Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing
Multiprocessor scheduling, also called scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, is a classic optimization problem which has been extensively studied. Scheduling with testing is an online variant, where the processing time of a job is revealed by an extra test operation, ot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of combinatorial optimization 2022-08, Vol.44 (1), p.877-893 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 893 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 877 |
container_title | Journal of combinatorial optimization |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Gong, Mingyang Goebel, Randy Lin, Guohui Miyano, Eiji |
description | Multiprocessor scheduling, also called scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, is a classic optimization problem which has been extensively studied. Scheduling with testing is an online variant, where the processing time of a job is revealed by an extra test operation, otherwise the job has to be executed for a given upper bound on the processing time. Albers and Eckl recently studied the multiprocessor scheduling with testing; among others, for the non-preemptive setting they presented an approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3.1016 when the number of machines tends to infinity and an improved approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3 when all test operations take one unit of time each. We propose to first sort the jobs into non-increasing order of the minimum value between the upper bound and the testing time, then partition the jobs into three groups and process them group by group according to the sorted job order. We show that our algorithm achieves better competitive ratios, which approach 2.9513 when the number of machines tends to infinity in the general case; when all test operations each takes one time unit, our algorithm achieves even better competitive ratios approaching 2.8081. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2696496906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696496906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-89cf0bad0cd25ece81f9ae5908c17694464776b9c06e57a585e43fd0dce9b5983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBIjMEf4FSJc8BNmzQ5ognYpElc4MQh6lJ369Qvknawf4-hSNw4-Vl-z89-jF3HcBsDZHchBp1pDkJwAK0kP56wWSyzhAut1SnhRAuuDMhzdhHCHgAIpzP2tmp63x2wiPKewGfV5EPVtVFebztfDbsmRGXno7Zree8Rm36oDhg1Yz1URHcYAk2D22Ex1lW7jT5IEw0YBmou2VmZ1wGvfuucvT4-vCyWfP38tFrcr7kTqRm4Nq6ETV6AK4REhzouTY7SgHZxpkyaqjTL1MY4UCizXGqJaVIWUDg0G2l0Mmc301666H0kb7vvRt-SpRXKqNTQ34pYYmI534XgsbS9p2_90cZgv0O0U4iWQrQ_IdojiZJJFIjcbtH_rf5H9QULzHhC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696496906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Gong, Mingyang ; Goebel, Randy ; Lin, Guohui ; Miyano, Eiji</creator><creatorcontrib>Gong, Mingyang ; Goebel, Randy ; Lin, Guohui ; Miyano, Eiji</creatorcontrib><description>Multiprocessor scheduling, also called scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, is a classic optimization problem which has been extensively studied. Scheduling with testing is an online variant, where the processing time of a job is revealed by an extra test operation, otherwise the job has to be executed for a given upper bound on the processing time. Albers and Eckl recently studied the multiprocessor scheduling with testing; among others, for the non-preemptive setting they presented an approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3.1016 when the number of machines tends to infinity and an improved approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3 when all test operations take one unit of time each. We propose to first sort the jobs into non-increasing order of the minimum value between the upper bound and the testing time, then partition the jobs into three groups and process them group by group according to the sorted job order. We show that our algorithm achieves better competitive ratios, which approach 2.9513 when the number of machines tends to infinity in the general case; when all test operations each takes one time unit, our algorithm achieves even better competitive ratios approaching 2.8081.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1382-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Combinatorics ; Competition ; Convex and Discrete Geometry ; Infinity ; Job shops ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics ; Mathematics ; Mathematics and Statistics ; Multiprocessing ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Optimization ; Preempting ; Scheduling ; Testing time ; Theory of Computation ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of combinatorial optimization, 2022-08, Vol.44 (1), p.877-893</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-89cf0bad0cd25ece81f9ae5908c17694464776b9c06e57a585e43fd0dce9b5983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-89cf0bad0cd25ece81f9ae5908c17694464776b9c06e57a585e43fd0dce9b5983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4283-3396</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gong, Mingyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Guohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyano, Eiji</creatorcontrib><title>Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing</title><title>Journal of combinatorial optimization</title><addtitle>J Comb Optim</addtitle><description>Multiprocessor scheduling, also called scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, is a classic optimization problem which has been extensively studied. Scheduling with testing is an online variant, where the processing time of a job is revealed by an extra test operation, otherwise the job has to be executed for a given upper bound on the processing time. Albers and Eckl recently studied the multiprocessor scheduling with testing; among others, for the non-preemptive setting they presented an approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3.1016 when the number of machines tends to infinity and an improved approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3 when all test operations take one unit of time each. We propose to first sort the jobs into non-increasing order of the minimum value between the upper bound and the testing time, then partition the jobs into three groups and process them group by group according to the sorted job order. We show that our algorithm achieves better competitive ratios, which approach 2.9513 when the number of machines tends to infinity in the general case; when all test operations each takes one time unit, our algorithm achieves even better competitive ratios approaching 2.8081.