Determining a risk management staffing model

Health care organizations have struggled to establish par levels of risk management personnel needed to effectively accomplish risk management functions. This study set out to determine whether a par level staffing model could be established utilizing a nonclinical role to enable the clinical risk m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of healthcare risk management 2022-07, Vol.42 (1), p.37-43
Hauptverfasser: Moritz, Diane L., Nichols, Joyce K., Stein, Karen M., Glusko, Lydia A., Tan, Michele M., Hileman, Melissa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Journal of healthcare risk management
container_volume 42
creator Moritz, Diane L.
Nichols, Joyce K.
Stein, Karen M.
Glusko, Lydia A.
Tan, Michele M.
Hileman, Melissa M.
description Health care organizations have struggled to establish par levels of risk management personnel needed to effectively accomplish risk management functions. This study set out to determine whether a par level staffing model could be established utilizing a nonclinical role to enable the clinical risk manager to focus on key risk management core functions, therefore enhancing risk management department efficacy. Utilizing a model published by Howard and Felton, Trinity Health Insurance and Risk Management Services (IRMS) evaluated risk management staffing according to our core functions and workload and determined recommended risk management staffing levels for our organization. Eighteen Risk Managers from 13 acute care hospitals participated in a 2‐week time study documenting time spent and estimated time needed to complete core risk management functions. By quantifying the time needed to complete risk management core functions and evaluating which activity could best be completed by specific roles, we have established both a recommended baseline staffing level of one risk manager FTE per 6650 monthly average adjusted patient days (APD), as well as a work distribution model of 70% clinical and 30% nonclinical split of risk management FTEs for our hospitals. Organizations can similarly evaluate their staffing according to their core functions and workload.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jhrm.21513
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2688880144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2688880144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2083-ccde9ef577fed1b870f60e371bbf7b3052ce02460ca091632121dae40da9b03a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqGw4QsisUOkzNiunSxReRRUhIRgbTnJuCQ0SbFTof49KWHNbGYxZ-6VDmPnCFME4Nf1h2-mHGcoDljEQUICqcJDFiFomUid6WN2EkINoLRSMmJXt9STb6q2alexjX0VPuPGtnZFDbV9HHrr3P7UdCWtT9mRs-tAZ397wt7v797mi2T58vA4v1kmBYdUJEVRUkZuprWjEvNUg1NAQmOeO50LmPGCgEsFhYUMleDIsbQkobRZDsKKCbsYcze--9pS6E3dbX07VBqu0mEApRyoy5EqfBeCJ2c2vmqs3xkEs7dh9jbMr40BxhH-rta0-4c0T4vX5_HnByd2YOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688880144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining a risk management staffing model</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Moritz, Diane L. ; Nichols, Joyce K. ; Stein, Karen M. ; Glusko, Lydia A. ; Tan, Michele M. ; Hileman, Melissa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Diane L. ; Nichols, Joyce K. ; Stein, Karen M. ; Glusko, Lydia A. ; Tan, Michele M. ; Hileman, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Health care organizations have struggled to establish par levels of risk management personnel needed to effectively accomplish risk management functions. This study set out to determine whether a par level staffing model could be established utilizing a nonclinical role to enable the clinical risk manager to focus on key risk management core functions, therefore enhancing risk management department efficacy. Utilizing a model published by Howard and Felton, Trinity Health Insurance and Risk Management Services (IRMS) evaluated risk management staffing according to our core functions and workload and determined recommended risk management staffing levels for our organization. Eighteen Risk Managers from 13 acute care hospitals participated in a 2‐week time study documenting time spent and estimated time needed to complete core risk management functions. By quantifying the time needed to complete risk management core functions and evaluating which activity could best be completed by specific roles, we have established both a recommended baseline staffing level of one risk manager FTE per 6650 monthly average adjusted patient days (APD), as well as a work distribution model of 70% clinical and 30% nonclinical split of risk management FTEs for our hospitals. Organizations can similarly evaluate their staffing according to their core functions and workload.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-0861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhrm.21513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Workforce planning ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Journal of healthcare risk management, 2022-07, Vol.42 (1), p.37-43</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Healthcare Risk Management of the American Hospital Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2083-ccde9ef577fed1b870f60e371bbf7b3052ce02460ca091632121dae40da9b03a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhrm.21513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhrm.21513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Diane L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Joyce K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glusko, Lydia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Michele M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hileman, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Determining a risk management staffing model</title><title>Journal of healthcare risk management</title><description>Health care organizations have struggled to establish par levels of risk management personnel needed to effectively accomplish risk management functions. This study set out to determine whether a par level staffing model could be established utilizing a nonclinical role to enable the clinical risk manager to focus on key risk management core functions, therefore enhancing risk management department efficacy. Utilizing a model published by Howard and Felton, Trinity Health Insurance and Risk Management Services (IRMS) evaluated risk management staffing according to our core functions and workload and determined recommended risk management staffing levels for our organization. Eighteen Risk Managers from 13 acute care hospitals participated in a 2‐week time study documenting time spent and estimated time needed to complete core risk management functions. By quantifying the time needed to complete risk management core functions and evaluating which activity could best be completed by specific roles, we have established both a recommended baseline staffing level of one risk manager FTE per 6650 monthly average adjusted patient days (APD), as well as a work distribution model of 70% clinical and 30% nonclinical split of risk management FTEs for our hospitals. Organizations can similarly evaluate their staffing according to their core functions and workload.</description><subject>Workforce planning</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1074-4797</issn><issn>2040-0861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqGw4QsisUOkzNiunSxReRRUhIRgbTnJuCQ0SbFTof49KWHNbGYxZ-6VDmPnCFME4Nf1h2-mHGcoDljEQUICqcJDFiFomUid6WN2EkINoLRSMmJXt9STb6q2alexjX0VPuPGtnZFDbV9HHrr3P7UdCWtT9mRs-tAZ397wt7v797mi2T58vA4v1kmBYdUJEVRUkZuprWjEvNUg1NAQmOeO50LmPGCgEsFhYUMleDIsbQkobRZDsKKCbsYcze--9pS6E3dbX07VBqu0mEApRyoy5EqfBeCJ2c2vmqs3xkEs7dh9jbMr40BxhH-rta0-4c0T4vX5_HnByd2YOY</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Moritz, Diane L.</creator><creator>Nichols, Joyce K.</creator><creator>Stein, Karen M.</creator><creator>Glusko, Lydia A.</creator><creator>Tan, Michele M.</creator><creator>Hileman, Melissa M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Determining a risk management staffing model</title><author>Moritz, Diane L. ; Nichols, Joyce K. ; Stein, Karen M. ; Glusko, Lydia A. ; Tan, Michele M. ; Hileman, Melissa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2083-ccde9ef577fed1b870f60e371bbf7b3052ce02460ca091632121dae40da9b03a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Workforce planning</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Diane L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Joyce K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glusko, Lydia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Michele M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hileman, Melissa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of healthcare risk management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moritz, Diane L.</au><au>Nichols, Joyce K.</au><au>Stein, Karen M.</au><au>Glusko, Lydia A.</au><au>Tan, Michele M.</au><au>Hileman, Melissa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining a risk management staffing model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of healthcare risk management</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>37-43</pages><issn>1074-4797</issn><eissn>2040-0861</eissn><abstract>Health care organizations have struggled to establish par levels of risk management personnel needed to effectively accomplish risk management functions. This study set out to determine whether a par level staffing model could be established utilizing a nonclinical role to enable the clinical risk manager to focus on key risk management core functions, therefore enhancing risk management department efficacy. Utilizing a model published by Howard and Felton, Trinity Health Insurance and Risk Management Services (IRMS) evaluated risk management staffing according to our core functions and workload and determined recommended risk management staffing levels for our organization. Eighteen Risk Managers from 13 acute care hospitals participated in a 2‐week time study documenting time spent and estimated time needed to complete core risk management functions. By quantifying the time needed to complete risk management core functions and evaluating which activity could best be completed by specific roles, we have established both a recommended baseline staffing level of one risk manager FTE per 6650 monthly average adjusted patient days (APD), as well as a work distribution model of 70% clinical and 30% nonclinical split of risk management FTEs for our hospitals. Organizations can similarly evaluate their staffing according to their core functions and workload.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jhrm.21513</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-4797
ispartof Journal of healthcare risk management, 2022-07, Vol.42 (1), p.37-43
issn 1074-4797
2040-0861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2688880144
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Workforce planning
Workloads
title Determining a risk management staffing model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A09%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20a%20risk%20management%20staffing%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20healthcare%20risk%20management&rft.au=Moritz,%20Diane%20L.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=37-43&rft.issn=1074-4797&rft.eissn=2040-0861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhrm.21513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688880144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688880144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true