Photoconductivity</subject><subject>Photoelectric effect</subject><subject>Photoelectric emission</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Pulse amplitude modulation</subject><subject>sub-THz communication</subject><issn>0733-8724</issn><issn>1558-2213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqXnATcD01j8kkcafjq9Ki0AruQibJ2KltUpMZRH-9U1pc3bs45174ADjHaIQxklfPk_mIIEJGFAvBmDwAA8yYyAjB9BAMEKc0E5zkx-AkpSVCOM8FH4D310Vog28MnHVVNndRL1xsf-F4CieN_0zXsAzrjY5NCh7euvbbOQ_vQletHNTewlnjP_q11DE2LsJpsN1Kt03wp-Co1qvkzvZzCN4e7uflUzZ5eRyXN5PMEInbzJq60DznrKZUVpYKlBd1URSW5VwTwhFjReVswaWojOFE1LVzjDIjKmuNzukQXO7ubmL46lxq1TJ00fcvVd-WmMm8FxgCtEuZGFKKrlab2Kx1_FEYqa2f6v3U1k_t_frKxa7SOOf-41IQLnvLP8o6a8A</recordid><startdate>20220915</startdate><enddate>20220915</enddate><creator>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creator><creator>Ali, Muhsin</creator><creator>Guzman, Robinson</creator><creator>Lamela, Horacio</creator><creator>Carpintero, Guillermo</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-3977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2809-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220915</creationdate><title>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</title><author>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis ; Ali, Muhsin ; Guzman, Robinson ; Lamela, Horacio ; Carpintero, Guillermo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dcf6a7475f339bd38046f666d547a2270556bed6798bcc728ffee535c8bddca43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptive optics</topic><topic>Amplitude modulation</topic><topic>communication systems</topic><topic>Mach-Zehnder interferometers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>microwave photonics</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Optical fibers</topic><topic>Optical modulation</topic><topic>Optical pulses</topic><topic>Optical transmitters</topic><topic>optoelectronic devices</topic><topic>Photoconductivity</topic><topic>Photoelectric effect</topic><topic>Photoelectric emission</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Pulse amplitude modulation</topic><topic>sub-THz communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Muhsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Robinson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamela, Horacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpintero, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez-Guerrero, Luis</au><au>Ali, Muhsin</au><au>Guzman, Robinson</au><au>Lamela, Horacio</au><au>Carpintero, Guillermo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of lightwave technology</jtitle><stitle>JLT</stitle><date>2022-09-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>6064</spage><epage>6070</epage><pages>6064-6070</pages><issn>0733-8724</issn><eissn>1558-2213</eissn><coden>JLTEDG</coden><abstract>Two different modulation schemes have been employed in photonic sub-THz systems to transmit intensity modulated signals: the dual-carrier (D-C) and single-carrier (S-C) schemes. Although it has been stated in the literature that D-C modulation performs better than S-C modulation, no demonstration of such claim has been provided so far. In this letter, we show that the superiority of one scheme or the other depends on the normalization factor that is used for comparison. Through mathematical analysis we show that, when 2-pulse amplitude modulation (2-PAM) signals are considered and the average photocurrent is taken as the normalization factor, the D-C scheme exhibits a 3-dB gain over the S-C scheme in the peak voltage of the recovered signal. However, the analysis also reveals that equal performance should be obtained when these schemes are compared in terms of transmitted sub-THz energy and that the S-C scheme should achieve better results when the comparison is made in terms of the output power of the lasers. We also run simulations to examine the impact of the non-linear transfer curve of a Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) on higher-order IM formats such as 4- and 8-PAM. The results of these simulations show that the penalty of the S-C scheme under photocurrent normalization progressively vanishes as the modulation order increases, and for 8-PAM signals, the S-C achieve better results than the D-C scheme. We attribute the deterioration of the D-C scheme with higher modulation orders to the signal-signal beat interference (SSBI).</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-3977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2809-788X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9676-3763</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-8724 |
ispartof | Journal of lightwave technology, 2022-09, Vol.40 (18), p.6064-6070 |
issn | 0733-8724 1558-2213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2709159421 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Adaptive optics Amplitude modulation communication systems Mach-Zehnder interferometers Mathematical analysis microwave photonics Modulation Optical fibers Optical modulation Optical pulses Optical transmitters optoelectronic devices Photoconductivity Photoelectric effect Photoelectric emission Photonics Pulse amplitude modulation sub-THz communication |
title | Photonic Sub-Terahertz IM Links: Comparison Between Double and Single Carrier Modulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photonic%20Sub-Terahertz%20IM%20Links:%20Comparison%20Between%20Double%20and%20Single%20Carrier%20Modulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20lightwave%20technology&rft.au=Gonzalez-Guerrero,%20Luis&rft.date=2022-09-15&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=6064&rft.epage=6070&rft.pages=6064-6070&rft.issn=0733-8724&rft.eissn=1558-2213&rft.coden=JLTEDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JLT.2022.3188559&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2709159421%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709159421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9827973&rfr_iscdi=true |