Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study
Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reading research quarterly 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 912 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 879 |
container_title | Reading research quarterly |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Castells, Núria Minguela, Marta Solé, Isabel Miras, Mariana Nadal, Esther Rijlaarsdam, Gert |
description | Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice.
Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rrq.451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681467656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1340021</ericid><sourcerecordid>2681467656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxCYQFDx4kdf9lk3grpWqlIq31vGyS3ZLSbNrdpLU338E39EncEPHmXGaY-fEN3wfAJUYDjBC5s3Y7YCE-Aj2cUB6QiJBj0EOIsgCFIT0FZ86tkK-Q0B7YTsqNrXaFWcJZo1xdVMbP359fQ-P2yrb7t9rKWi0L5WBh4FRJ2yJQ26qEL826LjZrBUdV6VupTC3tAS7UR-3u4dDAiamV3fm1F_ZKTX44Bydarp26-O198P4wXoyegunr42Q0nAYZZQwHiU4RJwkmKtUpl3Gcaax5QsOcYkZVHhEWcUJwlOKcEhlLTZJYMp0xFhFKCO2D607X-9u21sSqaqzxLwXhMWY84iH31E1HZbZyziotNrYovQeBkWjzFD5P4fP05FVH-lSyP2r8jCnzWHu_7e77Yq0O_8mI-XzWqv0Ax32BtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681467656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creator><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><description>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice.
Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-0553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rrq.451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: Wiley</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; content learning ; Control Groups ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Elementary school students ; Faculty Development ; History Instruction ; inferential questions ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intertextuality ; Learning ; middle school ; Middle School Teachers ; Professional development ; Questioning Techniques ; Questions ; reading comprehension ; Reading Materials ; Reading Strategies ; Seminars ; Students ; Teacher education ; Teacher Improvement ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Tests ; Units of Study</subject><ispartof>Reading research quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Literacy Association.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frrq.451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frrq.451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1340021$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minguela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miras, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><title>Reading research quarterly</title><description>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice.
Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>content learning</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>History Instruction</subject><subject>inferential questions</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intertextuality</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>middle school</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Questioning Techniques</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Materials</subject><subject>Reading Strategies</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Units of Study</subject><issn>0034-0553</issn><issn>1936-2722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxCYQFDx4kdf9lk3grpWqlIq31vGyS3ZLSbNrdpLU338E39EncEPHmXGaY-fEN3wfAJUYDjBC5s3Y7YCE-Aj2cUB6QiJBj0EOIsgCFIT0FZ86tkK-Q0B7YTsqNrXaFWcJZo1xdVMbP359fQ-P2yrb7t9rKWi0L5WBh4FRJ2yJQ26qEL826LjZrBUdV6VupTC3tAS7UR-3u4dDAiamV3fm1F_ZKTX44Bydarp26-O198P4wXoyegunr42Q0nAYZZQwHiU4RJwkmKtUpl3Gcaax5QsOcYkZVHhEWcUJwlOKcEhlLTZJYMp0xFhFKCO2D607X-9u21sSqaqzxLwXhMWY84iH31E1HZbZyziotNrYovQeBkWjzFD5P4fP05FVH-lSyP2r8jCnzWHu_7e77Yq0O_8mI-XzWqv0Ax32BtQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Castells, Núria</creator><creator>Minguela, Marta</creator><creator>Solé, Isabel</creator><creator>Miras, Mariana</creator><creator>Nadal, Esther</creator><creator>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><author>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>content learning</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>History Instruction</topic><topic>inferential questions</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intertextuality</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>middle school</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Questioning Techniques</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Materials</topic><topic>Reading Strategies</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Units of Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minguela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miras, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castells, Núria</au><au>Minguela, Marta</au><au>Solé, Isabel</au><au>Miras, Mariana</au><au>Nadal, Esther</au><au>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1340021</ericid><atitle>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</atitle><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>879-912</pages><issn>0034-0553</issn><eissn>1936-2722</eissn><abstract>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice.
Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/rrq.451</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-0553 |
ispartof | Reading research quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912 |
issn | 0034-0553 1936-2722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2681467656 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Comparative Analysis content learning Control Groups Educational Facilities Improvement Elementary school students Faculty Development History Instruction inferential questions Instructional Effectiveness Intertextuality Learning middle school Middle School Teachers Professional development Questioning Techniques Questions reading comprehension Reading Materials Reading Strategies Seminars Students Teacher education Teacher Improvement Teaching Teaching Methods Tests Units of Study |
title | Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Questioning%E2%80%93Answering%20Strategies%20in%20Learning%20from%20Multiple%20Complementary%20Texts:%20An%20Intervention%20Study&rft.jtitle=Reading%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Castells,%20N%C3%BAria&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=879-912&rft.issn=0034-0553&rft.eissn=1936-2722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rrq.451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681467656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681467656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1340021&rfr_iscdi=true |