Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India

Comparison of the carbon (C) stocks among different soil orders allows us to explore the role of various soil characteristics in long‐term C storage and their vulnerabilities. This study quantified and compared the accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (in 0–60 cm soil profile) i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land degradation & development 2022-07, Vol.33 (12), p.2039-2049
Hauptverfasser: Rakesh, S., Sinha, Abhas Kumar, Juttu, Ravinder, Sarkar, Deepranjan, Jogula, Kamalakar, Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal, Raju, Bairi, Danish, Subhan, Datta, Rahul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2049
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2039
container_title Land degradation & development
container_volume 33
creator Rakesh, S.
Sinha, Abhas Kumar
Juttu, Ravinder
Sarkar, Deepranjan
Jogula, Kamalakar
Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal
Raju, Bairi
Danish, Subhan
Datta, Rahul
description Comparison of the carbon (C) stocks among different soil orders allows us to explore the role of various soil characteristics in long‐term C storage and their vulnerabilities. This study quantified and compared the accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (in 0–60 cm soil profile) in an Alfisol of Malda (25°27′33.9″N, 88°19′10.2″E) and an Entisol of Cooch Behar (26°09′62.7″N, 89°53′51.7″E) districts of West Bengal, India. We noticed a greater level of SOC (0–60 cm depth) in the Alfisol than the Entisol as the former soils were clayey in nature (fine textured) which provided the maximum stabilization of SOC compared to the Entisol (sandy textured). However, the storage of C fractions showed some peculiar results. The concentration of mineral‐associated carbon (Min‐C) was more or less similar in both the soil orders, but its stock was maximum in the Alfisol. While in the Entisol, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX‐C) and particulate organic matter carbon (POM‐C) stocks recorded maximum among all the studied depths. A positive relation of SOC fractions and stocks with clay (r2 = >0.500 in the Alfisol; r2 = >0.700 in the Entisol) indicated the importance of finer fractions in profile storage of C. Min‐C contributed to SOC of about 75%–85% followed by POM‐C (3.27%–17.87%) and POX‐C (2.57%–4.22%). Higher stratification of SOC and POX‐C and POM‐C fractions was observed in Entisol; while in Alfisol, stratification of Min‐C was greater. Overall, this research demonstrated that the Alfisol has a greater potential in stabilizing Min‐C than the Entisol with POM‐C and POX‐C and the distribution of these fractions varied as per its stabilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ldr.4291
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689807090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689807090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-2b9cbe24ddf18f7eb244f9cf2391709a666d00764dbd0ee21783349e791e8b7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9KwzAcx4soOKfgIwS8eOlM0q5pTjK2qYOBIAreSpr8wjJqM5PMsZuP4Gv4Wj6JaefV0-_fh08g3yS5JHhEMKY3jXKjnHJylAwI5jwl-fj1uOvLcZpRVp4mZ96vMcaE5WyQfM8seBRWgISUDoKxLbIaSeHq2GknZLfySLSqo4xDPjgRjDZS9PCHcHu0MwqaroQV8tY0yDoFzt-iSTR5-Pn88mGr9p1ZtGjSaONt0zvjOG9DP8aj39aRDc5uor5BIHwA16JFq4w4T060aDxc_NVh8nI3f54-pMvH-8V0skwl5RlJac1lDTRXSpNSM6hpnmsuNc04YZiLoigUxqzIVa0wACWszLKcA-MEyprJbJhcHbwbZ9-34EO1tlvXxicrWpS8xNGCI3V9oKSz3jvQ1caZt_gXFcFVF0QVg6i6ICKaHtCdaWD_L1ctZ089_wu7t44_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689807090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rakesh, S. ; Sinha, Abhas Kumar ; Juttu, Ravinder ; Sarkar, Deepranjan ; Jogula, Kamalakar ; Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal ; Raju, Bairi ; Danish, Subhan ; Datta, Rahul</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakesh, S. ; Sinha, Abhas Kumar ; Juttu, Ravinder ; Sarkar, Deepranjan ; Jogula, Kamalakar ; Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal ; Raju, Bairi ; Danish, Subhan ; Datta, Rahul</creatorcontrib><description>Comparison of the carbon (C) stocks among different soil orders allows us to explore the role of various soil characteristics in long‐term C storage and their vulnerabilities. This study quantified and compared the accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (in 0–60 cm soil profile) in an Alfisol of Malda (25°27′33.9″N, 88°19′10.2″E) and an Entisol of Cooch Behar (26°09′62.7″N, 89°53′51.7″E) districts of West Bengal, India. We noticed a greater level of SOC (0–60 cm depth) in the Alfisol than the Entisol as the former soils were clayey in nature (fine textured) which provided the maximum stabilization of SOC compared to the Entisol (sandy textured). However, the storage of C fractions showed some peculiar results. The concentration of mineral‐associated carbon (Min‐C) was more or less similar in both the soil orders, but its stock was maximum in the Alfisol. While in the Entisol, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX‐C) and particulate organic matter carbon (POM‐C) stocks recorded maximum among all the studied depths. A positive relation of SOC fractions and stocks with clay (r2 = &gt;0.500 in the Alfisol; r2 = &gt;0.700 in the Entisol) indicated the importance of finer fractions in profile storage of C. Min‐C contributed to SOC of about 75%–85% followed by POM‐C (3.27%–17.87%) and POX‐C (2.57%–4.22%). Higher stratification of SOC and POX‐C and POM‐C fractions was observed in Entisol; while in Alfisol, stratification of Min‐C was greater. Overall, this research demonstrated that the Alfisol has a greater potential in stabilizing Min‐C than the Entisol with POM‐C and POX‐C and the distribution of these fractions varied as per its stabilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-3278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Alfisol ; Carbon ; carbon fractions ; carbon stock ; Clay minerals ; Deposition ; Entisol ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Particulate organic matter ; Soil characteristics ; Soil profiles ; Soil properties ; Soil stabilization ; Soils ; Stabilization ; Stratification ; stratification ratio</subject><ispartof>Land degradation &amp; development, 2022-07, Vol.33 (12), p.2039-2049</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-2b9cbe24ddf18f7eb244f9cf2391709a666d00764dbd0ee21783349e791e8b7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-2b9cbe24ddf18f7eb244f9cf2391709a666d00764dbd0ee21783349e791e8b7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1966-2824 ; 0000-0003-3964-6696 ; 0000-0001-7320-2728 ; 0000-0001-9001-2555 ; 0000-0002-6182-6207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fldr.4291$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fldr.4291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakesh, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Abhas Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttu, Ravinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Deepranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jogula, Kamalakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, Bairi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danish, Subhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Rahul</creatorcontrib><title>Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India</title><title>Land degradation &amp; development</title><description>Comparison of the carbon (C) stocks among different soil orders allows us to explore the role of various soil characteristics in long‐term C storage and their vulnerabilities. This study quantified and compared the accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (in 0–60 cm soil profile) in an Alfisol of Malda (25°27′33.9″N, 88°19′10.2″E) and an Entisol of Cooch Behar (26°09′62.7″N, 89°53′51.7″E) districts of West Bengal, India. We noticed a greater level of SOC (0–60 cm depth) in the Alfisol than the Entisol as the former soils were clayey in nature (fine textured) which provided the maximum stabilization of SOC compared to the Entisol (sandy textured). However, the storage of C fractions showed some peculiar results. The concentration of mineral‐associated carbon (Min‐C) was more or less similar in both the soil orders, but its stock was maximum in the Alfisol. While in the Entisol, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX‐C) and particulate organic matter carbon (POM‐C) stocks recorded maximum among all the studied depths. A positive relation of SOC fractions and stocks with clay (r2 = &gt;0.500 in the Alfisol; r2 = &gt;0.700 in the Entisol) indicated the importance of finer fractions in profile storage of C. Min‐C contributed to SOC of about 75%–85% followed by POM‐C (3.27%–17.87%) and POX‐C (2.57%–4.22%). Higher stratification of SOC and POX‐C and POM‐C fractions was observed in Entisol; while in Alfisol, stratification of Min‐C was greater. Overall, this research demonstrated that the Alfisol has a greater potential in stabilizing Min‐C than the Entisol with POM‐C and POX‐C and the distribution of these fractions varied as per its stabilization.</description><subject>Alfisol</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon fractions</subject><subject>carbon stock</subject><subject>Clay minerals</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Entisol</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>Soil characteristics</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil stabilization</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>stratification ratio</subject><issn>1085-3278</issn><issn>1099-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9KwzAcx4soOKfgIwS8eOlM0q5pTjK2qYOBIAreSpr8wjJqM5PMsZuP4Gv4Wj6JaefV0-_fh08g3yS5JHhEMKY3jXKjnHJylAwI5jwl-fj1uOvLcZpRVp4mZ96vMcaE5WyQfM8seBRWgISUDoKxLbIaSeHq2GknZLfySLSqo4xDPjgRjDZS9PCHcHu0MwqaroQV8tY0yDoFzt-iSTR5-Pn88mGr9p1ZtGjSaONt0zvjOG9DP8aj39aRDc5uor5BIHwA16JFq4w4T060aDxc_NVh8nI3f54-pMvH-8V0skwl5RlJac1lDTRXSpNSM6hpnmsuNc04YZiLoigUxqzIVa0wACWszLKcA-MEyprJbJhcHbwbZ9-34EO1tlvXxicrWpS8xNGCI3V9oKSz3jvQ1caZt_gXFcFVF0QVg6i6ICKaHtCdaWD_L1ctZ089_wu7t44_</recordid><startdate>20220730</startdate><enddate>20220730</enddate><creator>Rakesh, S.</creator><creator>Sinha, Abhas Kumar</creator><creator>Juttu, Ravinder</creator><creator>Sarkar, Deepranjan</creator><creator>Jogula, Kamalakar</creator><creator>Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal</creator><creator>Raju, Bairi</creator><creator>Danish, Subhan</creator><creator>Datta, Rahul</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-2824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-6696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7320-2728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-2555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-6207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220730</creationdate><title>Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India</title><author>Rakesh, S. ; Sinha, Abhas Kumar ; Juttu, Ravinder ; Sarkar, Deepranjan ; Jogula, Kamalakar ; Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal ; Raju, Bairi ; Danish, Subhan ; Datta, Rahul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-2b9cbe24ddf18f7eb244f9cf2391709a666d00764dbd0ee21783349e791e8b7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alfisol</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon fractions</topic><topic>carbon stock</topic><topic>Clay minerals</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Entisol</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>Soil characteristics</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil stabilization</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>stratification ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakesh, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, Abhas Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttu, Ravinder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Deepranjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jogula, Kamalakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raju, Bairi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danish, Subhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Rahul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakesh, S.</au><au>Sinha, Abhas Kumar</au><au>Juttu, Ravinder</au><au>Sarkar, Deepranjan</au><au>Jogula, Kamalakar</au><au>Reddy, Sharan Bhoopal</au><au>Raju, Bairi</au><au>Danish, Subhan</au><au>Datta, Rahul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India</atitle><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle><date>2022-07-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2039</spage><epage>2049</epage><pages>2039-2049</pages><issn>1085-3278</issn><eissn>1099-145X</eissn><abstract>Comparison of the carbon (C) stocks among different soil orders allows us to explore the role of various soil characteristics in long‐term C storage and their vulnerabilities. This study quantified and compared the accumulation rates of soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions (in 0–60 cm soil profile) in an Alfisol of Malda (25°27′33.9″N, 88°19′10.2″E) and an Entisol of Cooch Behar (26°09′62.7″N, 89°53′51.7″E) districts of West Bengal, India. We noticed a greater level of SOC (0–60 cm depth) in the Alfisol than the Entisol as the former soils were clayey in nature (fine textured) which provided the maximum stabilization of SOC compared to the Entisol (sandy textured). However, the storage of C fractions showed some peculiar results. The concentration of mineral‐associated carbon (Min‐C) was more or less similar in both the soil orders, but its stock was maximum in the Alfisol. While in the Entisol, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POX‐C) and particulate organic matter carbon (POM‐C) stocks recorded maximum among all the studied depths. A positive relation of SOC fractions and stocks with clay (r2 = &gt;0.500 in the Alfisol; r2 = &gt;0.700 in the Entisol) indicated the importance of finer fractions in profile storage of C. Min‐C contributed to SOC of about 75%–85% followed by POM‐C (3.27%–17.87%) and POX‐C (2.57%–4.22%). Higher stratification of SOC and POX‐C and POM‐C fractions was observed in Entisol; while in Alfisol, stratification of Min‐C was greater. Overall, this research demonstrated that the Alfisol has a greater potential in stabilizing Min‐C than the Entisol with POM‐C and POX‐C and the distribution of these fractions varied as per its stabilization.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ldr.4291</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-2824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-6696</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7320-2728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-2555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6182-6207</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1085-3278
ispartof Land degradation & development, 2022-07, Vol.33 (12), p.2039-2049
issn 1085-3278
1099-145X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2689807090
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Alfisol
Carbon
carbon fractions
carbon stock
Clay minerals
Deposition
Entisol
Organic carbon
Organic matter
Organic soils
Particulate organic matter
Soil characteristics
Soil profiles
Soil properties
Soil stabilization
Soils
Stabilization
Stratification
stratification ratio
title Does the accretion of carbon fractions and their stratification vary widely with soil orders? A case‐study of an Alfisol and an Entisol of sub‐tropical eastern India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20accretion%20of%20carbon%20fractions%20and%20their%20stratification%20vary%20widely%20with%20soil%20orders?%20A%20case%E2%80%90study%20of%20an%20Alfisol%20and%20an%20Entisol%20of%20sub%E2%80%90tropical%20eastern%20India&rft.jtitle=Land%20degradation%20&%20development&rft.au=Rakesh,%20S.&rft.date=2022-07-30&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2039&rft.epage=2049&rft.pages=2039-2049&rft.issn=1085-3278&rft.eissn=1099-145X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ldr.4291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689807090%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689807090&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true