Populist media diets
Objective The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the rela...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social science quarterly 2022-07, Vol.103 (4), p.975-991 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 991 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 975 |
| container_title | Social science quarterly |
| container_volume | 103 |
| creator | de Rooij, Eline A. Stecuła, Dominik A. Pickup, Mark A. |
| description | Objective
The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the relationship between populism and where Americans get their news and how they assess news media credibility.
Methods
Using an original, national survey of Americans (N = 1009) fielded in March 2020, we explore the news media diets of populists, controlling for partisanship, ideology, and relevant covariates.
Results
Analyses demonstrate that two primary dimensions of populism—anti‐elitism and distrust of experts—relate to media diets in complex ways.
Conclusion
Those who distrust experts have a more ideologically extreme media diet and put trust in fringe outlets and social media, whereas those with anti‐elite attitudes do not shy away from mainstream outlets and hold positive views of journalists and mainstream media. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ssqu.13178 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2682979007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2682979007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2648-967d306d54b40be46e790e1e81bd7386c6443a9f943796177e4e63363687cd063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhdRMFYv4g8oeBNSZ7PT2d2jFL-goFJ7XpLsBFJS0-4mSP-9qfHse5nLM-_LI8S1hJkcch_jvp9JJbU5EYmcI6SUKX0qEgBlUrQoz8VFjBsAwAxNIm7e213f1LGbbtnX-dTX3MVLcVblTeSrvzsR66fHz8VLunx7fl08LNMyIzSpJe0VkJ9jgVAwEmsLLNnIwmtlqCREldvKotKWpNaMTEqRIqNLD6Qm4nbs3YV233Ps3Kbtw9cw6TIymR3qQA_U3UiVoY0xcOV2od7m4eAkuKO1O1q7X-sBliP8XTd8-Id0q9XHevz5AZXjVsk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2682979007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Populist media diets</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>de Rooij, Eline A. ; Stecuła, Dominik A. ; Pickup, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Eline A. ; Stecuła, Dominik A. ; Pickup, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the relationship between populism and where Americans get their news and how they assess news media credibility.
Methods
Using an original, national survey of Americans (N = 1009) fielded in March 2020, we explore the news media diets of populists, controlling for partisanship, ideology, and relevant covariates.
Results
Analyses demonstrate that two primary dimensions of populism—anti‐elitism and distrust of experts—relate to media diets in complex ways.
Conclusion
Those who distrust experts have a more ideologically extreme media diet and put trust in fringe outlets and social media, whereas those with anti‐elite attitudes do not shy away from mainstream outlets and hold positive views of journalists and mainstream media.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Consumption patterns ; Credibility ; Diet ; Elitism ; Experts ; Journalists ; Mass media ; media consumption ; media trust ; News media ; Partisanship ; Polls & surveys ; Populism ; Social media ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.103 (4), p.975-991</ispartof><rights>2022 by the Southwestern Social Science Association.</rights><rights>2022 Southwestern Social Science Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2648-967d306d54b40be46e790e1e81bd7386c6443a9f943796177e4e63363687cd063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2648-967d306d54b40be46e790e1e81bd7386c6443a9f943796177e4e63363687cd063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6724-7559 ; 0000-0002-5808-920X ; 0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fssqu.13178$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fssqu.13178$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Eline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stecuła, Dominik A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Populist media diets</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><description>Objective
The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the relationship between populism and where Americans get their news and how they assess news media credibility.
Methods
Using an original, national survey of Americans (N = 1009) fielded in March 2020, we explore the news media diets of populists, controlling for partisanship, ideology, and relevant covariates.
Results
Analyses demonstrate that two primary dimensions of populism—anti‐elitism and distrust of experts—relate to media diets in complex ways.
Conclusion
Those who distrust experts have a more ideologically extreme media diet and put trust in fringe outlets and social media, whereas those with anti‐elite attitudes do not shy away from mainstream outlets and hold positive views of journalists and mainstream media.</description><subject>Consumption patterns</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>media consumption</subject><subject>media trust</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhdRMFYv4g8oeBNSZ7PT2d2jFL-goFJ7XpLsBFJS0-4mSP-9qfHse5nLM-_LI8S1hJkcch_jvp9JJbU5EYmcI6SUKX0qEgBlUrQoz8VFjBsAwAxNIm7e213f1LGbbtnX-dTX3MVLcVblTeSrvzsR66fHz8VLunx7fl08LNMyIzSpJe0VkJ9jgVAwEmsLLNnIwmtlqCREldvKotKWpNaMTEqRIqNLD6Qm4nbs3YV233Ps3Kbtw9cw6TIymR3qQA_U3UiVoY0xcOV2od7m4eAkuKO1O1q7X-sBliP8XTd8-Id0q9XHevz5AZXjVsk</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>de Rooij, Eline A.</creator><creator>Stecuła, Dominik A.</creator><creator>Pickup, Mark A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-7559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Populist media diets</title><author>de Rooij, Eline A. ; Stecuła, Dominik A. ; Pickup, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2648-967d306d54b40be46e790e1e81bd7386c6443a9f943796177e4e63363687cd063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consumption patterns</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>media consumption</topic><topic>media trust</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Rooij, Eline A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stecuła, Dominik A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Rooij, Eline A.</au><au>Stecuła, Dominik A.</au><au>Pickup, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Populist media diets</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>975-991</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><abstract>Objective
The changing media landscape highlights the need to understand the dynamic nature of Americans’ news consumption patterns. Research to date has focused on understanding how media diets vary across partisanship, while other, cross‐cutting cleavages remain underexplored. We focus on the relationship between populism and where Americans get their news and how they assess news media credibility.
Methods
Using an original, national survey of Americans (N = 1009) fielded in March 2020, we explore the news media diets of populists, controlling for partisanship, ideology, and relevant covariates.
Results
Analyses demonstrate that two primary dimensions of populism—anti‐elitism and distrust of experts—relate to media diets in complex ways.
Conclusion
Those who distrust experts have a more ideologically extreme media diet and put trust in fringe outlets and social media, whereas those with anti‐elite attitudes do not shy away from mainstream outlets and hold positive views of journalists and mainstream media.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ssqu.13178</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-7559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-920X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0539-1138</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0038-4941 |
| ispartof | Social science quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.103 (4), p.975-991 |
| issn | 0038-4941 1540-6237 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2682979007 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Consumption patterns Credibility Diet Elitism Experts Journalists Mass media media consumption media trust News media Partisanship Polls & surveys Populism Social media Trust |
| title | Populist media diets |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Populist%20media%20diets&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=de%20Rooij,%20Eline%20A.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=975-991&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ssqu.13178&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2682979007%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2682979007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |