Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition

Organizations are under mounting pressure to adapt to and to adopt corporate sustainability (CS) practices. Notwithstanding the increasing research attention given to the subject and the meaningful theoretical contributions, it is claimed that a definition, and a commonly accepted understanding of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-07, Vol.14 (13), p.7838
Hauptverfasser: Pazienza, Mariapia, de Jong, Martin, Schoenmaker, Dirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 7838
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Pazienza, Mariapia
de Jong, Martin
Schoenmaker, Dirk
description Organizations are under mounting pressure to adapt to and to adopt corporate sustainability (CS) practices. Notwithstanding the increasing research attention given to the subject and the meaningful theoretical contributions, it is claimed that a definition, and a commonly accepted understanding of the concept of corporate sustainability, is still missing. Alignment on the meaning of CS is of critical importance for enabling coherent and effective practices. The lack of a sound theoretical foundation and of conceptual clarity of corporate sustainability has been identified as an important cause of unsatisfactory and fruitless actions by organizations. To address the questions “What is Corporate Sustainability?” and “Is it true there is a lack of convergence and clarity of the concept?”, we perform an ontological analysis of the different and interrelated concepts, and a necessary condition analysis on the key constitutive features of corporate sustainability within the academic literature. We demonstrate that the concept of corporate sustainability is clearer than most authors claim and can be well defined around its environmental, social and economic constitutive pillars with the purpose to provide equal opportunities to future generations.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14137838
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2686187541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2686187541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f04659d1f9a5ebf89297bd26fb692a5dd2b6b9095d4a5f4d5dff4245374146a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWMZu_AUBd8JovmeylPGrUFBQ1yHTJDWlJmOSKfTfO6WCvs27i3vegwPAJUY3lEp0m0fMMG1a2p6AGUENrjHi6PRfPgfznDdoGkqxxGIGVLfVybu9D2tYPi3sYljZocDoppiGmHSx8G3MRfuge7_1ZQ91MPA1xZ03B2oidjat7cRBFxNclAzvrfPBFx_DBThzepvt_HdX4OPx4b17rpcvT4vublmviOSldogJLg12UnPbu1YS2fSGCNcLSTQ3hvSil0hywzR3zHDjHCOM04ZhJnRLK3B1vDuk-D3aXNQmjilMLxURrcBtwyc3Fbg-tlYp5pysU0PyXzrtFUbq4FD9OaQ_rMVkTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2686187541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Pazienza, Mariapia ; de Jong, Martin ; Schoenmaker, Dirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Pazienza, Mariapia ; de Jong, Martin ; Schoenmaker, Dirk</creatorcontrib><description>Organizations are under mounting pressure to adapt to and to adopt corporate sustainability (CS) practices. Notwithstanding the increasing research attention given to the subject and the meaningful theoretical contributions, it is claimed that a definition, and a commonly accepted understanding of the concept of corporate sustainability, is still missing. Alignment on the meaning of CS is of critical importance for enabling coherent and effective practices. The lack of a sound theoretical foundation and of conceptual clarity of corporate sustainability has been identified as an important cause of unsatisfactory and fruitless actions by organizations. To address the questions “What is Corporate Sustainability?” and “Is it true there is a lack of convergence and clarity of the concept?”, we perform an ontological analysis of the different and interrelated concepts, and a necessary condition analysis on the key constitutive features of corporate sustainability within the academic literature. We demonstrate that the concept of corporate sustainability is clearer than most authors claim and can be well defined around its environmental, social and economic constitutive pillars with the purpose to provide equal opportunities to future generations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14137838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Clarity ; Convergence ; Literature reviews ; Ontology ; Organizations ; Principles ; Social sciences ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (13), p.7838</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f04659d1f9a5ebf89297bd26fb692a5dd2b6b9095d4a5f4d5dff4245374146a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f04659d1f9a5ebf89297bd26fb692a5dd2b6b9095d4a5f4d5dff4245374146a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6554-2458 ; 0000-0003-3571-6976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pazienza, Mariapia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenmaker, Dirk</creatorcontrib><title>Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Organizations are under mounting pressure to adapt to and to adopt corporate sustainability (CS) practices. Notwithstanding the increasing research attention given to the subject and the meaningful theoretical contributions, it is claimed that a definition, and a commonly accepted understanding of the concept of corporate sustainability, is still missing. Alignment on the meaning of CS is of critical importance for enabling coherent and effective practices. The lack of a sound theoretical foundation and of conceptual clarity of corporate sustainability has been identified as an important cause of unsatisfactory and fruitless actions by organizations. To address the questions “What is Corporate Sustainability?” and “Is it true there is a lack of convergence and clarity of the concept?”, we perform an ontological analysis of the different and interrelated concepts, and a necessary condition analysis on the key constitutive features of corporate sustainability within the academic literature. We demonstrate that the concept of corporate sustainability is clearer than most authors claim and can be well defined around its environmental, social and economic constitutive pillars with the purpose to provide equal opportunities to future generations.</description><subject>Clarity</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEURYMoWMZu_AUBd8JovmeylPGrUFBQ1yHTJDWlJmOSKfTfO6WCvs27i3vegwPAJUY3lEp0m0fMMG1a2p6AGUENrjHi6PRfPgfznDdoGkqxxGIGVLfVybu9D2tYPi3sYljZocDoppiGmHSx8G3MRfuge7_1ZQ91MPA1xZ03B2oidjat7cRBFxNclAzvrfPBFx_DBThzepvt_HdX4OPx4b17rpcvT4vublmviOSldogJLg12UnPbu1YS2fSGCNcLSTQ3hvSil0hywzR3zHDjHCOM04ZhJnRLK3B1vDuk-D3aXNQmjilMLxURrcBtwyc3Fbg-tlYp5pysU0PyXzrtFUbq4FD9OaQ_rMVkTA</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Pazienza, Mariapia</creator><creator>de Jong, Martin</creator><creator>Schoenmaker, Dirk</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6554-2458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-6976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition</title><author>Pazienza, Mariapia ; de Jong, Martin ; Schoenmaker, Dirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-f04659d1f9a5ebf89297bd26fb692a5dd2b6b9095d4a5f4d5dff4245374146a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clarity</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pazienza, Mariapia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenmaker, Dirk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pazienza, Mariapia</au><au>de Jong, Martin</au><au>Schoenmaker, Dirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>7838</spage><pages>7838-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Organizations are under mounting pressure to adapt to and to adopt corporate sustainability (CS) practices. Notwithstanding the increasing research attention given to the subject and the meaningful theoretical contributions, it is claimed that a definition, and a commonly accepted understanding of the concept of corporate sustainability, is still missing. Alignment on the meaning of CS is of critical importance for enabling coherent and effective practices. The lack of a sound theoretical foundation and of conceptual clarity of corporate sustainability has been identified as an important cause of unsatisfactory and fruitless actions by organizations. To address the questions “What is Corporate Sustainability?” and “Is it true there is a lack of convergence and clarity of the concept?”, we perform an ontological analysis of the different and interrelated concepts, and a necessary condition analysis on the key constitutive features of corporate sustainability within the academic literature. We demonstrate that the concept of corporate sustainability is clearer than most authors claim and can be well defined around its environmental, social and economic constitutive pillars with the purpose to provide equal opportunities to future generations.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14137838</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6554-2458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-6976</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-07, Vol.14 (13), p.7838
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2686187541
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Clarity
Convergence
Literature reviews
Ontology
Organizations
Principles
Social sciences
Sustainability
Sustainable development
title Clarifying the Concept of Corporate Sustainability and Providing Convergence for Its Definition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clarifying%20the%20Concept%20of%20Corporate%20Sustainability%20and%20Providing%20Convergence%20for%20Its%20Definition&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Pazienza,%20Mariapia&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=7838&rft.pages=7838-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14137838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2686187541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2686187541&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true