Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education
Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociology of religion 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 129 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 102 |
container_title | Sociology of religion |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Evans, John H |
description | Abstract
The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/socrel/srab005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691109396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/socrel/srab005</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2691109396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePTfxZOJC2-2W7dEQFBKiB_TclNmplOAW2t0D_noXl7uneZl8b-blEXLP2YgznY9TgIi7cYp2zVhxQQZ8UuisLHl52WmmdCYlk9fkJqUtY0wKoQZksagPrY_HJ_oWGroCjzXgE7WJNhukq9BGQBocXSG0Oxv9j218qKmv6dx_bTDSWdXC3-6WXDm7S3h3nkPy-TL7mM6z5fvrYvq8zEAUqsikXuPaqcoyDU5xJioxcdJKjQLAYa4tOO04q0QXseQAlZyUSqhcolUSWT4kD_3dfQyHFlNjtl3KuntphNL8VIVWHTXqKYghpYjO7KP_tvFoODMnxvR1mXNdneGxN4R2_x_7C5QBbdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691109396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Evans, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-8818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srab005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>College students ; Conservatism ; Higher education ; Humanities ; Knowledge ; Natural environment ; Protestantism ; Religion ; Science ; Secularization ; Social sciences ; Students</subject><ispartof>Sociology of religion, 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association for the Sociology of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail:journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Spring 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><title>Sociology of religion</title><description>Abstract
The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Secularization</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1069-4404</issn><issn>1759-8818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePTfxZOJC2-2W7dEQFBKiB_TclNmplOAW2t0D_noXl7uneZl8b-blEXLP2YgznY9TgIi7cYp2zVhxQQZ8UuisLHl52WmmdCYlk9fkJqUtY0wKoQZksagPrY_HJ_oWGroCjzXgE7WJNhukq9BGQBocXSG0Oxv9j218qKmv6dx_bTDSWdXC3-6WXDm7S3h3nkPy-TL7mM6z5fvrYvq8zEAUqsikXuPaqcoyDU5xJioxcdJKjQLAYa4tOO04q0QXseQAlZyUSqhcolUSWT4kD_3dfQyHFlNjtl3KuntphNL8VIVWHTXqKYghpYjO7KP_tvFoODMnxvR1mXNdneGxN4R2_x_7C5QBbdw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Evans, John H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><author>Evans, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Secularization</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociology of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of religion</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>102-129</pages><issn>1069-4404</issn><eissn>1759-8818</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/socrel/srab005</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-4404 |
ispartof | Sociology of religion, 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129 |
issn | 1069-4404 1759-8818 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2691109396 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | College students Conservatism Higher education Humanities Knowledge Natural environment Protestantism Religion Science Secularization Social sciences Students |
title | Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T20%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inquiry,%20Not%20Science,%20as%20the%20Source%20of%20Secularization%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20religion&rft.au=Evans,%20John%20H&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=102-129&rft.issn=1069-4404&rft.eissn=1759-8818&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/socrel/srab005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691109396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691109396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/socrel/srab005&rfr_iscdi=true |