I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts
Students often struggle with developing understanding from expository science texts. This study explored whether training students to engage in a POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) study strategy might be beneficial when learning from texts that introduce theories by describing experiments and empirical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Metacognition and learning 2022-08, Vol.17 (2), p.337-373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Metacognition and learning |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Guerrero, Tricia A. Griffin, Thomas D. Wiley, Jennifer |
description | Students often struggle with developing understanding from expository science texts. This study explored whether training students to engage in a POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) study strategy might be beneficial when learning from texts that introduce theories by describing experiments and empirical results, a common style in social science textbooks. The main questions tested in this experiment were if training students how to use a POE study strategy while reading textbook excerpts would support better comprehension and comprehension monitoring outcomes when students engaged in future learning attempts for an introductory psychology class. In one condition students were trained to use the POE study strategy, while in a comparison condition students were simply trained to use an explanation study strategy. Analyses suggested that students in the POE strategy training condition may have become preoccupied with whether or not their experimental predictions were correct, prohibiting them from engaging with the POE strategy as intended. Although both POE and explanation strategy training helped students to improve their comprehension monitoring on a new set of texts, students in the explanation condition displayed better comprehension on those new texts than students in the POE condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2695189317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1343059</ericid><sourcerecordid>2695189317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9f880b1efdbfd4457f3a196a66810dd17b17181046c840d1c0d585ca39fceb4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4souD6-gCAEPFczTZq23kR8rAhe9BzSdLLbfSQ1yaJ79JsbrejN0wz8H8P8suwE6DlQWl0EAE6bnBaQ06aoRC52sgmUpchBMNj93Qu2nx2EsKCUcy6KSfYxJXHe2yWZkjcVyJt3dnZJnudI0BjUkThD1mrZ2xnB9wF9v0Yb1YoMHrtex97ZFJqjJStU3n7ZVOs2MZWi8z0GYrxbkyFs9dyt3GxLIr7H1rllqtPohxiOsj2jVgGPf-Zh9nJ783x9nz8-3U2vrx5zzTjEvDF1TVtA07Wm47ysDFPQCCVEDbTroGqhgrRyoWtOO9C0K-tSK9YYjS3v2GF2NvYO3r1uMES5cBtv00lZiKaEumFQJVcxurR3IXg0ckg_K7-VQOUXajmilgm1_EYtRQqdjqHER_8Gbh6AcUbLJuls1EPS7Az93-l_Wj8BIleNNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2695189317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts</title><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Guerrero, Tricia A. ; Griffin, Thomas D. ; Wiley, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Tricia A. ; Griffin, Thomas D. ; Wiley, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Students often struggle with developing understanding from expository science texts. This study explored whether training students to engage in a POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) study strategy might be beneficial when learning from texts that introduce theories by describing experiments and empirical results, a common style in social science textbooks. The main questions tested in this experiment were if training students how to use a POE study strategy while reading textbook excerpts would support better comprehension and comprehension monitoring outcomes when students engaged in future learning attempts for an introductory psychology class. In one condition students were trained to use the POE study strategy, while in a comparison condition students were simply trained to use an explanation study strategy. Analyses suggested that students in the POE strategy training condition may have become preoccupied with whether or not their experimental predictions were correct, prohibiting them from engaging with the POE strategy as intended. Although both POE and explanation strategy training helped students to improve their comprehension monitoring on a new set of texts, students in the explanation condition displayed better comprehension on those new texts than students in the POE condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Comprehension ; Education ; Introductory Courses ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Strategies ; Prediction ; Psychology ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Students ; Study Skills ; Teaching and Teacher Education ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Metacognition and learning, 2022-08, Vol.17 (2), p.337-373</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9f880b1efdbfd4457f3a196a66810dd17b17181046c840d1c0d585ca39fceb4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9f880b1efdbfd4457f3a196a66810dd17b17181046c840d1c0d585ca39fceb4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5214-8507 ; 0000-0002-0549-0980 ; 0000-0002-2590-7392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1343059$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Tricia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts</title><title>Metacognition and learning</title><addtitle>Metacognition Learning</addtitle><description>Students often struggle with developing understanding from expository science texts. This study explored whether training students to engage in a POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) study strategy might be beneficial when learning from texts that introduce theories by describing experiments and empirical results, a common style in social science textbooks. The main questions tested in this experiment were if training students how to use a POE study strategy while reading textbook excerpts would support better comprehension and comprehension monitoring outcomes when students engaged in future learning attempts for an introductory psychology class. In one condition students were trained to use the POE study strategy, while in a comparison condition students were simply trained to use an explanation study strategy. Analyses suggested that students in the POE strategy training condition may have become preoccupied with whether or not their experimental predictions were correct, prohibiting them from engaging with the POE strategy as intended. Although both POE and explanation strategy training helped students to improve their comprehension monitoring on a new set of texts, students in the explanation condition displayed better comprehension on those new texts than students in the POE condition.</description><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Study Skills</subject><subject>Teaching and Teacher Education</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>1556-1623</issn><issn>1556-1631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4souD6-gCAEPFczTZq23kR8rAhe9BzSdLLbfSQ1yaJ79JsbrejN0wz8H8P8suwE6DlQWl0EAE6bnBaQ06aoRC52sgmUpchBMNj93Qu2nx2EsKCUcy6KSfYxJXHe2yWZkjcVyJt3dnZJnudI0BjUkThD1mrZ2xnB9wF9v0Yb1YoMHrtex97ZFJqjJStU3n7ZVOs2MZWi8z0GYrxbkyFs9dyt3GxLIr7H1rllqtPohxiOsj2jVgGPf-Zh9nJ783x9nz8-3U2vrx5zzTjEvDF1TVtA07Wm47ysDFPQCCVEDbTroGqhgrRyoWtOO9C0K-tSK9YYjS3v2GF2NvYO3r1uMES5cBtv00lZiKaEumFQJVcxurR3IXg0ckg_K7-VQOUXajmilgm1_EYtRQqdjqHER_8Gbh6AcUbLJuls1EPS7Az93-l_Wj8BIleNNw</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Guerrero, Tricia A.</creator><creator>Griffin, Thomas D.</creator><creator>Wiley, Jennifer</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-8507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-0980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-7392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts</title><author>Guerrero, Tricia A. ; Griffin, Thomas D. ; Wiley, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-9f880b1efdbfd4457f3a196a66810dd17b17181046c840d1c0d585ca39fceb4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Study Skills</topic><topic>Teaching and Teacher Education</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Tricia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Metacognition and learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guerrero, Tricia A.</au><au>Griffin, Thomas D.</au><au>Wiley, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1343059</ericid><atitle>I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts</atitle><jtitle>Metacognition and learning</jtitle><stitle>Metacognition Learning</stitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>337-373</pages><issn>1556-1623</issn><eissn>1556-1631</eissn><abstract>Students often struggle with developing understanding from expository science texts. This study explored whether training students to engage in a POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) study strategy might be beneficial when learning from texts that introduce theories by describing experiments and empirical results, a common style in social science textbooks. The main questions tested in this experiment were if training students how to use a POE study strategy while reading textbook excerpts would support better comprehension and comprehension monitoring outcomes when students engaged in future learning attempts for an introductory psychology class. In one condition students were trained to use the POE study strategy, while in a comparison condition students were simply trained to use an explanation study strategy. Analyses suggested that students in the POE strategy training condition may have become preoccupied with whether or not their experimental predictions were correct, prohibiting them from engaging with the POE strategy as intended. Although both POE and explanation strategy training helped students to improve their comprehension monitoring on a new set of texts, students in the explanation condition displayed better comprehension on those new texts than students in the POE condition.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6</doi><tpages>37</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-8507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-0980</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-7392</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-1623 |
ispartof | Metacognition and learning, 2022-08, Vol.17 (2), p.337-373 |
issn | 1556-1623 1556-1631 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2695189317 |
source | Education Source; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Comprehension Education Introductory Courses Learning and Instruction Learning Strategies Prediction Psychology Resistance (Psychology) Students Study Skills Teaching and Teacher Education Textbooks |
title | I think I was wrong: The effect of making experimental predictions when learning about theories from psychology textbook excerpts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I%20think%20I%20was%20wrong:%20The%20effect%20of%20making%20experimental%20predictions%20when%20learning%20about%20theories%20from%20psychology%20textbook%20excerpts&rft.jtitle=Metacognition%20and%20learning&rft.au=Guerrero,%20Tricia%20A.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=337-373&rft.issn=1556-1623&rft.eissn=1556-1631&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11409-021-09276-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2695189317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2695189317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1343059&rfr_iscdi=true |