Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives
This study contributes to the emerging literature on the interplay between safety committees and employee perceptions of organizational safety culture. Creating, managing and maintaining a safety culture in organizations involves significant investment in the establishment of safety committees. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec) Québec), 2021-01, Vol.76 (1), p.115-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec) |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Gosen, Dora Mielly, Michelle |
description | This study contributes to the emerging literature on the interplay between safety committees and employee perceptions of organizational safety culture. Creating, managing and maintaining a safety culture in organizations involves significant investment in the establishment of safety committees. The role of such committees in improving safety culture perceptions has remained underexplored in the safety management and organizational literature.
This study addresses that gap and focuses on a safety committee within the facilities management operations of a large American academic institution. The objective is to generate understandings of how a committee can influence organizational cultural change and impact employee perceptions of safety.
Using Schein’s organizational culture model as a prism, we unpack the employees’ implicit cultural beliefs. Data from over sixty employee interviews revealed that formation of the Safety Committee resulted in unintended consequences in terms of employee perceptions.
Employees attributed most safety-related actions to the committee when, in fact, the managers and supervisors had actually carried them out. This overestimation of committee activities and concomitant underestimation of managerial actions by employees was an unintended consequence of establishing a committee. Employees, in fact, collectively attributed all positive changes in the organizational culture to the committee. The committee ultimately influenced the employees’ basic assumptions, such change being, according to Schein, a prerequisite for organizational cultural change.
This study, therefore, contributes to the literature by proposing that unintended consequences can operate in three different ways to support organizational change. First, unintended consequences can promote positive outcomes; second, they can reveal a new understanding of committees, which under certain circumstances can act as a proxy for management and encourage positive perceptions of managerial commitment. Lastly, unintended consequences can provide a means to detect and ‘excavate’ hidden, implicit assumptions that drive organizational culture’s deepest layers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7202/1075576ar |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>erudit_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2702467667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1075576ar</eruid><jstor_id>27016475</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1075576ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-8a6996b3c0cbc2e65881857e44b0de6bb509f64f8130db9919ffb896bb253c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFKAzEQhoMoWGoPPoAY8ORhNcnuJhtvZalaEDzYgrcl2Z1tI222JllpfXpTquLJ0zDzf_PPDIPQOSU3ghF2S4nIc8GVO0IDKkiaFDQtjtGAkDRLUiFfT9HIe6MJS1PO8oIP0HayrdWHCsYu8LNbKGs-Y9JZtcJj7_v1Zp94rHTXB1z2q9C7KJVLZRdwh2dLwHNrbADbQIPLiMJ7D7YGj7sWv6gWwi6W12sTAgCeWhNM9P8Af4ZOWrXyMPqOQzS_n8zKx-Tp-WFajp-SmnEakkJxKblOa1LrmgHPi4IWuYAs06QBrnVOZMuzNl5KGi0llW2ri9ihWR6bRDpEVwffjeviaj5Ub13v4n2-YoKwjAvO_6cyKYlkGZWRuj5Qteu8d9BWG2fWyu0qSqr9B6rfD0T24sC--dC5XzDOpDwTedQvDzq4vjHhj9OPwxfeG42S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499092419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Gosen, Dora ; Mielly, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Gosen, Dora ; Mielly, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>This study contributes to the emerging literature on the interplay between safety committees and employee perceptions of organizational safety culture. Creating, managing and maintaining a safety culture in organizations involves significant investment in the establishment of safety committees. The role of such committees in improving safety culture perceptions has remained underexplored in the safety management and organizational literature.
This study addresses that gap and focuses on a safety committee within the facilities management operations of a large American academic institution. The objective is to generate understandings of how a committee can influence organizational cultural change and impact employee perceptions of safety.
Using Schein’s organizational culture model as a prism, we unpack the employees’ implicit cultural beliefs. Data from over sixty employee interviews revealed that formation of the Safety Committee resulted in unintended consequences in terms of employee perceptions.
Employees attributed most safety-related actions to the committee when, in fact, the managers and supervisors had actually carried them out. This overestimation of committee activities and concomitant underestimation of managerial actions by employees was an unintended consequence of establishing a committee. Employees, in fact, collectively attributed all positive changes in the organizational culture to the committee. The committee ultimately influenced the employees’ basic assumptions, such change being, according to Schein, a prerequisite for organizational cultural change.
