Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment
Consumer behavior in terms of regular searching for and switching between suppliers is key to induce competition in markets and to increase efficiency. In the electricity market, though, we observe very little switching activity. One way to engage consumers may be to automate the choice of the contr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2022-05, Vol.164, p.112855, Article 112855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112855 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 164 |
creator | Feldhaus, Christoph Lingens, Jörg Löschel, Andreas Zunker, Gerald |
description | Consumer behavior in terms of regular searching for and switching between suppliers is key to induce competition in markets and to increase efficiency. In the electricity market, though, we observe very little switching activity. One way to engage consumers may be to automate the choice of the contract. However, little is known about the determinants of consumers’ use of automation services. To address this question, we present a stylized model of how households take their decision to enroll into an automation service and, based on that, run a field experiment with about 2600 customers of a German service provider that offers its customers to automatically switch between electricity contracts on their behalf. We provide evidence that arguments derived from our stylized model that aim to increase the take up of the automation service can be ineffective or even have detrimental effects. Thereby, we provide evidence that it might be difficult to realize potential efficiency-gains of a digitized world.
•Automatic contract choice may increase consumer activity in the electricity market.•We develop a stylized choice structure of what makes consumers opt for automation.•Based on that, we run a field experiment with 2600 German electricity consumers.•We find that common arguments to promote automation can be ineffective or harmful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112855 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2697714271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421522000805</els_id><sourcerecordid>2697714271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-47f5a8cbc9c11801dcadcb0f68bfb208b2c5aa036a8208aae2cbc8b3b62cbdfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBWwssU6wnZe7YFFV5SFVYgNry5lMWkdtXGyn0L_HIaxZeaw5d-w5hNxxlnLGy4cuxf5gd6lgQqScC1kUZ2TGZZUlZVVV52TGMsaTXPDiklx53zHGcjnPZ6Rb9WAHpzem31CwvR_26KiGYI4mnGjYOjtstlQPwe51MED9lwmwHWnbxjZS3CEEZ2DE44DgYpgmdEFbg7uG4vcBndljH27IRat3Hm__zmvy8bR6X74k67fn1-VinUCW8ZDkVVtoCTXMgXPJeAO6gZq1pazbWjBZCyi0ZlmpZbxpjSKyss7qMhZNi9k1uZ_mHpz9HNAH1cUN-_ikEuW8qnguKh6pbKLAWe8dtuoQv6ndSXGmRqmqU79S1ShVTVJj6nFKYVzgaNApDwZ7wMa4qEE11vyb_wGROYRh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697714271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Feldhaus, Christoph ; Lingens, Jörg ; Löschel, Andreas ; Zunker, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Feldhaus, Christoph ; Lingens, Jörg ; Löschel, Andreas ; Zunker, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Consumer behavior in terms of regular searching for and switching between suppliers is key to induce competition in markets and to increase efficiency. In the electricity market, though, we observe very little switching activity. One way to engage consumers may be to automate the choice of the contract. However, little is known about the determinants of consumers’ use of automation services. To address this question, we present a stylized model of how households take their decision to enroll into an automation service and, based on that, run a field experiment with about 2600 customers of a German service provider that offers its customers to automatically switch between electricity contracts on their behalf. We provide evidence that arguments derived from our stylized model that aim to increase the take up of the automation service can be ineffective or even have detrimental effects. Thereby, we provide evidence that it might be difficult to realize potential efficiency-gains of a digitized world.
•Automatic contract choice may increase consumer activity in the electricity market.•We develop a stylized choice structure of what makes consumers opt for automation.•Based on that, we run a field experiment with 2600 German electricity consumers.•We find that common arguments to promote automation can be ineffective or harmful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Automation ; Automation service usage ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Contract choices ; Customer services ; Customers ; Decision rights ; Electricity ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Field experiment ; Households ; Markets ; Search and switching behavior ; Switching</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2022-05, Vol.164, p.112855, Article 112855</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-47f5a8cbc9c11801dcadcb0f68bfb208b2c5aa036a8208aae2cbc8b3b62cbdfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-47f5a8cbc9c11801dcadcb0f68bfb208b2c5aa036a8208aae2cbc8b3b62cbdfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5875-5807</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feldhaus, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingens, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschel, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zunker, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Consumer behavior in terms of regular searching for and switching between suppliers is key to induce competition in markets and to increase efficiency. In the electricity market, though, we observe very little switching activity. One way to engage consumers may be to automate the choice of the contract. However, little is known about the determinants of consumers’ use of automation services. To address this question, we present a stylized model of how households take their decision to enroll into an automation service and, based on that, run a field experiment with about 2600 customers of a German service provider that offers its customers to automatically switch between electricity contracts on their behalf. We provide evidence that arguments derived from our stylized model that aim to increase the take up of the automation service can be ineffective or even have detrimental effects. Thereby, we provide evidence that it might be difficult to realize potential efficiency-gains of a digitized world.
•Automatic contract choice may increase consumer activity in the electricity market.•We develop a stylized choice structure of what makes consumers opt for automation.•Based on that, we run a field experiment with 2600 German electricity consumers.•We find that common arguments to promote automation can be ineffective or harmful.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Automation service usage</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Contract choices</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Decision rights</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Field experiment</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Search and switching behavior</subject><subject>Switching</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxBWwssU6wnZe7YFFV5SFVYgNry5lMWkdtXGyn0L_HIaxZeaw5d-w5hNxxlnLGy4cuxf5gd6lgQqScC1kUZ2TGZZUlZVVV52TGMsaTXPDiklx53zHGcjnPZ6Rb9WAHpzem31CwvR_26KiGYI4mnGjYOjtstlQPwe51MED9lwmwHWnbxjZS3CEEZ2DE44DgYpgmdEFbg7uG4vcBndljH27IRat3Hm__zmvy8bR6X74k67fn1-VinUCW8ZDkVVtoCTXMgXPJeAO6gZq1pazbWjBZCyi0ZlmpZbxpjSKyss7qMhZNi9k1uZ_mHpz9HNAH1cUN-_ikEuW8qnguKh6pbKLAWe8dtuoQv6ndSXGmRqmqU79S1ShVTVJj6nFKYVzgaNApDwZ7wMa4qEE11vyb_wGROYRh</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Feldhaus, Christoph</creator><creator>Lingens, Jörg</creator><creator>Löschel, Andreas</creator><creator>Zunker, Gerald</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-5807</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment</title><author>Feldhaus, Christoph ; Lingens, Jörg ; Löschel, Andreas ; Zunker, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-47f5a8cbc9c11801dcadcb0f68bfb208b2c5aa036a8208aae2cbc8b3b62cbdfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Automation service usage</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Contract choices</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Decision rights</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Field experiment</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Search and switching behavior</topic><topic>Switching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feldhaus, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lingens, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löschel, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zunker, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feldhaus, Christoph</au><au>Lingens, Jörg</au><au>Löschel, Andreas</au><au>Zunker, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>164</volume><spage>112855</spage><pages>112855-</pages><artnum>112855</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Consumer behavior in terms of regular searching for and switching between suppliers is key to induce competition in markets and to increase efficiency. In the electricity market, though, we observe very little switching activity. One way to engage consumers may be to automate the choice of the contract. However, little is known about the determinants of consumers’ use of automation services. To address this question, we present a stylized model of how households take their decision to enroll into an automation service and, based on that, run a field experiment with about 2600 customers of a German service provider that offers its customers to automatically switch between electricity contracts on their behalf. We provide evidence that arguments derived from our stylized model that aim to increase the take up of the automation service can be ineffective or even have detrimental effects. Thereby, we provide evidence that it might be difficult to realize potential efficiency-gains of a digitized world.
•Automatic contract choice may increase consumer activity in the electricity market.•We develop a stylized choice structure of what makes consumers opt for automation.•Based on that, we run a field experiment with 2600 German electricity consumers.•We find that common arguments to promote automation can be ineffective or harmful.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112855</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-5807</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2022-05, Vol.164, p.112855, Article 112855 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2697714271 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Automation Automation service usage Consumer behavior Consumers Contract choices Customer services Customers Decision rights Electricity Energy Energy policy Field experiment Households Markets Search and switching behavior Switching |
title | Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A48%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encouraging%20consumer%20activity%20through%20automatic%20switching%20of%20the%20electricity%20contract%20-%20A%20field%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Feldhaus,%20Christoph&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=164&rft.spage=112855&rft.pages=112855-&rft.artnum=112855&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697714271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697714271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421522000805&rfr_iscdi=true |