Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd
Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 123998 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 252 |
creator | Gilago, Mulatu C. V.P., Chandramohan |
description | Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes.
•Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689717432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036054422200901X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2689717432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1q3DAQFqWBbpO8QQ6CnL3Rn235EiihTQKB9tCcxVgab7SsLVeyF_wufdjIdc49zQzz_TDzEXLD2Z4zXt0d9zhgPCx7wYTYcyGbRn8iO65rWVS1Lj-THZMVK0qlxBfyNaUjY6zUTbMjf39h7ELsYbBIR4jQ44QxUTzDaYbJh4HC4KgNfV76lMfQZVxK_oz_NmCntfWD8xHtRKdlRJrCCSJ1cVml0jyOIU7oaLvQ8Q0SUvsGwwFpD9nLw4m6OfrhsBLW4s8LPYQ5uity0cEp4fVHvSSvP77_fngqXn4-Pj98eymsqNRU8LJ0rWNNowQ6CZ1y1rqKQausVloLqFUtS1Ssk5y12rZtXTmpNFOsFqUFeUluN90xhj8zpskcs_2QLY2odFPzWkmRUWpD2RhSitiZMfoe4mI4M2sO5mi2HMyag9lyyLT7jYb5grPHaJL1mN-9Pcy44P8v8A6SuJdJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689717432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes.
•Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Active and passive dryers ; Central processing units ; Coccinia grandis ; Collector and dryer efficiencies ; CPUs ; Diffusivity ; Driers ; Drying ; Energy consumption ; Energy storage ; Heat ; Heat transfer ; Indirect solar drying ; Mass transfer ; Moisture content ; Moisture diffusivity ; Moisture effects ; Parameters ; Performance evaluation ; Phase change materials ; Photovoltaics ; Reliability analysis ; Solar dryers ; Solar energy ; Solar panels ; Specific energy ; Specific moisture extraction ; Storage units ; Thermal energy ; Transfer coefficients ; Uncertainty analysis ; Water content</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 1, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7732-6549 ; 0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes.
•Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</description><subject>Active and passive dryers</subject><subject>Central processing units</subject><subject>Coccinia grandis</subject><subject>Collector and dryer efficiencies</subject><subject>CPUs</subject><subject>Diffusivity</subject><subject>Driers</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Indirect solar drying</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Moisture diffusivity</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phase change materials</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Solar dryers</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar panels</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><subject>Specific moisture extraction</subject><subject>Storage units</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><subject>Transfer coefficients</subject><subject>Uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Water content</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uc1q3DAQFqWBbpO8QQ6CnL3Rn235EiihTQKB9tCcxVgab7SsLVeyF_wufdjIdc49zQzz_TDzEXLD2Z4zXt0d9zhgPCx7wYTYcyGbRn8iO65rWVS1Lj-THZMVK0qlxBfyNaUjY6zUTbMjf39h7ELsYbBIR4jQ44QxUTzDaYbJh4HC4KgNfV76lMfQZVxK_oz_NmCntfWD8xHtRKdlRJrCCSJ1cVml0jyOIU7oaLvQ8Q0SUvsGwwFpD9nLw4m6OfrhsBLW4s8LPYQ5uity0cEp4fVHvSSvP77_fngqXn4-Pj98eymsqNRU8LJ0rWNNowQ6CZ1y1rqKQausVloLqFUtS1Ssk5y12rZtXTmpNFOsFqUFeUluN90xhj8zpskcs_2QLY2odFPzWkmRUWpD2RhSitiZMfoe4mI4M2sO5mi2HMyag9lyyLT7jYb5grPHaJL1mN-9Pcy44P8v8A6SuJdJ</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creator><creator>V.P., Chandramohan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</title><author>Gilago, Mulatu C. ; V.P., Chandramohan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-155dbd09942ed3af4dccd60ab4c84882a74735e40f310b8cbb76d348040725ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Active and passive dryers</topic><topic>Central processing units</topic><topic>Coccinia grandis</topic><topic>Collector and dryer efficiencies</topic><topic>CPUs</topic><topic>Diffusivity</topic><topic>Driers</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Indirect solar drying</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Moisture diffusivity</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phase change materials</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Solar dryers</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar panels</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><topic>Specific moisture extraction</topic><topic>Storage units</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><topic>Transfer coefficients</topic><topic>Uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Water content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilago, Mulatu C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>V.P., Chandramohan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilago, Mulatu C.</au><au>V.P., Chandramohan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>123998</spage><pages>123998-</pages><artnum>123998</artnum><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>Experimental investigations were carried out by drying ivy gourd slices to evaluate the performance of passive and active indirect type solar dryers (PITSD and AITSD) supported with a thermal energy storage unit. The PITSD was restructured with central processing unit fans powered by photovoltaic solar panels to form the AITSD. Performance parameters and drying kinetics were evaluated from the data recorded during experiments. The average values of heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption of PITSD and AITSD were 735.9 and 761.2 W, 38.95 and 36.35 kJ/mol, and 00.228 and 0.265 kWh/kg, respectively. Average collector and drying efficiencies were 66.7 and 69.87%, and 13.15 and 15.2% for PITSD and AITSD, respectively. The mean values of effective diffusivity, specific moisture extraction rate, heat and mass transfer coefficients of PITSD and AITSD were 8.06 × 10−9 and 10.00 × 10−9 m2/s, 78 and 4.380 kg/kWh, 0.0041 and 0.0055 m/s, and 4.7 and 6.28 W/m2 K, respectively. Moisture diffusivity, heat and mass transfer coefficients were negatively related in a logarithmic trend with moisture content. The AITSD performed well as compared to the PITSD. Uncertainty analysis was made to ascertain the reliability of the outcomes.
•Ivy gourd was dried in a passive indirect solar dryer (PITSD) with energy storage system and drying kinetics were estimated.•Similar experiments were done with active (AITSD) system and the results were compared.•The heat supplied, activation energy and specific energy consumption were estimated.•The average collector and drying efficiencies, effective diffusivity and surface transfer coefficients were estimated.•The results were compared for both setups and effective conclusions were drawn.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-6549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-8363</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2022-08, Vol.252, p.123998, Article 123998 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2689717432 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Active and passive dryers Central processing units Coccinia grandis Collector and dryer efficiencies CPUs Diffusivity Driers Drying Energy consumption Energy storage Heat Heat transfer Indirect solar drying Mass transfer Moisture content Moisture diffusivity Moisture effects Parameters Performance evaluation Phase change materials Photovoltaics Reliability analysis Solar dryers Solar energy Solar panels Specific energy Specific moisture extraction Storage units Thermal energy Transfer coefficients Uncertainty analysis Water content |
title | Performance parameters evaluation and comparison of passive and active indirect type solar dryers supported by phase change material during drying ivy gourd |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20parameters%20evaluation%20and%20comparison%20of%20passive%20and%20active%20indirect%20type%20solar%20dryers%20supported%20by%20phase%20change%20material%20during%20drying%20ivy%20gourd&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Gilago,%20Mulatu%20C.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=123998&rft.pages=123998-&rft.artnum=123998&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689717432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689717432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S036054422200901X&rfr_iscdi=true |