Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study

Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reading research quarterly 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912
Hauptverfasser: Castells, Núria, Minguela, Marta, Solé, Isabel, Miras, Mariana, Nadal, Esther, Rijlaarsdam, Gert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 912
container_issue 3
container_start_page 879
container_title Reading research quarterly
container_volume 57
creator Castells, Núria
Minguela, Marta
Solé, Isabel
Miras, Mariana
Nadal, Esther
Rijlaarsdam, Gert
description Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice. Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rrq.451
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681467656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1340021</ericid><sourcerecordid>2681467656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxCYQFDx4kdf9lk3grpWqlIq31vGyS3ZLSbNrdpLU338E39EncEPHmXGaY-fEN3wfAJUYDjBC5s3Y7YCE-Aj2cUB6QiJBj0EOIsgCFIT0FZ86tkK-Q0B7YTsqNrXaFWcJZo1xdVMbP359fQ-P2yrb7t9rKWi0L5WBh4FRJ2yJQ26qEL826LjZrBUdV6VupTC3tAS7UR-3u4dDAiamV3fm1F_ZKTX44Bydarp26-O198P4wXoyegunr42Q0nAYZZQwHiU4RJwkmKtUpl3Gcaax5QsOcYkZVHhEWcUJwlOKcEhlLTZJYMp0xFhFKCO2D607X-9u21sSqaqzxLwXhMWY84iH31E1HZbZyziotNrYovQeBkWjzFD5P4fP05FVH-lSyP2r8jCnzWHu_7e77Yq0O_8mI-XzWqv0Ax32BtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681467656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creator><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><description>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice. Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-0553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rrq.451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: Wiley</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; content learning ; Control Groups ; Educational Facilities Improvement ; Elementary school students ; Faculty Development ; History Instruction ; inferential questions ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intertextuality ; Learning ; middle school ; Middle School Teachers ; Professional development ; Questioning Techniques ; Questions ; reading comprehension ; Reading Materials ; Reading Strategies ; Seminars ; Students ; Teacher education ; Teacher Improvement ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Tests ; Units of Study</subject><ispartof>Reading research quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Literacy Association.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frrq.451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frrq.451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1340021$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minguela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miras, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><title>Reading research quarterly</title><description>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice. Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>content learning</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Educational Facilities Improvement</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>History Instruction</subject><subject>inferential questions</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intertextuality</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>middle school</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Questioning Techniques</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Materials</subject><subject>Reading Strategies</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Improvement</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>Units of Study</subject><issn>0034-0553</issn><issn>1936-2722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbxCYQFDx4kdf9lk3grpWqlIq31vGyS3ZLSbNrdpLU338E39EncEPHmXGaY-fEN3wfAJUYDjBC5s3Y7YCE-Aj2cUB6QiJBj0EOIsgCFIT0FZ86tkK-Q0B7YTsqNrXaFWcJZo1xdVMbP359fQ-P2yrb7t9rKWi0L5WBh4FRJ2yJQ26qEL826LjZrBUdV6VupTC3tAS7UR-3u4dDAiamV3fm1F_ZKTX44Bydarp26-O198P4wXoyegunr42Q0nAYZZQwHiU4RJwkmKtUpl3Gcaax5QsOcYkZVHhEWcUJwlOKcEhlLTZJYMp0xFhFKCO2D607X-9u21sSqaqzxLwXhMWY84iH31E1HZbZyziotNrYovQeBkWjzFD5P4fP05FVH-lSyP2r8jCnzWHu_7e77Yq0O_8mI-XzWqv0Ax32BtQ</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Castells, Núria</creator><creator>Minguela, Marta</creator><creator>Solé, Isabel</creator><creator>Miras, Mariana</creator><creator>Nadal, Esther</creator><creator>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</title><author>Castells, Núria ; Minguela, Marta ; Solé, Isabel ; Miras, Mariana ; Nadal, Esther ; Rijlaarsdam, Gert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-9fb062912ebfb6a88cf1f6935d3143ed724762217b1d32a8af298a4fc44723223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>content learning</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Educational Facilities Improvement</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>History Instruction</topic><topic>inferential questions</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intertextuality</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>middle school</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Questioning Techniques</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Materials</topic><topic>Reading Strategies</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Improvement</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>Units of Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castells, Núria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minguela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solé, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miras, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadal, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castells, Núria</au><au>Minguela, Marta</au><au>Solé, Isabel</au><au>Miras, Mariana</au><au>Nadal, Esther</au><au>Rijlaarsdam, Gert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1340021</ericid><atitle>Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study</atitle><jtitle>Reading research quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>879-912</pages><issn>0034-0553</issn><eissn>1936-2722</eissn><abstract>Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depth understanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategies for answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In this experimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐grade students’ (13‐ to 14‐years old) ability to answer intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions when they read one or multiple complementary texts. The intervention was implemented by a group of middle‐school history teachers. Teachers in both the intervention and control groups (IG and CG, respectively) taught the same teaching unit using the same reading materials. However, teachers in the IG participated in 12 hours of professional development seminars on analysis of their classroom practice and how to improve their questioning strategies. Post‐intervention results revealed that students in the IG were significantly better than those in the CG at answering intra‐ and intertextual inferential questions. This difference was maintained at follow‐up (2 months after finishing the intervention). Students in the IG also performed better than those in the CG at a learning test. These results confirm the value of teaching students how to answer complex questions, especially when they refer to more than one text. The findings also support the value of the professional development program that enables teachers to reflect on their practice. Studies have shown that inferential questions encourage a more in‐depthunderstanding of texts and that students need to learn appropriate strategiesfor answering them, particularly when they deal with multiple texts. In thisexperimental study, the authors aimed to improve eighth‐gradestudents’(13‐to14‐yearsold) ability to answer intra‐andintertextual inferential questionswhen they read one or multiple complementary texts.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/rrq.451</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-0553
ispartof Reading research quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.57 (3), p.879-912
issn 0034-0553
1936-2722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2681467656
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Comparative Analysis
content learning
Control Groups
Educational Facilities Improvement
Elementary school students
Faculty Development
History Instruction
inferential questions
Instructional Effectiveness
Intertextuality
Learning
middle school
Middle School Teachers
Professional development
Questioning Techniques
Questions
reading comprehension
Reading Materials
Reading Strategies
Seminars
Students
Teacher education
Teacher Improvement
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Tests
Units of Study
title Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts: An Intervention Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A52%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Questioning%E2%80%93Answering%20Strategies%20in%20Learning%20from%20Multiple%20Complementary%20Texts:%20An%20Intervention%20Study&rft.jtitle=Reading%20research%20quarterly&rft.au=Castells,%20N%C3%BAria&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=879-912&rft.issn=0034-0553&rft.eissn=1936-2722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rrq.451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681467656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681467656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1340021&rfr_iscdi=true