On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations

River meander dynamics inevitably interferes with a number of human activities and productive processes. Therefore, investigating the involved physical processes and modeling their space‐time evolution represent a crucial requirement in terms of sustainable river management and restoration planning....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2022-07, Vol.58 (7), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Pannone, M., Vincenzo, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 58
creator Pannone, M.
Vincenzo, A.
description River meander dynamics inevitably interferes with a number of human activities and productive processes. Therefore, investigating the involved physical processes and modeling their space‐time evolution represent a crucial requirement in terms of sustainable river management and restoration planning. In the present study, a deterministic integral‐differential equation that governs river‐bend growth and death in the absence of natural or anthropic forcing is for the first time derived and solved by resorting to cardinal fluid‐mechanical equations such as Navier‐Stokes’ in the Lamb‐Oseen version. The related 1‐D model, which accounts for morphology and sedimentology via the meander migration rate and its radius of curvature, proves to be able to grasp the periodic nature of the phenomenon. Additionally, it exhibits an overall very good agreement with field pre‐cutoff and post‐cutoff observations, as well as with the outcome of an ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment that simulated near‐cutoff conditions. Hence, it may represent a fast and easy tool to monitor river bend hydro‐geomorphological evolution, particularly when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its routine exploitation and to timely plan, where needed, suitable management and restoration interventions. Key Points An analytical solution in terms of dimensionless fluid‐mechanical circulation versus dimensionless time is for the first time provided in the literature for the modeling of river meander cyclic growth and death and the prediction of the related characteristic times and parameters. The proposed theoretical model hinges on the potential flow approach as the limiting case of Navier‐Stokes‐governed fluxes at very low Reynolds numbers around fast rotating cylinders. Its main distinctive value consists in the simple closed‐form solution and in the capability to account for the periodic nature of river bend cutoff An ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment was performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Constructions at University of Basilicata to validate the theoretical model in terms of neck width reduction as a function of time in near‐cutoff conditions (i.e., when the correct timing of the process can become a matter of safety even more than management) The results of the validating laboratory tests, jointly with the comparison between theoretical predictions and 20‐year observations at a cutoff site on river Bollin (UK) as reported by Hook
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021WR031661
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2695104828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2695104828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2989-591e6849a4cbb98fd9de9773f9e320c77ab598920700437a0e0349315289fa2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wCW2BLwTxLH7FBEAalVUSjqMnKSieIqjYudFvUkXBenZcGK1Ujzvnkz8xC6puSOEibvGWF0mRFO45ieoBGVYRgIKfgpGhES8oByKc7RhXMrQmgYxWKEvucd7hvAbxYqXfbadNjUh07aKKvKHqx2vS7xQq_BDVqmd2DxDFRX-Zpue1PX-B0-t9CV8IAXDRgLfkK1eGYqaLEHcWrWG-WdvP1S9w2eqsJY1Ru7P8gTDW2F54UDu1PDEe4SndWqdXD1W8foY_K0SF-C6fz5NX2cBorJRAaRpBAnoVRhWRQyqStZgRSC1xI4I6UQqog8x4gYAhCKAOGh5DRiiawVU3yMbo6-G2v8C67PV2ZrO78yZ7GMKAkTlnjq9kiV1jhnoc43Vq-V3eeU5EP0-d_oPc6P-JduYf8vmy-zNGMxJZL_APjMhdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2695104828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pannone, M. ; Vincenzo, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pannone, M. ; Vincenzo, A.</creatorcontrib><description>River meander dynamics inevitably interferes with a number of human activities and productive processes. Therefore, investigating the involved physical processes and modeling their space‐time evolution represent a crucial requirement in terms of sustainable river management and restoration planning. In the present study, a deterministic integral‐differential equation that governs river‐bend growth and death in the absence of natural or anthropic forcing is for the first time derived and solved by resorting to cardinal fluid‐mechanical equations such as Navier‐Stokes’ in the Lamb‐Oseen version. The related 1‐D model, which accounts for morphology and sedimentology via the meander migration rate and its radius of curvature, proves to be able to grasp the periodic nature of the phenomenon. Additionally, it exhibits an overall very good agreement with field pre‐cutoff and post‐cutoff observations, as well as with the outcome of an ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment that simulated near‐cutoff conditions. Hence, it may represent a fast and easy tool to monitor river bend hydro‐geomorphological evolution, particularly when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its routine exploitation and to timely plan, where needed, suitable management and restoration interventions. Key Points An analytical solution in terms of dimensionless fluid‐mechanical circulation versus dimensionless time is for the first time provided in the literature for the modeling of river meander cyclic growth and death and the prediction of the related characteristic times and parameters. The proposed theoretical model hinges on the potential flow approach as the limiting case of Navier‐Stokes‐governed