One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800

The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470
1. Verfasser: Chatterjee, Jacob Donald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 470
container_issue 269
container_start_page 447
container_title Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research
container_volume 95
creator Chatterjee, Jacob Donald
description The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/hisres/htac007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2697396686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697396686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-c7a2fd92dc3b84e2a064039c0bfd68fab71ee6408c2d51e8562ee1f7921267a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMltiJa3tJP4ZaUUBqagLzJFj35CUNC62W9St78DE6_VJCGqnK9177qdPB6FbSkaUqHRcN8FDGNdRG0LEGRrQjMuEMUnP0YConCRpJuglugphSQihea4GaL3oANebznqwWHcWQ_NRx10Svx12W_Ctc5_9ZeKb2IQaG7daQRcDdh2egO-0t_i1f4Nt07Zw2P8GPNNlC9hVONbQMxDwPaaCZYf9D5WEXKOLSrcBbk5ziN5nj2_T52S-eHqZPswTwxiLiRGaVVYxa9JSZsA04RlJlSFlZbmsdCkoQL-Shtmcgsw5A6CVUIwyLrRMh-jumLv27msDIRZLt-kLt6FgXIlUcS55T42OlPEu9PqqYu2blfa7gpLi32pxtFqcrKZ_WjhuNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697396686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><description>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-3471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/hisres/htac007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of Historical Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><title>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</title><description>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</description><issn>0950-3471</issn><issn>1468-2281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMltiJa3tJP4ZaUUBqagLzJFj35CUNC62W9St78DE6_VJCGqnK9177qdPB6FbSkaUqHRcN8FDGNdRG0LEGRrQjMuEMUnP0YConCRpJuglugphSQihea4GaL3oANebznqwWHcWQ_NRx10Svx12W_Ctc5_9ZeKb2IQaG7daQRcDdh2egO-0t_i1f4Nt07Zw2P8GPNNlC9hVONbQMxDwPaaCZYf9D5WEXKOLSrcBbk5ziN5nj2_T52S-eHqZPswTwxiLiRGaVVYxa9JSZsA04RlJlSFlZbmsdCkoQL-Shtmcgsw5A6CVUIwyLrRMh-jumLv27msDIRZLt-kLt6FgXIlUcS55T42OlPEu9PqqYu2blfa7gpLi32pxtFqcrKZ_WjhuNw</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><author>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-c7a2fd92dc3b84e2a064039c0bfd68fab71ee6408c2d51e8562ee1f7921267a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</atitle><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>269</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>447-470</pages><issn>0950-3471</issn><eissn>1468-2281</eissn><abstract>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/hisres/htac007</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-3471
ispartof Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470
issn 0950-3471
1468-2281
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2697396686
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20and%20eighty-two%20overlooked%20British%20comments%20on%20Bernard%20Mandeville%E2%80%99s%20Fable%20of%20the%20Bees%20,%201724%E2%80%931800&rft.jtitle=Historical%20research%20:%20the%20bulletin%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Historical%20Research&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Jacob%20Donald&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=269&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=447-470&rft.issn=0950-3471&rft.eissn=1468-2281&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/hisres/htac007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697396686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697396686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true