Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy 2022-09, Vol.40 (3), p.527-565 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 565 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 527 |
| container_title | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Sassaroli, Sandra Caselli, Gabriele Mansueto, Giovanni Palmieri, Sara Pepe, Alessandro Veronese, Guido Ruggiero, Giovanni M. |
| description | Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model.
Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment
(LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis–stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called “life themes,” which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and “semi-adaptive plans,” which are the rigid management strategies of “life themes” implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis–stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2703191084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2703191084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9b3b20243a4afd91870653552164fe2e09c9f0980d73a22b8847de20566bb3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhBThZ4gLSBsZ2_pnbphSoVMRKG3G1nHjSepU4wXZXghPvAE_IhdfAbZD2xmXG1szvm0_6kuQ5hdcUoHzjKYiMpcBoCpDFyh8kK5qXPC3ygj9MVlCJLBVQ5Y-TJ97fAgDLq3yV_PmiBqNVMHZPwgHJO6Ni88b__vHzJjj0nnyaNA6kVh41WcdK1pPtcA7HSH6P5GTJtZs61EeHxNg43lsTzB2SGg_qzkxODaQ5oFOzQf_29CS7bb1pyMud6fH0H9ETZTW5wdGkV1rNZ_x6UDb6-LUd58F050ueTD2pzdlLjYPB3l-STZyasDg5qTQOVRjRhlf3xp4mj3o1eHz2r18kzftNs_6Y7j5_2K6vdmnHCx5S0fKWAcu4ylSvBa1KKHKe54wWWY8MQXSiB1GBLrlirK2qrNTIIC-KtuUdv0heLLKzm74e0Qd5Ox2djRclK4FTQaHK4hZbtjo3ee-wl7Mzo3LfJAV5ylMuecqYpzznKXmE-AL5uGz36O6l_0P9BZhdp9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703191084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sassaroli, Sandra ; Caselli, Gabriele ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Palmieri, Sara ; Pepe, Alessandro ; Veronese, Guido ; Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sassaroli, Sandra ; Caselli, Gabriele ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Palmieri, Sara ; Pepe, Alessandro ; Veronese, Guido ; Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model.
Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment
(LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis–stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called “life themes,” which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and “semi-adaptive plans,” which are the rigid management strategies of “life themes” implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis–stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aggressive behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Beliefs ; Case formulation ; Clinical Psychology ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive behavioral therapy ; Cognitive bias ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; Community and Environmental Psychology ; Concept formation ; Consciousness ; Coping ; Coping strategies ; Education ; Elicitation ; Emotions ; Focused attention ; Life themes ; Mental states ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Safety behaviour ; Stress ; Textual analysis ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2022-09, Vol.40 (3), p.527-565</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9b3b20243a4afd91870653552164fe2e09c9f0980d73a22b8847de20566bb3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9b3b20243a4afd91870653552164fe2e09c9f0980d73a22b8847de20566bb3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1415-4495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12827,27903,27904,30978,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sassaroli, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caselli, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansueto, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmieri, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure</title><title>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</title><addtitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</addtitle><description>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model.
Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment
(LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis–stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called “life themes,” which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and “semi-adaptive plans,” which are the rigid management strategies of “life themes” implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis–stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.</description><subject>Aggressive behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Case formulation</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive bias</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping strategies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elicitation</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Focused attention</subject><subject>Life themes</subject><subject>Mental states</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Safety behaviour</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Textual analysis</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0894-9085</issn><issn>1573-6563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEEmXhBThZ4gLSBsZ2_pnbphSoVMRKG3G1nHjSepU4wXZXghPvAE_IhdfAbZD2xmXG1szvm0_6kuQ5hdcUoHzjKYiMpcBoCpDFyh8kK5qXPC3ygj9MVlCJLBVQ5Y-TJ97fAgDLq3yV_PmiBqNVMHZPwgHJO6Ni88b__vHzJjj0nnyaNA6kVh41WcdK1pPtcA7HSH6P5GTJtZs61EeHxNg43lsTzB2SGg_qzkxODaQ5oFOzQf_29CS7bb1pyMud6fH0H9ETZTW5wdGkV1rNZ_x6UDb6-LUd58F050ueTD2pzdlLjYPB3l-STZyasDg5qTQOVRjRhlf3xp4mj3o1eHz2r18kzftNs_6Y7j5_2K6vdmnHCx5S0fKWAcu4ylSvBa1KKHKe54wWWY8MQXSiB1GBLrlirK2qrNTIIC-KtuUdv0heLLKzm74e0Qd5Ox2djRclK4FTQaHK4hZbtjo3ee-wl7Mzo3LfJAV5ylMuecqYpzznKXmE-AL5uGz36O6l_0P9BZhdp9k</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Sassaroli, Sandra</creator><creator>Caselli, Gabriele</creator><creator>Mansueto, Giovanni</creator><creator>Palmieri, Sara</creator><creator>Pepe, Alessandro</creator><creator>Veronese, Guido</creator><creator>Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-4495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure</title><author>Sassaroli, Sandra ; Caselli, Gabriele ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Palmieri, Sara ; Pepe, Alessandro ; Veronese, Guido ; Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9b3b20243a4afd91870653552164fe2e09c9f0980d73a22b8847de20566bb3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aggressive behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Case formulation</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive bias</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping strategies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elicitation</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Focused attention</topic><topic>Life themes</topic><topic>Mental states</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Safety behaviour</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Textual analysis</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sassaroli, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caselli, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansueto, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmieri, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veronese, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sassaroli, Sandra</au><au>Caselli, Gabriele</au><au>Mansueto, Giovanni</au><au>Palmieri, Sara</au><au>Pepe, Alessandro</au><au>Veronese, Guido</au><au>Ruggiero, Giovanni M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy</jtitle><stitle>J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>527-565</pages><issn>0894-9085</issn><eissn>1573-6563</eissn><abstract>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches use case formulation procedures based on the diathesis–stress conceptualization model, arranged in two dimensions: emotional vulnerability (present in a patient’s consciousness in terms of core beliefs) and coping strategies. Nevertheless, despite its pivotal role, there are a limited number of validation studies for this model.
Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation and treatment
(LIBET) is a CBT case formulation method grounded on the CBT diathesis–stress model that aims to help validate the CBT case formulation model, and, in particular, its bidimensional arrangement. In LIBET, the two classic CBT dimensions are called “life themes,” which are mental states of focused attention to emotional sensitivities represented as core beliefs in consciousness, and “semi-adaptive plans,” which are the rigid management strategies of “life themes” implemented by adopting coping strategies such as anxious safety behaviors, compulsive controls and aggressive or rewarding strategies. The study uses quantitative textual analysis to validate the LIBET procedure in a clinical sample. The investigation discusses the extent to which the results can be considered a validation of the arrangement of the general CBT diathesis–stress model in the two dimensions of core beliefs and coping strategies.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3</doi><tpages>39</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-4495</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-9085 |
| ispartof | Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy, 2022-09, Vol.40 (3), p.527-565 |
| issn | 0894-9085 1573-6563 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2703191084 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aggressive behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Beliefs Case formulation Clinical Psychology Cognitive ability Cognitive behavioral therapy Cognitive bias Cognitive-behavioral factors Community and Environmental Psychology Concept formation Consciousness Coping Coping strategies Education Elicitation Emotions Focused attention Life themes Mental states Psychiatry Psychology Public Health Safety behaviour Stress Textual analysis Validation studies |
| title | Validating the Diathesis–Stress Model Based Case Conceptualization Procedure in Cognitive Behavioral Therapies: The LIBET (Life Themes and Semi-Adaptive Plans—Implications of Biased Beliefs, Elicitation and Treatment) Procedure |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20the%20Diathesis%E2%80%93Stress%20Model%20Based%20Case%20Conceptualization%20Procedure%20in%20Cognitive%20Behavioral%20Therapies:%20The%20LIBET%20(Life%20Themes%20and%20Semi-Adaptive%20Plans%E2%80%94Implications%20of%20Biased%20Beliefs,%20Elicitation%20and%20Treatment)%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rational-emotive%20and%20cognitive-behavior%20therapy&rft.au=Sassaroli,%20Sandra&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=527-565&rft.issn=0894-9085&rft.eissn=1573-6563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10942-021-00421-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2703191084%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703191084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |