Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers

Gendered discrimination based on age and disability is a pressing issue, because this discrimination can interfere with the goal of lengthening work lives, especially for older women. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibit age...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2022-08
Hauptverfasser: Neumark, David, McLaughlin, Joanne S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Neumark, David
McLaughlin, Joanne S
description Gendered discrimination based on age and disability is a pressing issue, because this discrimination can interfere with the goal of lengthening work lives, especially for older women. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibit age and disability discrimination in employment, while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination against women. However, because gender and age (and disability) discrimination fall under different statutes, these laws may be inadequate to protect against discrimination based on gendered ageism and disablism. Legal rulings in the United States generally do not recognize intersecting claims – discrimination based on two or more protected characteristics – when those characteristics are covered by separate statutes. This may help explain the evidence that age discrimination is worse for women than for men. We discuss the theory and methods we can use to analyze these issues, and the relevant laws and their failure to protect women from gendered ageism. We review evidence on gendered age discrimination, and evidence on the effects of discrimination laws and how well they protect from intersectional discrimination. Finally, we discuss potential changes in policies that could better protect against gendered age discrimination.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w30355
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nber_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2702174165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w30355</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2702174165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-n475-6def315fdb12084c0b938931eec694efb8933ad687422933eee3d437969482bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFKAzEQhnNQsFZ9AE8Bz6tJJrtJDh5KrVUo9FLwuCTNrGzdza5Ji_TtDayefj7-j5lhCLnj7BFAV08_wKAsL8iMaaMLYUBdkeuUDowJrRmfkec1Bo8RPV18Ypt6aoOnL22yrvunVT92w7nHcKRDQ7dd1unHEL8wphty2dgu4e1fzsnudbVbvhWb7fp9udgUQaqyqDw2wMvGOy6YlnvmDGgDHHFfGYmNywDWV1pJkU8ERAQvQZncauEczMnDNHaMw_cJ07E-DKcY8sZaKCa4krwqs3U_WcFhrMfY9jae6-kD8AutK03f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702174165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Neumark, David ; McLaughlin, Joanne S</creator><creatorcontrib>Neumark, David ; McLaughlin, Joanne S</creatorcontrib><description>Gendered discrimination based on age and disability is a pressing issue, because this discrimination can interfere with the goal of lengthening work lives, especially for older women. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibit age and disability discrimination in employment, while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination against women. However, because gender and age (and disability) discrimination fall under different statutes, these laws may be inadequate to protect against discrimination based on gendered ageism and disablism. Legal rulings in the United States generally do not recognize intersecting claims – discrimination based on two or more protected characteristics – when those characteristics are covered by separate statutes. This may help explain the evidence that age discrimination is worse for women than for men. We discuss the theory and methods we can use to analyze these issues, and the relevant laws and their failure to protect women from gendered ageism. We review evidence on gendered age discrimination, and evidence on the effects of discrimination laws and how well they protect from intersectional discrimination. Finally, we discuss potential changes in policies that could better protect against gendered age discrimination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w30355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Age discrimination ; Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US ; Disability ; Economic theory ; Employment ; Labor Studies ; Law and Economics</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-08</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Aug 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neumark, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Joanne S</creatorcontrib><title>Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>Gendered discrimination based on age and disability is a pressing issue, because this discrimination can interfere with the goal of lengthening work lives, especially for older women. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibit age and disability discrimination in employment, while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination against women. However, because gender and age (and disability) discrimination fall under different statutes, these laws may be inadequate to protect against discrimination based on gendered ageism and disablism. Legal rulings in the United States generally do not recognize intersecting claims – discrimination based on two or more protected characteristics – when those characteristics are covered by separate statutes. This may help explain the evidence that age discrimination is worse for women than for men. We discuss the theory and methods we can use to analyze these issues, and the relevant laws and their failure to protect women from gendered ageism. We review evidence on gendered age discrimination, and evidence on the effects of discrimination laws and how well they protect from intersectional discrimination. Finally, we discuss potential changes in policies that could better protect against gendered age discrimination.</description><subject>Age discrimination</subject><subject>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor Studies</subject><subject>Law and Economics</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMFKAzEQhnNQsFZ9AE8Bz6tJJrtJDh5KrVUo9FLwuCTNrGzdza5Ji_TtDayefj7-j5lhCLnj7BFAV08_wKAsL8iMaaMLYUBdkeuUDowJrRmfkec1Bo8RPV18Ypt6aoOnL22yrvunVT92w7nHcKRDQ7dd1unHEL8wphty2dgu4e1fzsnudbVbvhWb7fp9udgUQaqyqDw2wMvGOy6YlnvmDGgDHHFfGYmNywDWV1pJkU8ERAQvQZncauEczMnDNHaMw_cJ07E-DKcY8sZaKCa4krwqs3U_WcFhrMfY9jae6-kD8AutK03f</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Neumark, David</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Joanne S</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers</title><author>Neumark, David ; McLaughlin, Joanne S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-n475-6def315fdb12084c0b938931eec694efb8933ad687422933eee3d437969482bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age discrimination</topic><topic>Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor Studies</topic><topic>Law and Economics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neumark, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Joanne S</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neumark, David</au><au>McLaughlin, Joanne S</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>Gendered discrimination based on age and disability is a pressing issue, because this discrimination can interfere with the goal of lengthening work lives, especially for older women. In the United States, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibit age and disability discrimination in employment, while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination against women. However, because gender and age (and disability) discrimination fall under different statutes, these laws may be inadequate to protect against discrimination based on gendered ageism and disablism. Legal rulings in the United States generally do not recognize intersecting claims – discrimination based on two or more protected characteristics – when those characteristics are covered by separate statutes. This may help explain the evidence that age discrimination is worse for women than for men. We discuss the theory and methods we can use to analyze these issues, and the relevant laws and their failure to protect women from gendered ageism. We review evidence on gendered age discrimination, and evidence on the effects of discrimination laws and how well they protect from intersectional discrimination. Finally, we discuss potential changes in policies that could better protect against gendered age discrimination.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w30355</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-08
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2702174165
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age discrimination
Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US
Disability
Economic theory
Employment
Labor Studies
Law and Economics
title Gendered Ageism and Disablism and Employment of Older Workers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T16%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nber_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Gendered%20Ageism%20and%20Disablism%20and%20Employment%20of%20Older%20Workers&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Neumark,%20David&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w30355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nber_%3E2702174165%3C/proquest_nber_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702174165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w30355&rfr_iscdi=true