fluxes at very low Reynolds numbers around fast rotating cylinders. Its main distinctive value consists in the simple closed‐form solution and in the capability to account for the periodic nature of river bend cutoff An ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment was performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Constructions at University of Basilicata to validate the theoretical model in terms of neck width reduction as a function of time in near‐cutoff conditions (i.e., when the correct timing of the process can become a matter of safety even more than management) The results of the validating laboratory tests, jointly with the comparison between theoretical predictions and 20‐year observations at a cutoff site on river Bollin (UK) as reported by Hooke (1995, 2004), reveal the excellent performance of the non‐calibrated theoretical model in predicting times to cutoff, times from cutoff and rates of bank erosion. Thus, the model may represent a reliable, fast and easy tool to forecast the evolution of a river bend when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its exploitation as a naturalistic or an economical resource, and to timely plan suitable management and restoration interventions</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>analytical solution ; application to real river data ; Differential equations ; Evolution ; Exploitation ; Geomorphology ; Laboratories ; Laboratory experimentation ; meander life cycle ; neck cutoff laboratory investigation ; potential flow analogical model ; Radius of curvature ; Restoration ; River management ; River meanders ; RIVER morpho‐dynamics ; Rivers ; Sedimentology</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2022-07, Vol.58 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2989-591e6849a4cbb98fd9de9773f9e320c77ab598920700437a0e0349315289fa2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2989-591e6849a4cbb98fd9de9773f9e320c77ab598920700437a0e0349315289fa2a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2574-8125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021WR031661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021WR031661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pannone, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzo, A.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>River meander dynamics inevitably interferes with a number of human activities and productive processes. Therefore, investigating the involved physical processes and modeling their space‐time evolution represent a crucial requirement in terms of sustainable river management and restoration planning. In the present study, a deterministic integral‐differential equation that governs river‐bend growth and death in the absence of natural or anthropic forcing is for the first time derived and solved by resorting to cardinal fluid‐mechanical equations such as Navier‐Stokes’ in the Lamb‐Oseen version. The related 1‐D model, which accounts for morphology and sedimentology via the meander migration rate and its radius of curvature, proves to be able to grasp the periodic nature of the phenomenon. Additionally, it exhibits an overall very good agreement with field pre‐cutoff and post‐cutoff observations, as well as with the outcome of an ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment that simulated near‐cutoff conditions. Hence, it may represent a fast and easy tool to monitor river bend hydro‐geomorphological evolution, particularly when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its routine exploitation and to timely plan, where needed, suitable management and restoration interventions. Key Points An analytical solution in terms of dimensionless fluid‐mechanical circulation versus dimensionless time is for the first time provided in the literature for the modeling of river meander cyclic growth and death and the prediction of the related characteristic times and parameters. The proposed theoretical model hinges on the potential flow approach as the limiting case of Navier‐Stokes‐governed fluxes at very low Reynolds numbers around fast rotating cylinders. Its main distinctive value consists in the simple closed‐form solution and in the capability to account for the periodic nature of river bend cutoff An ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment was performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Constructions at University of Basilicata to validate the theoretical model in terms of neck width reduction as a function of time in near‐cutoff conditions (i.e., when the correct timing of the process can become a matter of safety even more than management) The results of the validating laboratory tests, jointly with the comparison between theoretical predictions and 20‐year observations at a cutoff site on river Bollin (UK) as reported by Hooke (1995, 2004), reveal the excellent performance of the non‐calibrated theoretical model in predicting times to cutoff, times from cutoff and rates of bank erosion. Thus, the model may represent a reliable, fast and easy tool to forecast the evolution of a river bend when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its exploitation as a naturalistic or an economical resource, and to timely plan suitable management and restoration interventions</description><subject>analytical solution</subject><subject>application to real river data</subject><subject>Differential equations</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>meander life cycle</subject><subject>neck cutoff laboratory investigation</subject><subject>potential flow analogical model</subject><subject>Radius of curvature</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>River management</subject><subject>River meanders</subject><subject>RIVER morpho‐dynamics</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wCW2BLwTxLH7FBEAalVUSjqMnKSieIqjYudFvUkXBenZcGK1Ujzvnkz8xC6puSOEibvGWF0mRFO45ieoBGVYRgIKfgpGhES8oByKc7RhXMrQmgYxWKEvucd7hvAbxYqXfbadNjUh07aKKvKHqx2vS7xQq_BDVqmd2DxDFRX-Zpue1PX-B0-t9CV8IAXDRgLfkK1eGYqaLEHcWrWG-WdvP1S9w2eqsJY1Ru7P8gTDW2F54UDu1PDEe4SndWqdXD1W8foY_K0SF-C6fz5NX2cBorJRAaRpBAnoVRhWRQyqStZgRSC1xI4I6UQqog8x4gYAhCKAOGh5DRiiawVU3yMbo6-G2v8C67PV2ZrO78yZ7GMKAkTlnjq9kiV1jhnoc43Vq-V3eeU5EP0-d_oPc6P-JduYf8vmy-zNGMxJZL_APjMhdI</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Pannone, M.</creator><creator>Vincenzo, A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-8125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations</title><author>Pannone, M. ; Vincenzo, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2989-591e6849a4cbb98fd9de9773f9e320c77ab598920700437a0e0349315289fa2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>analytical solution</topic><topic>application to real river data</topic><topic>Differential equations</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>meander life cycle</topic><topic>neck cutoff laboratory investigation</topic><topic>potential flow analogical model</topic><topic>Radius of curvature</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>River management</topic><topic>River meanders</topic><topic>RIVER morpho‐dynamics</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pannone, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenzo, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pannone, M.</au><au>Vincenzo, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>River meander dynamics inevitably interferes with a number of human activities and productive processes. Therefore, investigating the involved physical processes and modeling their space‐time evolution represent a crucial requirement in terms of sustainable river management and restoration planning. In the present study, a deterministic integral‐differential equation that governs river‐bend growth and death in the absence of natural or anthropic forcing is for the first time derived and solved by resorting to cardinal fluid‐mechanical equations such as Navier‐Stokes’ in the Lamb‐Oseen version. The related 1‐D model, which accounts for morphology and sedimentology via the meander migration rate and its radius of curvature, proves to be able to grasp the periodic nature of the phenomenon. Additionally, it exhibits an overall very good agreement with field pre‐cutoff and post‐cutoff observations, as well as with the outcome of an ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment that simulated near‐cutoff conditions. Hence, it may represent a fast and easy tool to monitor river bend hydro‐geomorphological evolution, particularly when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its routine exploitation and to timely plan, where needed, suitable management and restoration interventions. Key Points An analytical solution in terms of dimensionless fluid‐mechanical circulation versus dimensionless time is for the first time provided in the literature for the modeling of river meander cyclic growth and death and the prediction of the related characteristic times and parameters. The proposed theoretical model hinges on the potential flow approach as the limiting case of Navier‐Stokes‐governed fluxes at very low Reynolds numbers around fast rotating cylinders. Its main distinctive value consists in the simple closed‐form solution and in the capability to account for the periodic nature of river bend cutoff An ad hoc‐designed laboratory experiment was performed in the Laboratory of Hydraulics and Hydraulic Constructions at University of Basilicata to validate the theoretical model in terms of neck width reduction as a function of time in near‐cutoff conditions (i.e., when the correct timing of the process can become a matter of safety even more than management) The results of the validating laboratory tests, jointly with the comparison between theoretical predictions and 20‐year observations at a cutoff site on river Bollin (UK) as reported by Hooke (1995, 2004), reveal the excellent performance of the non‐calibrated theoretical model in predicting times to cutoff, times from cutoff and rates of bank erosion. Thus, the model may represent a reliable, fast and easy tool to forecast the evolution of a river bend when the signs of the incipient instability suggest quantifying the time left to its exploitation as a naturalistic or an economical resource, and to timely plan suitable management and restoration interventions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2021WR031661</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2574-8125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2022-07, Vol.58 (7), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2695104828
source Wiley Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects analytical solution
application to real river data
Differential equations
Evolution
Exploitation
Geomorphology
Laboratories
Laboratory experimentation
meander life cycle
neck cutoff laboratory investigation
potential flow analogical model
Radius of curvature
Restoration
River management
River meanders
RIVER morpho‐dynamics
Rivers
Sedimentology
title On the Prediction of the Characteristic Times of River Meander Cutoff Sequence: Theoretical Model and Comparison With Laboratory and Field Observations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Prediction%20of%20the%20Characteristic%20Times%20of%20River%20Meander%20Cutoff%20Sequence:%20Theoretical%20Model%20and%20Comparison%20With%20Laboratory%20and%20Field%20Observations&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Pannone,%20M.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021WR031661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2695104828%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2695104828&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true