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Convex and Discrete Geometry</subject><subject>Infinity</subject><subject>Job shops</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics and Statistics</subject><subject>Multiprocessing</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Preempting</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Testing time</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>1382-6905</issn><issn>1573-2886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1PwzAMjRBIjMEf4FSJc8BNmzQ5ognYpElc4MQh6lJ369Qvknawf4-hSNw4-Vl-z89-jF3HcBsDZHchBp1pDkJwAK0kP56wWSyzhAut1SnhRAuuDMhzdhHCHgAIpzP2tmp63x2wiPKewGfV5EPVtVFebztfDbsmRGXno7Zree8Rm36oDhg1Yz1URHcYAk2D22Ex1lW7jT5IEw0YBmou2VmZ1wGvfuucvT4-vCyWfP38tFrcr7kTqRm4Nq6ETV6AK4REhzouTY7SgHZxpkyaqjTL1MY4UCizXGqJaVIWUDg0G2l0Mmc301666H0kb7vvRt-SpRXKqNTQ34pYYmI534XgsbS9p2_90cZgv0O0U4iWQrQ_IdojiZJJFIjcbtH_rf5H9QULzHhC</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Gong, Mingyang</creator><creator>Goebel, Randy</creator><creator>Lin, Guohui</creator><creator>Miyano, Eiji</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-3396</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing</title><author>Gong, Mingyang ; Goebel, Randy ; Lin, Guohui ; Miyano, Eiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-89cf0bad0cd25ece81f9ae5908c17694464776b9c06e57a585e43fd0dce9b5983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Convex and Discrete Geometry</topic><topic>Infinity</topic><topic>Job shops</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics and Statistics</topic><topic>Multiprocessing</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Preempting</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Testing time</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gong, Mingyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goebel, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Guohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyano, Eiji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of combinatorial optimization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gong, Mingyang</au><au>Goebel, Randy</au><au>Lin, Guohui</au><au>Miyano, Eiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of combinatorial optimization</jtitle><stitle>J Comb Optim</stitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>877</spage><epage>893</epage><pages>877-893</pages><issn>1382-6905</issn><eissn>1573-2886</eissn><abstract>Multiprocessor scheduling, also called scheduling on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, is a classic optimization problem which has been extensively studied. Scheduling with testing is an online variant, where the processing time of a job is revealed by an extra test operation, otherwise the job has to be executed for a given upper bound on the processing time. Albers and Eckl recently studied the multiprocessor scheduling with testing; among others, for the non-preemptive setting they presented an approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3.1016 when the number of machines tends to infinity and an improved approximation algorithm with competitive ratio approaching 3 when all test operations take one unit of time each. We propose to first sort the jobs into non-increasing order of the minimum value between the upper bound and the testing time, then partition the jobs into three groups and process them group by group according to the sorted job order. We show that our algorithm achieves better competitive ratios, which approach 2.9513 when the number of machines tends to infinity in the general case; when all test operations each takes one time unit, our algorithm achieves even better competitive ratios approaching 2.8081.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-3396</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1382-6905 |
ispartof | Journal of combinatorial optimization, 2022-08, Vol.44 (1), p.877-893 |
issn | 1382-6905 1573-2886 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2696496906 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Approximation Combinatorics Competition Convex and Discrete Geometry Infinity Job shops Mathematical analysis Mathematical Modeling and Industrial Mathematics Mathematics Mathematics and Statistics Multiprocessing Operations Research/Decision Theory Optimization Preempting Scheduling Testing time Theory of Computation Upper bounds |
title | Improved approximation algorithms for non-preemptive multiprocessor scheduling with testing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A43%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20approximation%20algorithms%20for%20non-preemptive%20multiprocessor%20scheduling%20with%20testing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20combinatorial%20optimization&rft.au=Gong,%20Mingyang&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=893&rft.pages=877-893&rft.issn=1382-6905&rft.eissn=1573-2886&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10878-022-00865-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2696496906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696496906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |