How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles
This review contributes to the debate regarding feedback needed by architects and building designers to improve the sustainability of their building designs. It utilizes the Integral Sustainable Design framework to harness a more comprehensive definition of sustainability to examine the breadth of c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Building and environment 2022-06, Vol.218, p.109109, Article 109109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109109 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 218 |
creator | Whittem, Vanessa Roetzel, Astrid Sadick, Abdul-Manan Nakai Kidd, Akari |
description | This review contributes to the debate regarding feedback needed by architects and building designers to improve the sustainability of their building designs. It utilizes the Integral Sustainable Design framework to harness a more comprehensive definition of sustainability to examine the breadth of currently possible feedback to building designers. The review acknowledges the multiple stakeholders that partake in different stages of a building project and focusses specifically on feedback from completed buildings for architects and designers. This review has endeavoured to summarize the range of current feedback which may be available to architects and draw conclusions regarding the usefulness of some of the assessment methods. There are some aspects of sustainability that have well developed and agreed feedback measures, such as energy use, embodied energy, and Indoor Air Quality. Other aspects about which there has been some research but no agreement on feedback include feeling safe, ecosystem services, and inclusiveness. This review reveals important feedback aspects not covered by either research, sustainability ratings schemes or post occupancy evaluation methods. Indeed, there are many aspects of the sustainability of school buildings about which very little is known, such as physical externalities and community services and the building's effect on socialisation and sense of place. Direct feedback in these areas will increase the pace of sustainability improvement in school design. However, further research is required to determine aspects about which architects desire feedback, would find most useful and to develop efficient feedback methods.
•Applies the Integral Sustainable Design framework to school building feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in sustainability rating schemes as feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in academic research & POE as feedback to architects.•Develops a more comprehensive definition of sustainability for buildings.•Identifies aspects where feedback methods are needed for improved design of sustainable schools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2688596904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132322003468</els_id><sourcerecordid>2688596904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-cf5c098a508302d5541def3de15fc4b4fd1aa7eab1301ddad219712403ce28f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRBILIW_gCxxzuKPJJucoCqFVqrUQ1uJm-WMx7teUjt4kq36R_i9eFk4I4000sy8NzPvMfZeirUUsv24Xw9LGB3Gw1oJpUqxL_GCrWS30VXb1d9fspXQraikVvo1e0O0FwXY63rFfl2lJw7pccq4w0jhgDwQnxLNVQJYJhvhmXtEN1j4wVPkBLuURv5nZYhb4j5lbjPswoww0yd-Xugi4DQvduQZDwGf-GAJHV-mgr-OM25zad0tNNsQ7TAi_4IUtpFPOUQI04j0lr3ydiR89zefsYevl_cXV9XN7bfri_ObCnQt5gp8A6LvbCM6LZRrmlo69NqhbDzUQ-2dtHaDdpBaSOesU7LfSFULDag6X-sz9uHEO-X0c0GazT4tOZaVRrVd1_RtL45T7WkKciLK6E259NHmZyOFOXpg9uafB-bogTl5UICfT0AsPxQlsiEIWNRxIRe1jEvhfxS_Af8ol1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688596904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Whittem, Vanessa ; Roetzel, Astrid ; Sadick, Abdul-Manan ; Nakai Kidd, Akari</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittem, Vanessa ; Roetzel, Astrid ; Sadick, Abdul-Manan ; Nakai Kidd, Akari</creatorcontrib><description>This review contributes to the debate regarding feedback needed by architects and building designers to improve the sustainability of their building designs. It utilizes the Integral Sustainable Design framework to harness a more comprehensive definition of sustainability to examine the breadth of currently possible feedback to building designers. The review acknowledges the multiple stakeholders that partake in different stages of a building project and focusses specifically on feedback from completed buildings for architects and designers. This review has endeavoured to summarize the range of current feedback which may be available to architects and draw conclusions regarding the usefulness of some of the assessment methods. There are some aspects of sustainability that have well developed and agreed feedback measures, such as energy use, embodied energy, and Indoor Air Quality. Other aspects about which there has been some research but no agreement on feedback include feeling safe, ecosystem services, and inclusiveness. This review reveals important feedback aspects not covered by either research, sustainability ratings schemes or post occupancy evaluation methods. Indeed, there are many aspects of the sustainability of school buildings about which very little is known, such as physical externalities and community services and the building's effect on socialisation and sense of place. Direct feedback in these areas will increase the pace of sustainability improvement in school design. However, further research is required to determine aspects about which architects desire feedback, would find most useful and to develop efficient feedback methods.
•Applies the Integral Sustainable Design framework to school building feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in sustainability rating schemes as feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in academic research & POE as feedback to architects.•Develops a more comprehensive definition of sustainability for buildings.•Identifies aspects where feedback methods are needed for improved design of sustainable schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Architects ; Architecture ; Building performance evaluation ; Buildings ; Design ; Designers ; Ecosystem services ; Energy consumption ; Feedback ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Integral Sustainable Design ; Post occupancy evaluation ; Reviews ; School buildings ; Sustainability ; Sustainable design ; Sustainable school design</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2022-06, Vol.218, p.109109, Article 109109</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-cf5c098a508302d5541def3de15fc4b4fd1aa7eab1301ddad219712403ce28f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-cf5c098a508302d5541def3de15fc4b4fd1aa7eab1301ddad219712403ce28f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1958-139X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittem, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roetzel, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadick, Abdul-Manan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai Kidd, Akari</creatorcontrib><title>How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>This review contributes to the debate regarding feedback needed by architects and building designers to improve the sustainability of their building designs. It utilizes the Integral Sustainable Design framework to harness a more comprehensive definition of sustainability to examine the breadth of currently possible feedback to building designers. The review acknowledges the multiple stakeholders that partake in different stages of a building project and focusses specifically on feedback from completed buildings for architects and designers. This review has endeavoured to summarize the range of current feedback which may be available to architects and draw conclusions regarding the usefulness of some of the assessment methods. There are some aspects of sustainability that have well developed and agreed feedback measures, such as energy use, embodied energy, and Indoor Air Quality. Other aspects about which there has been some research but no agreement on feedback include feeling safe, ecosystem services, and inclusiveness. This review reveals important feedback aspects not covered by either research, sustainability ratings schemes or post occupancy evaluation methods. Indeed, there are many aspects of the sustainability of school buildings about which very little is known, such as physical externalities and community services and the building's effect on socialisation and sense of place. Direct feedback in these areas will increase the pace of sustainability improvement in school design. However, further research is required to determine aspects about which architects desire feedback, would find most useful and to develop efficient feedback methods.
•Applies the Integral Sustainable Design framework to school building feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in sustainability rating schemes as feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in academic research & POE as feedback to architects.•Develops a more comprehensive definition of sustainability for buildings.•Identifies aspects where feedback methods are needed for improved design of sustainable schools.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Architects</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Building performance evaluation</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Integral Sustainable Design</subject><subject>Post occupancy evaluation</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>School buildings</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable design</subject><subject>Sustainable school design</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRBILIW_gCxxzuKPJJucoCqFVqrUQ1uJm-WMx7teUjt4kq36R_i9eFk4I4000sy8NzPvMfZeirUUsv24Xw9LGB3Gw1oJpUqxL_GCrWS30VXb1d9fspXQraikVvo1e0O0FwXY63rFfl2lJw7pccq4w0jhgDwQnxLNVQJYJhvhmXtEN1j4wVPkBLuURv5nZYhb4j5lbjPswoww0yd-Xugi4DQvduQZDwGf-GAJHV-mgr-OM25zad0tNNsQ7TAi_4IUtpFPOUQI04j0lr3ydiR89zefsYevl_cXV9XN7bfri_ObCnQt5gp8A6LvbCM6LZRrmlo69NqhbDzUQ-2dtHaDdpBaSOesU7LfSFULDag6X-sz9uHEO-X0c0GazT4tOZaVRrVd1_RtL45T7WkKciLK6E259NHmZyOFOXpg9uafB-bogTl5UICfT0AsPxQlsiEIWNRxIRe1jEvhfxS_Af8ol1E</recordid><startdate>20220615</startdate><enddate>20220615</enddate><creator>Whittem, Vanessa</creator><creator>Roetzel, Astrid</creator><creator>Sadick, Abdul-Manan</creator><creator>Nakai Kidd, Akari</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-139X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220615</creationdate><title>How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles</title><author>Whittem, Vanessa ; Roetzel, Astrid ; Sadick, Abdul-Manan ; Nakai Kidd, Akari</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-cf5c098a508302d5541def3de15fc4b4fd1aa7eab1301ddad219712403ce28f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Architects</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Building performance evaluation</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Integral Sustainable Design</topic><topic>Post occupancy evaluation</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>School buildings</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable design</topic><topic>Sustainable school design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittem, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roetzel, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadick, Abdul-Manan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai Kidd, Akari</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittem, Vanessa</au><au>Roetzel, Astrid</au><au>Sadick, Abdul-Manan</au><au>Nakai Kidd, Akari</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2022-06-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>218</volume><spage>109109</spage><pages>109109-</pages><artnum>109109</artnum><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>This review contributes to the debate regarding feedback needed by architects and building designers to improve the sustainability of their building designs. It utilizes the Integral Sustainable Design framework to harness a more comprehensive definition of sustainability to examine the breadth of currently possible feedback to building designers. The review acknowledges the multiple stakeholders that partake in different stages of a building project and focusses specifically on feedback from completed buildings for architects and designers. This review has endeavoured to summarize the range of current feedback which may be available to architects and draw conclusions regarding the usefulness of some of the assessment methods. There are some aspects of sustainability that have well developed and agreed feedback measures, such as energy use, embodied energy, and Indoor Air Quality. Other aspects about which there has been some research but no agreement on feedback include feeling safe, ecosystem services, and inclusiveness. This review reveals important feedback aspects not covered by either research, sustainability ratings schemes or post occupancy evaluation methods. Indeed, there are many aspects of the sustainability of school buildings about which very little is known, such as physical externalities and community services and the building's effect on socialisation and sense of place. Direct feedback in these areas will increase the pace of sustainability improvement in school design. However, further research is required to determine aspects about which architects desire feedback, would find most useful and to develop efficient feedback methods.
•Applies the Integral Sustainable Design framework to school building feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in sustainability rating schemes as feedback to architects.•Reveals gaps in academic research & POE as feedback to architects.•Develops a more comprehensive definition of sustainability for buildings.•Identifies aspects where feedback methods are needed for improved design of sustainable schools.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109109</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-139X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2022-06, Vol.218, p.109109, Article 109109 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2688596904 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Air quality Architects Architecture Building performance evaluation Buildings Design Designers Ecosystem services Energy consumption Feedback Indoor air pollution Indoor air quality Indoor environments Integral Sustainable Design Post occupancy evaluation Reviews School buildings Sustainability Sustainable design Sustainable school design |
title | How comprehensive is post-occupancy feedback on school buildings for architects? A conceptual review based upon Integral Sustainable Design principles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20comprehensive%20is%20post-occupancy%20feedback%20on%20school%20buildings%20for%20architects?%20A%20conceptual%20review%20based%20upon%20Integral%20Sustainable%20Design%20principles&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Whittem,%20Vanessa&rft.date=2022-06-15&rft.volume=218&rft.spage=109109&rft.pages=109109-&rft.artnum=109109&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688596904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688596904&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132322003468&rfr_iscdi=true |