Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method

The aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2022-07, Vol.314 (2), p.377-392
Hauptverfasser: Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo, Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto, Frej, Eduarda Asfora, de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 2
container_start_page 377
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 314
creator Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo
Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto
Frej, Eduarda Asfora
de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
description The aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff). This method works with partial information, obtained from the decision maker (DM), and thus reduces the time that the DM has to spend on the process for eliciting his/her preferences as he/she may avoid answering difficult questions. The decision-making process makes use of a decision support system (DSS), in which the DM interactively gives preference statements in a structured manner. The DSS gives flexibility to the DM, in such way that he/she gives as much information as he/she is willing to. Graphical visualization is provided at each step in order to help the DM’s analyses. Throughout the description of an application, some insights are provided including a discussion of the advantages and features of the FITradeoff method.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2684783171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709345433</galeid><sourcerecordid>A709345433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-c735af4ef7f259671fba064204d0abbe904e47adeedd85a04b20e99368bc7d273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEURgtRsB39Ae4Cbq3x5lGVquUw-IIBF-o65HFTnbE6aZOU2P_eDC2MAyqBBMI53-Xydd1LCpcUQL4pFISce6BTz4FBf3rU7eggWT9zPj3udsAG0Q-cw9PuWSm3AEDpNOw68xlXtDXEhehI9JKD3da6Zb2SinYf05qWEzlq-00vSIwu6EiKpO6R-BV_BrNiEx0JsWLWLegHkpq1w-Q9OWDdJ_e8e-L1WvDF7_ei-_ru7ZfrD_3Np_cfr69ueivEVHsr-aC9QC89G-ZRUm80jIKBcKCNwRkECtmS0blp0CAMA5xnPk7GSsckv-henXOPOX3fsFR1m7Yc20jFxknIiVNJ_0vBTCcxzgzuqUWvqEL0qS1lD6FYdSVh5mIQnDfq8i9UOw4PwaaIPrT_B8LrPwSzlRCxtKuEZV_LordSHuL0jNucSsno1TGHg84nRUHd1a7OtatWu7qrXZ2aw85OaWxcMN_v92_pF0UcrxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2091846920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method</title><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo ; Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto ; Frej, Eduarda Asfora ; de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</creator><creatorcontrib>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo ; Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto ; Frej, Eduarda Asfora ; de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff). This method works with partial information, obtained from the decision maker (DM), and thus reduces the time that the DM has to spend on the process for eliciting his/her preferences as he/she may avoid answering difficult questions. The decision-making process makes use of a decision support system (DSS), in which the DM interactively gives preference statements in a structured manner. The DSS gives flexibility to the DM, in such way that he/she gives as much information as he/she is willing to. Graphical visualization is provided at each step in order to help the DM’s analyses. Throughout the description of an application, some insights are provided including a discussion of the advantages and features of the FITradeoff method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; Analysis ; BigData and Sustainable Development ; Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Decision making ; Decision support systems ; Multiple criterion ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; S.I.: Agriculture Analytics ; Studies ; Technology ; Theory of Computation ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2022-07, Vol.314 (2), p.377-392</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>Annals of Operations Research is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-c735af4ef7f259671fba064204d0abbe904e47adeedd85a04b20e99368bc7d273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-c735af4ef7f259671fba064204d0abbe904e47adeedd85a04b20e99368bc7d273</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6529-9910</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frej, Eduarda Asfora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff). This method works with partial information, obtained from the decision maker (DM), and thus reduces the time that the DM has to spend on the process for eliciting his/her preferences as he/she may avoid answering difficult questions. The decision-making process makes use of a decision support system (DSS), in which the DM interactively gives preference statements in a structured manner. The DSS gives flexibility to the DM, in such way that he/she gives as much information as he/she is willing to. Graphical visualization is provided at each step in order to help the DM’s analyses. Throughout the description of an application, some insights are provided including a discussion of the advantages and features of the FITradeoff method.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>BigData and Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>S.I.: Agriculture Analytics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEURgtRsB39Ae4Cbq3x5lGVquUw-IIBF-o65HFTnbE6aZOU2P_eDC2MAyqBBMI53-Xydd1LCpcUQL4pFISce6BTz4FBf3rU7eggWT9zPj3udsAG0Q-cw9PuWSm3AEDpNOw68xlXtDXEhehI9JKD3da6Zb2SinYf05qWEzlq-00vSIwu6EiKpO6R-BV_BrNiEx0JsWLWLegHkpq1w-Q9OWDdJ_e8e-L1WvDF7_ei-_ru7ZfrD_3Np_cfr69ueivEVHsr-aC9QC89G-ZRUm80jIKBcKCNwRkECtmS0blp0CAMA5xnPk7GSsckv-henXOPOX3fsFR1m7Yc20jFxknIiVNJ_0vBTCcxzgzuqUWvqEL0qS1lD6FYdSVh5mIQnDfq8i9UOw4PwaaIPrT_B8LrPwSzlRCxtKuEZV_LordSHuL0jNucSsno1TGHg84nRUHd1a7OtatWu7qrXZ2aw85OaWxcMN_v92_pF0UcrxQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo</creator><creator>Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto</creator><creator>Frej, Eduarda Asfora</creator><creator>de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-9910</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method</title><author>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo ; Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto ; Frej, Eduarda Asfora ; de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-c735af4ef7f259671fba064204d0abbe904e47adeedd85a04b20e99368bc7d273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>BigData and Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>S.I.: Agriculture Analytics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frej, Eduarda Asfora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>test</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alvarez Carrillo, Pavel Anselmo</au><au>Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto</au><au>Frej, Eduarda Asfora</au><au>de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>314</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>377-392</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>The aim of this paper is to solve an agricultural technology packages selection problem by considering multiple dimensions which influence a maize producer’s preferences. The decision-making process is aided by a new multicriteria method for eliciting scale constants in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff (FITradeoff). This method works with partial information, obtained from the decision maker (DM), and thus reduces the time that the DM has to spend on the process for eliciting his/her preferences as he/she may avoid answering difficult questions. The decision-making process makes use of a decision support system (DSS), in which the DM interactively gives preference statements in a structured manner. The DSS gives flexibility to the DM, in such way that he/she gives as much information as he/she is willing to. Graphical visualization is provided at each step in order to help the DM’s analyses. Throughout the description of an application, some insights are provided including a discussion of the advantages and features of the FITradeoff method.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-9910</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2022-07, Vol.314 (2), p.377-392
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2684783171
source SpringerLink Journals (MCLS); Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)
subjects Agricultural practices
Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
Analysis
BigData and Sustainable Development
Business and Management
Combinatorics
Decision making
Decision support systems
Multiple criterion
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
S.I.: Agriculture Analytics
Studies
Technology
Theory of Computation
Tradeoffs
title Selecting an agricultural technology package based on the flexible and interactive tradeoff method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T11%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20an%20agricultural%20technology%20package%20based%20on%20the%20flexible%20and%20interactive%20tradeoff%20method&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Alvarez%20Carrillo,%20Pavel%20Anselmo&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=314&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=377-392&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-018-3020-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA709345433%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2091846920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A709345433&rfr_iscdi=true