Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd

Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic so...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998
Hauptverfasser: Gilago, Mulatu C., V.P., Chandramohan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 123998
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 252
creator Gilago, Mulatu C.
V.P., Chandramohan
description Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes. •Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689717432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036054422200901X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2689717432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1q3DAQFqWBbpO8QQ6CnL3Rn235EiihTQKB9tCcxVgab7SsLVeyF_wufdjIdc49zQzz_TDzEXLD2Z4zXt0d9zhgPCx7wYTYcyGbRn8iO65rWVS1Lj-THZMVK0qlxBfyNaUjY6zUTbMjf39h7ELsYbBIR4jQ44QxUTzDaYbJh4HC4KgNfV76lMfQZVxK_oz_NmCntfWD8xHtRKdlRJrCCSJ1cVml0jyOIU7oaLvQ8Q0SUvsGwwFpD9nLw4m6OfrhsBLW4s8LPYQ5uity0cEp4fVHvSSvP77_fngqXn4-Pj98eymsqNRU8LJ0rWNNowQ6CZ1y1rqKQausVloLqFUtS1Ssk5y12rZtXTmpNFOsFqUFeUluN90xhj8zpskcs_2QLY2odFPzWkmRUWpD2RhSitiZMfoe4mI4M2sO5mi2HMyag9lyyLT7jYb5grPHaJL1mN-9Pcy44P8v8A6SuJdJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689717432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes. •Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Active and passive dryers ; Central processing units ; Coccinia grandis ; Collector and dryer efficiencies ; CPUs ; Diffusivity ; Driers ; Drying ; Energy consumption ; Energy storage ; Heat ; Heat transfer ; Indirect solar drying ; Mass transfer ; Moisture content ; Moisture diffusivity ; Moisture effects ; Parameters ; Performance evaluation ; Phase change materials ; Photovoltaics ; Reliability analysis ; Solar dryers ; Solar energy ; Solar panels ; Specific energy ; Specific moisture extraction ; Storage units ; Thermal energy ; Transfer coefficients ; Uncertainty analysis ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 1, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7732-6549 ; 0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes. •Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</description><subject>Active and passive dryers</subject><subject>Central processing units</subject><subject>Coccinia grandis</subject><subject>Collector and dryer efficiencies</subject><subject>CPUs</subject><subject>Diffusivity</subject><subject>Driers</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Indirect solar drying</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Moisture diffusivity</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phase change materials</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Solar dryers</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar panels</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><subject>Specific moisture extraction</subject><subject>Storage units</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><subject>Transfer coefficients</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uc1q3DAQFqWBbpO8QQ6CnL3Rn235EiihTQKB9tCcxVgab7SsLVeyF_wufdjIdc49zQzz_TDzEXLD2Z4zXt0d9zhgPCx7wYTYcyGbRn8iO65rWVS1Lj-THZMVK0qlxBfyNaUjY6zUTbMjf39h7ELsYbBIR4jQ44QxUTzDaYbJh4HC4KgNfV76lMfQZVxK_oz_NmCntfWD8xHtRKdlRJrCCSJ1cVml0jyOIU7oaLvQ8Q0SUvsGwwFpD9nLw4m6OfrhsBLW4s8LPYQ5uity0cEp4fVHvSSvP77_fngqXn4-Pj98eymsqNRU8LJ0rWNNowQ6CZ1y1rqKQausVloLqFUtS1Ssk5y12rZtXTmpNFOsFqUFeUluN90xhj8zpskcs_2QLY2odFPzWkmRUWpD2RhSitiZMfoe4mI4M2sO5mi2HMyag9lyyLT7jYb5grPHaJL1mN-9Pcy44P8v8A6SuJdJ</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creator><creator>V.P., Chandramohan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><author>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Active and passive dryers</topic><topic>Central processing units</topic><topic>Coccinia grandis</topic><topic>Collector and dryer efficiencies</topic><topic>CPUs</topic><topic>Diffusivity</topic><topic>Driers</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Indirect solar drying</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Moisture diffusivity</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phase change materials</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Solar dryers</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar panels</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><topic>Specific moisture extraction</topic><topic>Storage units</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><topic>Transfer coefficients</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilago, Mulatu C.</au><au>V.P., Chandramohan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>123998</spage><pages>123998-</pages><artnum>123998</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes. •Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998
issn 0360-5442
1873-6785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2689717432
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Active and passive dryers
Central processing units
Coccinia grandis
Collector and dryer efficiencies
CPUs
Diffusivity
Driers
Drying
Energy consumption
Energy storage
Heat
Heat transfer
Indirect solar drying
Mass transfer
Moisture content
Moisture diffusivity
Moisture effects
Parameters
Performance evaluation
Phase change materials
Photovoltaics
Reliability analysis
Solar dryers
Solar energy
Solar panels
Specific energy
Specific moisture extraction
Storage units
Thermal energy
Transfer coefficients
Uncertainty analysis
Water content
title Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20parameters%20evaluation%20and%20comparison%20of%20passive%20and%20active%20indirect%20type%20solar%20dryers%20supported%20by%20phase%20change%20material%20during%20drying%20ivy%20gourd&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Gilago,%20Mulatu%20C.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=123998&rft.pages=123998-&rft.artnum=123998&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689717432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689717432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S036054422200901X&rfr_iscdi=true