On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis

Summary Because the GEO belt is becoming more and more crowded every day, controlling the number of satellites in the same control box is becoming more common. There are different kinds of collocation strategies to control more than two satellites in the same box, such as (1) eccentricity and inclin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of satellite communications and networking 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.371-376
1. Verfasser: Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 5
container_start_page 371
container_title International journal of satellite communications and networking
container_volume 40
creator Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi
description Summary Because the GEO belt is becoming more and more crowded every day, controlling the number of satellites in the same control box is becoming more common. There are different kinds of collocation strategies to control more than two satellites in the same box, such as (1) eccentricity and inclination separation or (2) longitude separation. TURKSAT has been using option (1) for a long time. In this paper, we demonstrated TURKSAT on‐orbit experience to show mainly radial distances between the satellites. The motivation of this study is to demonstrate how often the satellites are becoming behind of each other, which can be used for RF colocation analysis. Most of the cases the worst case for RF interference analysis between two collocated satellites is having zero distance in normal and tangential but having a radial distance only. In this study, based on the radial distance thresholds, the noninterfered link availability is also shown.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sat.1453
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2699885717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2699885717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1843-5cc1917541e4b6ddf59a925fa69e8a998fbac7928104de382a2decdf3e546f3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9KwzAYAPAgCs4p-AgBL146m6Rpm-MYcwqDgc6Dp5AmXyAjtjPJGLv5CD6jT2JnxZun7zv8vr8IXZN8QvKc3kWVJqTg7ASNCC9olouanP7lFTtHFzFuelnmnIzQ66r9-vjsQuMSDhB3PkVsu4CDMk55bFxMqtUQcQNpD9Bi3XnfaZXA4MV8hftx4L1LMJQ93WPVKn-ILl6iM6t8hKvfOEYv9_P17CFbrhaPs-ky06QuWMa1JoJUvCBQNKUxlgslKLeqFFArIWrbKF0JWpO8MMBqqqgBbSwDXpSWWTZGN0PfbejedxCT3HS70C8RJS37-ppXpOrV7aB06GIMYOU2uDcVDpLk8vg42V8ij4_raTbQvfNw-NfJ5-n6x38Dsa1wbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2699885717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Because the GEO belt is becoming more and more crowded every day, controlling the number of satellites in the same control box is becoming more common. There are different kinds of collocation strategies to control more than two satellites in the same box, such as (1) eccentricity and inclination separation or (2) longitude separation. TURKSAT has been using option (1) for a long time. In this paper, we demonstrated TURKSAT on‐orbit experience to show mainly radial distances between the satellites. The motivation of this study is to demonstrate how often the satellites are becoming behind of each other, which can be used for RF colocation analysis. Most of the cases the worst case for RF interference analysis between two collocated satellites is having zero distance in normal and tangential but having a radial distance only. In this study, based on the radial distance thresholds, the noninterfered link availability is also shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-0973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-0981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sat.1453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>collocated GEO ; colocation ; Control equipment ; Radio frequency interference ; RF interference ; Satellites ; Separation ; TURKSAT</subject><ispartof>International journal of satellite communications and networking, 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.371-376</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1843-5cc1917541e4b6ddf59a925fa69e8a998fbac7928104de382a2decdf3e546f3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5886-9743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsat.1453$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsat.1453$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</creatorcontrib><title>On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis</title><title>International journal of satellite communications and networking</title><description>Summary Because the GEO belt is becoming more and more crowded every day, controlling the number of satellites in the same control box is becoming more common. There are different kinds of collocation strategies to control more than two satellites in the same box, such as (1) eccentricity and inclination separation or (2) longitude separation. TURKSAT has been using option (1) for a long time. In this paper, we demonstrated TURKSAT on‐orbit experience to show mainly radial distances between the satellites. The motivation of this study is to demonstrate how often the satellites are becoming behind of each other, which can be used for RF colocation analysis. Most of the cases the worst case for RF interference analysis between two collocated satellites is having zero distance in normal and tangential but having a radial distance only. In this study, based on the radial distance thresholds, the noninterfered link availability is also shown.</description><subject>collocated GEO</subject><subject>colocation</subject><subject>Control equipment</subject><subject>Radio frequency interference</subject><subject>RF interference</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>TURKSAT</subject><issn>1542-0973</issn><issn>1542-0981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9KwzAYAPAgCs4p-AgBL146m6Rpm-MYcwqDgc6Dp5AmXyAjtjPJGLv5CD6jT2JnxZun7zv8vr8IXZN8QvKc3kWVJqTg7ASNCC9olouanP7lFTtHFzFuelnmnIzQ66r9-vjsQuMSDhB3PkVsu4CDMk55bFxMqtUQcQNpD9Bi3XnfaZXA4MV8hftx4L1LMJQ93WPVKn-ILl6iM6t8hKvfOEYv9_P17CFbrhaPs-ky06QuWMa1JoJUvCBQNKUxlgslKLeqFFArIWrbKF0JWpO8MMBqqqgBbSwDXpSWWTZGN0PfbejedxCT3HS70C8RJS37-ppXpOrV7aB06GIMYOU2uDcVDpLk8vg42V8ij4_raTbQvfNw-NfJ5-n6x38Dsa1wbA</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-9743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis</title><author>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1843-5cc1917541e4b6ddf59a925fa69e8a998fbac7928104de382a2decdf3e546f3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>collocated GEO</topic><topic>colocation</topic><topic>Control equipment</topic><topic>Radio frequency interference</topic><topic>RF interference</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>TURKSAT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>International journal of satellite communications and networking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yilmaz, Umit Cezmi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of satellite communications and networking</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>371-376</pages><issn>1542-0973</issn><eissn>1542-0981</eissn><abstract>Summary Because the GEO belt is becoming more and more crowded every day, controlling the number of satellites in the same control box is becoming more common. There are different kinds of collocation strategies to control more than two satellites in the same box, such as (1) eccentricity and inclination separation or (2) longitude separation. TURKSAT has been using option (1) for a long time. In this paper, we demonstrated TURKSAT on‐orbit experience to show mainly radial distances between the satellites. The motivation of this study is to demonstrate how often the satellites are becoming behind of each other, which can be used for RF colocation analysis. Most of the cases the worst case for RF interference analysis between two collocated satellites is having zero distance in normal and tangential but having a radial distance only. In this study, based on the radial distance thresholds, the noninterfered link availability is also shown.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sat.1453</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-9743</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-0973
ispartof International journal of satellite communications and networking, 2022-09, Vol.40 (5), p.371-376
issn 1542-0973
1542-0981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2699885717
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects collocated GEO
colocation
Control equipment
Radio frequency interference
RF interference
Satellites
Separation
TURKSAT
title On‐orbit results for radial distances between collocated GEO satellites for RF analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A44%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%E2%80%90orbit%20results%20for%20radial%20distances%20between%20collocated%20GEO%20satellites%20for%20RF%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20satellite%20communications%20and%20networking&rft.au=Yilmaz,%20Umit%20Cezmi&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=371-376&rft.issn=1542-0973&rft.eissn=1542-0981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sat.1453&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2699885717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2699885717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true