Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life

This paper is focused on the urban-rural dichotomy as one of the dichotomies of quality of life (QOL). The first objective is to find out whether the quality of urban life, or the quality of rural life, is higher in Czechia. The hypothesis assumes that the quality of urban life is higher. The second...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-07, Vol.14 (14), p.8658
Hauptverfasser: Petrovič, František, Maturkanič, Patrik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 8658
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Petrovič, František
Maturkanič, Patrik
description This paper is focused on the urban-rural dichotomy as one of the dichotomies of quality of life (QOL). The first objective is to find out whether the quality of urban life, or the quality of rural life, is higher in Czechia. The hypothesis assumes that the quality of urban life is higher. The second objective is to identify predictors of QOL and compare values for the residents of cities and villages. In the Theoretical Background section, we discuss cities and urban life, plus villages and rural life. In the QOL section, we explore the quality of urban and rural life in Czechia, and give examples of QOL measurements in Czech municipalities. In the Measurement and Findings section we measure QOL with a subjective indicator on the Cantril scale, and derive findings from these measurements. The correlations between QOL and other variables yield very strong predictors of both urban and rural quality of life. The measurements also yielded two “by products”: The first was the finding that women’s measured values are, except for women’s quality of city life, higher than the measured values of men. The second was the finding that the combination of quality of place and quality of the environment, which we named ‘geographical matter’, was rated higher by the respondents than the combination of QOL and happiness, which we named ‘psychological matter’.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14148658
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2694069252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2694069252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-af11f15ef83714847a6ad445e3eae9ef90e1a0ccdae2ba0e1ca53f636915852f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNRe_AsCXkSI7uxXskepnxAQxZ6X6XYWU9Ju3U0O_e-NVtC5vPfgx8zwGDsHfi2l5Td5AAWqNro-YhPBKyiBa378z5-yWc5rPo6UYMFM2OUiLXFbvg0Ju-Ku9R-xj5t9EUPxOmDX9j-2aQOdsZOAXabZr07Z4uH-ff5UNi-Pz_PbpvTC6r7EABBAU6hlNf6iKjS4UkqTJCRLwXIC5N6vkMQSx-BRy2CksaBrLYKcsovD3l2KnwPl3q3jkLbjSSeMVdxYocVIXR0on2LOiYLbpXaDae-Au-8y3F8Z8gtdu0-a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2694069252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Petrovič, František ; Maturkanič, Patrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Petrovič, František ; Maturkanič, Patrik</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is focused on the urban-rural dichotomy as one of the dichotomies of quality of life (QOL). The first objective is to find out whether the quality of urban life, or the quality of rural life, is higher in Czechia. The hypothesis assumes that the quality of urban life is higher. The second objective is to identify predictors of QOL and compare values for the residents of cities and villages. In the Theoretical Background section, we discuss cities and urban life, plus villages and rural life. In the QOL section, we explore the quality of urban and rural life in Czechia, and give examples of QOL measurements in Czech municipalities. In the Measurement and Findings section we measure QOL with a subjective indicator on the Cantril scale, and derive findings from these measurements. The correlations between QOL and other variables yield very strong predictors of both urban and rural quality of life. The measurements also yielded two “by products”: The first was the finding that women’s measured values are, except for women’s quality of city life, higher than the measured values of men. The second was the finding that the combination of quality of place and quality of the environment, which we named ‘geographical matter’, was rated higher by the respondents than the combination of QOL and happiness, which we named ‘psychological matter’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14148658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cities ; COVID-19 ; Dichotomies ; Epistemology ; Happiness ; Hypotheses ; Municipalities ; Population ; Public policy ; Quality of life ; Rural areas ; Rural development ; Sustainability ; Urban areas ; Urbanism ; Variables ; Villages</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (14), p.8658</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-af11f15ef83714847a6ad445e3eae9ef90e1a0ccdae2ba0e1ca53f636915852f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-af11f15ef83714847a6ad445e3eae9ef90e1a0ccdae2ba0e1ca53f636915852f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1087-3847 ; 0000-0002-2364-3610</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petrovič, František</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maturkanič, Patrik</creatorcontrib><title>Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This paper is focused on the urban-rural dichotomy as one of the dichotomies of quality of life (QOL). The first objective is to find out whether the quality of urban life, or the quality of rural life, is higher in Czechia. The hypothesis assumes that the quality of urban life is higher. The second objective is to identify predictors of QOL and compare values for the residents of cities and villages. In the Theoretical Background section, we discuss cities and urban life, plus villages and rural life. In the QOL section, we explore the quality of urban and rural life in Czechia, and give examples of QOL measurements in Czech municipalities. In the Measurement and Findings section we measure QOL with a subjective indicator on the Cantril scale, and derive findings from these measurements. The correlations between QOL and other variables yield very strong predictors of both urban and rural quality of life. The measurements also yielded two “by products”: The first was the finding that women’s measured values are, except for women’s quality of city life, higher than the measured values of men. The second was the finding that the combination of quality of place and quality of the environment, which we named ‘geographical matter’, was rated higher by the respondents than the combination of QOL and happiness, which we named ‘psychological matter’.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Dichotomies</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urbanism</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Villages</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNRe_AsCXkSI7uxXskepnxAQxZ6X6XYWU9Ju3U0O_e-NVtC5vPfgx8zwGDsHfi2l5Td5AAWqNro-YhPBKyiBa378z5-yWc5rPo6UYMFM2OUiLXFbvg0Ju-Ku9R-xj5t9EUPxOmDX9j-2aQOdsZOAXabZr07Z4uH-ff5UNi-Pz_PbpvTC6r7EABBAU6hlNf6iKjS4UkqTJCRLwXIC5N6vkMQSx-BRy2CksaBrLYKcsovD3l2KnwPl3q3jkLbjSSeMVdxYocVIXR0on2LOiYLbpXaDae-Au-8y3F8Z8gtdu0-a</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Petrovič, František</creator><creator>Maturkanič, Patrik</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-3847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3610</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life</title><author>Petrovič, František ; Maturkanič, Patrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-af11f15ef83714847a6ad445e3eae9ef90e1a0ccdae2ba0e1ca53f636915852f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Dichotomies</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urbanism</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Villages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petrovič, František</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maturkanič, Patrik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petrovič, František</au><au>Maturkanič, Patrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>8658</spage><pages>8658-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This paper is focused on the urban-rural dichotomy as one of the dichotomies of quality of life (QOL). The first objective is to find out whether the quality of urban life, or the quality of rural life, is higher in Czechia. The hypothesis assumes that the quality of urban life is higher. The second objective is to identify predictors of QOL and compare values for the residents of cities and villages. In the Theoretical Background section, we discuss cities and urban life, plus villages and rural life. In the QOL section, we explore the quality of urban and rural life in Czechia, and give examples of QOL measurements in Czech municipalities. In the Measurement and Findings section we measure QOL with a subjective indicator on the Cantril scale, and derive findings from these measurements. The correlations between QOL and other variables yield very strong predictors of both urban and rural quality of life. The measurements also yielded two “by products”: The first was the finding that women’s measured values are, except for women’s quality of city life, higher than the measured values of men. The second was the finding that the combination of quality of place and quality of the environment, which we named ‘geographical matter’, was rated higher by the respondents than the combination of QOL and happiness, which we named ‘psychological matter’.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14148658</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-3847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-3610</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (14), p.8658
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2694069252
source Electronic Journals Library; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Cities
COVID-19
Dichotomies
Epistemology
Happiness
Hypotheses
Municipalities
Population
Public policy
Quality of life
Rural areas
Rural development
Sustainability
Urban areas
Urbanism
Variables
Villages
title Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A19%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban-Rural%20Dichotomy%20of%20Quality%20of%20Life&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Petrovi%C4%8D,%20Franti%C5%A1ek&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=8658&rft.pages=8658-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14148658&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2694069252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2694069252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true