One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800
The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 269 |
container_start_page | 447 |
container_title | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Chatterjee, Jacob Donald |
description | The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/hisres/htac007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2697396686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697396686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-c7a2fd92dc3b84e2a064039c0bfd68fab71ee6408c2d51e8562ee1f7921267a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMltiJa3tJP4ZaUUBqagLzJFj35CUNC62W9St78DE6_VJCGqnK9177qdPB6FbSkaUqHRcN8FDGNdRG0LEGRrQjMuEMUnP0YConCRpJuglugphSQihea4GaL3oANebznqwWHcWQ_NRx10Svx12W_Ctc5_9ZeKb2IQaG7daQRcDdh2egO-0t_i1f4Nt07Zw2P8GPNNlC9hVONbQMxDwPaaCZYf9D5WEXKOLSrcBbk5ziN5nj2_T52S-eHqZPswTwxiLiRGaVVYxa9JSZsA04RlJlSFlZbmsdCkoQL-Shtmcgsw5A6CVUIwyLrRMh-jumLv27msDIRZLt-kLt6FgXIlUcS55T42OlPEu9PqqYu2blfa7gpLi32pxtFqcrKZ_WjhuNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697396686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><description>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-3471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/hisres/htac007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of Historical Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><title>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</title><description>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</description><issn>0950-3471</issn><issn>1468-2281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMltiJa3tJP4ZaUUBqagLzJFj35CUNC62W9St78DE6_VJCGqnK9177qdPB6FbSkaUqHRcN8FDGNdRG0LEGRrQjMuEMUnP0YConCRpJuglugphSQihea4GaL3oANebznqwWHcWQ_NRx10Svx12W_Ctc5_9ZeKb2IQaG7daQRcDdh2egO-0t_i1f4Nt07Zw2P8GPNNlC9hVONbQMxDwPaaCZYf9D5WEXKOLSrcBbk5ziN5nj2_T52S-eHqZPswTwxiLiRGaVVYxa9JSZsA04RlJlSFlZbmsdCkoQL-Shtmcgsw5A6CVUIwyLrRMh-jumLv27msDIRZLt-kLt6FgXIlUcS55T42OlPEu9PqqYu2blfa7gpLi32pxtFqcrKZ_WjhuNw</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</title><author>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-c7a2fd92dc3b84e2a064039c0bfd68fab71ee6408c2d51e8562ee1f7921267a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Jacob Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800</atitle><jtitle>Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>269</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>447-470</pages><issn>0950-3471</issn><eissn>1468-2281</eissn><abstract>The Fable of the Bees (1714) by Bernard Mandeville, a Dutch émigré physician and acerbic satirist, provoked some of the fiercest debates of the eighteenth century by arguing that luxury and vice were the driving forces of modern commercial societies. However, studies of these polemical storms remain largely reliant on Frederick Benjamin Kaye’s incomplete appendix of contemporary references to Mandeville in the Clarendon Edition of the Fable (1924). To address this historiographical lacuna, this research note presents substantial new evidence on the Fable’s reception by listing and describing 182 overlooked eighteenth-century British responses to Mandeville.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/hisres/htac007</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0336-6385</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-3471 |
ispartof | Historical research : the bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 2022-08, Vol.95 (269), p.447-470 |
issn | 0950-3471 1468-2281 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2697396686 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | One hundred and eighty-two overlooked British comments on Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees , 1724–1800 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20hundred%20and%20eighty-two%20overlooked%20British%20comments%20on%20Bernard%20Mandeville%E2%80%99s%20Fable%20of%20the%20Bees%20,%201724%E2%80%931800&rft.jtitle=Historical%20research%20:%20the%20bulletin%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Historical%20Research&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Jacob%20Donald&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=269&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=447-470&rft.issn=0950-3471&rft.eissn=1468-2281&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/hisres/htac007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697396686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697396686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |