Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?

Abstract Well-stocked natural tree regeneration is critical to sustainable management of northern hardwood forests (NHF) by selection silviculture, but explicit goals and stocking criteria for sapling recruit size classes are lacking. For stems 0–2 in. (0–5.1 cm), we define 171 and 691 stems ac−1 (4...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forestry 2022-07, Vol.120 (4), p.395-419
Hauptverfasser: Walters, Michael B, Henry, Catherine R, Farinosi, Evan J, Roloff, Gary J, Donovan, Michael L, Hartman, Jason P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 4
container_start_page 395
container_title Journal of forestry
container_volume 120
creator Walters, Michael B
Henry, Catherine R
Farinosi, Evan J
Roloff, Gary J
Donovan, Michael L
Hartman, Jason P
description Abstract Well-stocked natural tree regeneration is critical to sustainable management of northern hardwood forests (NHF) by selection silviculture, but explicit goals and stocking criteria for sapling recruit size classes are lacking. For stems 0–2 in. (0–5.1 cm), we define 171 and 691 stems ac−1 (422.5 and 1,707.5 ha−1) as lower and upper full stocking thresholds for basic NHF management goals (wood and biomass productivity) and overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. We define component stocking targets as 15% of full stocking targets for six additional wildlife (e.g., nut producers) and resilience (e.g., pest–pathogen) goals and individual species representation. Applying our system to 141 managed stands in Michigan, USA, we found several areas of concern. At low threshold, 33% of stands were understocked for biomass and wood goals, whereas 67% were fully stocked with overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. Among goals, component stocking (low threshold) was as low as 5% (nut producers), with more than half the stands component stocked for ≤ 2 goals and ≤ 2 individual species. Stocking varied geographically and decreased with increasing site quality, overstory basal area, and deer use. Study Implications The stocking goals and density criteria we developed can help managers objectively identify areas where current silvicultural practices are ineffective and need modification. Our system is based on an interactive platform that can be readily modified to accommodate new information and management goals. Several management suggestions emerged from applying our system to selection-managed NHF stands in Michigan. First, highest quality sites have the greatest stocking challenges. Stocking outcomes could likely be improved via more intense overstory harvests and mitigation of deer impacts. Second, most stands meeting stocking goals are vulnerable to future changes in climate and pest–pathogen outbreaks, given stocking is often dominated by a small subset of candidate species. Planting, including the incorporation of assisted migration species candidates could help ameliorate this problem, as species could be evaluated based on their contribution to multiple component stocking goals.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jofore/fvac002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685285226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jofore/fvac002</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2685285226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-449b14f8ea556029c2eb795142dd13c63d6c938619c061ddf53d941badf974e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUEtPAjEQbowmInr13MSTh4W-tmy9GAMCJqAH4LwpbRcXl3ZtdyX-e0uWu8kkM5l8j5kPgHuMBhgJOty7wnkzLH6kQohcgB4WNEvoiPFL0IsbkmCC8DW4CWGPEMo4ZT1gV7KuSruDq8apr9Owln5nmgCjGFy2VVPWlYFLaeXOHIxt4MzJKsDSwnfnm0_jLZxLr4_OaTiN_qEJT3DujnDioqa0OsClkaH1Bm7q51twVUS6uTv3PthMX9fjebL4mL2NXxaJIhQ3CWNii1mRGZmmHBGhiNmORIoZ0RpTxanmKj7HsVCIY62LlGrB8FbqQoyYYbQPHjrd2rvvNh6V713rbbTMCc9SEovwiBp0KOVdCN4Uee3Lg_S_OUb5KdO8yzQ_ZxoJjx3BtfV_2D9-Dnqu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685285226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Walters, Michael B ; Henry, Catherine R ; Farinosi, Evan J ; Roloff, Gary J ; Donovan, Michael L ; Hartman, Jason P</creator><creatorcontrib>Walters, Michael B ; Henry, Catherine R ; Farinosi, Evan J ; Roloff, Gary J ; Donovan, Michael L ; Hartman, Jason P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Well-stocked natural tree regeneration is critical to sustainable management of northern hardwood forests (NHF) by selection silviculture, but explicit goals and stocking criteria for sapling recruit size classes are lacking. For stems 0–2 in. (0–5.1 cm), we define 171 and 691 stems ac−1 (422.5 and 1,707.5 ha−1) as lower and upper full stocking thresholds for basic NHF management goals (wood and biomass productivity) and overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. We define component stocking targets as 15% of full stocking targets for six additional wildlife (e.g., nut producers) and resilience (e.g., pest–pathogen) goals and individual species representation. Applying our system to 141 managed stands in Michigan, USA, we found several areas of concern. At low threshold, 33% of stands were understocked for biomass and wood goals, whereas 67% were fully stocked with overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. Among goals, component stocking (low threshold) was as low as 5% (nut producers), with more than half the stands component stocked for ≤ 2 goals and ≤ 2 individual species. Stocking varied geographically and decreased with increasing site quality, overstory basal area, and deer use. Study Implications The stocking goals and density criteria we developed can help managers objectively identify areas where current silvicultural practices are ineffective and need modification. Our system is based on an interactive platform that can be readily modified to accommodate new information and management goals. Several management suggestions emerged from applying our system to selection-managed NHF stands in Michigan. First, highest quality sites have the greatest stocking challenges. Stocking outcomes could likely be improved via more intense overstory harvests and mitigation of deer impacts. Second, most stands meeting stocking goals are vulnerable to future changes in climate and pest–pathogen outbreaks, given stocking is often dominated by a small subset of candidate species. Planting, including the incorporation of assisted migration species candidates could help ameliorate this problem, as species could be evaluated based on their contribution to multiple component stocking goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvac002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Assisted migration ; Biomass ; Candidate species ; Climate change ; Criteria ; Hardwoods ; Information management ; Migratory species ; Nuts ; Pathogens ; Pest outbreaks ; Pests ; Silvicultural practices ; Silviculture ; Species ; Stems ; Stocking ; Sustainability management ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 2022-07, Vol.120 (4), p.395-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of American Foresters. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of American Foresters. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-449b14f8ea556029c2eb795142dd13c63d6c938619c061ddf53d941badf974e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-449b14f8ea556029c2eb795142dd13c63d6c938619c061ddf53d941badf974e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5988-6377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walters, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Catherine R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farinosi, Evan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Jason P</creatorcontrib><title>Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>Abstract Well-stocked natural tree regeneration is critical to sustainable management of northern hardwood forests (NHF) by selection silviculture, but explicit goals and stocking criteria for sapling recruit size classes are lacking. For stems 0–2 in. (0–5.1 cm), we define 171 and 691 stems ac−1 (422.5 and 1,707.5 ha−1) as lower and upper full stocking thresholds for basic NHF management goals (wood and biomass productivity) and overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. We define component stocking targets as 15% of full stocking targets for six additional wildlife (e.g., nut producers) and resilience (e.g., pest–pathogen) goals and individual species representation. Applying our system to 141 managed stands in Michigan, USA, we found several areas of concern. At low threshold, 33% of stands were understocked for biomass and wood goals, whereas 67% were fully stocked with overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. Among goals, component stocking (low threshold) was as low as 5% (nut producers), with more than half the stands component stocked for ≤ 2 goals and ≤ 2 individual species. Stocking varied geographically and decreased with increasing site quality, overstory basal area, and deer use. Study Implications The stocking goals and density criteria we developed can help managers objectively identify areas where current silvicultural practices are ineffective and need modification. Our system is based on an interactive platform that can be readily modified to accommodate new information and management goals. Several management suggestions emerged from applying our system to selection-managed NHF stands in Michigan. First, highest quality sites have the greatest stocking challenges. Stocking outcomes could likely be improved via more intense overstory harvests and mitigation of deer impacts. Second, most stands meeting stocking goals are vulnerable to future changes in climate and pest–pathogen outbreaks, given stocking is often dominated by a small subset of candidate species. Planting, including the incorporation of assisted migration species candidates could help ameliorate this problem, as species could be evaluated based on their contribution to multiple component stocking goals.</description><subject>Assisted migration</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Candidate species</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>Nuts</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Pest outbreaks</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Silvicultural practices</subject><subject>Silviculture</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUEtPAjEQbowmInr13MSTh4W-tmy9GAMCJqAH4LwpbRcXl3ZtdyX-e0uWu8kkM5l8j5kPgHuMBhgJOty7wnkzLH6kQohcgB4WNEvoiPFL0IsbkmCC8DW4CWGPEMo4ZT1gV7KuSruDq8apr9Owln5nmgCjGFy2VVPWlYFLaeXOHIxt4MzJKsDSwnfnm0_jLZxLr4_OaTiN_qEJT3DujnDioqa0OsClkaH1Bm7q51twVUS6uTv3PthMX9fjebL4mL2NXxaJIhQ3CWNii1mRGZmmHBGhiNmORIoZ0RpTxanmKj7HsVCIY62LlGrB8FbqQoyYYbQPHjrd2rvvNh6V713rbbTMCc9SEovwiBp0KOVdCN4Uee3Lg_S_OUb5KdO8yzQ_ZxoJjx3BtfV_2D9-Dnqu</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Walters, Michael B</creator><creator>Henry, Catherine R</creator><creator>Farinosi, Evan J</creator><creator>Roloff, Gary J</creator><creator>Donovan, Michael L</creator><creator>Hartman, Jason P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-6377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?</title><author>Walters, Michael B ; Henry, Catherine R ; Farinosi, Evan J ; Roloff, Gary J ; Donovan, Michael L ; Hartman, Jason P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c231t-449b14f8ea556029c2eb795142dd13c63d6c938619c061ddf53d941badf974e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Assisted migration</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Candidate species</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>Nuts</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Pest outbreaks</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Silvicultural practices</topic><topic>Silviculture</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walters, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Catherine R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farinosi, Evan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Jason P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walters, Michael B</au><au>Henry, Catherine R</au><au>Farinosi, Evan J</au><au>Roloff, Gary J</au><au>Donovan, Michael L</au><au>Hartman, Jason P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>395-419</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>Abstract Well-stocked natural tree regeneration is critical to sustainable management of northern hardwood forests (NHF) by selection silviculture, but explicit goals and stocking criteria for sapling recruit size classes are lacking. For stems 0–2 in. (0–5.1 cm), we define 171 and 691 stems ac−1 (422.5 and 1,707.5 ha−1) as lower and upper full stocking thresholds for basic NHF management goals (wood and biomass productivity) and overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. We define component stocking targets as 15% of full stocking targets for six additional wildlife (e.g., nut producers) and resilience (e.g., pest–pathogen) goals and individual species representation. Applying our system to 141 managed stands in Michigan, USA, we found several areas of concern. At low threshold, 33% of stands were understocked for biomass and wood goals, whereas 67% were fully stocked with overabundant/pest–pathogen-challenged species. Among goals, component stocking (low threshold) was as low as 5% (nut producers), with more than half the stands component stocked for ≤ 2 goals and ≤ 2 individual species. Stocking varied geographically and decreased with increasing site quality, overstory basal area, and deer use. Study Implications The stocking goals and density criteria we developed can help managers objectively identify areas where current silvicultural practices are ineffective and need modification. Our system is based on an interactive platform that can be readily modified to accommodate new information and management goals. Several management suggestions emerged from applying our system to selection-managed NHF stands in Michigan. First, highest quality sites have the greatest stocking challenges. Stocking outcomes could likely be improved via more intense overstory harvests and mitigation of deer impacts. Second, most stands meeting stocking goals are vulnerable to future changes in climate and pest–pathogen outbreaks, given stocking is often dominated by a small subset of candidate species. Planting, including the incorporation of assisted migration species candidates could help ameliorate this problem, as species could be evaluated based on their contribution to multiple component stocking goals.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jofore/fvac002</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-6377</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1201
ispartof Journal of forestry, 2022-07, Vol.120 (4), p.395-419
issn 0022-1201
1938-3746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2685285226
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Assisted migration
Biomass
Candidate species
Climate change
Criteria
Hardwoods
Information management
Migratory species
Nuts
Pathogens
Pest outbreaks
Pests
Silvicultural practices
Silviculture
Species
Stems
Stocking
Sustainability management
Wildlife
Wildlife management
Wood
title Sapling Stocking Targets for Multiple Management Goals in Northern Hardwood Forests: How Do Stands Measure Up?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A49%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sapling%20Stocking%20Targets%20for%20Multiple%20Management%20Goals%20in%20Northern%20Hardwood%20Forests:%20How%20Do%20Stands%20Measure%20Up?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=Walters,%20Michael%20B&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=395-419&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jofore/fvac002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685285226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685285226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jofore/fvac002&rfr_iscdi=true