Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland
This article discusses how administrative practices shape immigration detention policies, addressing both administrative discretion in detention orders and their judicial supervision. Due to vaguely formulated legal criteria and ineffective ex‐post judicial supervision, the authorities have consider...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Law & society review 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.418-440 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 440 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 418 |
container_title | Law & society review |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Könönen, Jukka |
description | This article discusses how administrative practices shape immigration detention policies, addressing both administrative discretion in detention orders and their judicial supervision. Due to vaguely formulated legal criteria and ineffective ex‐post judicial supervision, the authorities have considerable discretionary powers in ordering detentions for noncompliant and criminalized noncitizens. Instead of being a measure of last resort, immigration detention is used in a routine manner, with little individual assessment, for the enforcement of removals and the prevention of irregular migration, as well as extensively for crime prevention. The findings demonstrate the role of the police as the main actor in the detention system in Finland, with significant implications for the formation of detention policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lasr.12621 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2702531687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702531687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-59d0be6bd54349c682d85a6d78b15454b021b4959a2d4bebee69d3dbfad4e1e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXJm3S1tuiri4sCH6cQ9JMJUub1KR1WX-97daDJ-cyM8wz7zAvQpckXpAhbmoZ_IJQTskRmhGWxhHLi-QYzeKYJlFBCT9FZyFs46FnCZuh_bppzIeXnXEWa-jAHioZsMTe9Z2xgFtXmxJwAzL0Hm7xvQmlh5GTfj9Md-ADNha3HqBpO_MFf5Rcha2zpenMN9gDtjK2llafo5NK1gEufvMcva8e3u6eos3z4_puuYlKyjMSsULHCrjSLE3SouQ51TmTXGe5Gv5jqYopUWnBCkl1qkAB8EInWlVSp0CAJnN0Nem23n32EDqxdb23w0lBs9EFwvNsoK4nqvQuBA-VaL1phv8EicVorRitFQdrB5hM8M7UsP-HFJvl68u08wO1SX6m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702531687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Könönen, Jukka</creator><creatorcontrib>Könönen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><description>This article discusses how administrative practices shape immigration detention policies, addressing both administrative discretion in detention orders and their judicial supervision. Due to vaguely formulated legal criteria and ineffective ex‐post judicial supervision, the authorities have considerable discretionary powers in ordering detentions for noncompliant and criminalized noncitizens. Instead of being a measure of last resort, immigration detention is used in a routine manner, with little individual assessment, for the enforcement of removals and the prevention of irregular migration, as well as extensively for crime prevention. The findings demonstrate the role of the police as the main actor in the detention system in Finland, with significant implications for the formation of detention policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Court decisions ; Crime prevention ; Detention ; Discretionary power ; Enforcement ; Families & family life ; Immigration ; Immigration policy ; Judicial reviews ; Migration ; Noncitizens ; Police ; Policy making ; Prevention ; Supervision</subject><ispartof>Law & society review, 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.418-440</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Law and Society Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Law and Society Association Sep 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-59d0be6bd54349c682d85a6d78b15454b021b4959a2d4bebee69d3dbfad4e1e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-59d0be6bd54349c682d85a6d78b15454b021b4959a2d4bebee69d3dbfad4e1e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4843-7741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flasr.12621$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flasr.12621$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,12834,27333,27913,27914,33763,45563,45564</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Könönen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><title>Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland</title><title>Law & society review</title><description>This article discusses how administrative practices shape immigration detention policies, addressing both administrative discretion in detention orders and their judicial supervision. Due to vaguely formulated legal criteria and ineffective ex‐post judicial supervision, the authorities have considerable discretionary powers in ordering detentions for noncompliant and criminalized noncitizens. Instead of being a measure of last resort, immigration detention is used in a routine manner, with little individual assessment, for the enforcement of removals and the prevention of irregular migration, as well as extensively for crime prevention. The findings demonstrate the role of the police as the main actor in the detention system in Finland, with significant implications for the formation of detention policies.</description><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Detention</subject><subject>Discretionary power</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Immigration policy</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Noncitizens</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><issn>0023-9216</issn><issn>1540-5893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXJm3S1tuiri4sCH6cQ9JMJUub1KR1WX-97daDJ-cyM8wz7zAvQpckXpAhbmoZ_IJQTskRmhGWxhHLi-QYzeKYJlFBCT9FZyFs46FnCZuh_bppzIeXnXEWa-jAHioZsMTe9Z2xgFtXmxJwAzL0Hm7xvQmlh5GTfj9Md-ADNha3HqBpO_MFf5Rcha2zpenMN9gDtjK2llafo5NK1gEufvMcva8e3u6eos3z4_puuYlKyjMSsULHCrjSLE3SouQ51TmTXGe5Gv5jqYopUWnBCkl1qkAB8EInWlVSp0CAJnN0Nem23n32EDqxdb23w0lBs9EFwvNsoK4nqvQuBA-VaL1phv8EicVorRitFQdrB5hM8M7UsP-HFJvl68u08wO1SX6m</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Könönen, Jukka</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-7741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland</title><author>Könönen, Jukka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2671-59d0be6bd54349c682d85a6d78b15454b021b4959a2d4bebee69d3dbfad4e1e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Detention</topic><topic>Discretionary power</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Immigration policy</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Noncitizens</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Könönen, Jukka</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Könönen, Jukka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland</atitle><jtitle>Law & society review</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>418-440</pages><issn>0023-9216</issn><eissn>1540-5893</eissn><abstract>This article discusses how administrative practices shape immigration detention policies, addressing both administrative discretion in detention orders and their judicial supervision. Due to vaguely formulated legal criteria and ineffective ex‐post judicial supervision, the authorities have considerable discretionary powers in ordering detentions for noncompliant and criminalized noncitizens. Instead of being a measure of last resort, immigration detention is used in a routine manner, with little individual assessment, for the enforcement of removals and the prevention of irregular migration, as well as extensively for crime prevention. The findings demonstrate the role of the police as the main actor in the detention system in Finland, with significant implications for the formation of detention policies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/lasr.12621</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-7741</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-9216 |
ispartof | Law & society review, 2022-09, Vol.56 (3), p.418-440 |
issn | 0023-9216 1540-5893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2702531687 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
subjects | Court decisions Crime prevention Detention Discretionary power Enforcement Families & family life Immigration Immigration policy Judicial reviews Migration Noncitizens Police Policy making Prevention Supervision |
title | Immigration detention as a routine police measure: Discretionary powers in preemptive detention of noncitizens in Finland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immigration%20detention%20as%20a%20routine%20police%20measure:%20Discretionary%20powers%20in%20preemptive%20detention%20of%20noncitizens%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Law%20&%20society%20review&rft.au=K%C3%B6n%C3%B6nen,%20Jukka&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=418-440&rft.issn=0023-9216&rft.eissn=1540-5893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lasr.12621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2702531687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702531687&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |