Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India

This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ecologica Sinica 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197
Hauptverfasser: Yashmita-Ulman, Singh, Manoj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 197
container_issue 3
container_start_page 188
container_title Acta ecologica Sinica
container_volume 42
creator Yashmita-Ulman
Singh, Manoj
description This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681899905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1872203221000330</els_id><sourcerecordid>2681899905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpeSQkPqf9CDoJcUvFtJ693VXgomH27AtFDcs9DHbCw7KzmaXYP_Sn5t5G4OPUWH0czwzjMMb5Z9YbRglNXfd4XZegVYcMpZQcuC0sWH7JKJhueclvziv_xTNkPc0fSaRghKL7OXW_DohtOcbJV2gxqIQgzGqcEFj0R5S0xKIB7_dQgmyYgkdGQF-30gj2BSvN6EvTpNxTfiPNmOvfK5Db3zagBLnhIIjTpAQsYwJuov1UN0ZOMeIZI_cN4Ac7JEVP2cPHjr1OfsY6eeEGZv_1X29_5uc_MzX_9ePdws17nhohxyVoM1zYJCKUSrRamrrrJUM75odSdK1emqol3Lams4azjo2jDNNNRapFZSXGVfJ-4hhucRcJC7MEafVkpeCybatqVVUi0mlYkBMUInD9H1Kp4ko_JshNzJyQh5NkLSUiYj0tiPaQzSBUcHUaJx4A1YF8EM0gb3PuAVcvWVRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681899905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</creator><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><description>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-2032</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1000-0933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-2032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Conservation status ; Density ; Distance from forest ; Geckos ; Gekko gecko ; Gender ; Habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Homegardens ; Landscape ; People's attitude ; Plant diversity ; Plant species ; Source of income ; Species diversity ; Threatened species ; Tree preference ; Trees ; Villages ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Acta ecologica Sinica, 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197</ispartof><rights>2021 Ecological Society of China</rights><rights>Copyright Science Press Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><title>Acta ecologica Sinica</title><description>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</description><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Distance from forest</subject><subject>Geckos</subject><subject>Gekko gecko</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Homegardens</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>People's attitude</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Source of income</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Tree preference</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1872-2032</issn><issn>1000-0933</issn><issn>1872-2032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpeSQkPqf9CDoJcUvFtJ693VXgomH27AtFDcs9DHbCw7KzmaXYP_Sn5t5G4OPUWH0czwzjMMb5Z9YbRglNXfd4XZegVYcMpZQcuC0sWH7JKJhueclvziv_xTNkPc0fSaRghKL7OXW_DohtOcbJV2gxqIQgzGqcEFj0R5S0xKIB7_dQgmyYgkdGQF-30gj2BSvN6EvTpNxTfiPNmOvfK5Db3zagBLnhIIjTpAQsYwJuov1UN0ZOMeIZI_cN4Ac7JEVP2cPHjr1OfsY6eeEGZv_1X29_5uc_MzX_9ePdws17nhohxyVoM1zYJCKUSrRamrrrJUM75odSdK1emqol3Lams4azjo2jDNNNRapFZSXGVfJ-4hhucRcJC7MEafVkpeCybatqVVUi0mlYkBMUInD9H1Kp4ko_JshNzJyQh5NkLSUiYj0tiPaQzSBUcHUaJx4A1YF8EM0gb3PuAVcvWVRA</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yashmita-Ulman</creator><creator>Singh, Manoj</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Science Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><author>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Distance from forest</topic><topic>Geckos</topic><topic>Gekko gecko</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Homegardens</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>People's attitude</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Source of income</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Tree preference</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta ecologica Sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yashmita-Ulman</au><au>Singh, Manoj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</atitle><jtitle>Acta ecologica Sinica</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>188-197</pages><issn>1872-2032</issn><issn>1000-0933</issn><eissn>1872-2032</eissn><abstract>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1872-2032
ispartof Acta ecologica Sinica, 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197
issn 1872-2032
1000-0933
1872-2032
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2681899905
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Conservation status
Density
Distance from forest
Geckos
Gekko gecko
Gender
Habitat preferences
Habitats
Homegardens
Landscape
People's attitude
Plant diversity
Plant species
Source of income
Species diversity
Threatened species
Tree preference
Trees
Villages
Wildlife conservation
title Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density,%20habitat%20associations%20and%20conservation%20status%20of%20Gekko%20gecko%20(Tokay%20gecko)%20in%20human-dominated%20landscapes%20around%20Nameri%20Tiger%20Reserve,%20Assam,%20India&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ecologica%20Sinica&rft.au=Yashmita-Ulman&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=188-197&rft.issn=1872-2032&rft.eissn=1872-2032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681899905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681899905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1872203221000330&rfr_iscdi=true