Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China?
Using nationally representative data from the 2017 National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, this paper examines the nexus between social integration and the political participation of internal migrants in China. We document a positive association between social integration status and in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Review of development economics 2022-08, Vol.26 (3), p.1555-1573 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1573 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1555 |
| container_title | Review of development economics |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Lu, Haiyang Kandilov, Ivan T. Zhu, Rong |
| description | Using nationally representative data from the 2017 National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, this paper examines the nexus between social integration and the political participation of internal migrants in China. We document a positive association between social integration status and internal migrants’ political participation. The study further examines the political participation differentials from two perspectives: between migration types and between migration distances. Our Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis suggests that while only about 5.2% of the political participation differential between urban‐to‐urban migrants and rural‐to‐urban migrants is attributable to the difference in social integration status, the difference in social integration status explains about 12.0% of the participation gap between intra‐provincial migrants and inter‐provincial migrants. Our findings suggest that regionally diverse social integration policies may have unintended consequences for the political participation of migrant workers in China. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rode.12879 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2688981371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2688981371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-2f25a8c6d93b0f21ca86f40bf089ac1c75a8b6ed353feecb807828dc017da3a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsbnyDgTpiaTGYyyUqk1h8oFETXIZNJbEqbjEmK9O3NdAR3ZpML93yHywfANUYznN9d8J2e4ZI1_ARMcEWbghOKT_NMKCkopfwcXMS4QQhxjOsJiI9eRxi9snILrUv6M8hkvYM7mZIO0PgAlV_7kGBnjdFBO5UD1sG01rD3W5usytFehjzYfgx7c3QFlzc7m5UuHTPztXXy_hKcGbmN-ur3n4KPp8X7_KVYrp5f5w_LQhGOeVGaspZM0Y6TFpkSK8moqVBrEONSYdXkbUt1R2pitFYtQw0rWacQbjpJZE2m4Gb09sF_7XVMYuP3w01RlJQxzjBpcKZuR0oFH2PQRvTB7mQ4CIzEUKoYShXHUjMMR1gr72z8Q7OLVGVTDT48It92qw__yMTb6nExan8AxviGgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688981371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lu, Haiyang ; Kandilov, Ivan T. ; Zhu, Rong</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Haiyang ; Kandilov, Ivan T. ; Zhu, Rong</creatorcontrib><description>Using nationally representative data from the 2017 National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, this paper examines the nexus between social integration and the political participation of internal migrants in China. We document a positive association between social integration status and internal migrants’ political participation. The study further examines the political participation differentials from two perspectives: between migration types and between migration distances. Our Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis suggests that while only about 5.2% of the political participation differential between urban‐to‐urban migrants and rural‐to‐urban migrants is attributable to the difference in social integration status, the difference in social integration status explains about 12.0% of the participation gap between intra‐provincial migrants and inter‐provincial migrants. Our findings suggest that regionally diverse social integration policies may have unintended consequences for the political participation of migrant workers in China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-6669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rode.12879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age differences ; China ; internal migrants ; Internal migration ; Migrant workers ; Migrants ; Migration ; migration distance ; Political participation ; Rural urban differences ; Social integration</subject><ispartof>Review of development economics, 2022-08, Vol.26 (3), p.1555-1573</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-2f25a8c6d93b0f21ca86f40bf089ac1c75a8b6ed353feecb807828dc017da3a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-2f25a8c6d93b0f21ca86f40bf089ac1c75a8b6ed353feecb807828dc017da3a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5789-2319</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frode.12879$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frode.12879$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandilov, Ivan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Rong</creatorcontrib><title>Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China?</title><title>Review of development economics</title><description>Using nationally representative data from the 2017 National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, this paper examines the nexus between social integration and the political participation of internal migrants in China. We document a positive association between social integration status and internal migrants’ political participation. The study further examines the political participation differentials from two perspectives: between migration types and between migration distances. Our Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis suggests that while only about 5.2% of the political participation differential between urban‐to‐urban migrants and rural‐to‐urban migrants is attributable to the difference in social integration status, the difference in social integration status explains about 12.0% of the participation gap between intra‐provincial migrants and inter‐provincial migrants. Our findings suggest that regionally diverse social integration policies may have unintended consequences for the political participation of migrant workers in China.</description><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>internal migrants</subject><subject>Internal migration</subject><subject>Migrant workers</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>migration distance</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Rural urban differences</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><issn>1363-6669</issn><issn>1467-9361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsbnyDgTpiaTGYyyUqk1h8oFETXIZNJbEqbjEmK9O3NdAR3ZpML93yHywfANUYznN9d8J2e4ZI1_ARMcEWbghOKT_NMKCkopfwcXMS4QQhxjOsJiI9eRxi9snILrUv6M8hkvYM7mZIO0PgAlV_7kGBnjdFBO5UD1sG01rD3W5usytFehjzYfgx7c3QFlzc7m5UuHTPztXXy_hKcGbmN-ur3n4KPp8X7_KVYrp5f5w_LQhGOeVGaspZM0Y6TFpkSK8moqVBrEONSYdXkbUt1R2pitFYtQw0rWacQbjpJZE2m4Gb09sF_7XVMYuP3w01RlJQxzjBpcKZuR0oFH2PQRvTB7mQ4CIzEUKoYShXHUjMMR1gr72z8Q7OLVGVTDT48It92qw__yMTb6nExan8AxviGgA</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Lu, Haiyang</creator><creator>Kandilov, Ivan T.</creator><creator>Zhu, Rong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-2319</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China?</title><author>Lu, Haiyang ; Kandilov, Ivan T. ; Zhu, Rong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-2f25a8c6d93b0f21ca86f40bf089ac1c75a8b6ed353feecb807828dc017da3a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>internal migrants</topic><topic>Internal migration</topic><topic>Migrant workers</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>migration distance</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Rural urban differences</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandilov, Ivan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Rong</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Haiyang</au><au>Kandilov, Ivan T.</au><au>Zhu, Rong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China?</atitle><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1555</spage><epage>1573</epage><pages>1555-1573</pages><issn>1363-6669</issn><eissn>1467-9361</eissn><abstract>Using nationally representative data from the 2017 National Internal Migrants Dynamic Monitoring Survey, this paper examines the nexus between social integration and the political participation of internal migrants in China. We document a positive association between social integration status and internal migrants’ political participation. The study further examines the political participation differentials from two perspectives: between migration types and between migration distances. Our Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition analysis suggests that while only about 5.2% of the political participation differential between urban‐to‐urban migrants and rural‐to‐urban migrants is attributable to the difference in social integration status, the difference in social integration status explains about 12.0% of the participation gap between intra‐provincial migrants and inter‐provincial migrants. Our findings suggest that regionally diverse social integration policies may have unintended consequences for the political participation of migrant workers in China.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rode.12879</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-2319</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1363-6669 |
| ispartof | Review of development economics, 2022-08, Vol.26 (3), p.1555-1573 |
| issn | 1363-6669 1467-9361 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2688981371 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Age differences China internal migrants Internal migration Migrant workers Migrants Migration migration distance Political participation Rural urban differences Social integration |
| title | Does social integration matter for cohort differences in the political participation of internal migrants in China? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T03%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20social%20integration%20matter%20for%20cohort%20differences%20in%20the%20political%20participation%20of%20internal%20migrants%20in%20China?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20development%20economics&rft.au=Lu,%20Haiyang&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1555&rft.epage=1573&rft.pages=1555-1573&rft.issn=1363-6669&rft.eissn=1467-9361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rode.12879&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688981371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688981371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |