Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium

This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CoDesign 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339
Hauptverfasser: Devos, Tim, Loopmans, Maarten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 339
container_issue 3
container_start_page 322
container_title CoDesign
container_volume 18
creator Devos, Tim
Loopmans, Maarten
description This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2708111585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2708111585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiW2JLisetHWAEVL6mCBbC2XMcprpI42A6lf0-qli2rmcW5dzQny84BTwBLfAVMDFOSCcEEJiCLKYjiIBuBmLKcCsYOh31g8i10nJ3EuMJ4CpTwUabfkmv6WifXLpFtFr50tkSuTTbEfrGyJrlvl5yN1yitPep0SM64TicfNsj-dDa4xrYpDhF026a1DR168SF9XqI7Wy9d35xmR5Wuoz3bz3H28XD_PnvK56-Pz7PbeW6oZCm3cgHCCuCcF5ZyIyjlRFRgWEWELhiuSoKl4SXjwBhZUMYxcKJ1pYsCM0zH2cWutwv-q7cxqZXvQzucVERgCQBMsoFiO8oEH2OwleqGD3TYKMBqa1P92VRbm2pvc8jd7HKurXxo9NqHulRJb2ofqqBb46Ki_1f8AnuzfFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2708111585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</creator><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><description>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1571-0882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Co-design ; intersubjective learning ; Participation ; Participatory planning ; place-making ; Sociopolitical factors</subject><ispartof>CoDesign, 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,59654,60443</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><title>CoDesign</title><description>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</description><subject>Co-design</subject><subject>intersubjective learning</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Participatory planning</subject><subject>place-making</subject><subject>Sociopolitical factors</subject><issn>1571-0882</issn><issn>1745-3755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiW2JLisetHWAEVL6mCBbC2XMcprpI42A6lf0-qli2rmcW5dzQny84BTwBLfAVMDFOSCcEEJiCLKYjiIBuBmLKcCsYOh31g8i10nJ3EuMJ4CpTwUabfkmv6WifXLpFtFr50tkSuTTbEfrGyJrlvl5yN1yitPep0SM64TicfNsj-dDa4xrYpDhF026a1DR168SF9XqI7Wy9d35xmR5Wuoz3bz3H28XD_PnvK56-Pz7PbeW6oZCm3cgHCCuCcF5ZyIyjlRFRgWEWELhiuSoKl4SXjwBhZUMYxcKJ1pYsCM0zH2cWutwv-q7cxqZXvQzucVERgCQBMsoFiO8oEH2OwleqGD3TYKMBqa1P92VRbm2pvc8jd7HKurXxo9NqHulRJb2ofqqBb46Ki_1f8AnuzfFk</recordid><startdate>20220703</startdate><enddate>20220703</enddate><creator>Devos, Tim</creator><creator>Loopmans, Maarten</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220703</creationdate><title>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</title><author>Devos, Tim ; Loopmans, Maarten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e8b17e716669e36c733627f1c5f27a950fd208c6d561552b3560162aafa990503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Co-design</topic><topic>intersubjective learning</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Participatory planning</topic><topic>place-making</topic><topic>Sociopolitical factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Devos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loopmans, Maarten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Design &amp; Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>CoDesign</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Devos, Tim</au><au>Loopmans, Maarten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium</atitle><jtitle>CoDesign</jtitle><date>2022-07-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>322-339</pages><issn>1571-0882</issn><eissn>1745-3755</eissn><abstract>This paper argues how communicative planning approaches, as one of the most dominant conceptualisations of participatory planning, often ignore the embodied dimensions of participation as a socio-political learning processes. To do so, the paper theoretically traces why a Habermasian conceptualisation of political intersubjectivity fails to democratise planning processes and turns to an alternative Mouffean framework where coproductive methods are conceptualised as public pedagogic interventions, allowing for different meanings to be created and shared in a dialogical process. Based on an analysis of two experiments the authors have conducted, some lessons are drawn on how specific methods can be designed to stimulate more embodied forms of intersubjectivity between involved actors, while avoiding top-down consensus-making. In this way, the analysis demonstrates how such methods stimulate participants to share experiences, while orienting the discussion in a spatialised direction and creating a space where the ambivalence of place is effectively stimulated.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1571-0882
ispartof CoDesign, 2022-07, Vol.18 (3), p.322-339
issn 1571-0882
1745-3755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2708111585
source Access via Taylor & Francis
subjects Co-design
intersubjective learning
Participation
Participatory planning
place-making
Sociopolitical factors
title Stimulating embodied intersubjectivities: two participatory experiments in Antwerp North, Belgium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T11%3A01%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stimulating%20embodied%20intersubjectivities:%20two%20participatory%20experiments%20in%20Antwerp%20North,%20Belgium&rft.jtitle=CoDesign&rft.au=Devos,%20Tim&rft.date=2022-07-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=322-339&rft.issn=1571-0882&rft.eissn=1745-3755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15710882.2021.1894179&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2708111585%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2708111585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true