Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Team-based learning and flipped classrooms in terms of test scores in undergraduate medical education. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Federal Medical College, Islamabad Pakistan, from Mar to Jun 2020. Methodology: A tot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2022-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1018-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1018 |
container_title | Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Zaman, Atteaya Yasmeen, Raheela Faysal, Lubna Rani Minhas, Rafia Taj, Rizwan Mumtaz, Saima |
description | Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Team-based learning and flipped classrooms in terms of test scores in undergraduate medical education.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Federal Medical College, Islamabad Pakistan, from Mar to Jun 2020.
Methodology: A total of 100 first-year MBBS students were randomly equally allocated to either team-based learning or flipped classroom for biochemistry class. In the former technique, students were assigned a topic from the textbook as prereading material. In contrast, in the latter technique, they were given an audio-based power-point lecture before class. Then, students were asked to review the material and prepare at least three questions to ask during class in the flipped classroom while they followed a modified team-based learning class. In the first session, there were (n=43) and (n=39) students in the Team-based Learning and Flipped Classroom group, whereas in the second session, 40 students each attended class. However, in the third and fourth sessions, attendance was 100.0%. Each session was given pre and post-test based on 20 Multiple Choice Questions.
Results: Females were in the majority (57%), and most students (72%) were 17 years of age. Team-based learning scored better than Flipped Classroom in each session. For example, in session 1, the mean scores were 67.0 ± 10.4 in Team-Based Learning and 48.3 ± 8.4 in Flipped Classroom group (p-value |
doi_str_mv | 10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7091 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689025669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709141041</galeid><sourcerecordid>A709141041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-bbbcfd6563255984776d06f6d0148bf393ad55ab4b24c5d98215270ebf13f4ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUdtKAzEQDaJg0X6AbwGft-a6l0ct9QIVH6zPIZtLm7KbrMm24N-btoIIzsBkMnNOLnMAuMFoxjHh9G6Qtt_O9hVxdFahBp-BCWEYF3XNyDmYIERR0ZSsvgTTlLYoG6eEIT4B64W1Ro1ub7xJCQYLHzs3DEbDeSdTiiH0UHoNV0b2xYNMubE0Mnrn19D5Q1ltDvmDC2pjepfG-AXHAF-Ndkp28H3caePHdA0urOySmf6sV-DjcbGaPxfLt6eX-f2yUITzsWjbVlld8pLmbVOzqio1Km0OmNWtpQ2VmnPZspYwxXVTE8xJhUxrMbXMKHoFbk_nDjF87kwaxTbsos9XClLWDSK8LJtf1Fp2Rjhvwxilyq9X4v4wP4YRwxk1-weVXeePquCNdbn-h4BPBBVDnp2xYoiul_FLYCSOSomjUuKolDgQ6Tcj7Ybg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689025669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zaman, Atteaya ; Yasmeen, Raheela ; Faysal, Lubna Rani ; Minhas, Rafia ; Taj, Rizwan ; Mumtaz, Saima</creator><creatorcontrib>Zaman, Atteaya ; Yasmeen, Raheela ; Faysal, Lubna Rani ; Minhas, Rafia ; Taj, Rizwan ; Mumtaz, Saima</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Team-based learning and flipped classrooms in terms of test scores in undergraduate medical education.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Federal Medical College, Islamabad Pakistan, from Mar to Jun 2020.
Methodology: A total of 100 first-year MBBS students were randomly equally allocated to either team-based learning or flipped classroom for biochemistry class. In the former technique, students were assigned a topic from the textbook as prereading material. In contrast, in the latter technique, they were given an audio-based power-point lecture before class. Then, students were asked to review the material and prepare at least three questions to ask during class in the flipped classroom while they followed a modified team-based learning class. In the first session, there were (n=43) and (n=39) students in the Team-based Learning and Flipped Classroom group, whereas in the second session, 40 students each attended class. However, in the third and fourth sessions, attendance was 100.0%. Each session was given pre and post-test based on 20 Multiple Choice Questions.
Results: Females were in the majority (57%), and most students (72%) were 17 years of age. Team-based learning scored better than Flipped Classroom in each session. For example, in session 1, the mean scores were 67.0 ± 10.4 in Team-Based Learning and 48.3 ± 8.4 in Flipped Classroom group (p-value <0.001). The difference in marks obtained continued in sessions 2, 3 and 4.
Conclusion: Team-Based Learning is more effective than Flipped classrooms in teaching biochemistry to medical students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-9648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2411-8842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rawalpindi: Knowledge Bylanes</publisher><subject>Active learning ; Age ; Biochemistry ; Education ; Flipped classroom ; Learning strategies ; Males ; Medical colleges ; Medical education ; Medical personnel ; Medical students ; Methods ; Multiple choice ; Pandemics ; Problem solving ; Sample size ; Sciences education ; Study and teaching ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Teams ; Training</subject><ispartof>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal, 2022-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1018-22</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Knowledge Bylanes</rights><rights>(c)2022 Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-bbbcfd6563255984776d06f6d0148bf393ad55ab4b24c5d98215270ebf13f4ec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zaman, Atteaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasmeen, Raheela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faysal, Lubna Rani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhas, Rafia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taj, Rizwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumtaz, Saima</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students</title><title>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</title><description>Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Team-based learning and flipped classrooms in terms of test scores in undergraduate medical education.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Federal Medical College, Islamabad Pakistan, from Mar to Jun 2020.
Methodology: A total of 100 first-year MBBS students were randomly equally allocated to either team-based learning or flipped classroom for biochemistry class. In the former technique, students were assigned a topic from the textbook as prereading material. In contrast, in the latter technique, they were given an audio-based power-point lecture before class. Then, students were asked to review the material and prepare at least three questions to ask during class in the flipped classroom while they followed a modified team-based learning class. In the first session, there were (n=43) and (n=39) students in the Team-based Learning and Flipped Classroom group, whereas in the second session, 40 students each attended class. However, in the third and fourth sessions, attendance was 100.0%. Each session was given pre and post-test based on 20 Multiple Choice Questions.
Results: Females were in the majority (57%), and most students (72%) were 17 years of age. Team-based learning scored better than Flipped Classroom in each session. For example, in session 1, the mean scores were 67.0 ± 10.4 in Team-Based Learning and 48.3 ± 8.4 in Flipped Classroom group (p-value <0.001). The difference in marks obtained continued in sessions 2, 3 and 4.
Conclusion: Team-Based Learning is more effective than Flipped classrooms in teaching biochemistry to medical students.</description><subject>Active learning</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Flipped classroom</subject><subject>Learning strategies</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sciences education</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0030-9648</issn><issn>2411-8842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptUdtKAzEQDaJg0X6AbwGft-a6l0ct9QIVH6zPIZtLm7KbrMm24N-btoIIzsBkMnNOLnMAuMFoxjHh9G6Qtt_O9hVxdFahBp-BCWEYF3XNyDmYIERR0ZSsvgTTlLYoG6eEIT4B64W1Ro1ub7xJCQYLHzs3DEbDeSdTiiH0UHoNV0b2xYNMubE0Mnrn19D5Q1ltDvmDC2pjepfG-AXHAF-Ndkp28H3caePHdA0urOySmf6sV-DjcbGaPxfLt6eX-f2yUITzsWjbVlld8pLmbVOzqio1Km0OmNWtpQ2VmnPZspYwxXVTE8xJhUxrMbXMKHoFbk_nDjF87kwaxTbsos9XClLWDSK8LJtf1Fp2Rjhvwxilyq9X4v4wP4YRwxk1-weVXeePquCNdbn-h4BPBBVDnp2xYoiul_FLYCSOSomjUuKolDgQ6Tcj7Ybg</recordid><startdate>20220630</startdate><enddate>20220630</enddate><creator>Zaman, Atteaya</creator><creator>Yasmeen, Raheela</creator><creator>Faysal, Lubna Rani</creator><creator>Minhas, Rafia</creator><creator>Taj, Rizwan</creator><creator>Mumtaz, Saima</creator><general>Knowledge Bylanes</general><general>AsiaNet Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220630</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students</title><author>Zaman, Atteaya ; Yasmeen, Raheela ; Faysal, Lubna Rani ; Minhas, Rafia ; Taj, Rizwan ; Mumtaz, Saima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-bbbcfd6563255984776d06f6d0148bf393ad55ab4b24c5d98215270ebf13f4ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Active learning</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Flipped classroom</topic><topic>Learning strategies</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sciences education</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaman, Atteaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasmeen, Raheela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faysal, Lubna Rani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhas, Rafia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taj, Rizwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumtaz, Saima</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaman, Atteaya</au><au>Yasmeen, Raheela</au><au>Faysal, Lubna Rani</au><au>Minhas, Rafia</au><au>Taj, Rizwan</au><au>Mumtaz, Saima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students</atitle><jtitle>Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal</jtitle><date>2022-06-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1018</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1018-22</pages><issn>0030-9648</issn><eissn>2411-8842</eissn><abstract>Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Team-based learning and flipped classrooms in terms of test scores in undergraduate medical education.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Federal Medical College, Islamabad Pakistan, from Mar to Jun 2020.
Methodology: A total of 100 first-year MBBS students were randomly equally allocated to either team-based learning or flipped classroom for biochemistry class. In the former technique, students were assigned a topic from the textbook as prereading material. In contrast, in the latter technique, they were given an audio-based power-point lecture before class. Then, students were asked to review the material and prepare at least three questions to ask during class in the flipped classroom while they followed a modified team-based learning class. In the first session, there were (n=43) and (n=39) students in the Team-based Learning and Flipped Classroom group, whereas in the second session, 40 students each attended class. However, in the third and fourth sessions, attendance was 100.0%. Each session was given pre and post-test based on 20 Multiple Choice Questions.
Results: Females were in the majority (57%), and most students (72%) were 17 years of age. Team-based learning scored better than Flipped Classroom in each session. For example, in session 1, the mean scores were 67.0 ± 10.4 in Team-Based Learning and 48.3 ± 8.4 in Flipped Classroom group (p-value <0.001). The difference in marks obtained continued in sessions 2, 3 and 4.
Conclusion: Team-Based Learning is more effective than Flipped classrooms in teaching biochemistry to medical students.</abstract><cop>Rawalpindi</cop><pub>Knowledge Bylanes</pub><doi>10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7091</doi><tpages>-995</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-9648 |
ispartof | Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal, 2022-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1018-22 |
issn | 0030-9648 2411-8842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2689025669 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Active learning Age Biochemistry Education Flipped classroom Learning strategies Males Medical colleges Medical education Medical personnel Medical students Methods Multiple choice Pandemics Problem solving Sample size Sciences education Study and teaching Teaching Teaching methods Teams Training |
title | Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in Teaching Biochemistry to Medical Students |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T12%3A07%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Flipped%20Classroom%20and%20Team-Based%20Learning%20in%20Teaching%20Biochemistry%20to%20Medical%20Students&rft.jtitle=Pakistan%20Armed%20Forces%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Zaman,%20Atteaya&rft.date=2022-06-30&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1018&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1018-22&rft.issn=0030-9648&rft.eissn=2411-8842&rft_id=info:doi/10.51253/pafmj.v72i3.7091&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA709141041%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689025669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A709141041&rfr_iscdi=true |