Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings
The present methods for three‐dimensional time‐domain soil‐structure interaction (SSI) analysis are often uneconomical because they are performed with a single time integration scheme and a single time step, which prohibits their application to large‐scale SSI problems. In this study, a partitioned...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2022-08, Vol.51 (10), p.2220-2247 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2247 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2220 |
container_title | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Chen, Shaolin Lv, Hao Zhou, Guoliang |
description | The present methods for three‐dimensional time‐domain soil‐structure interaction (SSI) analysis are often uneconomical because they are performed with a single time integration scheme and a single time step, which prohibits their application to large‐scale SSI problems. In this study, a partitioned analysis of SSI (PASSI) is proposed for enhancing SSI computational efficiency. This is accomplished by partitioning the soil‐foundation‐structure system into the soil (foundation) and structure subsystems and implementing the continuity conditions of the displacements and reaction forces at the soil (foundation)‐structure interface in a primal way. A lumped‐mass explicit finite element method and a transmitting artificial boundary are used to model the unbounded soil, the structure is analyzed via the implicit finite element method, and the response of the rigid foundation is calculated through an explicit time integration scheme. The solution is separately advanced over time for each subsystem. Different time steps can be chosen for the explicit and implicit integration schemes, which can greatly improve efficiency. Interaction effects are accounted for by the transmission and synchronization of the coupled state variables. In addition, intrafield and interfield parallel procedures for PASSI are developed, and their theoretical efficiencies are analyzed. A simple example is provided to verify the performance of the partitioned approach with an explicit‐implicit co‐computation and to compare it to the fully explicit approach. Finally, the seismic response analysis of a nuclear power plant is presented to validate the feasibility and efficiency of the intrafield and interfield parallel procedures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eqe.3661 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685503360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685503360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3161-5b1df4da2593ca062e9a0efc9b1d7b8bbb18c65f294c96b3c1def80580f722183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFKAzEUBdAgCtYq-AkBN26mvkwmmWSppdVCUQu6DplMIinjpE1mkO78BL_RL3Fq3bp68DhcuBehSwITApDf2K2dUM7JERoRkDyTomDHaAQgRSZEUZ6is5TWAEA5lCO0etax850Pra2xbnWzSz7h4HAKvvn-_Epd7E3XR4t929mozZ5iFyJ-7E1jdcSL1Oi2xne9b2rfvqVzdOJ0k-zF3x2j1_nsZfqQLZ_uF9PbZaYp4SRjFaldUeucSWo08NxKDdYZOfzLSlRVRYThzOWyMJJX1JDaOgFMgCvznAg6RleH3E0M296mTq1DH4cGSeVcMAZ0aDio64MyMaQUrVOb6N913CkCaj-YGgZT-8EGmh3oh2_s7l-nZqvZr_8Bi7huDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685503360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chen, Shaolin ; Lv, Hao ; Zhou, Guoliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shaolin ; Lv, Hao ; Zhou, Guoliang</creatorcontrib><description>The present methods for three‐dimensional time‐domain soil‐structure interaction (SSI) analysis are often uneconomical because they are performed with a single time integration scheme and a single time step, which prohibits their application to large‐scale SSI problems. In this study, a partitioned analysis of SSI (PASSI) is proposed for enhancing SSI computational efficiency. This is accomplished by partitioning the soil‐foundation‐structure system into the soil (foundation) and structure subsystems and implementing the continuity conditions of the displacements and reaction forces at the soil (foundation)‐structure interface in a primal way. A lumped‐mass explicit finite element method and a transmitting artificial boundary are used to model the unbounded soil, the structure is analyzed via the implicit finite element method, and the response of the rigid foundation is calculated through an explicit time integration scheme. The solution is separately advanced over time for each subsystem. Different time steps can be chosen for the explicit and implicit integration schemes, which can greatly improve efficiency. Interaction effects are accounted for by the transmission and synchronization of the coupled state variables. In addition, intrafield and interfield parallel procedures for PASSI are developed, and their theoretical efficiencies are analyzed. A simple example is provided to verify the performance of the partitioned approach with an explicit‐implicit co‐computation and to compare it to the fully explicit approach. Finally, the seismic response analysis of a nuclear power plant is presented to validate the feasibility and efficiency of the intrafield and interfield parallel procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Computation ; Computer applications ; Efficiency ; explicit‐implicit integration scheme ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Integration ; Methods ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear power plants ; parallel algorithm ; Procedures ; Response analysis ; Seismic response ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Soil-structure interaction ; Soils ; Subsystems ; Synchronism ; Synchronization ; the lumped mass explicit finite element method ; Time integration ; transmitting artificial boundary</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2022-08, Vol.51 (10), p.2220-2247</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3161-5b1df4da2593ca062e9a0efc9b1d7b8bbb18c65f294c96b3c1def80580f722183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3161-5b1df4da2593ca062e9a0efc9b1d7b8bbb18c65f294c96b3c1def80580f722183</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6545-2815 ; 0000-0001-7044-6452 ; 0000-0003-2488-566X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.3661$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.3661$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Guoliang</creatorcontrib><title>Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings</title><title>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</title><description>The present methods for three‐dimensional time‐domain soil‐structure interaction (SSI) analysis are often uneconomical because they are performed with a single time integration scheme and a single time step, which prohibits their application to large‐scale SSI problems. In this study, a partitioned analysis of SSI (PASSI) is proposed for enhancing SSI computational efficiency. This is accomplished by partitioning the soil‐foundation‐structure system into the soil (foundation) and structure subsystems and