Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India
This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta ecologica Sinica 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 197 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Acta ecologica Sinica |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Yashmita-Ulman Singh, Manoj |
description | This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681899905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1872203221000330</els_id><sourcerecordid>2681899905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpeSQkPqf9CDoJcUvFtJ693VXgomH27AtFDcs9DHbCw7KzmaXYP_Sn5t5G4OPUWH0czwzjMMb5Z9YbRglNXfd4XZegVYcMpZQcuC0sWH7JKJhueclvziv_xTNkPc0fSaRghKL7OXW_DohtOcbJV2gxqIQgzGqcEFj0R5S0xKIB7_dQgmyYgkdGQF-30gj2BSvN6EvTpNxTfiPNmOvfK5Db3zagBLnhIIjTpAQsYwJuov1UN0ZOMeIZI_cN4Ac7JEVP2cPHjr1OfsY6eeEGZv_1X29_5uc_MzX_9ePdws17nhohxyVoM1zYJCKUSrRamrrrJUM75odSdK1emqol3Lams4azjo2jDNNNRapFZSXGVfJ-4hhucRcJC7MEafVkpeCybatqVVUi0mlYkBMUInD9H1Kp4ko_JshNzJyQh5NkLSUiYj0tiPaQzSBUcHUaJx4A1YF8EM0gb3PuAVcvWVRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681899905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</creator><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><description>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1872-2032</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1000-0933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-2032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Conservation status ; Density ; Distance from forest ; Geckos ; Gekko gecko ; Gender ; Habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Homegardens ; Landscape ; People's attitude ; Plant diversity ; Plant species ; Source of income ; Species diversity ; Threatened species ; Tree preference ; Trees ; Villages ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Acta ecologica Sinica, 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197</ispartof><rights>2021 Ecological Society of China</rights><rights>Copyright Science Press Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><title>Acta ecologica Sinica</title><description>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</description><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Distance from forest</subject><subject>Geckos</subject><subject>Gekko gecko</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Homegardens</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>People's attitude</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Source of income</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Tree preference</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Villages</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1872-2032</issn><issn>1000-0933</issn><issn>1872-2032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhpeSQkPqf9CDoJcUvFtJ693VXgomH27AtFDcs9DHbCw7KzmaXYP_Sn5t5G4OPUWH0czwzjMMb5Z9YbRglNXfd4XZegVYcMpZQcuC0sWH7JKJhueclvziv_xTNkPc0fSaRghKL7OXW_DohtOcbJV2gxqIQgzGqcEFj0R5S0xKIB7_dQgmyYgkdGQF-30gj2BSvN6EvTpNxTfiPNmOvfK5Db3zagBLnhIIjTpAQsYwJuov1UN0ZOMeIZI_cN4Ac7JEVP2cPHjr1OfsY6eeEGZv_1X29_5uc_MzX_9ePdws17nhohxyVoM1zYJCKUSrRamrrrJUM75odSdK1emqol3Lams4azjo2jDNNNRapFZSXGVfJ-4hhucRcJC7MEafVkpeCybatqVVUi0mlYkBMUInD9H1Kp4ko_JshNzJyQh5NkLSUiYj0tiPaQzSBUcHUaJx4A1YF8EM0gb3PuAVcvWVRA</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yashmita-Ulman</creator><creator>Singh, Manoj</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Science Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</title><author>Yashmita-Ulman ; Singh, Manoj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-16edc740e3889b83b5f5d0b1249bf83afb550f916dc2172eb6c1b1be6b86dcf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Distance from forest</topic><topic>Geckos</topic><topic>Gekko gecko</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Homegardens</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>People's attitude</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Source of income</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Tree preference</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Villages</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yashmita-Ulman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manoj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta ecologica Sinica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yashmita-Ulman</au><au>Singh, Manoj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India</atitle><jtitle>Acta ecologica Sinica</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>188-197</pages><issn>1872-2032</issn><issn>1000-0933</issn><eissn>1872-2032</eissn><abstract>This study conducted from January to June 2018, attempts to determine the density, habitat preferences and attitudes of people towards Gekko gecko and its impact on the conservation of this species in human-dominated landscapes in Sonitpur district, Assam. Eight villages at different distances from Nameri Tiger Reserve were chosen for the study. The line transects analyzed using DISTANCE software estimated a density of 7.99 individuals ha−1 in fringe villages of Nameri Tiger Reserve which also had higher number of host tree species diversity with higher basal area and density as compared to that of villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve. Gekko gecko was sighted on a total of 30 trees (6 species, 2 families), the highest being Ficus rumphii (40%). Maximum sightings of Gekko gecko was done on trees (67%). The occurrence of Gekko gecko was highly influenced by distance from forest (12%), followed by source of income (11%) and gender (4%). The majority of the respondents (53.54%) revealed that Gekko gecko occurred naturally in the homegardens implying that homegardens provided the habitat that can support the populations of Gekko gecko. But 46.45% of the respondents reported that they were adopted (62.16% in villages distant from Nameri Tiger Reserve), which raises serious concerns about the conservation of Gekko gecko in homegardens. Though, majority of the people knew that it is illegal to trade Gekko gecko, the financial benefits of its trade is very alluring. To make homegardens more favourable for the survival of Gekko gecko there should be strict law enforcement, upgradation of the species in the IUCN Red List and options for alternative livelihood.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1872-2032 |
ispartof | Acta ecologica Sinica, 2022-06, Vol.42 (3), p.188-197 |
issn | 1872-2032 1000-0933 1872-2032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2681899905 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Conservation status Density Distance from forest Geckos Gekko gecko Gender Habitat preferences Habitats Homegardens Landscape People's attitude Plant diversity Plant species Source of income Species diversity Threatened species Tree preference Trees Villages Wildlife conservation |
title | Density, habitat associations and conservation status of Gekko gecko (Tokay gecko) in human-dominated landscapes around Nameri Tiger Reserve, Assam, India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density,%20habitat%20associations%20and%20conservation%20status%20of%20Gekko%20gecko%20(Tokay%20gecko)%20in%20human-dominated%20landscapes%20around%20Nameri%20Tiger%20Reserve,%20Assam,%20India&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ecologica%20Sinica&rft.au=Yashmita-Ulman&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=188-197&rft.issn=1872-2032&rft.eissn=1872-2032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chnaes.2021.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681899905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681899905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1872203221000330&rfr_iscdi=true |