This study, therefore, contributes to the literature by proposing that unintended consequences can operate in three different ways to support organizational change. First, unintended consequences can promote positive outcomes; second, they can reveal a new understanding of committees, which under certain circumstances can act as a proxy for management and encourage positive perceptions of managerial commitment. Lastly, unintended consequences can provide a means to detect and ‘excavate’ hidden, implicit assumptions that drive organizational culture’s deepest layers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-379X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1703-8138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7202/1075576ar</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Quebec: Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval</publisher><subject>Action ; Assumptions ; Attitudes ; Case studies ; Colleges & universities ; Committees ; Corporate culture ; Cultural change ; Cultural factors ; Cultural maintenance ; Cultural values ; Decision making ; Employee involvement ; Employees ; Employment interviews ; Facilities management ; Industrial safety ; Influence ; Labor relations ; Management ; Managers ; Nuclear accidents & safety ; Occupational safety ; Organizational change ; Organizational culture ; Perceptions ; Safety ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec), 2021-01, Vol.76 (1), p.115-142</ispartof><rights>Tous droits réservés © Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval, 2021</rights><rights>DÉPARTEMENT DES RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES, UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL</rights><rights>Copyright Universite Laval - Departement des Relations Industrielles Winter 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-8a6996b3c0cbc2e65881857e44b0de6bb509f64f8130db9919ffb896bb253c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-8a6996b3c0cbc2e65881857e44b0de6bb509f64f8130db9919ffb896bb253c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27016475$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27016475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,25332,27321,27901,27902,33751,54499,54505,79311,79318</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27016475$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gosen, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielly, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives</title><title>Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec)</title><description>This study contributes to the emerging literature on the interplay between safety committees and employee perceptions of organizational safety culture. Creating, managing and maintaining a safety culture in organizations involves significant investment in the establishment of safety committees. The role of such committees in improving safety culture perceptions has remained underexplored in the safety management and organizational literature.
This study addresses that gap and focuses on a safety committee within the facilities management operations of a large American academic institution. The objective is to generate understandings of how a committee can influence organizational cultural change and impact employee perceptions of safety.
Using Schein’s organizational culture model as a prism, we unpack the employees’ implicit cultural beliefs. Data from over sixty employee interviews revealed that formation of the Safety Committee resulted in unintended consequences in terms of employee perceptions.
Employees attributed most safety-related actions to the committee when, in fact, the managers and supervisors had actually carried them out. This overestimation of committee activities and concomitant underestimation of managerial actions by employees was an unintended consequence of establishing a committee. Employees, in fact, collectively attributed all positive changes in the organizational culture to the committee. The committee ultimately influenced the employees’ basic assumptions, such change being, according to Schein, a prerequisite for organizational cultural change.
This study, therefore, contributes to the literature by proposing that unintended consequences can operate in three different ways to support organizational change. First, unintended consequences can promote positive outcomes; second, they can reveal a new understanding of committees, which under certain circumstances can act as a proxy for management and encourage positive perceptions of managerial commitment. Lastly, unintended consequences can provide a means to detect and ‘excavate’ hidden, implicit assumptions that drive organizational culture’s deepest layers.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Assumptions</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural maintenance</subject><subject>Cultural values</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Employee involvement</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment interviews</subject><subject>Facilities management</subject><subject>Industrial safety</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Nuclear accidents & safety</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Organizational