How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean
In the Mexican Caribbean, marine protected areas have been established to tackle marine ecosystem degradation caused by the coastal development that started in Cancún in the 1970s and extended south to the border with Belize in the 1990s. It is crucial to assess their effectiveness for conservation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic conservation 2022-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1126-1140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1126 |
container_title | Aquatic conservation |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C. Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J. Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro |
description | In the Mexican Caribbean, marine protected areas have been established to tackle marine ecosystem degradation caused by the coastal development that started in Cancún in the 1970s and extended south to the border with Belize in the 1990s. It is crucial to assess their effectiveness for conservation of the reef ecosystem, but also the perception of stakeholders, because the objective would be unattainable without their participation.
This study evaluated the conservation status and the management effectiveness of National Park Xcalak Reefs (PNAX), in the southernmost Mexican Caribbean. In addition to interviewing local stakeholders to recognize issues related to the administration and functioning of PNAX, four zones with different use restrictions inside the park were evaluated, using ecological indicators (diversity and abundance of fishes, coral diversity and cover, and macroalgal cover) and ecological knowledge by interviewing local stakeholders, mostly fishers and conservation personnel.
The results suggest that one of the restricted‐use zones is in good condition, with a higher abundance of fishes and coral cover, and a lower cover of fleshy macroalgae and turf, compared with the other zones in the protected area. On the other hand, the core area presents bad indicators, such as a higher macroalgal cover and lower abundance of fishes, suggesting poor management or insufficient enforcement.
Although mistrust and lack of communication between fishers and conservation authorities may limit the achievement of conservation goals, some programmes involving active participation of local people, for example lionfish culling and coastal vegetation restoration, have had a good impact on the coral reef community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aqc.3820 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2688043819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2688043819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-4914b63a9c63564409eee089b43aff4b4d858fd6269b19b4334d8ed516a97f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTzjgjTedSZNmzZWMok6YiKDXIU1PtHNrt6Rz9t-bOm-9Oof3POfrJeSS0QmjNL0xWzvheUqPyIhRpRI6zbLjIc_SZCoZPyVnISwppUoyOSLNvN0DOoe2q78QjEdYG183CBvjPwPUDWx82w3l5h26D6w92NabFXhEB2jb0IcO17cwg9Dtqh6sCTi0RRae8Lu2poEijixLNM05OXFmFfDiL47J2_3dazFPFs8Pj8VskdhUcZoIxUQpuVFW8kwKQRUi0lyVghvnRCmqPMtdJVOpSjaoPCpYZUwaNXWq5GNydZgbj9_uMHR62e58E1fqVOY5FTxnKlLXB8r6NgSPTm98Hd_vNaN6cFNHN_XgZkSTA7qvV9j_y-nZS_HL_wA2anVy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2688043819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C. ; Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J. ; Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro ; Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C. ; Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J. ; Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro ; Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><description>In the Mexican Caribbean, marine protected areas have been established to tackle marine ecosystem degradation caused by the coastal development that started in Cancún in the 1970s and extended south to the border with Belize in the 1990s. It is crucial to assess their effectiveness for conservation of the reef ecosystem, but also the perception of stakeholders, because the objective would be unattainable without their participation.
This study evaluated the conservation status and the management effectiveness of National Park Xcalak Reefs (PNAX), in the southernmost Mexican Caribbean. In addition to interviewing local stakeholders to recognize issues related to the administration and functioning of PNAX, four zones with different use restrictions inside the park were evaluated, using ecological indicators (diversity and abundance of fishes, coral diversity and cover, and macroalgal cover) and ecological knowledge by interviewing local stakeholders, mostly fishers and conservation personnel.
The results suggest that one of the restricted‐use zones is in good condition, with a higher abundance of fishes and coral cover, and a lower cover of fleshy macroalgae and turf, compared with the other zones in the protected area. On the other hand, the core area presents bad indicators, such as a higher macroalgal cover and lower abundance of fishes, suggesting poor management or insufficient enforcement.
Although mistrust and lack of communication between fishers and conservation authorities may limit the achievement of conservation goals, some programmes involving active participation of local people, for example lionfish culling and coastal vegetation restoration, have had a good impact on the coral reef community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Algae ; Biodiversity ; Coastal development ; Communication ; Conservation ; Conservation status ; Coral reef ecosystems ; Coral reefs ; Culling ; Ecosystem degradation ; Ecosystems ; environmental conditions ; Evaluation ; fisher perception ; Fishers ; Indicators ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine fishes ; Marine invertebrates ; Marine parks ; Marine protected areas ; multidisciplinary approach ; National parks ; Protected areas ; Restoration ; Seaweeds ; Turf</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2022-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1126-1140</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-4914b63a9c63564409eee089b43aff4b4d858fd6269b19b4334d8ed516a97f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-4914b63a9c63564409eee089b43aff4b4d858fd6269b19b4334d8ed516a97f9b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4736-8382 ; 0000-0001-6050-8736 ; 0000-0002-8327-6955 ; 0000-0002-0211-2976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.3820$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.3820$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27902,27903,45552,45553</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><title>How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>In the Mexican Caribbean, marine protected areas have been established to tackle marine ecosystem degradation caused by the coastal development that started in Cancún in the 1970s and extended south to the border with Belize in the 1990s. It is crucial to assess their effectiveness for conservation of the reef ecosystem, but also the perception of stakeholders, because the objective would be unattainable without their participation.
This study evaluated the conservation status and the management effectiveness of National Park Xcalak Reefs (PNAX), in the southernmost Mexican Caribbean. In addition to interviewing local stakeholders to recognize issues related to the administration and functioning of PNAX, four zones with different use restrictions inside the park were evaluated, using ecological indicators (diversity and abundance of fishes, coral diversity and cover, and macroalgal cover) and ecological knowledge by interviewing local stakeholders, mostly fishers and conservation personnel.
The results suggest that one of the restricted‐use zones is in good condition, with a higher abundance of fishes and coral cover, and a lower cover of fleshy macroalgae and turf, compared with the other zones in the protected area. On the other hand, the core area presents bad indicators, such as a higher macroalgal cover and lower abundance of fishes, suggesting poor management or insufficient enforcement.
Although mistrust and lack of communication between fishers and conservation authorities may limit the achievement of conservation goals, some programmes involving active participation of local people, for example lionfish culling and coastal vegetation restoration, have had a good impact on the coral reef community.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Coastal development</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Coral reef ecosystems</subject><subject>Coral reefs</subject><subject>Culling</subject><subject>Ecosystem degradation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>environmental conditions</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>fisher perception</subject><subject>Fishers</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>multidisciplinary approach</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Turf</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKfgTzjgjTedSZNmzZWMok6YiKDXIU1PtHNrt6Rz9t-bOm-9Oof3POfrJeSS0QmjNL0xWzvheUqPyIhRpRI6zbLjIc_SZCoZPyVnISwppUoyOSLNvN0DOoe2q78QjEdYG183CBvjPwPUDWx82w3l5h26D6w92NabFXhEB2jb0IcO17cwg9Dtqh6sCTi0RRae8Lu2poEijixLNM05OXFmFfDiL47J2_3dazFPFs8Pj8VskdhUcZoIxUQpuVFW8kwKQRUi0lyVghvnRCmqPMtdJVOpSjaoPCpYZUwaNXWq5GNydZgbj9_uMHR62e58E1fqVOY5FTxnKlLXB8r6NgSPTm98Hd_vNaN6cFNHN_XgZkSTA7qvV9j_y-nZS_HL_wA2anVy</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C.</creator><creator>Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J.</creator><creator>Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro</creator><creator>Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-8382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-8736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-6955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean</title><author>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C. ; Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J. ; Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro ; Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2930-4914b63a9c63564409eee089b43aff4b4d858fd6269b19b4334d8ed516a97f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Coastal development</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Coral reef ecosystems</topic><topic>Coral reefs</topic><topic>Culling</topic><topic>Ecosystem degradation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>environmental conditions</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>fisher perception</topic><topic>Fishers</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>multidisciplinary approach</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Turf</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Díaz‐Osorio, Alicia C.</au><au>Schmitter‐Soto, Juan J.</au><au>Vega‐Zepeda, Alejandro</au><au>Espinoza‐Tenorio, Alejandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1126</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1126-1140</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>In the Mexican Caribbean, marine protected areas have been established to tackle marine ecosystem degradation caused by the coastal development that started in Cancún in the 1970s and extended south to the border with Belize in the 1990s. It is crucial to assess their effectiveness for conservation of the reef ecosystem, but also the perception of stakeholders, because the objective would be unattainable without their participation.
This study evaluated the conservation status and the management effectiveness of National Park Xcalak Reefs (PNAX), in the southernmost Mexican Caribbean. In addition to interviewing local stakeholders to recognize issues related to the administration and functioning of PNAX, four zones with different use restrictions inside the park were evaluated, using ecological indicators (diversity and abundance of fishes, coral diversity and cover, and macroalgal cover) and ecological knowledge by interviewing local stakeholders, mostly fishers and conservation personnel.
The results suggest that one of the restricted‐use zones is in good condition, with a higher abundance of fishes and coral cover, and a lower cover of fleshy macroalgae and turf, compared with the other zones in the protected area. On the other hand, the core area presents bad indicators, such as a higher macroalgal cover and lower abundance of fishes, suggesting poor management or insufficient enforcement.
Although mistrust and lack of communication between fishers and conservation authorities may limit the achievement of conservation goals, some programmes involving active participation of local people, for example lionfish culling and coastal vegetation restoration, have had a good impact on the coral reef community.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3820</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-8382</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-8736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-6955</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2976</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-7613 |
ispartof | Aquatic conservation, 2022-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1126-1140 |
issn | 1052-7613 1099-0755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2688043819 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abundance Algae Biodiversity Coastal development Communication Conservation Conservation status Coral reef ecosystems Coral reefs Culling Ecosystem degradation Ecosystems environmental conditions Evaluation fisher perception Fishers Indicators Marine ecosystems Marine fishes Marine invertebrates Marine parks Marine protected areas multidisciplinary approach National parks Protected areas Restoration Seaweeds Turf |
title | How effective are marine parks in protecting their coral reef ecosystem? A study case in the Mexican Caribbean |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T09%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20effective%20are%20marine%20parks%20in%20protecting%20their%20coral%20reef%20ecosystem?%20A%20study%20case%20in%20the%20Mexican%20Caribbean&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=D%C3%ADaz%E2%80%90Osorio,%20Alicia%20C.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1126&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1126-1140&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2688043819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2688043819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |