Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure
This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self‐consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.1933-1946 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1946 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1933 |
container_title | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato Gil, Augusto Masiero Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis Li, Zongjin Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca |
description | This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self‐consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second‐best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump‐flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/suco.202000566 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681791827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681791827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-ce7637c0cc07a1da7412f9b8d91f61b2cadb6ae587978f81c2ee8fc9a28ba12b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw5WyJc4rtJrbDrarKj1SpB-jZcpx1myqNi50AvfEIPCNPgksQHDntrPabHWkQuqRkRAlh16EzbsQII4RknB-hARUZTQRP5XHUKU-TlApxis5C2EQ-6myAzOxF151uq2aF2zVg74outA2EgJ3FAWr7-f5hXBNcXZU9FjfjoYUbPGmw3u2802aNW_ft31ZvuIRQrRocDwbKzsM5OrG6DnDxM4doeTt7mt4n88Xdw3QyT8yYCp4YEHwsDDGGCE1LLVLKbF7IMqeW04IZXRZcQyZFLqSV1DAAaU2umSw0ZcV4iK76vzH5uYPQqo3rfBMjFeOSipxKJiI16injXQgerNr5aqv9XlGiDkWqQ5Hqt8hoyHvDa1XD_h9aPS6niz_vF1pdep4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681791827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato ; Gil, Augusto Masiero ; Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis ; Li, Zongjin ; Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</creator><creatorcontrib>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato ; Gil, Augusto Masiero ; Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis ; Li, Zongjin ; Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</creatorcontrib><description>This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self‐consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second‐best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump‐flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/suco.202000566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>Mathematical analysis ; mixture design method ; Mixtures ; Moisture content ; Robustness ; robustness index ; self‐consolidating concrete ; Weighting methods</subject><ispartof>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.1933-1946</ispartof><rights>2021 . International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><rights>2022 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-ce7637c0cc07a1da7412f9b8d91f61b2cadb6ae587978f81c2ee8fc9a28ba12b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-ce7637c0cc07a1da7412f9b8d91f61b2cadb6ae587978f81c2ee8fc9a28ba12b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1319-0547</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsuco.202000566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Augusto Masiero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure</title><title>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</title><description>This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self‐consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second‐best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump‐flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±).</description><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>mixture design method</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>robustness index</subject><subject>self‐consolidating concrete</subject><subject>Weighting methods</subject><issn>1464-4177</issn><issn>1751-7648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw5WyJc4rtJrbDrarKj1SpB-jZcpx1myqNi50AvfEIPCNPgksQHDntrPabHWkQuqRkRAlh16EzbsQII4RknB-hARUZTQRP5XHUKU-TlApxis5C2EQ-6myAzOxF151uq2aF2zVg74outA2EgJ3FAWr7-f5hXBNcXZU9FjfjoYUbPGmw3u2802aNW_ft31ZvuIRQrRocDwbKzsM5OrG6DnDxM4doeTt7mt4n88Xdw3QyT8yYCp4YEHwsDDGGCE1LLVLKbF7IMqeW04IZXRZcQyZFLqSV1DAAaU2umSw0ZcV4iK76vzH5uYPQqo3rfBMjFeOSipxKJiI16injXQgerNr5aqv9XlGiDkWqQ5Hqt8hoyHvDa1XD_h9aPS6niz_vF1pdep4</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato</creator><creator>Gil, Augusto Masiero</creator><creator>Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis</creator><creator>Li, Zongjin</creator><creator>Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-0547</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure</title><author>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato ; Gil, Augusto Masiero ; Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis ; Li, Zongjin ; Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3176-ce7637c0cc07a1da7412f9b8d91f61b2cadb6ae587978f81c2ee8fc9a28ba12b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>mixture design method</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>robustness index</topic><topic>self‐consolidating concrete</topic><topic>Weighting methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Augusto Masiero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zongjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rissardi, Cristyan Zenato</au><au>Gil, Augusto Masiero</au><au>Ehrenbring, Hinoel Zamis</au><au>Li, Zongjin</au><au>Tutikian, Bernardo Fonseca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure</atitle><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1933</spage><epage>1946</epage><pages>1933-1946</pages><issn>1464-4177</issn><eissn>1751-7648</eissn><abstract>This paper aimed to develop a method to analyze and rank self‐consolidating concrete (SCC) according to its robustness, considering isolated and simultaneous variations in its main components, like water (±6%) and cement content (ΔC±), in three matrices with binder to aggregate ratio (rich, intermediate and poor). In the experimental campaign, only water variations (±6%) were considered, and the cement content variations were considered in the analytical method. The method regarded the behavior of SCC in fresh and hardened states and turned out to be potentially useful to the academic community and the industry. The simple additive weighting method was used for that reason, which is probably the most adopted among methods for decisions with multiple variables due to its simplicity. Among the families studied, the poor mixture presented the lowest robustness with variation in water content due to the higher initial w/c ratio. However, for the condition ΔC±, the poor mixture achieved the second‐best robustness index. The rich mixture behaved differently as it was ranked second for ±6% of water and the worst for ΔC± due to slump‐flow and segregation results. The intermediate matrix presented the highest robustness in both conditions analyzed, water (±6%), and cement content (ΔC±).</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</pub><doi>10.1002/suco.202000566</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-0547</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4177 |
ispartof | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2022-06, Vol.23 (3), p.1933-1946 |
issn | 1464-4177 1751-7648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2681791827 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Mathematical analysis mixture design method Mixtures Moisture content Robustness robustness index self‐consolidating concrete Weighting methods |
title | Evaluating the robustness of self‐consolidating concrete: An approach to the mix design procedure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A52%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20robustness%20of%20self%E2%80%90consolidating%20concrete:%20An%20approach%20to%20the%20mix%20design%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Structural%20concrete%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20FIB&rft.au=Rissardi,%20Cristyan%20Zenato&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1933&rft.epage=1946&rft.pages=1933-1946&rft.issn=1464-4177&rft.eissn=1751-7648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/suco.202000566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681791827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681791827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |