Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification

Multiracial self-classifiers are the fastest-growing racial population in the United States. While their rise signals a departure from norms of hypodescent, little is known about the sociopolitical meanings attached to multiracial labels. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding mu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of political science 2022-07, Vol.66 (3), p.570-586
Hauptverfasser: Davenport, Lauren D., Iyengar, Shanto, Westwood, Sean J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 586
container_issue 3
container_start_page 570
container_title American journal of political science
container_volume 66
creator Davenport, Lauren D.
Iyengar, Shanto
Westwood, Sean J.
description Multiracial self-classifiers are the fastest-growing racial population in the United States. While their rise signals a departure from norms of hypodescent, little is known about the sociopolitical meanings attached to multiracial labels. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding multiracial sense of racial group identity, linked fate, and racial attitudes. Examining a national opinion survey that samples more than 1200 multiracial adults, we compare the identity and attitudinal profiles of the two largest multiracial groups in the United States—White-Asians and White-Blacks—with those of their component monoracial groups. We find that while White-Asians and White-Blach often distinguish themselves from their component races, on balance, the assertion of dual racial membership signals greater solidarity and/or affect toward the minority race. These findings suggest that members of these multiracial populations are likely to align themselves relatively more with their minority background than with Whites on political issues that are racial in nature.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajps.12674
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685488566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45474553</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45474553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3234-5f8241d16b57f96279a3b84d39db1773d8836c319c3306b9c33e28d52639164a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKcvvgsB32SdSfPRxLdS3FQmitPnkrappHZNTVrG_ns7qz56Xw6X-zvnwgHgHKM5HuZaVa2f45BH9ABMMKMoYBJFh2CCkAwDJhg5BifeV2jYqSQT0Lyo3Kga3he66Uy3m8Gls30LE9v43NjeN9r7GVRNAeNuAPpC-xsYw4VTG7217gOW1sHY-wEzzTt87OvOuDFzresySGo1XEqTq87Y5hQclar2-uxHp-Btcfua3AWrp-V9Eq-CnISEBqwUIcUF5hmLSsnDSCqSCVoQWWQ4ikghBOE5wTInBPFsLzoUBQs5kZhTRabgcsxtnf3ste_SyvauGV6mIReMCsE4H6irkcqd9d7pMm2d2Si3SzFK932m-z7T7z4HGI_w1tR69w-Zxg_P61_PxeipfGfdn4cyGlHGCPkCfIOBKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685488566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Davenport, Lauren D. ; Iyengar, Shanto ; Westwood, Sean J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davenport, Lauren D. ; Iyengar, Shanto ; Westwood, Sean J.</creatorcontrib><description>Multiracial self-classifiers are the fastest-growing racial population in the United States. While their rise signals a departure from norms of hypodescent, little is known about the sociopolitical meanings attached to multiracial labels. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding multiracial sense of racial group identity, linked fate, and racial attitudes. Examining a national opinion survey that samples more than 1200 multiracial adults, we compare the identity and attitudinal profiles of the two largest multiracial groups in the United States—White-Asians and White-Blacks—with those of their component monoracial groups. We find that while White-Asians and White-Blach often distinguish themselves from their component races, on balance, the assertion of dual racial membership signals greater solidarity and/or affect toward the minority race. These findings suggest that members of these multiracial populations are likely to align themselves relatively more with their minority background than with Whites on political issues that are racial in nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0092-5853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Asian cultural groups ; Black people ; Classification ; Consciousness ; Ethnic identity ; Group identity ; Multiracial people ; Political factors ; Public opinion surveys ; Race ; Race relations ; Racial attitudes ; Racial identity</subject><ispartof>American journal of political science, 2022-07, Vol.66 (3), p.570-586</ispartof><rights>2022, Midwest Political Science Association</rights><rights>2021, Midwest Political Science Association.</rights><rights>2022 by the Midwest Political Science Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3234-5f8241d16b57f96279a3b84d39db1773d8836c319c3306b9c33e28d52639164a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3234-5f8241d16b57f96279a3b84d39db1773d8836c319c3306b9c33e28d52639164a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45474553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45474553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,33781,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davenport, Lauren D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyengar, Shanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Sean J.</creatorcontrib><title>Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification</title><title>American journal of political science</title><description>Multiracial self-classifiers are the fastest-growing racial population in the United States. While their rise signals a departure from norms of hypodescent, little is known about the sociopolitical meanings attached to multiracial labels. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding multiracial sense of racial group identity, linked fate, and racial attitudes. Examining a national opinion survey that samples more than 1200 multiracial adults, we compare the identity and attitudinal profiles of the two largest multiracial groups in the United States—White-Asians and White-Blacks—with those of their component monoracial groups. We find that while White-Asians and White-Blach often distinguish themselves from their component races, on balance, the assertion of dual racial membership signals greater solidarity and/or affect toward the minority race. These findings suggest that members of these multiracial populations are likely to align themselves relatively more with their minority background than with Whites on political issues that are racial in nature.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Asian cultural groups</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Ethnic identity</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Multiracial people</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Public opinion surveys</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Race relations</subject><subject>Racial attitudes</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><issn>0092-5853</issn><issn>1540-5907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKcvvgsB32SdSfPRxLdS3FQmitPnkrappHZNTVrG_ns7qz56Xw6X-zvnwgHgHKM5HuZaVa2f45BH9ABMMKMoYBJFh2CCkAwDJhg5BifeV2jYqSQT0Lyo3Kga3he66Uy3m8Gls30LE9v43NjeN9r7GVRNAeNuAPpC-xsYw4VTG7217gOW1sHY-wEzzTt87OvOuDFzresySGo1XEqTq87Y5hQclar2-uxHp-Btcfua3AWrp-V9Eq-CnISEBqwUIcUF5hmLSsnDSCqSCVoQWWQ4ikghBOE5wTInBPFsLzoUBQs5kZhTRabgcsxtnf3ste_SyvauGV6mIReMCsE4H6irkcqd9d7pMm2d2Si3SzFK932m-z7T7z4HGI_w1tR69w-Zxg_P61_PxeipfGfdn4cyGlHGCPkCfIOBKA</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Davenport, Lauren D.</creator><creator>Iyengar, Shanto</creator><creator>Westwood, Sean J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification</title><author>Davenport, Lauren D. ; Iyengar, Shanto ; Westwood, Sean J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3234-5f8241d16b57f96279a3b84d39db1773d8836c319c3306b9c33e28d52639164a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Asian cultural groups</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Ethnic identity</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Multiracial people</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Public opinion surveys</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Race relations</topic><topic>Racial attitudes</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davenport, Lauren D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyengar, Shanto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Sean J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davenport, Lauren D.</au><au>Iyengar, Shanto</au><au>Westwood, Sean J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification</atitle><jtitle>American journal of political science</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>570-586</pages><issn>0092-5853</issn><eissn>1540-5907</eissn><abstract>Multiracial self-classifiers are the fastest-growing racial population in the United States. While their rise signals a departure from norms of hypodescent, little is known about the sociopolitical meanings attached to multiracial labels. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for understanding multiracial sense of racial group identity, linked fate, and racial attitudes. Examining a national opinion survey that samples more than 1200 multiracial adults, we compare the identity and attitudinal profiles of the two largest multiracial groups in the United States—White-Asians and White-Blacks—with those of their component monoracial groups. We find that while White-Asians and White-Blach often distinguish themselves from their component races, on balance, the assertion of dual racial membership signals greater solidarity and/or affect toward the minority race. These findings suggest that members of these multiracial populations are likely to align themselves relatively more with their minority background than with Whites on political issues that are racial in nature.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ajps.12674</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0092-5853
ispartof American journal of political science, 2022-07, Vol.66 (3), p.570-586
issn 0092-5853
1540-5907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2685488566
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Adults
Asian cultural groups
Black people
Classification
Consciousness
Ethnic identity
Group identity
Multiracial people
Political factors
Public opinion surveys
Race
Race relations
Racial attitudes
Racial identity
title Racial Identity, Group Consciousness, and Attitudes: A Framework for Assessing Multiracial Self-Classification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A08%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Racial%20Identity,%20Group%20Consciousness,%20and%20Attitudes:%20A%20Framework%20for%20Assessing%20Multiracial%20Self-Classification&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Davenport,%20Lauren%20D.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=570-586&rft.issn=0092-5853&rft.eissn=1540-5907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajps.12674&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45474553%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685488566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45474553&rfr_iscdi=true