942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

Despite the increase in telehealth services in diabetes care during the COVID-pandemic, studies have found disparities in telemedicine (TM) use among patients. Our Diabetes Clinic currently cares for 1400 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with 46% being publicly insured and for 375 patients with t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2022-06, Vol.71 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: CHAN, KAREN, DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 71
creator CHAN, KAREN
DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA
description Despite the increase in telehealth services in diabetes care during the COVID-pandemic, studies have found disparities in telemedicine (TM) use among patients. Our Diabetes Clinic currently cares for 1400 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with 46% being publicly insured and for 375 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) , 88% being publicly insured. We have previously shown a significantly lower number of completed TM encounters between March and July 2020 by publicly insured patients when compared with privately insured and a threefold increase in no-shows and same day TM visit cancelations by the publicly insured group. Between January and March 2021 we surveyed families who had never attended a TM visit to better understand barriers to TM use. Of the 7patients who received care during this period, 162 (22.8%) had never attended a TM visit. Of the 39 surveyed patients, 84.6% had T1D and 15.4% had T2D. There were 46.2% who self-identified as Non-Hispanic White, 35.9% as Hispanic, 5.1% as Asian, 2.6% as Non-Hispanic Black, and 10.3% as Other. Additionally, 48.7% had public insurance, 23.1% had no EMR access and 15.4% did not speak English as their primary language. Out of patients with T1D, 63.6% used a CGM and 33.3% used an insulin pump. Reported reasons not to attend a TM visit included: preference for in-person care (43.6%) , not being offered a TM visit (17.9%) , technology issues (12.8%) , scheduling conflicts or forgetting about the appointment (17.9%) and 20.5% preferred not to provide a reason. In conclusion, more than half of our surveyed patients with diabetes who never attended a TM visit were from racial and ethnic minority groups. The COVID-pandemic has highlighted disparities related to access to and use of technology to improve diabetes care. Our results show the importance of ensuring all families are aware of TM options and receive support with TM technology. Further research into TM perception and adoption barriers should be conducted to prevent disparities in care and to close health equity gaps.
doi_str_mv 10.2337/db22-942-P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685591301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685591301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631-cfdb3f9b010c11d94b27e8166ebce0b23fc4f89b83225f6df6686534b34141133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0I1k7Rp403WT1iwhwreQpJONMtuW5Musv_eritzmOHl4R14CLkEdsOFKG9by3mmcp7VR2QGSqhM8PLjmMwYA55BqcpTcpbSijEmp5kR_Qff0YeQBhPDGDDR0NEG17jBNrjQIX1PSM2m7z5pPUVmjMHR2kxoNyb6E8Yv2uwGpEBN1x5OPvUZiyOmc3LizTrhxf-ek-bpsVm8ZMu359fF_TJzUkDmfGuFV5YBcwCtyi0vsQIp0Tpklgvvcl8pWwnOCy9bL2UlC5FbkUMOIMScXB1qh9h_bzGNetVvYzd91FxWRaFAMJio6wPlYp9SRK-HGDYm7jQwvfen9_72SnQtfgEVXmC3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685591301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>CHAN, KAREN ; DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</creator><creatorcontrib>CHAN, KAREN ; DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the increase in telehealth services in diabetes care during the COVID-pandemic, studies have found disparities in telemedicine (TM) use among patients. Our Diabetes Clinic currently cares for 1400 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with 46% being publicly insured and for 375 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) , 88% being publicly insured. We have previously shown a significantly lower number of completed TM encounters between March and July 2020 by publicly insured patients when compared with privately insured and a threefold increase in no-shows and same day TM visit cancelations by the publicly insured group. Between January and March 2021 we surveyed families who had never attended a TM visit to better understand barriers to TM use. Of the 7patients who received care during this period, 162 (22.8%) had never attended a TM visit. Of the 39 surveyed patients, 84.6% had T1D and 15.4% had T2D. There were 46.2% who self-identified as Non-Hispanic White, 35.9% as Hispanic, 5.1% as Asian, 2.6% as Non-Hispanic Black, and 10.3% as Other. Additionally, 48.7% had public insurance, 23.1% had no EMR access and 15.4% did not speak English as their primary language. Out of patients with T1D, 63.6% used a CGM and 33.3% used an insulin pump. Reported reasons not to attend a TM visit included: preference for in-person care (43.6%) , not being offered a TM visit (17.9%) , technology issues (12.8%) , scheduling conflicts or forgetting about the appointment (17.9%) and 20.5% preferred not to provide a reason. In conclusion, more than half of our surveyed patients with diabetes who never attended a TM visit were from racial and ethnic minority groups. The COVID-pandemic has highlighted disparities related to access to and use of technology to improve diabetes care. Our results show the importance of ensuring all families are aware of TM options and receive support with TM technology. Further research into TM perception and adoption barriers should be conducted to prevent disparities in care and to close health equity gaps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-327X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/db22-942-P</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent) ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Hispanic Americans ; Insulin ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2022-06, Vol.71 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHAN, KAREN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</creatorcontrib><title>942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes</title><title>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Despite the increase in telehealth services in diabetes care during the COVID-pandemic, studies have found disparities in telemedicine (TM) use among patients. Our Diabetes Clinic currently cares for 1400 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with 46% being publicly insured and for 375 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) , 88% being publicly insured. We have previously shown a significantly lower number of completed TM encounters between March and July 2020 by publicly insured patients when compared with privately insured and a threefold increase in no-shows and same day TM visit cancelations by the publicly insured group. Between January and March 2021 we surveyed families who had never attended a TM visit to better understand barriers to TM use. Of the 7patients who received care during this period, 162 (22.8%) had never attended a TM visit. Of the 39 surveyed patients, 84.6% had T1D and 15.4% had T2D. There were 46.2% who self-identified as Non-Hispanic White, 35.9% as Hispanic, 5.1% as Asian, 2.6% as Non-Hispanic Black, and 10.3% as Other. Additionally, 48.7% had public insurance, 23.1% had no EMR access and 15.4% did not speak English as their primary language. Out of patients with T1D, 63.6% used a CGM and 33.3% used an insulin pump. Reported reasons not to attend a TM visit included: preference for in-person care (43.6%) , not being offered a TM visit (17.9%) , technology issues (12.8%) , scheduling conflicts or forgetting about the appointment (17.9%) and 20.5% preferred not to provide a reason. In conclusion, more than half of our surveyed patients with diabetes who never attended a TM visit were from racial and ethnic minority groups. The COVID-pandemic has highlighted disparities related to access to and use of technology to improve diabetes care. Our results show the importance of ensuring all families are aware of TM options and receive support with TM technology. Further research into TM perception and adoption barriers should be conducted to prevent disparities in care and to close health equity gaps.</description><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>0012-1797</issn><issn>1939-327X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0I1k7Rp403WT1iwhwreQpJONMtuW5Musv_eritzmOHl4R14CLkEdsOFKG9by3mmcp7VR2QGSqhM8PLjmMwYA55BqcpTcpbSijEmp5kR_Qff0YeQBhPDGDDR0NEG17jBNrjQIX1PSM2m7z5pPUVmjMHR2kxoNyb6E8Yv2uwGpEBN1x5OPvUZiyOmc3LizTrhxf-ek-bpsVm8ZMu359fF_TJzUkDmfGuFV5YBcwCtyi0vsQIp0Tpklgvvcl8pWwnOCy9bL2UlC5FbkUMOIMScXB1qh9h_bzGNetVvYzd91FxWRaFAMJio6wPlYp9SRK-HGDYm7jQwvfen9_72SnQtfgEVXmC3</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>CHAN, KAREN</creator><creator>DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes</title><author>CHAN, KAREN ; DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631-cfdb3f9b010c11d94b27e8166ebce0b23fc4f89b83225f6df6686534b34141133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHAN, KAREN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHAN, KAREN</au><au>DEMETERCO-BERGGREN, CARLA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0012-1797</issn><eissn>1939-327X</eissn><abstract>Despite the increase in telehealth services in diabetes care during the COVID-pandemic, studies have found disparities in telemedicine (TM) use among patients. Our Diabetes Clinic currently cares for 1400 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with 46% being publicly insured and for 375 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) , 88% being publicly insured. We have previously shown a significantly lower number of completed TM encounters between March and July 2020 by publicly insured patients when compared with privately insured and a threefold increase in no-shows and same day TM visit cancelations by the publicly insured group. Between January and March 2021 we surveyed families who had never attended a TM visit to better understand barriers to TM use. Of the 7patients who received care during this period, 162 (22.8%) had never attended a TM visit. Of the 39 surveyed patients, 84.6% had T1D and 15.4% had T2D. There were 46.2% who self-identified as Non-Hispanic White, 35.9% as Hispanic, 5.1% as Asian, 2.6% as Non-Hispanic Black, and 10.3% as Other. Additionally, 48.7% had public insurance, 23.1% had no EMR access and 15.4% did not speak English as their primary language. Out of patients with T1D, 63.6% used a CGM and 33.3% used an insulin pump. Reported reasons not to attend a TM visit included: preference for in-person care (43.6%) , not being offered a TM visit (17.9%) , technology issues (12.8%) , scheduling conflicts or forgetting about the appointment (17.9%) and 20.5% preferred not to provide a reason. In conclusion, more than half of our surveyed patients with diabetes who never attended a TM visit were from racial and ethnic minority groups. The COVID-pandemic has highlighted disparities related to access to and use of technology to improve diabetes care. Our results show the importance of ensuring all families are aware of TM options and receive support with TM technology. Further research into TM perception and adoption barriers should be conducted to prevent disparities in care and to close health equity gaps.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/db22-942-P</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1797
ispartof Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2022-06, Vol.71 (Supplement_1)
issn 0012-1797
1939-327X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2685591301
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent)
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Hispanic Americans
Insulin
Minority & ethnic groups
Pandemics
Patients
Pediatrics
Telemedicine
title 942-P: Disparities in Telemedicine Use among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A57%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=942-P:%20Disparities%20in%20Telemedicine%20Use%20among%20Pediatric%20Patients%20with%20Type%201%20and%20Type%202%20Diabetes&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=CHAN,%20KAREN&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0012-1797&rft.eissn=1939-327X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/db22-942-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685591301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685591301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true