Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective

Epistemic modality is a crucial tool for describing the speaker's judgment—or request for the judgment of the listener—that has gained broad recognition and been widely investigated in academic writing. This research investigates the use of epistemic modality in 50 English-medium artificial int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theory and practice in language studies 2022-07, Vol.12 (7), p.1337-1348
Hauptverfasser: Bo, Gefei, Ma, Jianjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1348
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1337
container_title Theory and practice in language studies
container_volume 12
creator Bo, Gefei
Ma, Jianjun
description Epistemic modality is a crucial tool for describing the speaker's judgment—or request for the judgment of the listener—that has gained broad recognition and been widely investigated in academic writing. This research investigates the use of epistemic modality in 50 English-medium artificial intelligence (AI) research articles (RAs) from a systemic–functional perspective. Our research focuses on the frequency and function of the value, orientation, and polarity of epistemic modality in AI RAs. The results reveal that these AI RA writers tend to use both high- and low-value modality with explicitly objective orientation and positive polarity and that the epistemic modality performs the interpersonal function. This indicates that AI RA writers tend to ensure the objectivity of their results and that these writers adopt varying attitudes and hold differing views toward AI technology and thus have not yet achieved consensus. The study furthers the understanding of scholars’ attitudes toward AI statements in recent years.
doi_str_mv 10.17507/tpls.1207.13
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685103857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711339283</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711339283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-b8eb2f560f960d634fdebb6a93536af379f20a53ccefa1d8e3a4588fdc6cdf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWNSjZxc8b81Hk914K1I_oKL4cQ5pdlIj6e6aZIXe_A_-Q3-JqfWgM4dhhucdZngROiZ4TCqOq7PU-zgmFFdjwnbQiGLOSiwk3UUjUklZUi7JPjqK8RXnEJxQPhmhOOtdTLByprjtGu1dWheuLWbt0rv4Ut5C44ZVMQ3JWWec9sVNm8B7t4TWQPEAEXQwLz-A8RDPi2nxuN4u_Pr4vBxak1zXZt09hNhD7t7hEO1Z7SMc_dYD9Hw5e7q4Lud3VzcX03lpiJSpXNSwoJYLbKXAjWAT28BiIbRknAltWSUtxZozY8Bq0tTA9ITXtW2MMI3lNTtAp9u9fejeBohJvXZDyMdERUXNCWY1rzJ1sqWW2oPywSz1EKOaVoQwJmnNMjH-Q7jWdilok7PZvNm1YF2e_xOUW4EJXYwBrOqDW-mwVgSrH7fUxi21cUtl0TeDnInF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685103857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bo, Gefei ; Ma, Jianjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Bo, Gefei ; Ma, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><description>Epistemic modality is a crucial tool for describing the speaker's judgment—or request for the judgment of the listener—that has gained broad recognition and been widely investigated in academic writing. This research investigates the use of epistemic modality in 50 English-medium artificial intelligence (AI) research articles (RAs) from a systemic–functional perspective. Our research focuses on the frequency and function of the value, orientation, and polarity of epistemic modality in AI RAs. The results reveal that these AI RA writers tend to use both high- and low-value modality with explicitly objective orientation and positive polarity and that the epistemic modality performs the interpersonal function. This indicates that AI RA writers tend to ensure the objectivity of their results and that these writers adopt varying attitudes and hold differing views toward AI technology and thus have not yet achieved consensus. The study furthers the understanding of scholars’ attitudes toward AI statements in recent years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1799-2591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-0692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17507/tpls.1207.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Academy Publication Co., LTD</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic Language ; Academic writing ; Artificial intelligence ; Attitudes ; Computer Networks ; Engineering Technology ; English for Special Purposes ; English language ; Evaluation ; Evidentiality ; Grammar ; Interpersonal communication ; Judgment ; Linguistics ; Modality (Linguistics) ; Polarity ; Semantics ; Semiotics ; Systemic functional linguistics ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Theory and practice in language studies, 2022-07, Vol.12 (7), p.1337-1348</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Academy Publication Co., LTD</rights><rights>Copyright Academy Publication Co., Ltd. Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bo, Gefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><title>Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective</title><title>Theory and practice in language studies</title><description>Epistemic modality is a crucial tool for describing the speaker's judgment—or request for the judgment of the listener—that has gained broad recognition and been widely investigated in academic writing. This research investigates the use of epistemic modality in 50 English-medium artificial intelligence (AI) research articles (RAs) from a systemic–functional perspective. Our research focuses on the frequency and function of the value, orientation, and polarity of epistemic modality in AI RAs. The results reveal that these AI RA writers tend to use both high- and low-value modality with explicitly objective orientation and positive polarity and that the epistemic modality performs the interpersonal function. This indicates that AI RA writers tend to ensure the objectivity of their results and that these writers adopt varying attitudes and hold differing views toward AI technology and thus have not yet achieved consensus. The study furthers the understanding of scholars’ attitudes toward AI statements in recent years.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic Language</subject><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Computer Networks</subject><subject>Engineering Technology</subject><subject>English for Special Purposes</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evidentiality</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Modality (Linguistics)</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Systemic functional linguistics</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>1799-2591</issn><issn>2053-0692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWNSjZxc8b81Hk914K1I_oKL4cQ5pdlIj6e6aZIXe_A_-Q3-JqfWgM4dhhucdZngROiZ4TCqOq7PU-zgmFFdjwnbQiGLOSiwk3UUjUklZUi7JPjqK8RXnEJxQPhmhOOtdTLByprjtGu1dWheuLWbt0rv4Ut5C44ZVMQ3JWWec9sVNm8B7t4TWQPEAEXQwLz-A8RDPi2nxuN4u_Pr4vBxak1zXZt09hNhD7t7hEO1Z7SMc_dYD9Hw5e7q4Lud3VzcX03lpiJSpXNSwoJYLbKXAjWAT28BiIbRknAltWSUtxZozY8Bq0tTA9ITXtW2MMI3lNTtAp9u9fejeBohJvXZDyMdERUXNCWY1rzJ1sqWW2oPywSz1EKOaVoQwJmnNMjH-Q7jWdilok7PZvNm1YF2e_xOUW4EJXYwBrOqDW-mwVgSrH7fUxi21cUtl0TeDnInF</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Bo, Gefei</creator><creator>Ma, Jianjun</creator><general>Academy Publication Co., LTD</general><general>Academy Publication Co., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective</title><author>Bo, Gefei ; Ma, Jianjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-b8eb2f560f960d634fdebb6a93536af379f20a53ccefa1d8e3a4588fdc6cdf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic Language</topic><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Computer Networks</topic><topic>Engineering Technology</topic><topic>English for Special Purposes</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evidentiality</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Modality (Linguistics)</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Systemic functional linguistics</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bo, Gefei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Jianjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theory and practice in language studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bo, Gefei</au><au>Ma, Jianjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Theory and practice in language studies</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1337</spage><epage>1348</epage><pages>1337-1348</pages><issn>1799-2591</issn><eissn>2053-0692</eissn><abstract>Epistemic modality is a crucial tool for describing the speaker's judgment—or request for the judgment of the listener—that has gained broad recognition and been widely investigated in academic writing. This research investigates the use of epistemic modality in 50 English-medium artificial intelligence (AI) research articles (RAs) from a systemic–functional perspective. Our research focuses on the frequency and function of the value, orientation, and polarity of epistemic modality in AI RAs. The results reveal that these AI RA writers tend to use both high- and low-value modality with explicitly objective orientation and positive polarity and that the epistemic modality performs the interpersonal function. This indicates that AI RA writers tend to ensure the objectivity of their results and that these writers adopt varying attitudes and hold differing views toward AI technology and thus have not yet achieved consensus. The study furthers the understanding of scholars’ attitudes toward AI statements in recent years.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Academy Publication Co., LTD</pub><doi>10.17507/tpls.1207.13</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1799-2591
ispartof Theory and practice in language studies, 2022-07, Vol.12 (7), p.1337-1348
issn 1799-2591
2053-0692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2685103857
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Academic Achievement
Academic Language
Academic writing
Artificial intelligence
Attitudes
Computer Networks
Engineering Technology
English for Special Purposes
English language
Evaluation
Evidentiality
Grammar
Interpersonal communication
Judgment
Linguistics
Modality (Linguistics)
Polarity
Semantics
Semiotics
Systemic functional linguistics
Writing
title Epistemic Modality in English-Medium Artificial Intelligence Research Articles: A Systemic–Functional Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A56%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epistemic%20Modality%20in%20English-Medium%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Research%20Articles:%20A%20Systemic%E2%80%93Functional%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20practice%20in%20language%20studies&rft.au=Bo,%20Gefei&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1337&rft.epage=1348&rft.pages=1337-1348&rft.issn=1799-2591&rft.eissn=2053-0692&rft_id=info:doi/10.17507/tpls.1207.13&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA711339283%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685103857&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A711339283&rfr_iscdi=true