implementing the continuity conditions of the displacements and reaction forces at the soil (foundation)‐structure interface in a primal way. A lumped‐mass explicit finite element method and a transmitting artificial boundary are used to model the unbounded soil, the structure is analyzed via the implicit finite element method, and the response of the rigid foundation is calculated through an explicit time integration scheme. The solution is separately advanced over time for each subsystem. Different time steps can be chosen for the explicit and implicit integration schemes, which can greatly improve efficiency. Interaction effects are accounted for by the transmission and synchronization of the coupled state variables. In addition, intrafield and interfield parallel procedures for PASSI are developed, and their theoretical efficiencies are analyzed. A simple example is provided to verify the performance of the partitioned approach with an explicit‐implicit co‐computation and to compare it to the fully explicit approach. Finally, the seismic response analysis of a nuclear power plant is presented to validate the feasibility and efficiency of the intrafield and interfield parallel procedures.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>explicit‐implicit integration scheme</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear power plants</subject><subject>parallel algorithm</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Response analysis</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil-structure interaction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>Synchronism</subject><subject>Synchronization</subject><subject>the lumped mass explicit finite element method</subject><subject>Time integration</subject><subject>transmitting artificial boundary</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFKAzEUBdAgCtYq-AkBN26mvkwmmWSppdVCUQu6DplMIinjpE1mkO78BL_RL3Fq3bp68DhcuBehSwITApDf2K2dUM7JERoRkDyTomDHaAQgRSZEUZ6is5TWAEA5lCO0etax850Pra2xbnWzSz7h4HAKvvn-_Epd7E3XR4t929mozZ5iFyJ-7E1jdcSL1Oi2xne9b2rfvqVzdOJ0k-zF3x2j1_nsZfqQLZ_uF9PbZaYp4SRjFaldUeucSWo08NxKDdYZOfzLSlRVRYThzOWyMJJX1JDaOgFMgCvznAg6RleH3E0M296mTq1DH4cGSeVcMAZ0aDio64MyMaQUrVOb6N913CkCaj-YGgZT-8EGmh3oh2_s7l-nZqvZr_8Bi7huDA</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Chen, Shaolin</creator><creator>Lv, Hao</creator><creator>Zhou, Guoliang</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-2815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-6452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-566X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings</title><author>Chen, Shaolin ; Lv, Hao ; Zhou, Guoliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3161-5b1df4da2593ca062e9a0efc9b1d7b8bbb18c65f294c96b3c1def80580f722183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>explicit‐implicit integration scheme</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear power plants</topic><topic>parallel algorithm</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Response analysis</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil-structure interaction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>Synchronism</topic><topic>Synchronization</topic><topic>the lumped mass explicit finite element method</topic><topic>Time integration</topic><topic>transmitting artificial boundary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Guoliang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Shaolin</au><au>Lv, Hao</au><au>Zhou, Guoliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2220</spage><epage>2247</epage><pages>2220-2247</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><abstract>The present methods for three‐dimensional time‐domain soil‐structure interaction (SSI) analysis are often uneconomical because they are performed with a single time integration scheme and a single time step, which prohibits their application to large‐scale SSI problems. In this study, a partitioned analysis of SSI (PASSI) is proposed for enhancing SSI computational efficiency. This is accomplished by partitioning the soil‐foundation‐structure system into the soil (foundation) and structure subsystems and implementing the continuity conditions of the displacements and reaction forces at the soil (foundation)‐structure interface in a primal way. A lumped‐mass explicit finite element method and a transmitting artificial boundary are used to model the unbounded soil, the structure is analyzed via the implicit finite element method, and the response of the rigid foundation is calculated through an explicit time integration scheme. The solution is separately advanced over time for each subsystem. Different time steps can be chosen for the explicit and implicit integration schemes, which can greatly improve efficiency. Interaction effects are accounted for by the transmission and synchronization of the coupled state variables. In addition, intrafield and interfield parallel procedures for PASSI are developed, and their theoretical efficiencies are analyzed. A simple example is provided to verify the performance of the partitioned approach with an explicit‐implicit co‐computation and to compare it to the fully explicit approach. Finally, the seismic response analysis of a nuclear power plant is presented to validate the feasibility and efficiency of the intrafield and interfield parallel procedures.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.3661</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-2815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7044-6452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-566X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-8847 |
ispartof | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2022-08, Vol.51 (10), p.2220-2247 |
issn | 0098-8847 1096-9845 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2685503360 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Computation Computer applications Efficiency explicit‐implicit integration scheme Finite element analysis Finite element method Integration Methods Nuclear energy Nuclear power plants parallel algorithm Procedures Response analysis Seismic response Soil Soil analysis Soil-structure interaction Soils Subsystems Synchronism Synchronization the lumped mass explicit finite element method Time integration transmitting artificial boundary |
title | Partitioned analysis of soil‐structure interaction for Nuclear Island Buildings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partitioned%20analysis%20of%20soil%E2%80%90structure%20interaction%20for%20Nuclear%20Island%20Buildings&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Chen,%20Shaolin&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2220&rft.epage=2247&rft.pages=2220-2247&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.3661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685503360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685503360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |