General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q
Summary The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical obesity 2022-08, Vol.12 (4), p.e12528-n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | e12528 |
| container_title | Clinical obesity |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Dalaei, Farima Vries, Claire E. E. Poulsen, Lotte Kaur, Manraj N. Pfob, André Mou, Danny Jacobsen, Amalie L. Repo, Jussi P. Salzillo, Rosa Opyrchal, Jakub Klassen, Anne F. Sørensen, Jens Ahm Pusic, Andrea L. |
| description | Summary
The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m2, and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cob.12528 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2688981600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2688981600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-5b43ba61c7b5f5fb78b61141e1d0f9df110f3bb16862bee3cfeac35bc57b472f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0Eoqh04AVQJCaGtHYcO-7YFihIlSokGJis2D1DqjQOdgLqxiPwjDwJhpRu3HK_Tp_-u_sROiN4SEKNtFVDkrBEHKATkjERizA93GtMe2jg_RqH4gkfs_QY9SjjhHCcnaDJHCpweRnVtm7LvClsFVXWbYJ6g8hr68BHxrqoqBpwtYOmqJ6j5gWi6fLq6evj8_4UHZm89DDY9T56vLl-mN3Gi-X8bjZZxJoKIWKmUqpyTnSmmGFGZUKFG1ICZIXNeGUIwYYqRbjgiQKg2kCuKVOaZSrNEkP76KLzrZ19bcE3cm1bV4WVMuFCjEV4CAfqsqO0s947MLJ2xSZ3W0mw_MlLhrzkb16BPd85tmoDqz35l04ARh3wXpSw_d9JzpbTzvIbHZd0gQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688981600</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dalaei, Farima ; Vries, Claire E. E. ; Poulsen, Lotte ; Kaur, Manraj N. ; Pfob, André ; Mou, Danny ; Jacobsen, Amalie L. ; Repo, Jussi P. ; Salzillo, Rosa ; Opyrchal, Jakub ; Klassen, Anne F. ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm ; Pusic, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dalaei, Farima ; Vries, Claire E. E. ; Poulsen, Lotte ; Kaur, Manraj N. ; Pfob, André ; Mou, Danny ; Jacobsen, Amalie L. ; Repo, Jussi P. ; Salzillo, Rosa ; Opyrchal, Jakub ; Klassen, Anne F. ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm ; Pusic, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m2, and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p < .001). This study provides normative values for the BODY‐Q scales to aid in the interpretation of BODY‐Q scores in research and clinical practise. These values enable us to understand the impact of weight loss and BC on patients' lives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-8103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cob.12528</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35611607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bariatric surgery ; body contouring ; Body mass index ; Crowdsourcing ; general population norms ; normative scores ; patient‐reported outcome measure ; patient‐reported outcomes ; quality of life ; weight loss surgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical obesity, 2022-08, Vol.12 (4), p.e12528-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors. Clinical Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-5b43ba61c7b5f5fb78b61141e1d0f9df110f3bb16862bee3cfeac35bc57b472f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-5b43ba61c7b5f5fb78b61141e1d0f9df110f3bb16862bee3cfeac35bc57b472f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3983-4523 ; 0000-0001-8885-9546 ; 0000-0003-3529-3563 ; 0000-0002-1911-0395 ; 0000-0003-4205-806X ; 0000-0003-4720-0096 ; 0000-0003-2305-7758 ; 0000-0003-4903-0094 ; 0000-0002-4688-5698 ; 0000-0001-6140-9895 ; 0000-0002-1596-5919</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcob.12528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcob.12528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35611607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dalaei, Farima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Claire E. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Manraj N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfob, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Amalie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Jussi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzillo, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opyrchal, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Anne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Jens Ahm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusic, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q</title><title>Clinical obesity</title><addtitle>Clin Obes</addtitle><description>Summary
The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m2, and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p < .001). This study provides normative values for the BODY‐Q scales to aid in the interpretation of BODY‐Q scores in research and clinical practise. These values enable us to understand the impact of weight loss and BC on patients' lives.</description><subject>bariatric surgery</subject><subject>body contouring</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>general population norms</subject><subject>normative scores</subject><subject>patient‐reported outcome measure</subject><subject>patient‐reported outcomes</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>weight loss surgery</subject><issn>1758-8103</issn><issn>1758-8111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0Eoqh04AVQJCaGtHYcO-7YFihIlSokGJis2D1DqjQOdgLqxiPwjDwJhpRu3HK_Tp_-u_sROiN4SEKNtFVDkrBEHKATkjERizA93GtMe2jg_RqH4gkfs_QY9SjjhHCcnaDJHCpweRnVtm7LvClsFVXWbYJ6g8hr68BHxrqoqBpwtYOmqJ6j5gWi6fLq6evj8_4UHZm89DDY9T56vLl-mN3Gi-X8bjZZxJoKIWKmUqpyTnSmmGFGZUKFG1ICZIXNeGUIwYYqRbjgiQKg2kCuKVOaZSrNEkP76KLzrZ19bcE3cm1bV4WVMuFCjEV4CAfqsqO0s947MLJ2xSZ3W0mw_MlLhrzkb16BPd85tmoDqz35l04ARh3wXpSw_d9JzpbTzvIbHZd0gQ</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Dalaei, Farima</creator><creator>Vries, Claire E. E.</creator><creator>Poulsen, Lotte</creator><creator>Kaur, Manraj N.</creator><creator>Pfob, André</creator><creator>Mou, Danny</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Amalie L.</creator><creator>Repo, Jussi P.</creator><creator>Salzillo, Rosa</creator><creator>Opyrchal, Jakub</creator><creator>Klassen, Anne F.</creator><creator>Sørensen, Jens Ahm</creator><creator>Pusic, Andrea L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-9546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-806X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-0096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2305-7758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-0094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-5698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-5919</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q</title><author>Dalaei, Farima ; Vries, Claire E. E. ; Poulsen, Lotte ; Kaur, Manraj N. ; Pfob, André ; Mou, Danny ; Jacobsen, Amalie L. ; Repo, Jussi P. ; Salzillo, Rosa ; Opyrchal, Jakub ; Klassen, Anne F. ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm ; Pusic, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-5b43ba61c7b5f5fb78b61141e1d0f9df110f3bb16862bee3cfeac35bc57b472f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>bariatric surgery</topic><topic>body contouring</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>general population norms</topic><topic>normative scores</topic><topic>patient‐reported outcome measure</topic><topic>patient‐reported outcomes</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>weight loss surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dalaei, Farima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vries, Claire E. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Manraj N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfob, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mou, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Amalie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repo, Jussi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzillo, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opyrchal, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Anne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Jens Ahm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pusic, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Clinical obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dalaei, Farima</au><au>Vries, Claire E. E.</au><au>Poulsen, Lotte</au><au>Kaur, Manraj N.</au><au>Pfob, André</au><au>Mou, Danny</au><au>Jacobsen, Amalie L.</au><au>Repo, Jussi P.</au><au>Salzillo, Rosa</au><au>Opyrchal, Jakub</au><au>Klassen, Anne F.</au><au>Sørensen, Jens Ahm</au><au>Pusic, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q</atitle><jtitle>Clinical obesity</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Obes</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e12528</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12528-n/a</pages><issn>1758-8103</issn><eissn>1758-8111</eissn><abstract>Summary
The BODY‐Q is a patient‐reported outcome measure used to assess outcomes in patients undergoing weight loss and/or body contouring surgery (BC) following massive weight loss. Normative values for the BODY‐Q are needed to improve data interpretation and enable comparison. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine normative values for the BODY‐Q. Participants were recruited internationally through two crowdsourcing platforms. The participants were invited to complete the BODY‐Q scales through an URL link provided within the crowdsourcing platforms. General linear analyses were performed to compare normative means between countries and continents adjusted for relevant covariates. Normative reference values were stratified by age, body mass index (BMI), and gender. The BODY‐Q was completed by 4051 (2052 North American and 1999 European) participants. The mean age was 36 years (±14.7 SD) and ranged from 17 to 76 years, the mean BMI was 26.4 (±6.7 SD) kg/m2, and the sample consisted of 1996 (49.3%) females and 2023 (49.9%) males. Younger age and higher BMI were negatively associated with all BODY‐Q scales (p < .001). This study provides normative values for the BODY‐Q scales to aid in the interpretation of BODY‐Q scores in research and clinical practise. These values enable us to understand the impact of weight loss and BC on patients' lives.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35611607</pmid><doi>10.1111/cob.12528</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-4523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8885-9546</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-0395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-806X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-0096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2305-7758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-0094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-5698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-5919</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1758-8103 |
| ispartof | Clinical obesity, 2022-08, Vol.12 (4), p.e12528-n/a |
| issn | 1758-8103 1758-8111 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2688981600 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | bariatric surgery body contouring Body mass index Crowdsourcing general population norms normative scores patient‐reported outcome measure patient‐reported outcomes quality of life weight loss surgery |
| title | General population normative scores for interpreting the BODY‐Q |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=General%20population%20normative%20scores%20for%20interpreting%20the%20BODY%E2%80%90Q&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20obesity&rft.au=Dalaei,%20Farima&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e12528&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12528-n/a&rft.issn=1758-8103&rft.eissn=1758-8111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cob.12528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688981600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688981600&rft_id=info:pmid/35611607&rfr_iscdi=true |