Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications

Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no‐till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2598-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rowen, Elizabeth K., Pearsons, Kirsten A., Smith, Richard G., Wickings, Kyle, Tooker, John F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2598
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 32
creator Rowen, Elizabeth K.
Pearsons, Kirsten A.
Smith, Richard G.
Wickings, Kyle
Tooker, John F.
description Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no‐till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early‐season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3‐year corn (Zea mays mays L.)–soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no‐pest‐management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early‐season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention‐based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad‐spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation‐based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural‐enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2598
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2684210644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2684210644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2798-b3da038943176b90f3fc01ba1acfceefa0aaae3c2f9cc9c85e61d9c8738e559b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlbBJ5CAFy9b87FfOZZSP6CgBz3Kks1OcMt2E5PdSm8-gs_ok5i11ZtzmYH58Z_hh9A5JVNKCLsGaacsEfkBGlPBRZQkOTsMM0loRLKUjtCJ9ysSijF2jEY84TEnLB6jl4V0zfbr49OD9KbFtpFth5XZgMO-t9a4zuO1cYBBa1BdvQFswQ9I2znT4O5Vtrhu_bBTdQVYWtvUSna1af0pOtKy8XC27xP0fLN4mt9Fy4fb-_lsGSmWiTwqeSUJz0XMaZaWgmiuFaGlpFJpBaAlkVICV0wLpYTKE0hpFXrGc0gSUfIJutzlWmfe-vBesTK9a8PJgqV5zChJ4zhQVztKOeO9A11YV6-l2xaUFIPHIngsBo8BvdgH9uUaqj_wV1wAoh3wXjew_TeoWMwefwK_AdIkfxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684210644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rowen, Elizabeth K. ; Pearsons, Kirsten A. ; Smith, Richard G. ; Wickings, Kyle ; Tooker, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowen, Elizabeth K. ; Pearsons, Kirsten A. ; Smith, Richard G. ; Wickings, Kyle ; Tooker, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no‐till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early‐season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3‐year corn (Zea mays mays L.)–soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no‐pest‐management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early‐season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention‐based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad‐spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation‐based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural‐enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2598</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35343024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute toxicity ; Agricultural conservation ; Agricultural practices ; Animals ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Biological control ; Biological effects ; Conservation ; Conservation practices ; Corn ; Cover crops ; Crop rotation ; Crops ; Crops, Agricultural ; Damage ; Density ; Glycine max ; Herbivores ; Insect Control ; Insecta ; Insecticides ; Insects ; Integrated pest management ; Invertebrates ; IPM ; Neonicotinoids ; Pest Control ; Pest Control, Biological - methods ; Pests ; Plant protection ; Populations ; Predation ; Predators ; Pyrethroids ; Seasons ; soy ; Strategy ; Zea mays ; Zea mays mays</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2598-n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jul 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2798-b3da038943176b90f3fc01ba1acfceefa0aaae3c2f9cc9c85e61d9c8738e559b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2798-b3da038943176b90f3fc01ba1acfceefa0aaae3c2f9cc9c85e61d9c8738e559b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1904-3716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feap.2598$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feap.2598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35343024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowen, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearsons, Kirsten A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickings, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tooker, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no‐till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early‐season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3‐year corn (Zea mays mays L.)–soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no‐pest‐management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early‐season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention‐based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad‐spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation‐based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural‐enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.</description><subject>Acute toxicity</subject><subject>Agricultural conservation</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insect Control</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>IPM</subject><subject>Neonicotinoids</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>Pest Control, Biological - methods</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Pyrethroids</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>soy</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zea mays mays</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlbBJ5CAFy9b87FfOZZSP6CgBz3Kks1OcMt2E5PdSm8-gs_ok5i11ZtzmYH58Z_hh9A5JVNKCLsGaacsEfkBGlPBRZQkOTsMM0loRLKUjtCJ9ysSijF2jEY84TEnLB6jl4V0zfbr49OD9KbFtpFth5XZgMO-t9a4zuO1cYBBa1BdvQFswQ9I2znT4O5Vtrhu_bBTdQVYWtvUSna1af0pOtKy8XC27xP0fLN4mt9Fy4fb-_lsGSmWiTwqeSUJz0XMaZaWgmiuFaGlpFJpBaAlkVICV0wLpYTKE0hpFXrGc0gSUfIJutzlWmfe-vBesTK9a8PJgqV5zChJ4zhQVztKOeO9A11YV6-l2xaUFIPHIngsBo8BvdgH9uUaqj_wV1wAoh3wXjew_TeoWMwefwK_AdIkfxw</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Rowen, Elizabeth K.</creator><creator>Pearsons, Kirsten A.</creator><creator>Smith, Richard G.</creator><creator>Wickings, Kyle</creator><creator>Tooker, John F.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-3716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications</title><author>Rowen, Elizabeth K. ; Pearsons, Kirsten A. ; Smith, Richard G. ; Wickings, Kyle ; Tooker, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2798-b3da038943176b90f3fc01ba1acfceefa0aaae3c2f9cc9c85e61d9c8738e559b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute toxicity</topic><topic>Agricultural conservation</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insect Control</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>IPM</topic><topic>Neonicotinoids</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>Pest Control, Biological - methods</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Pyrethroids</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>soy</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zea mays mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowen, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearsons, Kirsten A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickings, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tooker, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowen, Elizabeth K.</au><au>Pearsons, Kirsten A.</au><au>Smith, Richard G.</au><au>Wickings, Kyle</au><au>Tooker, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2598</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2598-n/a</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Growing evidence suggests that conservation agricultural practices, like no‐till and cover crops, help protect annual crops from insect pests by supporting populations of resident arthropod predators. While adoption of conservation practices is growing, most field crop producers are also using more insecticides, including neonicotinoid seed coatings, as insurance against early‐season insect pests. This tactic may disrupt benefits associated with conservation practices by reducing arthropods that contribute to biological control. We investigated the interaction between preventive pest management (PPM) and the conservation practice of cover cropping. We also investigated an alternative pest management approach, integrated pest management (IPM), which responds to insect pest risk, rather than using insecticides prophylactically. In a 3‐year corn (Zea mays mays L.)–soy (Glycine max L.) rotation, we measured the response of invertebrate pests and predators to PPM and IPM with and without a cover crop. Using any insecticide provided some small reduction to plant damage in soy, but no yield benefit. In corn, vegetative cover early in the season was key to reducing pest density and damage, likely by increasing the abundance of arthropod predators. Further, PPM in year 1 decreased predation compared to a no‐pest‐management control. Contrary to our expectation, the IPM strategy, which required just one insecticide application, was more disruptive to the predator community than PPM, likely because the applied pyrethroid was more acutely toxic to a wider range of arthropods than neonicotinoids. Promoting early‐season cover was more effective at reducing pest density and damage than either intervention‐based strategy. Our results suggest that the best pest management outcomes may occur when biological control is encouraged by planting cover crops and avoiding broad‐spectrum insecticides as much as possible. As part of a conservation‐based approach to farming, cover crops can promote natural‐enemy populations that can help provide biological effective control of insect pest populations.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>35343024</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2598</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-3716</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2022-07, Vol.32 (5), p.e2598-n/a
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2684210644
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Acute toxicity
Agricultural conservation
Agricultural practices
Animals
Arthropoda
Arthropods
Biological control
Biological effects
Conservation
Conservation practices
Corn
Cover crops
Crop rotation
Crops
Crops, Agricultural
Damage
Density
Glycine max
Herbivores
Insect Control
Insecta
Insecticides
Insects
Integrated pest management
Invertebrates
IPM
Neonicotinoids
Pest Control
Pest Control, Biological - methods
Pests
Plant protection
Populations
Predation
Predators
Pyrethroids
Seasons
soy
Strategy
Zea mays
Zea mays mays
title Early‐season plant cover supports more effective pest control than insecticide applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%E2%80%90season%20plant%20cover%20supports%20more%20effective%20pest%20control%20than%20insecticide%20applications&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Rowen,%20Elizabeth%20K.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2598&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2598-n/a&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2684210644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684210644&rft_id=info:pmid/35343024&rfr_iscdi=true