Social Perception of Riparian Forests
Riparian forests are ecotones that differ from the surrounding landscapes, delineating the transition from terrestrial ecosystems into aquatic ones. Riparian forest management has been recognized as a possible method for promoting several ecological functions. In order to develop a sustainable and r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-07, Vol.14 (15), p.9302 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 15 |
| container_start_page | 9302 |
| container_title | Sustainability |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Saklaurs, M?rcis Liepi?a, Agnese Anta Elferts, Didzis Jansons, ?ris |
| description | Riparian forests are ecotones that differ from the surrounding landscapes, delineating the transition from terrestrial ecosystems into aquatic ones. Riparian forest management has been recognized as a possible method for promoting several ecological functions. In order to develop a sustainable and resilient relationship between river riparian forests and society, it is necessary to analyze the sociocultural dimension of riparian zones. The aim of this study was to assess the social perceptions of riparian forests. A total of 734 respondents (61% woman), inhabitants from the region of Latvia, where there is a rather dense network of streams, were surveyed. Respondents represented various education levels, ages, and economic backgrounds. Riverine forests tend to be a less popular option for recreation compared with other types of forests. The most popular activities were walking and swimming. “Forest and water bodies” was not among the main topics that respondents were concerned about. Regarding rivers and riparian forests, the obstructed movement of fish to spawning grounds was recognized as the most important problem, but the least concerning was the reduction of water tourism and fishing opportunities. Dynamic river basin and river bank management could be a possible solution to restoring eligible locations for recreational activities, at least along some parts of rivers, and for improving the state of riparian ecosystems simultaneously. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14159302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700793044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724190765</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724190765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-3d281787cf7fd36f3c36a2aaa647e623d54678608a0e957b3595685d4ac2d7c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWGov_oIF8aCwNd_ZPZZitVBQWj2HMZuUlHazJrug_95IBXXmMMPwvPMyg9AlwVPGanyXBsKJqBmmJ2hEsSIlwQKf_unP0SSlHc7BGKmJHKHrTTAe9sWzjcZ2vQ9tEVyx9h1ED22xCNGmPl2gMwf7ZCc_dYxeF_cv88dy9fSwnM9WpaFC9SVraEVUpYxTrmHSMcMkUACQXFlJWSO4VJXEFWBbC_XGRC1kJRoOhjbKSDZGV8e9XQzvQ3bWuzDENltqqjBW-TbOMzU9UlvYW-1bF_oIJmdjD96E1jqf5zNFOamxkiILbv4JMtPbj34LQ0p6uVn_Z2-PrIkhpWid7qI_QPzUBOvvN-vfN7Mv9DxrLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2700793044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Perception of Riparian Forests</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Saklaurs, M?rcis ; Liepi?a, Agnese Anta ; Elferts, Didzis ; Jansons, ?ris</creator><creatorcontrib>Saklaurs, M?rcis ; Liepi?a, Agnese Anta ; Elferts, Didzis ; Jansons, ?ris</creatorcontrib><description>Riparian forests are ecotones that differ from the surrounding landscapes, delineating the transition from terrestrial ecosystems into aquatic ones. Riparian forest management has been recognized as a possible method for promoting several ecological functions. In order to develop a sustainable and resilient relationship between river riparian forests and society, it is necessary to analyze the sociocultural dimension of riparian zones. The aim of this study was to assess the social perceptions of riparian forests. A total of 734 respondents (61% woman), inhabitants from the region of Latvia, where there is a rather dense network of streams, were surveyed. Respondents represented various education levels, ages, and economic backgrounds. Riverine forests tend to be a less popular option for recreation compared with other types of forests. The most popular activities were walking and swimming. “Forest and water bodies” was not among the main topics that respondents were concerned about. Regarding rivers and riparian forests, the obstructed movement of fish to spawning grounds was recognized as the most important problem, but the least concerning was the reduction of water tourism and fishing opportunities. Dynamic river basin and river bank management could be a possible solution to restoring eligible locations for recreational activities, at least along some parts of rivers, and for improving the state of riparian ecosystems simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14159302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Biodiversity ; Creeks & streams ; Ecosystems ; Ecotones ; Education ; Environmental aspects ; Fishing ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest management ; Forests ; Forests and forestry ; Latvia ; Polls & surveys ; Recreation ; Riparian areas ; Riparian buffers ; Riparian ecology ; Riparian forests ; Riparian land ; River banks ; River basin management ; River basins ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Social aspects ; Social perception ; Society ; Spawning ; Spawning grounds ; Strategic management ; Streams ; Sustainability ; Swimming ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Tourism ; Variance analysis ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (15), p.9302</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-3d281787cf7fd36f3c36a2aaa647e623d54678608a0e957b3595685d4ac2d7c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9401-1231</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saklaurs, M?rcis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liepi?a, Agnese Anta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elferts, Didzis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, ?ris</creatorcontrib><title>Social Perception of Riparian Forests</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Riparian forests are ecotones that differ from the surrounding landscapes, delineating the transition from terrestrial ecosystems into aquatic ones. Riparian forest management has been recognized as a possible method for promoting several ecological functions. In order to develop a sustainable and resilient relationship between river riparian forests and society, it is necessary to analyze the sociocultural dimension of riparian zones. The aim of this study was to assess the social perceptions of riparian forests. A total of 734 respondents (61% woman), inhabitants from the region of Latvia, where there is a rather dense network of streams, were surveyed. Respondents represented various education levels, ages, and economic backgrounds. Riverine forests tend to be a less popular option for recreation compared with other types of forests. The most popular activities were walking and swimming. “Forest and water bodies” was not among the main topics that respondents were concerned about. Regarding rivers and riparian forests, the obstructed movement of fish to spawning grounds was recognized as the most important problem, but the least concerning was the reduction of water tourism and fishing opportunities. Dynamic river basin and river bank management could be a possible solution to restoring eligible locations for recreational activities, at least along some parts of rivers, and for improving the state of riparian ecosystems simultaneously.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Creeks & streams</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotones</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>Latvia</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Riparian areas</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>Riparian forests</subject><subject>Riparian land</subject><subject>River banks</subject><subject>River basin management</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social perception</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Spawning grounds</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Swimming</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMoWGov_oIF8aCwNd_ZPZZitVBQWj2HMZuUlHazJrug_95IBXXmMMPwvPMyg9AlwVPGanyXBsKJqBmmJ2hEsSIlwQKf_unP0SSlHc7BGKmJHKHrTTAe9sWzjcZ2vQ9tEVyx9h1ED22xCNGmPl2gMwf7ZCc_dYxeF_cv88dy9fSwnM9WpaFC9SVraEVUpYxTrmHSMcMkUACQXFlJWSO4VJXEFWBbC_XGRC1kJRoOhjbKSDZGV8e9XQzvQ3bWuzDENltqqjBW-TbOMzU9UlvYW-1bF_oIJmdjD96E1jqf5zNFOamxkiILbv4JMtPbj34LQ0p6uVn_Z2-PrIkhpWid7qI_QPzUBOvvN-vfN7Mv9DxrLg</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Saklaurs, M?rcis</creator><creator>Liepi?a, Agnese Anta</creator><creator>Elferts, Didzis</creator><creator>Jansons, ?ris</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-1231</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Social Perception of Riparian Forests</title><author>Saklaurs, M?rcis ; Liepi?a, Agnese Anta ; Elferts, Didzis ; Jansons, ?ris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-3d281787cf7fd36f3c36a2aaa647e623d54678608a0e957b3595685d4ac2d7c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Creeks & streams</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotones</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>Latvia</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Riparian areas</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>Riparian forests</topic><topic>Riparian land</topic><topic>River banks</topic><topic>River basin management</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social perception</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Spawning grounds</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Swimming</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saklaurs, M?rcis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liepi?a, Agnese Anta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elferts, Didzis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansons, ?ris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saklaurs, M?rcis</au><au>Liepi?a, Agnese Anta</au><au>Elferts, Didzis</au><au>Jansons, ?ris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Perception of Riparian Forests</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>9302</spage><pages>9302-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Riparian forests are ecotones that differ from the surrounding landscapes, delineating the transition from terrestrial ecosystems into aquatic ones. Riparian forest management has been recognized as a possible method for promoting several ecological functions. In order to develop a sustainable and resilient relationship between river riparian forests and society, it is necessary to analyze the sociocultural dimension of riparian zones. The aim of this study was to assess the social perceptions of riparian forests. A total of 734 respondents (61% woman), inhabitants from the region of Latvia, where there is a rather dense network of streams, were surveyed. Respondents represented various education levels, ages, and economic backgrounds. Riverine forests tend to be a less popular option for recreation compared with other types of forests. The most popular activities were walking and swimming. “Forest and water bodies” was not among the main topics that respondents were concerned about. Regarding rivers and riparian forests, the obstructed movement of fish to spawning grounds was recognized as the most important problem, but the least concerning was the reduction of water tourism and fishing opportunities. Dynamic river basin and river bank management could be a possible solution to restoring eligible locations for recreational activities, at least along some parts of rivers, and for improving the state of riparian ecosystems simultaneously.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14159302</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-1231</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
| ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (15), p.9302 |
| issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2700793044 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Biodiversity Creeks & streams Ecosystems Ecotones Education Environmental aspects Fishing Forest ecosystems Forest management Forests Forests and forestry Latvia Polls & surveys Recreation Riparian areas Riparian buffers Riparian ecology Riparian forests Riparian land River banks River basin management River basins River ecology Rivers Social aspects Social perception Society Spawning Spawning grounds Strategic management Streams Sustainability Swimming Terrestrial ecosystems Tourism Variance analysis Vegetation |
| title | Social Perception of Riparian Forests |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A44%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Perception%20of%20Riparian%20Forests&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Saklaurs,%20M?rcis&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=9302&rft.pages=9302-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14159302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724190765%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2700793044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A724190765&rfr_iscdi=true |