Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing

We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Integrated environmental assessment and management 2022-07, Vol.18 (4), p.1101-1113
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Lawrence A., Fisk, Grace, Cohen, Martin A., Crollard, Allison, Whittaker, Stephen G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1113
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1101
container_title Integrated environmental assessment and management
container_volume 18
creator Brown, Lawrence A.
Fisk, Grace
Cohen, Martin A.
Crollard, Allison
Whittaker, Stephen G.
description We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term “solventborne,” as used in this article, refers to products that contain relatively high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (referred to as “high‐volatile organic compound [VOC] basecoats” in the industry). These products are distinct from the “low‐VOC” solventborne products used widely in California and elsewhere. From a health and environmental hazard perspective, our evaluation found that waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts. Automotive painters who spray‐painted vehicles with waterborne products experienced significantly lower exposures to several harmful solvents. Waterborne products are readily available and offer advantages with regard to social impacts. Some of these advantages include lower worker and community exposure to VOCs, reduced VOC release and smog formation, and reduced potential for generation of and exposure to hazardous waste. Based on our assessment in auto body shops, we consider waterborne basecoats to be safer alternatives from both a human health and environmental perspective. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1101–1113. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Key Points We evaluated waterborne vs. solventborne automotive basecoats using an alternatives assessment framework. Waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts and offered additional advantages with regard to several other factors. We conclude that waterborne basecoats are safer and commercially viable alternatives to solventborne products.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ieam.4543
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681666191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681666191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-f571c24e3a80627ec44a846a28fd1135f5050d8424641caf1a873fe590954323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1Pw0AMhk8IJEph4B-cxMSQ9j6TdKyqApWKWMocuakDKUmunJNUXfjtJASxsdiW9fi1_TJ2K8VECqGmOUI5MdboMzaS1spARzN9_ldH0SW7ItoLYbTSasS-Ximv3jhUHIoafQV13iJxIEKiEquaZx5KPDr_wWvHsYWigRr5sQt-63yFvEVPDXFyRdvxQ28LhKmDmnhDuON5J9_UrnS9OveY5VVO793ia3aRQUF485vHbPOw3CyegvXL42oxXwep1kIHmY1kqgxqiEWoIkyNgdiEoOJsJ6W2mRVW7GKjTGhkCpmEONIZ2pmY2f7RMbsbZA_efTZIdbJ3TfdsQYkKYxmGoZzJjrofqNQ7ou7K5ODzEvwpkSLp3U16d5Pe3Y6dDuwxL_D0P5islvPnn4lvnDh-xA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681666191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Brown, Lawrence A. ; Fisk, Grace ; Cohen, Martin A. ; Crollard, Allison ; Whittaker, Stephen G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lawrence A. ; Fisk, Grace ; Cohen, Martin A. ; Crollard, Allison ; Whittaker, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term “solventborne,” as used in this article, refers to products that contain relatively high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (referred to as “high‐volatile organic compound [VOC] basecoats” in the industry). These products are distinct from the “low‐VOC” solventborne products used widely in California and elsewhere. From a health and environmental hazard perspective, our evaluation found that waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts. Automotive painters who spray‐painted vehicles with waterborne products experienced significantly lower exposures to several harmful solvents. Waterborne products are readily available and offer advantages with regard to social impacts. Some of these advantages include lower worker and community exposure to VOCs, reduced VOC release and smog formation, and reduced potential for generation of and exposure to hazardous waste. Based on our assessment in auto body shops, we consider waterborne basecoats to be safer alternatives from both a human health and environmental perspective. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1101–1113. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Key Points We evaluated waterborne vs. solventborne automotive basecoats using an alternatives assessment framework. Waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts and offered additional advantages with regard to several other factors. We conclude that waterborne basecoats are safer and commercially viable alternatives to solventborne products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-3777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-3793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4543</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternatives assessment ; Automobiles ; Automotive bodies ; Automotive refinishing ; Environmental hazards ; Evaluation ; Exposure ; Hazardous wastes ; Occupational exposure ; Organic compounds ; Public domain ; Safer alternative ; Smog ; Solventborne basecoats ; Solvents ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Waterborne basecoats</subject><ispartof>Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022-07, Vol.18 (4), p.1101-1113</ispartof><rights>Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA</rights><rights>2022 SETAC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-f571c24e3a80627ec44a846a28fd1135f5050d8424641caf1a873fe590954323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-f571c24e3a80627ec44a846a28fd1135f5050d8424641caf1a873fe590954323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fieam.4543$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fieam.4543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lawrence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crollard, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><title>Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing</title><title>Integrated environmental assessment and management</title><description>We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term “solventborne,” as used in this article, refers to products that contain relatively high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (referred to as “high‐volatile organic compound [VOC] basecoats” in the industry). These products are distinct from the “low‐VOC” solventborne products used widely in California and elsewhere. From a health and environmental hazard perspective, our evaluation found that waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts. Automotive painters who spray‐painted vehicles with waterborne products experienced significantly lower exposures to several harmful solvents. Waterborne products are readily available and offer advantages with regard to social impacts. Some of these advantages include lower worker and community exposure to VOCs, reduced VOC release and smog formation, and reduced potential for generation of and exposure to hazardous waste. Based on our assessment in auto body shops, we consider waterborne basecoats to be safer alternatives from both a human health and environmental perspective. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1101–1113. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Key Points We evaluated waterborne vs. solventborne automotive basecoats using an alternatives assessment framework. Waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts and offered additional advantages with regard to several other factors. We conclude that waterborne basecoats are safer and commercially viable alternatives to solventborne products.</description><subject>Alternatives assessment</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive bodies</subject><subject>Automotive refinishing</subject><subject>Environmental hazards</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Hazardous wastes</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Safer alternative</subject><subject>Smog</subject><subject>Solventborne basecoats</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Waterborne basecoats</subject><issn>1551-3777</issn><issn>1551-3793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1Pw0AMhk8IJEph4B-cxMSQ9j6TdKyqApWKWMocuakDKUmunJNUXfjtJASxsdiW9fi1_TJ2K8VECqGmOUI5MdboMzaS1spARzN9_ldH0SW7ItoLYbTSasS-Ximv3jhUHIoafQV13iJxIEKiEquaZx5KPDr_wWvHsYWigRr5sQt-63yFvEVPDXFyRdvxQ28LhKmDmnhDuON5J9_UrnS9OveY5VVO793ia3aRQUF485vHbPOw3CyegvXL42oxXwep1kIHmY1kqgxqiEWoIkyNgdiEoOJsJ6W2mRVW7GKjTGhkCpmEONIZ2pmY2f7RMbsbZA_efTZIdbJ3TfdsQYkKYxmGoZzJjrofqNQ7ou7K5ODzEvwpkSLp3U16d5Pe3Y6dDuwxL_D0P5islvPnn4lvnDh-xA</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Brown, Lawrence A.</creator><creator>Fisk, Grace</creator><creator>Cohen, Martin A.</creator><creator>Crollard, Allison</creator><creator>Whittaker, Stephen G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing</title><author>Brown, Lawrence A. ; Fisk, Grace ; Cohen, Martin A. ; Crollard, Allison ; Whittaker, Stephen G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-f571c24e3a80627ec44a846a28fd1135f5050d8424641caf1a873fe590954323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alternatives assessment</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive bodies</topic><topic>Automotive refinishing</topic><topic>Environmental hazards</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Hazardous wastes</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Safer alternative</topic><topic>Smog</topic><topic>Solventborne basecoats</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Waterborne basecoats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Lawrence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisk, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Martin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crollard, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Stephen G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Lawrence A.</au><au>Fisk, Grace</au><au>Cohen, Martin A.</au><au>Crollard, Allison</au><au>Whittaker, Stephen G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing</atitle><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1101</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1101-1113</pages><issn>1551-3777</issn><eissn>1551-3793</eissn><abstract>We evaluated two types of automotive basecoats used in automotive refinishing (i.e., in auto body shops): waterborne and solventborne. The primary tool we used for this evaluation was the Alternatives Assessment Guide (version 1.0) developed by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2). The term “solventborne,” as used in this article, refers to products that contain relatively high concentrations of volatile organic compounds (referred to as “high‐volatile organic compound [VOC] basecoats” in the industry). These products are distinct from the “low‐VOC” solventborne products used widely in California and elsewhere. From a health and environmental hazard perspective, our evaluation found that waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts. Automotive painters who spray‐painted vehicles with waterborne products experienced significantly lower exposures to several harmful solvents. Waterborne products are readily available and offer advantages with regard to social impacts. Some of these advantages include lower worker and community exposure to VOCs, reduced VOC release and smog formation, and reduced potential for generation of and exposure to hazardous waste. Based on our assessment in auto body shops, we consider waterborne basecoats to be safer alternatives from both a human health and environmental perspective. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:1101–1113. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Key Points We evaluated waterborne vs. solventborne automotive basecoats using an alternatives assessment framework. Waterborne basecoats contained fewer hazardous ingredients and at lower concentrations than their solventborne counterparts and offered additional advantages with regard to several other factors. We conclude that waterborne basecoats are safer and commercially viable alternatives to solventborne products.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ieam.4543</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-3777
ispartof Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2022-07, Vol.18 (4), p.1101-1113
issn 1551-3777
1551-3793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2681666191
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alternatives assessment
Automobiles
Automotive bodies
Automotive refinishing
Environmental hazards
Evaluation
Exposure
Hazardous wastes
Occupational exposure
Organic compounds
Public domain
Safer alternative
Smog
Solventborne basecoats
Solvents
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
Waterborne basecoats
title Using an alternatives assessment framework to evaluate waterborne versus solventborne basecoats used in automotive refinishing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A03%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20an%20alternatives%20assessment%20framework%20to%20evaluate%20waterborne%20versus%20solventborne%20basecoats%20used%20in%20automotive%20refinishing&rft.jtitle=Integrated%20environmental%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=Brown,%20Lawrence%20A.&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1101&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1101-1113&rft.issn=1551-3777&rft.eissn=1551-3793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ieam.4543&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681666191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681666191&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true