Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage

Crop phenology provides important information for crop growth management and yield estimations. The popular shape model fitting (SMF) method detects crop phenology from vegetation index (VI) time-series data, but it has two limitations. First, SMF assumes the same “relative position” of phenological...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2022-08, Vol.277, p.113060, Article 113060
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Licong, Cao, Ruyin, Chen, Jin, Shen, Miaogen, Wang, Shuai, Zhou, Ji, He, Binbin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113060
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 277
creator Liu, Licong
Cao, Ruyin
Chen, Jin
Shen, Miaogen
Wang, Shuai
Zhou, Ji
He, Binbin
description Crop phenology provides important information for crop growth management and yield estimations. The popular shape model fitting (SMF) method detects crop phenology from vegetation index (VI) time-series data, but it has two limitations. First, SMF assumes the same “relative position” of phenological stages for the pixels of the same crop type. This assumption is valid only if all target pixels, relative to the shape model, display a synchronized increase (or decrease) in length between any two phenological stages, which is uncommon in practice. Second, the variance in the resulting phenology estimates for a particular phenological stage is related to the stage itself; this makes it challenging to simulate spatial and temporal variations in crop phenology using SMF. Here, we address both limitations by developing the shape model fitting by the Separate phenological stage method (“SMF-S"). SMF-S uses a modified fitting function and an iterative procedure to match the shape model with the VI time series for each phenological stage in an adaptive local window. Comparisons between SMF-S and SMF in simulation experiments show the superior performance of SMF-S in different scenarios, regardless of noise. Comparisons involving winter wheat field observations from the North China Plain showed that the RMSE values averaged over nine phenological stages were smaller for SMF-S (RMSE = 9.5 d) than for SMF (RMSE = 13.4 d) and one variant of SMF (the shape model with accumulated growing degree days (SM-AGDD); RMSE=33.6 d). Moreover, SMF-S better described the spatial variations (i.e., variance) in the results and captured the temporal shifts in multiple phenological stages. In the derived regional phenology maps of winter wheat on the North China Plain, SMF-S generated more reasonable spatial patterns, whereas SMF underestimated (overestimated) the variance in the early (late) phenological stages. We expect that the improved crop phenology estimates obtained with SMF-S could benefit various agricultural activities. •SMF-S is developed to detect crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data.•SMF-S fits each phenological stage by using modified function and adaptive windows.•SMF-S addresses two inherent limitations in SMF.•SMF-S performs better than SMF by testing on multisource phenology data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689717946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425722001742</els_id><sourcerecordid>2689717946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-b06c0f4cfdc4424f7383e6456772ef5d1e4a3ef2fd48f925b8295e50ca45178d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEuXxA9gsMafYjh0nYkLlKVVigdly7evWURMH260ov56UIkamu5zz3aMPoStKppTQ6qadxgRTRhibUlqSihyhCa1lUxBJ-DGaEFLygjMhT9FZSi0hVNSSTtDXPWQw2fdLbGIY8LCCPqzDcoddDB3ewhKyzj702PcWPnH2HRQJooeErc4aL3bYd0MMW7A4rfQAuAsW1tj5_EP1PQZtVn9gb_Qap6yXcIFOnF4nuPy95-j98eFt9lzMX59eZnfzwpRM5GJBKkMcN84azhl3sqxLqLiopGTghKXAdQmOOctr1zCxqFkjQBCjuaCytuU5uj5wx5UfG0hZtWET-_GlYlXdSCobXo0pekiNGlKK4NQQfafjTlGi9opVq0bFaq9YHRSPndtDB8b5Ww9RJeOhN2B9HKUqG_w_7W_miIXW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689717946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Licong ; Cao, Ruyin ; Chen, Jin ; Shen, Miaogen ; Wang, Shuai ; Zhou, Ji ; He, Binbin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Licong ; Cao, Ruyin ; Chen, Jin ; Shen, Miaogen ; Wang, Shuai ; Zhou, Ji ; He, Binbin</creatorcontrib><description>Crop phenology provides important information for crop growth management and yield estimations. The popular shape model fitting (SMF) method detects crop phenology from vegetation index (VI) time-series data, but it has two limitations. First, SMF assumes the same “relative position” of phenological stages for the pixels of the same crop type. This assumption is valid only if all target pixels, relative to the shape model, display a synchronized increase (or decrease) in length between any two phenological stages, which is uncommon in practice. Second, the variance in the resulting phenology estimates for a particular phenological stage is related to the stage itself; this makes it challenging to simulate spatial and temporal variations in crop phenology using SMF. Here, we address both limitations by developing the shape model fitting by the Separate phenological stage method (“SMF-S"). SMF-S uses a modified fitting function and an iterative procedure to match the shape model with the VI time series for each phenological stage in an adaptive local window. Comparisons between SMF-S and SMF in simulation experiments show the superior performance of SMF-S in different scenarios, regardless of noise. Comparisons involving winter wheat field observations from the North China Plain showed that the RMSE values averaged over nine phenological stages were smaller for SMF-S (RMSE = 9.5 d) than for SMF (RMSE = 13.4 d) and one variant of SMF (the shape model with accumulated growing degree days (SM-AGDD); RMSE=33.6 d). Moreover, SMF-S better described the spatial variations (i.e., variance) in the results and captured the temporal shifts in multiple phenological stages. In the derived regional phenology maps of winter wheat on the North China Plain, SMF-S generated more reasonable spatial patterns, whereas SMF underestimated (overestimated) the variance in the early (late) phenological stages. We expect that the improved crop phenology estimates obtained with SMF-S could benefit various agricultural activities. •SMF-S is developed to detect crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data.•SMF-S fits each phenological stage by using modified function and adaptive windows.•SMF-S addresses two inherent limitations in SMF.•SMF-S performs better than SMF by testing on multisource phenology data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Crop classification ; Crop growth ; Crop phenology ; Crops ; Curve fitting ; Estimates ; Iterative methods ; Modelling ; Phenology ; Pixels ; Shape model ; Spatial variations ; Temporal variations ; Time series ; Triticum aestivum ; Vegetation ; Vegetation index ; Vegetation index time series ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2022-08, Vol.277, p.113060, Article 113060</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-b06c0f4cfdc4424f7383e6456772ef5d1e4a3ef2fd48f925b8295e50ca45178d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-b06c0f4cfdc4424f7383e6456772ef5d1e4a3ef2fd48f925b8295e50ca45178d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Licong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Ruyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Miaogen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Binbin</creatorcontrib><title>Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Crop phenology provides important information for crop growth management and yield estimations. The popular shape model fitting (SMF) method detects crop phenology from vegetation index (VI) time-series data, but it has two limitations. First, SMF assumes the same “relative position” of phenological stages for the pixels of the same crop type. This assumption is valid only if all target pixels, relative to the shape model, display a synchronized increase (or decrease) in length between any two phenological stages, which is uncommon in practice. Second, the variance in the resulting phenology estimates for a particular phenological stage is related to the stage itself; this makes it challenging to simulate spatial and temporal variations in crop phenology using SMF. Here, we address both limitations by developing the shape model fitting by the Separate phenological stage method (“SMF-S"). SMF-S uses a modified fitting function and an iterative procedure to match the shape model with the VI time series for each phenological stage in an adaptive local window. Comparisons between SMF-S and SMF in simulation experiments show the superior performance of SMF-S in different scenarios, regardless of noise. Comparisons involving winter wheat field observations from the North China Plain showed that the RMSE values averaged over nine phenological stages were smaller for SMF-S (RMSE = 9.5 d) than for SMF (RMSE = 13.4 d) and one variant of SMF (the shape model with accumulated growing degree days (SM-AGDD); RMSE=33.6 d). Moreover, SMF-S better described the spatial variations (i.e., variance) in the results and captured the temporal shifts in multiple phenological stages. In the derived regional phenology maps of winter wheat on the North China Plain, SMF-S generated more reasonable spatial patterns, whereas SMF underestimated (overestimated) the variance in the early (late) phenological stages. We expect that the improved crop phenology estimates obtained with SMF-S could benefit various agricultural activities. •SMF-S is developed to detect crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data.•SMF-S fits each phenological stage by using modified function and adaptive windows.•SMF-S addresses two inherent limitations in SMF.•SMF-S performs better than SMF by testing on multisource phenology data.