culture</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>0034-379X</issn><issn>1703-8138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFKAzEQhoMoWGoPPoAY8ORhNcnuJhtvZalaEDzYgrcl2Z1tI222JllpfXpTquLJ0zDzf_PPDIPQOSU3ghF2S4nIc8GVO0IDKkiaFDQtjtGAkDRLUiFfT9HIe6MJS1PO8oIP0HayrdWHCsYu8LNbKGs-Y9JZtcJj7_v1Zp94rHTXB1z2q9C7KJVLZRdwh2dLwHNrbADbQIPLiMJ7D7YGj7sWv6gWwi6W12sTAgCeWhNM9P8Af4ZOWrXyMPqOQzS_n8zKx-Tp-WFajp-SmnEakkJxKblOa1LrmgHPi4IWuYAs06QBrnVOZMuzNl5KGi0llW2ri9ihWR6bRDpEVwffjeviaj5Ub13v4n2-YoKwjAvO_6cyKYlkGZWRuj5Qteu8d9BWG2fWyu0qSqr9B6rfD0T24sC--dC5XzDOpDwTedQvDzq4vjHhj9OPwxfeG42S</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Gosen, Dora</creator><creator>Mielly, Michelle</creator><general>Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval</general><general>Départment des Relations Industrielles, Université Laval</general><general>Universite Laval - Departement des Relations Industrielles</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>L.0</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives</title><author>Gosen, Dora ; Mielly, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-8a6996b3c0cbc2e65881857e44b0de6bb509f64f8130db9919ffb896bb253c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Assumptions</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural maintenance</topic><topic>Cultural values</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Employee involvement</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment interviews</topic><topic>Facilities management</topic><topic>Industrial safety</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Nuclear accidents & safety</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Organizational culture</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gosen, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mielly, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><jtitle>Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gosen, Dora</au><au>Mielly, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec)</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>115-142</pages><issn>0034-379X</issn><eissn>1703-8138</eissn><abstract>This study contributes to the emerging literature on the interplay between safety committees and employee perceptions of organizational safety culture. Creating, managing and maintaining a safety culture in organizations involves significant investment in the establishment of safety committees. The role of such committees in improving safety culture perceptions has remained underexplored in the safety management and organizational literature.
This study addresses that gap and focuses on a safety committee within the facilities management operations of a large American academic institution. The objective is to generate understandings of how a committee can influence organizational cultural change and impact employee perceptions of safety.
Using Schein’s organizational culture model as a prism, we unpack the employees’ implicit cultural beliefs. Data from over sixty employee interviews revealed that formation of the Safety Committee resulted in unintended consequences in terms of employee perceptions.
Employees attributed most safety-related actions to the committee when, in fact, the managers and supervisors had actually carried them out. This overestimation of committee activities and concomitant underestimation of managerial actions by employees was an unintended consequence of establishing a committee. Employees, in fact, collectively attributed all positive changes in the organizational culture to the committee. The committee ultimately influenced the employees’ basic assumptions, such change being, according to Schein, a prerequisite for organizational cultural change.
This study, therefore, contributes to the literature by proposing that unintended consequences can operate in three different ways to support organizational change. First, unintended consequences can promote positive outcomes; second, they can reveal a new understanding of committees, which under certain circumstances can act as a proxy for management and encourage positive perceptions of managerial commitment. Lastly, unintended consequences can provide a means to detect and ‘excavate’ hidden, implicit assumptions that drive organizational culture’s deepest layers.</abstract><cop>Quebec</cop><pub>Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval</pub><doi>10.7202/1075576ar</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-379X |
ispartof | Relations industrielles (Québec, Québec), 2021-01, Vol.76 (1), p.115-142 |
issn | 0034-379X 1703-8138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2702467667 |
source | Jstor Journals Open Access |
subjects | Action Assumptions Attitudes Case studies Colleges & universities Committees Corporate culture Cultural change Cultural factors Cultural maintenance Cultural values Decision making Employee involvement Employees Employment interviews Facilities management Industrial safety Influence Labor relations Management Managers Nuclear accidents & safety Occupational safety Organizational change Organizational culture Perceptions Safety Supervisors |
title | Excavating Organizational Assumptions about Cultural Change: The Unintended Consequences of Safety Committee Initiatives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excavating%20Organizational%20Assumptions%20about%20Cultural%20Change:%20The%20Unintended%20Consequences%20of%20Safety%20Committee%20Initiatives&rft.jtitle=Relations%20industrielles%20(Qu%C3%A9bec,%20Qu%C3%A9bec)&rft.au=Gosen,%20Dora&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=115-142&rft.issn=0034-379X&rft.eissn=1703-8138&rft_id=info:doi/10.7202/1075576ar&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_JFNAL%3E1075576ar%3C/erudit_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499092419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1075576ar&rft_jstor_id=27016475&rfr_iscdi=true |