Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton
Fluting is a technological and morphological hallmark of some of the most iconic North American Paleoindian stone points. Through decades of detailed artifact analyses and replication experiments, archaeologists have spent considerable effort reconstructing how flute removals were achieved, and they...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American antiquity 2022-07, Vol.87 (3), p.544-566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 566 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 544 |
container_title | American antiquity |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Smallwood, Ashley M. Jennings, Thomas A. Smith, Heather L. Pevny, Charlotte D. Waters, Michael R. Loebel, Thomas J. Lambert, John Ray, Jacob Stephens, Devin |
description | Fluting is a technological and morphological hallmark of some of the most iconic North American Paleoindian stone points. Through decades of detailed artifact analyses and replication experiments, archaeologists have spent considerable effort reconstructing how flute removals were achieved, and they have explored possible explanations of why fluting was such an important aspect of early point technologies. However, the end of fluting has been less thoroughly researched. In southern North America, fluting is recognized as a diagnostic characteristic of Clovis points dating to approximately 13,000 cal yr BP, the earliest widespread use of fluting. One thousand years later, fluting occurs more variably in Dalton and is no longer useful as a diagnostic indicator. How did fluting change, and why did point makers eventually abandon fluting? In this article, we use traditional 2D measurements, geometric morphometric (GM) analysis of 3D models, and 2D GM of flute cross sections to compare Clovis and Dalton point flute and basal morphologies. The significant differences observed show that fluting in Clovis was highly standardized, suggesting that fluting may have functioned to improve projectile durability. Because Dalton points were used increasingly as knives and other types of tools, maximizing projectile functionality became less important. We propose that fluting in Dalton is a vestigial technological trait retained beyond its original functional usefulness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/aaq.2022.19 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681684294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_aaq_2022_19</cupid><sourcerecordid>2681684294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-a9f9200b41ef43029f0feeb71d0495691206213a0daaf97a2e29be3156bf92e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAo2ydTPajOcpqVago0p5Dtpu0W7ZJm6RC_727tuDF07wDz7wDDyG3DEYMWPGg1G6EgDhi4owMkGOWZJCn52QAAJgUnOWX5CqENQDjwMcDsp2Hxi4pf6LvrtZtoNHRua21D1HZmsaVpuVK2WUPfblWU2fopN3Hfm8s_VStdo2tG9XlLkQ604uVda1bHqjxbkPL1n03v7VPqo3OXpMLo9qgb05zSOaT51n5mkw_Xt7Kx2myQCFiooQRCFClTJuUAwoDRuuqYDWkIssFQ8iRcQW1UkYUCjWKSnOW5VV3qJEPyd2xd-vdbq9DlGu397Z7KTEfs3ycokg76v5ILbwLwWsjt77ZKH-QDGSvVHZKZa9UMtHRyYlWm8o39VL_lf7H_wDrDnfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681684294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Smallwood, Ashley M. ; Jennings, Thomas A. ; Smith, Heather L. ; Pevny, Charlotte D. ; Waters, Michael R. ; Loebel, Thomas J. ; Lambert, John ; Ray, Jacob ; Stephens, Devin</creator><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Ashley M. ; Jennings, Thomas A. ; Smith, Heather L. ; Pevny, Charlotte D. ; Waters, Michael R. ; Loebel, Thomas J. ; Lambert, John ; Ray, Jacob ; Stephens, Devin</creatorcontrib><description>Fluting is a technological and morphological hallmark of some of the most iconic North American Paleoindian stone points. Through decades of detailed artifact analyses and replication experiments, archaeologists have spent considerable effort reconstructing how flute removals were achieved, and they have explored possible explanations of why fluting was such an important aspect of early point technologies. However, the end of fluting has been less thoroughly researched. In southern North America, fluting is recognized as a diagnostic characteristic of Clovis points dating to approximately 13,000 cal yr BP, the earliest widespread use of fluting. One thousand years later, fluting occurs more variably in Dalton and is no longer useful as a diagnostic indicator. How did fluting change, and why did point makers eventually abandon fluting? In this article, we use traditional 2D measurements, geometric morphometric (GM) analysis of 3D models, and 2D GM of flute cross sections to compare Clovis and Dalton point flute and basal morphologies. The significant differences observed show that fluting in Clovis was highly standardized, suggesting that fluting may have functioned to improve projectile durability. Because Dalton points were used increasingly as knives and other types of tools, maximizing projectile functionality became less important. We propose that fluting in Dalton is a vestigial technological trait retained beyond its original functional usefulness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/aaq.2022.19</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Cultural change ; Historic artifacts ; Hunter-gatherers ; Hypotheses ; Lithic ; Morphology ; Native North Americans ; Paleolithic ; Technology ; Three dimensional imaging</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 2022-07, Vol.87 (3), p.544-566</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-a9f9200b41ef43029f0feeb71d0495691206213a0daaf97a2e29be3156bf92e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-a9f9200b41ef43029f0feeb71d0495691206213a0daaf97a2e29be3156bf92e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731622000191/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pevny, Charlotte D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loebel, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Devin</creatorcontrib><title>Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. Antiq</addtitle><description>Fluting is a technological and morphological hallmark of some of the most iconic North American Paleoindian stone points. Through decades of detailed artifact analyses and replication experiments, archaeologists have spent considerable effort reconstructing how flute removals were achieved, and they have explored possible explanations of why fluting was such an important aspect of early point technologies. However, the end of fluting has been less thoroughly researched. In southern North America, fluting is recognized as a diagnostic characteristic of Clovis points dating to approximately 13,000 cal yr BP, the earliest widespread use of fluting. One thousand years later, fluting occurs more variably in Dalton and is no longer useful as a diagnostic indicator. How did fluting change, and why did point makers eventually abandon fluting? In this article, we use traditional 2D measurements, geometric morphometric (GM) analysis of 3D models, and 2D GM of flute cross sections to compare Clovis and Dalton point flute and basal morphologies. The significant differences observed show that fluting in Clovis was highly standardized, suggesting that fluting may have functioned to improve projectile durability. Because Dalton points were used increasingly as knives and other types of tools, maximizing projectile functionality became less important. We propose that fluting in Dalton is a vestigial technological trait retained beyond its original functional usefulness.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Historic artifacts</subject><subject>Hunter-gatherers</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Lithic</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Paleolithic</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAo2ydTPajOcpqVago0p5Dtpu0W7ZJm6RC_727tuDF07wDz7wDDyG3DEYMWPGg1G6EgDhi4owMkGOWZJCn52QAAJgUnOWX5CqENQDjwMcDsp2Hxi4pf6LvrtZtoNHRua21D1HZmsaVpuVK2WUPfblWU2fopN3Hfm8s_VStdo2tG9XlLkQ604uVda1bHqjxbkPL1n03v7VPqo3OXpMLo9qgb05zSOaT51n5mkw_Xt7Kx2myQCFiooQRCFClTJuUAwoDRuuqYDWkIssFQ8iRcQW1UkYUCjWKSnOW5VV3qJEPyd2xd-vdbq9DlGu397Z7KTEfs3ycokg76v5ILbwLwWsjt77ZKH-QDGSvVHZKZa9UMtHRyYlWm8o39VL_lf7H_wDrDnfQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Smallwood, Ashley M.</creator><creator>Jennings, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Smith, Heather L.</creator><creator>Pevny, Charlotte D.</creator><creator>Waters, Michael R.</creator><creator>Loebel, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Lambert, John</creator><creator>Ray, Jacob</creator><creator>Stephens, Devin</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton</title><author>Smallwood, Ashley M. ; Jennings, Thomas A. ; Smith, Heather L. ; Pevny, Charlotte D. ; Waters, Michael R. ; Loebel, Thomas J. ; Lambert, John ; Ray, Jacob ; Stephens, Devin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-a9f9200b41ef43029f0feeb71d0495691206213a0daaf97a2e29be3156bf92e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Historic artifacts</topic><topic>Hunter-gatherers</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Lithic</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Paleolithic</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennings, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pevny, Charlotte D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loebel, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Devin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smallwood, Ashley M.</au><au>Jennings, Thomas A.</au><au>Smith, Heather L.</au><au>Pevny, Charlotte D.</au><au>Waters, Michael R.</au><au>Loebel, Thomas J.</au><au>Lambert, John</au><au>Ray, Jacob</au><au>Stephens, Devin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. Antiq</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>544</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>544-566</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><abstract>Fluting is a technological and morphological hallmark of some of the most iconic North American Paleoindian stone points. Through decades of detailed artifact analyses and replication experiments, archaeologists have spent considerable effort reconstructing how flute removals were achieved, and they have explored possible explanations of why fluting was such an important aspect of early point technologies. However, the end of fluting has been less thoroughly researched. In southern North America, fluting is recognized as a diagnostic characteristic of Clovis points dating to approximately 13,000 cal yr BP, the earliest widespread use of fluting. One thousand years later, fluting occurs more variably in Dalton and is no longer useful as a diagnostic indicator. How did fluting change, and why did point makers eventually abandon fluting? In this article, we use traditional 2D measurements, geometric morphometric (GM) analysis of 3D models, and 2D GM of flute cross sections to compare Clovis and Dalton point flute and basal morphologies. The significant differences observed show that fluting in Clovis was highly standardized, suggesting that fluting may have functioned to improve projectile durability. Because Dalton points were used increasingly as knives and other types of tools, maximizing projectile functionality became less important. We propose that fluting in Dalton is a vestigial technological trait retained beyond its original functional usefulness.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/aaq.2022.19</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7316 |
ispartof | American antiquity, 2022-07, Vol.87 (3), p.544-566 |
issn | 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2681684294 |
source | Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Archaeology Cultural change Historic artifacts Hunter-gatherers Hypotheses Lithic Morphology Native North Americans Paleolithic Technology Three dimensional imaging |
title | Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%203D%20Models%20to%20Understand%20the%20Changing%20Role%20of%20Fluting%20in%20Paleoindian%20Point%20Technology%20from%20Clovis%20to%20Dalton&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Smallwood,%20Ashley%20M.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=544-566&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/aaq.2022.19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681684294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681684294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_aaq_2022_19&rfr_iscdi=true |