It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing
Size-assortative pairing is common across a wide range of taxa. In many cases, both sexes would benefit from pairing with a mate larger than themselves. As males and females cannot simultaneously be larger than their pair mate, size differences within pairs reflect which sex is able to obtain this b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2022-08, Vol.76 (8), Article 107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Heuring, Whitney L. Hughes, Melissa |
description | Size-assortative pairing is common across a wide range of taxa. In many cases, both sexes would benefit from pairing with a mate larger than themselves. As males and females cannot simultaneously be larger than their pair mate, size differences within pairs reflect which sex is able to obtain this benefit. Snapping shrimp can be found in pairs year-round, and both males and females would benefit from pairing with larger individuals. Larger females are more fecund; males, then, are likely to benefit from pairing with larger females primarily in the reproductive season. Larger individuals are more successful competitors and females benefit more from shared burrow defense than males; for females, then, benefits of pairing with larger males are likely to accrue year-round. In this study, we use field data to test whether within-pair size differences in snapping shrimp correspond more to male or female interests, and whether this outcome differs between seasons. We find that size-assortative pairing varies seasonally: although body sizes of paired males and females are highly correlated year-round, the within-pair size difference is greater during the reproductive season than the nonreproductive season. Furthermore, within pairs, females are larger than males during the reproductive season, while pairs are size-matched or male-biased during the nonreproductive season. These changes in within-pair size relationships suggest seasonal differences in which sex has greater control over pair formation, and highlight nonreproductive benefits associated with monogamous pairing. In addition, these results underscore the importance of considering temporal variation in studies of size-assortative pairing.
Significance statement
In many taxa, it is advantageous for both males and females to mate with larger individuals. As both sexes cannot simultaneously mate with larger individuals, size relationships within pairs reflect the outcome of this sexual conflict. In snapping shrimp, pairs cooperate in defending their burrows from invading conspecifics, and larger individuals are better competitors; larger females are also more fecund. Thus, males obtain a reproductive advantage from mating with larger females, while for females, mating with larger males provides social (territorial defense) benefits. Here, we find seasonal differences in within-pair size relationships, such that females are larger than males during the reproductive season, but pairs in the nonreproductive sea |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2695617470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2695617470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f0c885caa1eb5584f478c41afa84e359a8ecc80960855808bfa2b48392cc67c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtOwzAUtBBIlMIFWFlibXj-JQ47VPGpVIkNrC3X2OAqTYKdVpQV1-B6nAS3qcSO1bzPzOi9QeicwiUFKK8SACskAcYIcEYFkQdoRAXPbVmwQzQCLoBIIfgxOklpAQAFVWqEzLT_-fpOuH9zuA9Lh1u_q5MzqW2u92hqvDYxmD60DQ5Nnn6sTF1vsG0bXwfbuxecwqcjJqU29pm3drgzIYbm9RQdeVMnd7bHMXq-u32aPJDZ4_10cjMjltOqJ9yDVUpaY6ibS6mEF6WyghpvlHBcVkY5axVUBai8BjX3hs2F4hWztigtH6OLwbeL7fvKpV4v2lXMpyfNikoWtBQlZBYbWDa2KUXndRfD0sSNpqC3UeohSp2j1LsotcwiPohSt_3IxT_rf1S_qbZ4bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2695617470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Heuring, Whitney L. ; Hughes, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Heuring, Whitney L. ; Hughes, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Size-assortative pairing is common across a wide range of taxa. In many cases, both sexes would benefit from pairing with a mate larger than themselves. As males and females cannot simultaneously be larger than their pair mate, size differences within pairs reflect which sex is able to obtain this benefit. Snapping shrimp can be found in pairs year-round, and both males and females would benefit from pairing with larger individuals. Larger females are more fecund; males, then, are likely to benefit from pairing with larger females primarily in the reproductive season. Larger individuals are more successful competitors and females benefit more from shared burrow defense than males; for females, then, benefits of pairing with larger males are likely to accrue year-round. In this study, we use field data to test whether within-pair size differences in snapping shrimp correspond more to male or female interests, and whether this outcome differs between seasons. We find that size-assortative pairing varies seasonally: although body sizes of paired males and females are highly correlated year-round, the within-pair size difference is greater during the reproductive season than the nonreproductive season. Furthermore, within pairs, females are larger than males during the reproductive season, while pairs are size-matched or male-biased during the nonreproductive season. These changes in within-pair size relationships suggest seasonal differences in which sex has greater control over pair formation, and highlight nonreproductive benefits associated with monogamous pairing. In addition, these results underscore the importance of considering temporal variation in studies of size-assortative pairing.
Significance statement
In many taxa, it is advantageous for both males and females to mate with larger individuals. As both sexes cannot simultaneously mate with larger individuals, size relationships within pairs reflect the outcome of this sexual conflict. In snapping shrimp, pairs cooperate in defending their burrows from invading conspecifics, and larger individuals are better competitors; larger females are also more fecund. Thus, males obtain a reproductive advantage from mating with larger females, while for females, mating with larger males provides social (territorial defense) benefits. Here, we find seasonal differences in within-pair size relationships, such that females are larger than males during the reproductive season, but pairs in the nonreproductive season are size-matched or male-biased. These results suggest seasonal variation in the outcome of conflict over body size within pairs, and highlights the need to consider temporal variation in size-assortative pairing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Conspecifics ; Females ; Life Sciences ; Males ; Mating ; Monogamy ; Original Article ; Pair bond ; Seasonal variations ; Seasons ; Sex ; Sexes ; Temporal variations ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2022-08, Vol.76 (8), Article 107</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f0c885caa1eb5584f478c41afa84e359a8ecc80960855808bfa2b48392cc67c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f0c885caa1eb5584f478c41afa84e359a8ecc80960855808bfa2b48392cc67c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3235-487X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heuring, Whitney L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Size-assortative pairing is common across a wide range of taxa. In many cases, both sexes would benefit from pairing with a mate larger than themselves. As males and females cannot simultaneously be larger than their pair mate, size differences within pairs reflect which sex is able to obtain this benefit. Snapping shrimp can be found in pairs year-round, and both males and females would benefit from pairing with larger individuals. Larger females are more fecund; males, then, are likely to benefit from pairing with larger females primarily in the reproductive season. Larger individuals are more successful competitors and females benefit more from shared burrow defense than males; for females, then, benefits of pairing with larger males are likely to accrue year-round. In this study, we use field data to test whether within-pair size differences in snapping shrimp correspond more to male or female interests, and whether this outcome differs between seasons. We find that size-assortative pairing varies seasonally: although body sizes of paired males and females are highly correlated year-round, the within-pair size difference is greater during the reproductive season than the nonreproductive season. Furthermore, within pairs, females are larger than males during the reproductive season, while pairs are size-matched or male-biased during the nonreproductive season. These changes in within-pair size relationships suggest seasonal differences in which sex has greater control over pair formation, and highlight nonreproductive benefits associated with monogamous pairing. In addition, these results underscore the importance of considering temporal variation in studies of size-assortative pairing.
Significance statement
In many taxa, it is advantageous for both males and females to mate with larger individuals. As both sexes cannot simultaneously mate with larger individuals, size relationships within pairs reflect the outcome of this sexual conflict. In snapping shrimp, pairs cooperate in defending their burrows from invading conspecifics, and larger individuals are better competitors; larger females are also more fecund. Thus, males obtain a reproductive advantage from mating with larger females, while for females, mating with larger males provides social (territorial defense) benefits. Here, we find seasonal differences in within-pair size relationships, such that females are larger than males during the reproductive season, but pairs in the nonreproductive season are size-matched or male-biased. These results suggest seasonal variation in the outcome of conflict over body size within pairs, and highlights the need to consider temporal variation in size-assortative pairing.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pair bond</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtOwzAUtBBIlMIFWFlibXj-JQ47VPGpVIkNrC3X2OAqTYKdVpQV1-B6nAS3qcSO1bzPzOi9QeicwiUFKK8SACskAcYIcEYFkQdoRAXPbVmwQzQCLoBIIfgxOklpAQAFVWqEzLT_-fpOuH9zuA9Lh1u_q5MzqW2u92hqvDYxmD60DQ5Nnn6sTF1vsG0bXwfbuxecwqcjJqU29pm3drgzIYbm9RQdeVMnd7bHMXq-u32aPJDZ4_10cjMjltOqJ9yDVUpaY6ibS6mEF6WyghpvlHBcVkY5axVUBai8BjX3hs2F4hWztigtH6OLwbeL7fvKpV4v2lXMpyfNikoWtBQlZBYbWDa2KUXndRfD0sSNpqC3UeohSp2j1LsotcwiPohSt_3IxT_rf1S_qbZ4bg</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Heuring, Whitney L.</creator><creator>Hughes, Melissa</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-487X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing</title><author>Heuring, Whitney L. ; Hughes, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f0c885caa1eb5584f478c41afa84e359a8ecc80960855808bfa2b48392cc67c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pair bond</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heuring, Whitney L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heuring, Whitney L.</au><au>Hughes, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>8</issue><artnum>107</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Size-assortative pairing is common across a wide range of taxa. In many cases, both sexes would benefit from pairing with a mate larger than themselves. As males and females cannot simultaneously be larger than their pair mate, size differences within pairs reflect which sex is able to obtain this benefit. Snapping shrimp can be found in pairs year-round, and both males and females would benefit from pairing with larger individuals. Larger females are more fecund; males, then, are likely to benefit from pairing with larger females primarily in the reproductive season. Larger individuals are more successful competitors and females benefit more from shared burrow defense than males; for females, then, benefits of pairing with larger males are likely to accrue year-round. In this study, we use field data to test whether within-pair size differences in snapping shrimp correspond more to male or female interests, and whether this outcome differs between seasons. We find that size-assortative pairing varies seasonally: although body sizes of paired males and females are highly correlated year-round, the within-pair size difference is greater during the reproductive season than the nonreproductive season. Furthermore, within pairs, females are larger than males during the reproductive season, while pairs are size-matched or male-biased during the nonreproductive season. These changes in within-pair size relationships suggest seasonal differences in which sex has greater control over pair formation, and highlight nonreproductive benefits associated with monogamous pairing. In addition, these results underscore the importance of considering temporal variation in studies of size-assortative pairing.
Significance statement
In many taxa, it is advantageous for both males and females to mate with larger individuals. As both sexes cannot simultaneously mate with larger individuals, size relationships within pairs reflect the outcome of this sexual conflict. In snapping shrimp, pairs cooperate in defending their burrows from invading conspecifics, and larger individuals are better competitors; larger females are also more fecund. Thus, males obtain a reproductive advantage from mating with larger females, while for females, mating with larger males provides social (territorial defense) benefits. Here, we find seasonal differences in within-pair size relationships, such that females are larger than males during the reproductive season, but pairs in the nonreproductive season are size-matched or male-biased. These results suggest seasonal variation in the outcome of conflict over body size within pairs, and highlights the need to consider temporal variation in size-assortative pairing.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-487X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2022-08, Vol.76 (8), Article 107 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2695617470 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal Ecology Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Body size Conspecifics Females Life Sciences Males Mating Monogamy Original Article Pair bond Seasonal variations Seasons Sex Sexes Temporal variations Zoology |
title | It’s the time of the season: seasonal variation in sexually conflicted size-assortative pairing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A39%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%E2%80%99s%20the%20time%20of%20the%20season:%20seasonal%20variation%20in%20sexually%20conflicted%20size-assortative%20pairing&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Heuring,%20Whitney%20L.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=8&rft.artnum=107&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-022-03214-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2695617470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2695617470&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |