Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium
This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CoDesign 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 322 |
container_title | CoDesign |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Devos, Tim Loopmans, Maarten |
description | This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2708111585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2708111585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiW2JLisetHWAEVL6mCBbC2XMcprpI42A6lf0-qli2rmcW5dzQny84BTwBLfAVMDFOSCcEEJiCLKYjiIBuBmLKcCsYOh31g8i10nJ3EuMJ4CpTwUabfkmv6WifXLpFtFr50tkSuTTbEfrGyJrlvl5yN1yitPep0SM64TicfNsj-dDa4xrYpDhF026a1DR168SF9XqI7Wy9d35xmR5Wuoz3bz3H28XD_PnvK56-Pz7PbeW6oZCm3cgHCCuCcF5ZyIyjlRFRgWEWELhiuSoKl4SXjwBhZUMYxcKJ1pYsCM0zH2cWutwv-q7cxqZXvQzucVERgCQBMsoFiO8oEH2OwleqGD3TYKMBqa1P92VRbm2pvc8jd7HKurXxo9NqHulRJb2ofqqBb46Ki_1f8AnuzfFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708111585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</creator><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1571-0882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Co-design ; intersubjective learning ; Participation ; Participatory planning ; place-making ; Sociopolitical factors</subject><ispartof>CoDesign, 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,59654,60443</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><title>CoDesign</title><description>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</description><subject>Co-design</subject><subject>intersubjective learning</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Participatory planning</subject><subject>place-making</subject><subject>Sociopolitical factors</subject><issn>1571-0882</issn><issn>1745-3755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiW2JLisetHWAEVL6mCBbC2XMcprpI42A6lf0-qli2rmcW5dzQny84BTwBLfAVMDFOSCcEEJiCLKYjiIBuBmLKcCsYOh31g8i10nJ3EuMJ4CpTwUabfkmv6WifXLpFtFr50tkSuTTbEfrGyJrlvl5yN1yitPep0SM64TicfNsj-dDa4xrYpDhF026a1DR168SF9XqI7Wy9d35xmR5Wuoz3bz3H28XD_PnvK56-Pz7PbeW6oZCm3cgHCCuCcF5ZyIyjlRFRgWEWELhiuSoKl4SXjwBhZUMYxcKJ1pYsCM0zH2cWutwv-q7cxqZXvQzucVERgCQBMsoFiO8oEH2OwleqGD3TYKMBqa1P92VRbm2pvc8jd7HKurXxo9NqHulRJb2ofqqBb46Ki_1f8AnuzfFk</recordid><startdate>20220703</startdate><enddate>20220703</enddate><creator>Devos, Tim</creator><creator>Loopmans, Maarten</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220703</creationdate><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><author>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Co-design</topic><topic>intersubjective learning</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Participatory planning</topic><topic>place-making</topic><topic>Sociopolitical factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>CoDesign</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devos, Tim</au><au>Loopmans, Maarten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</atitle><jtitle>CoDesign</jtitle><date>2022-07-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>322-339</pages><issn>1571-0882</issn><eissn>1745-3755</eissn><abstract>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1571-0882 |
ispartof | CoDesign, 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339 |
issn | 1571-0882 1745-3755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2708111585 |
source | Access via Taylor & Francis |
subjects | Co-design intersubjective learning Participation Participatory planning place-making Sociopolitical factors |
title | Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T04%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stimulating%20embodied%20intersubjectivities:%20two%20participatory%20experiments%20in%20Antwerp%20North,%20Belgium&rft.jtitle=CoDesign&rft.au=Devos,%20Tim&rft.date=2022-07-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=322-339&rft.issn=1571-0882&rft.eissn=1745-3755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2708111585%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708111585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |