Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive
The loot box, a feature of online video games, contains randomised virtual items of importance to gameplay. Comparisons are drawn between chance-based loot boxes and the legal and psychological definitions of gambling, leading to concerns that the format may be an unregulated form of quasi-gambling....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consumer policy 2022-09, Vol.45 (3), p.561-592 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 561 |
container_title | Journal of consumer policy |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Leahy, D. |
description | The loot box, a feature of online video games, contains randomised virtual items of importance to gameplay. Comparisons are drawn between chance-based loot boxes and the legal and psychological definitions of gambling, leading to concerns that the format may be an unregulated form of quasi-gambling. Globally, several jurisdictions have intervened to control the loot box, some applying national gambling laws, while others have implemented more general rules, an alternative described as “consumer protection”. In 2020, a study commissioned on behalf of the EU Parliament recommended that loot boxes and in-game purchasing systems be regulated from a “consumer protection” perspective. This paper questions firstly whether the debate on product-specific rules for loot box games was conducted in reverse, commencing with a set of potential solutions, while research on harms is still at an early stage. It interrogates the “consumer protection” route, critiquing proposals that borrow from the conceptually and structurally distinct areas of gambling law and consumer protection law, without first resolving the tensions between them. The paper proposes that an alternative paradigm of “player protection” may be the better route towards solving the regulatory puzzle of loot boxes. The paper secondly argues for the EU and its Member States to adopt an interim approach, relying on existing legislation to tackle immediate concerns and facilitate testing of remedial measures, but which leaves the door ajar to alternative options, including regulation under national gambling law frameworks. It examines the UCPD as an immediate solution and considers how the updated UCPD Guidance addresses questions of potentially exploitative game design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2698983669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2698983669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-55aed1edeb22ce8882f06ef647f7ddc51d9b3f2d785ab792dcccd557d25ee3db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1KBDEQhYMoOP5cwFXAra1JetJJu9PxFwYUccBdyCTVY7Qn0aRHdOfCS3g9T2KcFty5qSqq3nsFH0I7lOxTQsRBoqQiZUEYK0jNcxUraEC5yCtByCoaEFrJQpByuI42UnoghNSy5AP0cRPMo_Mz3N0DPg66O8TjELo8vkLCzuMr3zoP-MTNXKdbfK7nkPaW6huYLVrdhfiGR_e6bcHPYA9rb5fX08nX-2fCE99oF_EozOcQjcsJ11GbzpmcfuIi5PEFttBao9sE2799E03OTm9HF8X46vxydDQuzJDRruBcg6VgYcqYASkla0gFTTUUjbDWcGrradkwKyTXU1Eza4yxnAvLOEBpp-Um2u1zn2J4XkDq1ENYRJ9fKlbVMhOpqjqrWK8yMaQUoVFP0c11fFOUqB_aqqetMm21pK1ENuHeBCZ4l_4skrGKS0rvsqTsJSkfM6v49_2f4G-5Yo8L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2698983669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Leahy, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leahy, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The loot box, a feature of online video games, contains randomised virtual items of importance to gameplay. Comparisons are drawn between chance-based loot boxes and the legal and psychological definitions of gambling, leading to concerns that the format may be an unregulated form of quasi-gambling. Globally, several jurisdictions have intervened to control the loot box, some applying national gambling laws, while others have implemented more general rules, an alternative described as “consumer protection”. In 2020, a study commissioned on behalf of the EU Parliament recommended that loot boxes and in-game purchasing systems be regulated from a “consumer protection” perspective. This paper questions firstly whether the debate on product-specific rules for loot box games was conducted in reverse, commencing with a set of potential solutions, while research on harms is still at an early stage. It interrogates the “consumer protection” route, critiquing proposals that borrow from the conceptually and structurally distinct areas of gambling law and consumer protection law, without first resolving the tensions between them. The paper proposes that an alternative paradigm of “player protection” may be the better route towards solving the regulatory puzzle of loot boxes. The paper secondly argues for the EU and its Member States to adopt an interim approach, relying on existing legislation to tackle immediate concerns and facilitate testing of remedial measures, but which leaves the door ajar to alternative options, including regulation under national gambling law frameworks. It examines the UCPD as an immediate solution and considers how the updated UCPD Guidance addresses questions of potentially exploitative game design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-7034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Boxes ; Commercial Law ; Computer & video games ; Consumer protection ; Economic Policy ; Gambling ; Internet ; Law ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Marketing ; Original Paper ; Rules ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of consumer policy, 2022-09, Vol.45 (3), p.561-592</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-55aed1edeb22ce8882f06ef647f7ddc51d9b3f2d785ab792dcccd557d25ee3db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-55aed1edeb22ce8882f06ef647f7ddc51d9b3f2d785ab792dcccd557d25ee3db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7647-2934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leahy, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive</title><title>Journal of consumer policy</title><addtitle>J Consum Policy</addtitle><description>The loot box, a feature of online video games, contains randomised virtual items of importance to gameplay. Comparisons