Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation
The present study aims to compare the efficiencies and energy consumption of different anodes in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) by electro-oxidation method with using two different anodes (Ti/Pt and Ti/IrO 2 /RuO 2 ). It aims to remove many parameters from wastewater at the same ti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International Journal of Environmental Research 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), Article 79 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | International Journal of Environmental Research |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Fil, Baybars Ali Günaslan, Sermin |
| description | The present study aims to compare the efficiencies and energy consumption of different anodes in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) by electro-oxidation method with using two different anodes (Ti/Pt and Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
). It aims to remove many parameters from wastewater at the same time and to examine the efficiency of the electro-oxidation method for food industry wastewater. The electrooxidation mechanism was prepared and the parameters to be removed from the wastewater were determined using two different anodes and using different supporting electrolytes (SE). The efficiency of removal of COD, turbidity, suspended solids (SS), and color from wastewater was studied. The highest removal was obtained at approximately 7.0 of pH, which is the natural value of the wastewater. Color, turbidity, and SS removals provided over 95% removal for both anodes. In optimum electrolyte concentration (0.2 M NaCl), the COD removal efficiency and the energy consumption are obtained as 80.05% and 210.7 kWh/m
3
for the Ti/Pt anode and 66.46% and 183.6 kWh/m
3
for Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
anode. It has been observed that as the current density increases, the efficiency also increases, but the energy consumption increases depending on the voltage increase. Cost is also important here. Priority should be determined for the option to be preferred. Both anodes were found to be quite efficient at removing dirt. Additional processes can be considered to increase treatment efficiency. It is an ideal method for small-scale areas. However, sizing is recommended so that it can be applied to larger areas.
Article Highlights
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the application of electrochemical treatment methods for slaughterhouse wastewater and to evaluate them in terms of efficiency.
Electrooxidation, which is one of the electrochemical treatment methods that has become widespread recently, is to determine the most suitable conditions by examining the removal of slaughterhouse wastewater and electricity consumption.
As a result of the study, it was emphasized that electrooxidation is a very efficient method for water containing such high organic pollution and its use is recommended.
In the results obtained, it was found that high color, suspended solids, turbidity, and COD removal were achieved with this method in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Electrochemical methods have advantageous applications. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2708281136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715633622</galeid><sourcerecordid>A715633622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-b70d09784ea4d9db3af554e207f48de7c5fd8df51f9982b5f871490ae72c6f313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qGzEURkVpoSbNC3Ql6HpS_Y40S-M6iSFQKCldCnl05Sp4JFeS03rTZ4_sKWRXCSG4nHN1xYfQR0puKCHqcxFUCdYR1g4RUnT0DVowQnTHOBFv0YIqLrte9_I9ui7libTFh6EX_QL9XaXpYHMoKeLk8ZfgPWSIFS9jclCwjQ5v4jOUGna2hplaR8i7E16lWI7T4VINEdefgB8z2Dqd_YZ9A7vHP2yp8NtWyHh7wus9jDWn9Ce4S7cP6J23-wLX_-4r9P12_bi67x6-3m1Wy4duZFrXbquII4PSAqxwg9ty66UUwIjyQjtQo_ROOy-pHwbNttJrRcVALCg29p5TfoU-zX0POf06tt-Yp3TMsT1pmCKaaUp536ibmdrZPZgQfarZjm07mMKYIvjQ6ktFZc95z1gT2CyMOZWSwZtDDpPNJ0OJOWdj5mxMy8ZcsjHnWfgslQbHHeTXWf5jvQCPIJLd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708281136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Bioline International</source><creator>Fil, Baybars Ali ; Günaslan, Sermin</creator><creatorcontrib>Fil, Baybars Ali ; Günaslan, Sermin</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aims to compare the efficiencies and energy consumption of different anodes in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) by electro-oxidation method with using two different anodes (Ti/Pt and Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
). It aims to remove many parameters from wastewater at the same time and to examine the efficiency of the electro-oxidation method for food industry wastewater. The electrooxidation mechanism was prepared and the parameters to be removed from the wastewater were determined using two different anodes and using different supporting electrolytes (SE). The efficiency of removal of COD, turbidity, suspended solids (SS), and color from wastewater was studied. The highest removal was obtained at approximately 7.0 of pH, which is the natural value of the wastewater. Color, turbidity, and SS removals provided over 95% removal for both anodes. In optimum electrolyte concentration (0.2 M NaCl), the COD removal efficiency and the energy consumption are obtained as 80.05% and 210.7 kWh/m
3
for the Ti/Pt anode and 66.46% and 183.6 kWh/m
3
for Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
anode. It has been observed that as the current density increases, the efficiency also increases, but the energy consumption increases depending on the voltage increase. Cost is also important here. Priority should be determined for the option to be preferred. Both anodes were found to be quite efficient at removing dirt. Additional processes can be considered to increase treatment efficiency. It is an ideal method for small-scale areas. However, sizing is recommended so that it can be applied to larger areas.
Article Highlights
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the application of electrochemical treatment methods for slaughterhouse wastewater and to evaluate them in terms of efficiency.
Electrooxidation, which is one of the electrochemical treatment methods that has become widespread recently, is to determine the most suitable conditions by examining the removal of slaughterhouse wastewater and electricity consumption.
As a result of the study, it was emphasized that electrooxidation is a very efficient method for water containing such high organic pollution and its use is recommended.
In the results obtained, it was found that high color, suspended solids, turbidity, and COD removal were achieved with this method in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Electrochemical methods have advantageous applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-6865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-2304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Anodes ; Chemical treatment ; Color ; Comparative analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Efficiency ; Electricity consumption ; Electrochemical reactions ; Electrochemistry ; Electrolytes ; Energy consumption ; Energy management systems ; Energy use ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Food industries wastewaters ; Food industry ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Investigations ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Natural Hazards ; Oxidation ; Parameters ; Purification ; Research Paper ; Ruthenium oxide ; Sewage ; Sodium chloride ; Solid suspensions ; Suspended solids ; Turbidity ; Wastewater oxidation ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Environmental Research, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), Article 79</ispartof><rights>University of Tehran 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-b70d09784ea4d9db3af554e207f48de7c5fd8df51f9982b5f871490ae72c6f313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-b70d09784ea4d9db3af554e207f48de7c5fd8df51f9982b5f871490ae72c6f313</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2395-2808 ; 0000-0003-3085-224X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fil, Baybars Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günaslan, Sermin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation</title><title>International Journal of Environmental Research</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res</addtitle><description>The present study aims to compare the efficiencies and energy consumption of different anodes in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) by electro-oxidation method with using two different anodes (Ti/Pt and Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
). It aims to remove many parameters from wastewater at the same time and to examine the efficiency of the electro-oxidation method for food industry wastewater. The electrooxidation mechanism was prepared and the parameters to be removed from the wastewater were determined using two different anodes and using different supporting electrolytes (SE). The efficiency of removal of COD, turbidity, suspended solids (SS), and color from wastewater was studied. The highest removal was obtained at approximately 7.0 of pH, which is the natural value of the wastewater. Color, turbidity, and SS removals provided over 95% removal for both anodes. In optimum electrolyte concentration (0.2 M NaCl), the COD removal efficiency and the energy consumption are obtained as 80.05% and 210.7 kWh/m
3
for the Ti/Pt anode and 66.46% and 183.6 kWh/m
3
for Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
anode. It has been observed that as the current density increases, the efficiency also increases, but the energy consumption increases depending on the voltage increase. Cost is also important here. Priority should be determined for the option to be preferred. Both anodes were found to be quite efficient at removing dirt. Additional processes can be considered to increase treatment efficiency. It is an ideal method for small-scale areas. However, sizing is recommended so that it can be applied to larger areas.
Article Highlights
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the application of electrochemical treatment methods for slaughterhouse wastewater and to evaluate them in terms of efficiency.
Electrooxidation, which is one of the electrochemical treatment methods that has become widespread recently, is to determine the most suitable conditions by examining the removal of slaughterhouse wastewater and electricity consumption.
As a result of the study, it was emphasized that electrooxidation is a very efficient method for water containing such high organic pollution and its use is recommended.
In the results obtained, it was found that high color, suspended solids, turbidity, and COD removal were achieved with this method in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Electrochemical methods have advantageous applications.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Anodes</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electricity consumption</subject><subject>Electrochemical reactions</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy management systems</subject><subject>Energy use</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Food industries wastewaters</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Ruthenium oxide</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Solid suspensions</subject><subject>Suspended solids</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Wastewater oxidation</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>1735-6865</issn><issn>2008-2304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1qGzEURkVpoSbNC3Ql6HpS_Y40S-M6iSFQKCldCnl05Sp4JFeS03rTZ4_sKWRXCSG4nHN1xYfQR0puKCHqcxFUCdYR1g4RUnT0DVowQnTHOBFv0YIqLrte9_I9ui7libTFh6EX_QL9XaXpYHMoKeLk8ZfgPWSIFS9jclCwjQ5v4jOUGna2hplaR8i7E16lWI7T4VINEdefgB8z2Dqd_YZ9A7vHP2yp8NtWyHh7wus9jDWn9Ce4S7cP6J23-wLX_-4r9P12_bi67x6-3m1Wy4duZFrXbquII4PSAqxwg9ty66UUwIjyQjtQo_ROOy-pHwbNttJrRcVALCg29p5TfoU-zX0POf06tt-Yp3TMsT1pmCKaaUp536ibmdrZPZgQfarZjm07mMKYIvjQ6ktFZc95z1gT2CyMOZWSwZtDDpPNJ0OJOWdj5mxMy8ZcsjHnWfgslQbHHeTXWf5jvQCPIJLd</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Fil, Baybars Ali</creator><creator>Günaslan, Sermin</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-2808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-224X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation</title><author>Fil, Baybars Ali ; Günaslan, Sermin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-b70d09784ea4d9db3af554e207f48de7c5fd8df51f9982b5f871490ae72c6f313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Anodes</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electricity consumption</topic><topic>Electrochemical reactions</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy management systems</topic><topic>Energy use</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Food industries wastewaters</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Ruthenium oxide</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Solid suspensions</topic><topic>Suspended solids</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Wastewater oxidation</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fil, Baybars Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Günaslan, Sermin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fil, Baybars Ali</au><au>Günaslan, Sermin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Environmental Research</jtitle><stitle>Int J Environ Res</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><artnum>79</artnum><issn>1735-6865</issn><eissn>2008-2304</eissn><abstract>The present study aims to compare the efficiencies and energy consumption of different anodes in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater (SWW) by electro-oxidation method with using two different anodes (Ti/Pt and Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
). It aims to remove many parameters from wastewater at the same time and to examine the efficiency of the electro-oxidation method for food industry wastewater. The electrooxidation mechanism was prepared and the parameters to be removed from the wastewater were determined using two different anodes and using different supporting electrolytes (SE). The efficiency of removal of COD, turbidity, suspended solids (SS), and color from wastewater was studied. The highest removal was obtained at approximately 7.0 of pH, which is the natural value of the wastewater. Color, turbidity, and SS removals provided over 95% removal for both anodes. In optimum electrolyte concentration (0.2 M NaCl), the COD removal efficiency and the energy consumption are obtained as 80.05% and 210.7 kWh/m
3
for the Ti/Pt anode and 66.46% and 183.6 kWh/m
3
for Ti/IrO
2
/RuO
2
anode. It has been observed that as the current density increases, the efficiency also increases, but the energy consumption increases depending on the voltage increase. Cost is also important here. Priority should be determined for the option to be preferred. Both anodes were found to be quite efficient at removing dirt. Additional processes can be considered to increase treatment efficiency. It is an ideal method for small-scale areas. However, sizing is recommended so that it can be applied to larger areas.
Article Highlights
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the application of electrochemical treatment methods for slaughterhouse wastewater and to evaluate them in terms of efficiency.
Electrooxidation, which is one of the electrochemical treatment methods that has become widespread recently, is to determine the most suitable conditions by examining the removal of slaughterhouse wastewater and electricity consumption.
As a result of the study, it was emphasized that electrooxidation is a very efficient method for water containing such high organic pollution and its use is recommended.
In the results obtained, it was found that high color, suspended solids, turbidity, and COD removal were achieved with this method in the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Electrochemical methods have advantageous applications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-2808</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3085-224X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1735-6865 |
| ispartof | International Journal of Environmental Research, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), Article 79 |
| issn | 1735-6865 2008-2304 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2708281136 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals; Bioline International |
| subjects | Abattoirs Anodes Chemical treatment Color Comparative analysis Earth and Environmental Science Efficiency Electricity consumption Electrochemical reactions Electrochemistry Electrolytes Energy consumption Energy management systems Energy use Environment Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Environmental Management Food industries wastewaters Food industry Geoecology/Natural Processes Investigations Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Natural Hazards Oxidation Parameters Purification Research Paper Ruthenium oxide Sewage Sodium chloride Solid suspensions Suspended solids Turbidity Wastewater oxidation Wastewater treatment |
| title | Comparison of Different Anodes and Investigation of Energy Consumption in the Treatment of Real Wastewater by Electrooxidation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Different%20Anodes%20and%20Investigation%20of%20Energy%20Consumption%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Real%20Wastewater%20by%20Electrooxidation&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Environmental%20Research&rft.au=Fil,%20Baybars%20Ali&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.artnum=79&rft.issn=1735-6865&rft.eissn=2008-2304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41742-022-00454-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA715633622%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708281136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A715633622&rfr_iscdi=true |