Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education

Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociology of religion 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129
1. Verfasser: Evans, John H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 129
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102
container_title Sociology of religion
container_volume 83
creator Evans, John H
description Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/socrel/srab005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691109396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/socrel/srab005</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2691109396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePTfxZOJC2-2W7dEQFBKiB_TclNmplOAW2t0D_noXl7uneZl8b-blEXLP2YgznY9TgIi7cYp2zVhxQQZ8UuisLHl52WmmdCYlk9fkJqUtY0wKoQZksagPrY_HJ_oWGroCjzXgE7WJNhukq9BGQBocXSG0Oxv9j218qKmv6dx_bTDSWdXC3-6WXDm7S3h3nkPy-TL7mM6z5fvrYvq8zEAUqsikXuPaqcoyDU5xJioxcdJKjQLAYa4tOO04q0QXseQAlZyUSqhcolUSWT4kD_3dfQyHFlNjtl3KuntphNL8VIVWHTXqKYghpYjO7KP_tvFoODMnxvR1mXNdneGxN4R2_x_7C5QBbdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691109396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Evans, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-4404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-8818</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/socrel/srab005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>College students ; Conservatism ; Higher education ; Humanities ; Knowledge ; Natural environment ; Protestantism ; Religion ; Science ; Secularization ; Social sciences ; Students</subject><ispartof>Sociology of religion, 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association for the Sociology of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail:journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Spring 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><title>Sociology of religion</title><description>Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Secularization</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1069-4404</issn><issn>1759-8818</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePTfxZOJC2-2W7dEQFBKiB_TclNmplOAW2t0D_noXl7uneZl8b-blEXLP2YgznY9TgIi7cYp2zVhxQQZ8UuisLHl52WmmdCYlk9fkJqUtY0wKoQZksagPrY_HJ_oWGroCjzXgE7WJNhukq9BGQBocXSG0Oxv9j218qKmv6dx_bTDSWdXC3-6WXDm7S3h3nkPy-TL7mM6z5fvrYvq8zEAUqsikXuPaqcoyDU5xJioxcdJKjQLAYa4tOO04q0QXseQAlZyUSqhcolUSWT4kD_3dfQyHFlNjtl3KuntphNL8VIVWHTXqKYghpYjO7KP_tvFoODMnxvR1mXNdneGxN4R2_x_7C5QBbdw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Evans, John H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</title><author>Evans, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2565-49bebf6da09cf6102d27f4a49e2ccfe39acf9f10d200481ccd47862634ea64e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Secularization</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociology of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of religion</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102</spage><epage>129</epage><pages>102-129</pages><issn>1069-4404</issn><eissn>1759-8818</eissn><abstract>Abstract The traditional claim in the literature on religion and science is that exposure to science leads to secularity because the claims about the natural world in the two systems are incompatible. More recently, research has narrowed this claim and shown that conflict over knowledge in the USA is primarily limited to one religion—conservative Protestantism—and only to a few fact claims. In this paper, I test this claim using longitudinal data from matched surveys taken in students’ first and fourth year of university. I find no evidence that the science is more secularizing than nonscience. I then turn to a distinction in university majors long used by sociologists of education—between majors focused on inquiry versus those focused on applying knowledge—and find that majors focused on inquiry are more likely to secularize than those focused on application. I interpret this to mean that learning to inquire secularizes.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/socrel/srab005</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-4404
ispartof Sociology of religion, 2022-04, Vol.83 (1), p.102-129
issn 1069-4404
1759-8818
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2691109396
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects College students
Conservatism
Higher education
Humanities
Knowledge
Natural environment
Protestantism
Religion
Science
Secularization
Social sciences
Students
title Inquiry, Not Science, as the Source of Secularization in Higher Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T20%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inquiry,%20Not%20Science,%20as%20the%20Source%20of%20Secularization%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20religion&rft.au=Evans,%20John%20H&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=129&rft.pages=102-129&rft.issn=1069-4404&rft.eissn=1759-8818&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/socrel/srab005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2691109396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691109396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/socrel/srab005&rfr_iscdi=true