are drawn between chance-based loot boxes and the legal and psychological definitions of gambling, leading to concerns that the format may be an unregulated form of quasi-gambling. Globally, several jurisdictions have intervened to control the loot box, some applying national gambling laws, while others have implemented more general rules, an alternative described as “consumer protection”. In 2020, a study commissioned on behalf of the EU Parliament recommended that loot boxes and in-game purchasing systems be regulated from a “consumer protection” perspective. This paper questions firstly whether the debate on product-specific rules for loot box games was conducted in reverse, commencing with a set of potential solutions, while research on harms is still at an early stage. It interrogates the “consumer protection” route, critiquing proposals that borrow from the conceptually and structurally distinct areas of gambling law and consumer protection law, without first resolving the tensions between them. The paper proposes that an alternative paradigm of “player protection” may be the better route towards solving the regulatory puzzle of loot boxes. The paper secondly argues for the EU and its Member States to adopt an interim approach, relying on existing legislation to tackle immediate concerns and facilitate testing of remedial measures, but which leaves the door ajar to alternative options, including regulation under national gambling law frameworks. It examines the UCPD as an immediate solution and considers how the updated UCPD Guidance addresses questions of potentially exploitative game design.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Computer & video games</subject><subject>Consumer protection</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0168-7034</issn><issn>1573-0700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1KBDEQhYMoOP5cwFXAra1JetJJu9PxFwYUccBdyCTVY7Qn0aRHdOfCS3g9T2KcFty5qSqq3nsFH0I7lOxTQsRBoqQiZUEYK0jNcxUraEC5yCtByCoaEFrJQpByuI42UnoghNSy5AP0cRPMo_Mz3N0DPg66O8TjELo8vkLCzuMr3zoP-MTNXKdbfK7nkPaW6huYLVrdhfiGR_e6bcHPYA9rb5fX08nX-2fCE99oF_EozOcQjcsJ11GbzpmcfuIi5PEFttBao9sE2799E03OTm9HF8X46vxydDQuzJDRruBcg6VgYcqYASkla0gFTTUUjbDWcGrradkwKyTXU1Eza4yxnAvLOEBpp-Um2u1zn2J4XkDq1ENYRJ9fKlbVMhOpqjqrWK8yMaQUoVFP0c11fFOUqB_aqqetMm21pK1ENuHeBCZ4l_4skrGKS0rvsqTsJSkfM6v49_2f4G-5Yo8L</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Leahy, D.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-2934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive</title><author>Leahy, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-55aed1edeb22ce8882f06ef647f7ddc51d9b3f2d785ab792dcccd557d25ee3db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Computer & video games</topic><topic>Consumer protection</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leahy, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of consumer policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leahy, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consumer policy</jtitle><stitle>J Consum Policy</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>592</epage><pages>561-592</pages><issn>0168-7034</issn><eissn>1573-0700</eissn><abstract>The loot box, a feature of online video games, contains randomised virtual items of importance to gameplay. Comparisons are drawn between chance-based loot boxes and the legal and psychological definitions of gambling, leading to concerns that the format may be an unregulated form of quasi-gambling. Globally, several jurisdictions have intervened to control the loot box, some applying national gambling laws, while others have implemented more general rules, an alternative described as “consumer protection”. In 2020, a study commissioned on behalf of the EU Parliament recommended that loot boxes and in-game purchasing systems be regulated from a “consumer protection” perspective. This paper questions firstly whether the debate on product-specific rules for loot box games was conducted in reverse, commencing with a set of potential solutions, while research on harms is still at an early stage. It interrogates the “consumer protection” route, critiquing proposals that borrow from the conceptually and structurally distinct areas of gambling law and consumer protection law, without first resolving the tensions between them. The paper proposes that an alternative paradigm of “player protection” may be the better route towards solving the regulatory puzzle of loot boxes. The paper secondly argues for the EU and its Member States to adopt an interim approach, relying on existing legislation to tackle immediate concerns and facilitate testing of remedial measures, but which leaves the door ajar to alternative options, including regulation under national gambling law frameworks. It examines the UCPD as an immediate solution and considers how the updated UCPD Guidance addresses questions of potentially exploitative game design.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-2934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-7034 |
ispartof | Journal of consumer policy, 2022-09, Vol.45 (3), p.561-592 |
issn | 0168-7034 1573-0700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2698983669 |
source | PAIS Index; SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Alternatives Boxes Commercial Law Computer & video games Consumer protection Economic Policy Gambling Internet Law Legislation Legislatures Marketing Original Paper Rules Social Sciences |
title | Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T04%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rocking%20the%20Boat:%20Loot%20Boxes%20in%20Online%20Digital%20Games,%20the%20Regulatory%20Challenge,%20and%20the%20EU%E2%80%99s%20Unfair%20Commercial%20Practices%20Directive&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consumer%20policy&rft.au=Leahy,%20D.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=592&rft.pages=561-592&rft.issn=0168-7034&rft.eissn=1573-0700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2698983669%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2698983669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |