A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system

Background: Older adults may require assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Robotic assistance can offset healthcare costs and allow older adults to preserve their autonomy. Younger adults are often involved in the design and purchase of these robotic technologies and must take int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gerontechnology 2020-11, Vol.19 (3), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Nisha Raghunath, Christopher Pereyda, Justin Frow, Diane Cook, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Gerontechnology
container_volume 19
creator Nisha Raghunath
Christopher Pereyda
Justin Frow
Diane Cook
Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
description Background: Older adults may require assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Robotic assistance can offset healthcare costs and allow older adults to preserve their autonomy. Younger adults are often involved in the design and purchase of these robotic technologies and must take into account the needs and expectations of the target population (i.e., older adults) to create a robotic system that they will adopt. Objective: This study evaluated the opinions of younger and older adults regarding the design and performance of the Robot Activity Support (RAS) system. It is important to understand points of agreement and divergence between these populations' perspectives so that effective robotic aids are created for older adults. Methods: Fifty-two younger and older adults completed three scripted tasks with the RAS system in a smart home environment. Each participant made task errors to cue the robot to offer help via three prompt modalities (guide to object, video of forgotten step, and video of a full task). After interacting with the RAS system, participants completed questionnaires to report opinions of and satisfaction with the robot. Results: There were minimal differences between younger and older adults' perceptions of the RAS system across multiple factors (e.g., likability, cognitive demand), with both groups expressing generally neutral opinions. Both groups rated the Full Video prompt as least helpful, effective, and liked. Participants recommended the robotic system's response accuracy, movement speed, alerting style and system flexibility be improved. Younger adults overestimated how much older adults would want a robot like this. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of testing technology with target populations, as older adults were less interested in having RAS or a similar robot in their home than younger counterparts expected. Future work with robotic aids should focus first on older adults' requirements for an adoptable product, and then on optimal design to increase its usability.
doi_str_mv 10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2685095677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20230104002_N202301130013_00005</airiti_id><sourcerecordid>2685095677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2797-408d30209348eb084269cc8379c1c59b7ee74784b0afa908ab88fd6fceff6c3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUMtKxDAULaLg8wPcBVyoi6k3Tdsk7obBF4iKD3AX2jQZI9OmJqnSL_C3TRnRu7n3wHlwT5IcYkhzwPRsGdIMMkgxTwFICnQj2cFFyWcY49fNvxvwdrLr_TtAifOi3Em-5-jR1jaguQzm04QRPQ19b11AJ4_zp1PkRx9Ui7R1qFfO286jLxPeUKta60Zk2r4yrlVdOEcLG4Ez3RLZVaMcqroGjXboltPdDKvgjycPqfpgJh-rUXhTvwn7yZauVl4d_O695OXy4nlxPbu9v7pZzG9nVUY5neXAGhL_5CRnqgaWZyWXkhHKJZYFr6lSNKcsr6HSFQdW1YzpptRSaV1KoslecrT27Z39GJQP4t0OrouRIitZAbwoKY0svGZJZ713SovembZyo8Agpr7FMoipb4G5iH0LmDR0rYmFmGD-fR8ikQCGHCATd2uACQCOsjgF-QFNCYUF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2685095677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Nisha Raghunath ; Christopher Pereyda ; Justin Frow ; Diane Cook ; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</creator><creatorcontrib>Nisha Raghunath ; Christopher Pereyda ; Justin Frow ; Diane Cook ; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Older adults may require assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Robotic assistance can offset healthcare costs and allow older adults to preserve their autonomy. Younger adults are often involved in the design and purchase of these robotic technologies and must take into account the needs and expectations of the target population (i.e., older adults) to create a robotic system that they will adopt. Objective: This study evaluated the opinions of younger and older adults regarding the design and performance of the Robot Activity Support (RAS) system. It is important to understand points of agreement and divergence between these populations' perspectives so that effective robotic aids are created for older adults. Methods: Fifty-two younger and older adults completed three scripted tasks with the RAS system in a smart home environment. Each participant made task errors to cue the robot to offer help via three prompt modalities (guide to object, video of forgotten step, and video of a full task). After interacting with the RAS system, participants completed questionnaires to report opinions of and satisfaction with the robot. Results: There were minimal differences between younger and older adults' perceptions of the RAS system across multiple factors (e.g., likability, cognitive demand), with both groups expressing generally neutral opinions. Both groups rated the Full Video prompt as least helpful, effective, and liked. Participants recommended the robotic system's response accuracy, movement speed, alerting style and system flexibility be improved. Younger adults overestimated how much older adults would want a robot like this. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of testing technology with target populations, as older adults were less interested in having RAS or a similar robot in their home than younger counterparts expected. Future work with robotic aids should focus first on older adults' requirements for an adoptable product, and then on optimal design to increase its usability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-1101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-111X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eindhoven: 元智大學老人福祉科技研究中心</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Age differences ; Autonomy ; Flexibility ; Health care expenditures ; Home environment ; Older people ; Perceptions ; Robotics ; Robots ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Gerontechnology, 2020-11, Vol.19 (3), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Society for Gerontechnology Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2797-408d30209348eb084269cc8379c1c59b7ee74784b0afa908ab88fd6fceff6c3f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nisha Raghunath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher Pereyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justin Frow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diane Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</creatorcontrib><title>A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system</title><title>Gerontechnology</title><description>Background: Older adults may require assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Robotic assistance can offset healthcare costs and allow older adults to preserve their autonomy. Younger adults are often involved in the design and purchase of these robotic technologies and must take into account the needs and expectations of the target population (i.e., older adults) to create a robotic system that they will adopt. Objective: This study evaluated the opinions of younger and older adults regarding the design and performance of the Robot Activity Support (RAS) system. It is important to understand points of agreement and divergence between these populations' perspectives so that effective robotic aids are created for older adults. Methods: Fifty-two younger and older adults completed three scripted tasks with the RAS system in a smart home environment. Each participant made task errors to cue the robot to offer help via three prompt modalities (guide to object, video of forgotten step, and video of a full task). After interacting with the RAS system, participants completed questionnaires to report opinions of and satisfaction with the robot. Results: There were minimal differences between younger and older adults' perceptions of the RAS system across multiple factors (e.g., likability, cognitive demand), with both groups expressing generally neutral opinions. Both groups rated the Full Video prompt as least helpful, effective, and liked. Participants recommended the robotic system's response accuracy, movement speed, alerting style and system flexibility be improved. Younger adults overestimated how much older adults would want a robot like this. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of testing technology with target populations, as older adults were less interested in having RAS or a similar robot in their home than younger counterparts expected. Future work with robotic aids should focus first on older adults' requirements for an adoptable product, and then on optimal design to increase its usability.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Age differences</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Home environment</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1569-1101</issn><issn>1569-111X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUMtKxDAULaLg8wPcBVyoi6k3Tdsk7obBF4iKD3AX2jQZI9OmJqnSL_C3TRnRu7n3wHlwT5IcYkhzwPRsGdIMMkgxTwFICnQj2cFFyWcY49fNvxvwdrLr_TtAifOi3Em-5-jR1jaguQzm04QRPQ19b11AJ4_zp1PkRx9Ui7R1qFfO286jLxPeUKta60Zk2r4yrlVdOEcLG4Ez3RLZVaMcqroGjXboltPdDKvgjycPqfpgJh-rUXhTvwn7yZauVl4d_O695OXy4nlxPbu9v7pZzG9nVUY5neXAGhL_5CRnqgaWZyWXkhHKJZYFr6lSNKcsr6HSFQdW1YzpptRSaV1KoslecrT27Z39GJQP4t0OrouRIitZAbwoKY0svGZJZ713SovembZyo8Agpr7FMoipb4G5iH0LmDR0rYmFmGD-fR8ikQCGHCATd2uACQCOsjgF-QFNCYUF</recordid><startdate>20201102</startdate><enddate>20201102</enddate><creator>Nisha Raghunath</creator><creator>Christopher Pereyda</creator><creator>Justin Frow</creator><creator>Diane Cook</creator><creator>Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</creator><general>元智大學老人福祉科技研究中心</general><general>International Society for Gerontechnology</general><scope>188</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201102</creationdate><title>A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system</title><author>Nisha Raghunath ; Christopher Pereyda ; Justin Frow ; Diane Cook ; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2797-408d30209348eb084269cc8379c1c59b7ee74784b0afa908ab88fd6fceff6c3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Age differences</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Home environment</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nisha Raghunath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher Pereyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justin Frow</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diane Cook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Gerontechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nisha Raghunath</au><au>Christopher Pereyda</au><au>Justin Frow</au><au>Diane Cook</au><au>Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system</atitle><jtitle>Gerontechnology</jtitle><date>2020-11-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>1569-1101</issn><eissn>1569-111X</eissn><abstract>Background: Older adults may require assistance completing activities of daily living (ADLs). Robotic assistance can offset healthcare costs and allow older adults to preserve their autonomy. Younger adults are often involved in the design and purchase of these robotic technologies and must take into account the needs and expectations of the target population (i.e., older adults) to create a robotic system that they will adopt. Objective: This study evaluated the opinions of younger and older adults regarding the design and performance of the Robot Activity Support (RAS) system. It is important to understand points of agreement and divergence between these populations' perspectives so that effective robotic aids are created for older adults. Methods: Fifty-two younger and older adults completed three scripted tasks with the RAS system in a smart home environment. Each participant made task errors to cue the robot to offer help via three prompt modalities (guide to object, video of forgotten step, and video of a full task). After interacting with the RAS system, participants completed questionnaires to report opinions of and satisfaction with the robot. Results: There were minimal differences between younger and older adults' perceptions of the RAS system across multiple factors (e.g., likability, cognitive demand), with both groups expressing generally neutral opinions. Both groups rated the Full Video prompt as least helpful, effective, and liked. Participants recommended the robotic system's response accuracy, movement speed, alerting style and system flexibility be improved. Younger adults overestimated how much older adults would want a robot like this. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of testing technology with target populations, as older adults were less interested in having RAS or a similar robot in their home than younger counterparts expected. Future work with robotic aids should focus first on older adults' requirements for an adoptable product, and then on optimal design to increase its usability.</abstract><cop>Eindhoven</cop><pub>元智大學老人福祉科技研究中心</pub><doi>10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-1101
ispartof Gerontechnology, 2020-11, Vol.19 (3), p.1-11
issn 1569-1101
1569-111X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2685095677
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Activities of daily living
Age differences
Autonomy
Flexibility
Health care expenditures
Home environment
Older people
Perceptions
Robotics
Robots
Technology
title A Robot Activity Support (RAS) system for persons with memory impairment: Comparing older and younger adults' perceptions of the system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A21%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Robot%20Activity%20Support%20(RAS)%20system%20for%20persons%20with%20memory%20impairment:%20Comparing%20older%20and%20younger%20adults'%20perceptions%20of%20the%20system&rft.jtitle=Gerontechnology&rft.au=Nisha%20Raghunath&rft.date=2020-11-02&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=1569-1101&rft.eissn=1569-111X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4017/gt.2020.19.003.07&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685095677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2685095677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_airiti_id=P20230104002_N202301130013_00005&rfr_iscdi=true