</description><subject>Crop classification</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crop phenology</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Curve fitting</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Shape model</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><subject>Vegetation index time series</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEuXxA9gsMafYjh0nYkLlKVVigdly7evWURMH260ov56UIkamu5zz3aMPoStKppTQ6qadxgRTRhibUlqSihyhCa1lUxBJ-DGaEFLygjMhT9FZSi0hVNSSTtDXPWQw2fdLbGIY8LCCPqzDcoddDB3ewhKyzj702PcWPnH2HRQJooeErc4aL3bYd0MMW7A4rfQAuAsW1tj5_EP1PQZtVn9gb_Qap6yXcIFOnF4nuPy95-j98eFt9lzMX59eZnfzwpRM5GJBKkMcN84azhl3sqxLqLiopGTghKXAdQmOOctr1zCxqFkjQBCjuaCytuU5uj5wx5UfG0hZtWET-_GlYlXdSCobXo0pekiNGlKK4NQQfafjTlGi9opVq0bFaq9YHRSPndtDB8b5Ww9RJeOhN2B9HKUqG_w_7W_miIXW</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Liu, Licong</creator><creator>Cao, Ruyin</creator><creator>Chen, Jin</creator><creator>Shen, Miaogen</creator><creator>Wang, Shuai</creator><creator>Zhou, Ji</creator><creator>He, Binbin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage</title><author>Liu, Licong ; Cao, Ruyin ; Chen, Jin ; Shen, Miaogen ; Wang, Shuai ; Zhou, Ji ; He, Binbin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-b06c0f4cfdc4424f7383e6456772ef5d1e4a3ef2fd48f925b8295e50ca45178d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Crop classification</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crop phenology</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Curve fitting</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Shape model</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><topic>Vegetation index time series</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Licong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Ruyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Miaogen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Binbin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Licong</au><au>Cao, Ruyin</au><au>Chen, Jin</au><au>Shen, Miaogen</au><au>Wang, Shuai</au><au>Zhou, Ji</au><au>He, Binbin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>277</volume><spage>113060</spage><pages>113060-</pages><artnum>113060</artnum><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>Crop phenology provides important information for crop growth management and yield estimations. The popular shape model fitting (SMF) method detects crop phenology from vegetation index (VI) time-series data, but it has two limitations. First, SMF assumes the same “relative position” of phenological stages for the pixels of the same crop type. This assumption is valid only if all target pixels, relative to the shape model, display a synchronized increase (or decrease) in length between any two phenological stages, which is uncommon in practice. Second, the variance in the resulting phenology estimates for a particular phenological stage is related to the stage itself; this makes it challenging to simulate spatial and temporal variations in crop phenology using SMF. Here, we address both limitations by developing the shape model fitting by the Separate phenological stage method (“SMF-S"). SMF-S uses a modified fitting function and an iterative procedure to match the shape model with the VI time series for each phenological stage in an adaptive local window. Comparisons between SMF-S and SMF in simulation experiments show the superior performance of SMF-S in different scenarios, regardless of noise. Comparisons involving winter wheat field observations from the North China Plain showed that the RMSE values averaged over nine phenological stages were smaller for SMF-S (RMSE = 9.5 d) than for SMF (RMSE = 13.4 d) and one variant of SMF (the shape model with accumulated growing degree days (SM-AGDD); RMSE=33.6 d). Moreover, SMF-S better described the spatial variations (i.e., variance) in the results and captured the temporal shifts in multiple phenological stages. In the derived regional phenology maps of winter wheat on the North China Plain, SMF-S generated more reasonable spatial patterns, whereas SMF underestimated (overestimated) the variance in the early (late) phenological stages. We expect that the improved crop phenology estimates obtained with SMF-S could benefit various agricultural activities. •SMF-S is developed to detect crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data.•SMF-S fits each phenological stage by using modified function and adaptive windows.•SMF-S addresses two inherent limitations in SMF.•SMF-S performs better than SMF by testing on multisource phenology data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2022.113060</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2022-08, Vol.277, p.113060, Article 113060
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2689717946
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Crop classification
Crop growth
Crop phenology
Crops
Curve fitting
Estimates
Iterative methods
Modelling
Phenology
Pixels
Shape model
Spatial variations
Temporal variations
Time series
Triticum aestivum
Vegetation
Vegetation index
Vegetation index time series
Wheat
Winter wheat
title Detecting crop phenology from vegetation index time-series data by improved shape model fitting in each phenological stage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A23%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detecting%20crop%20phenology%20from%20vegetation%20index%20time-series%20data%20by%20improved%20shape%20model%20fitting%20in%20each%20phenological%20stage&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Liu,%20Licong&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=277&rft.spage=113060&rft.pages=113060-&rft.artnum=113060&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689717946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689717946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425722001742&rfr_iscdi=true