The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska
Remote communities that rely on natural resource production may be differentially affected by changes in property rights to the resource. We examine the effect on remote fishing ports of the 1995 introduction of individual fishing quotas in the Alaskan halibut and sablefish fisheries, two of the fir...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land economics 2022-05, Vol.98 (2), p.239-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Land economics |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Sutherland, Sara A Edwards, Eric C |
description | Remote communities that rely on natural resource production may be differentially affected by changes in property rights to the resource. We examine the effect on remote fishing ports of the 1995 introduction of individual fishing quotas in the Alaskan halibut and sablefish fisheries, two of the first and largest adoptions. Using a two-way fixed effect difference-in-difference model, we find that affected remote communities see a 5%–13% decrease in population and declines in taxable sales revenue of 15%–19%. Quota allocation and market transfer rules, designed to address social objectives, generally failed to reduce these community effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3368/le.98.2.061520-0087R1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2680334770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2680334770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b943229b47b47029fe4596732523d975dc9c756708e6be5c0bc2dd25e2767a253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQj43JneNP8ex9h0MFDmfA5tmrrOtqlN-uC3N6Oilwv35dxzDj-E7lOyoJTLx8YulFzAgvCUAUkIkWKfXqBZyjKaSArsEs0IAZoITtU1uvH-ROIILmZofThavG373ATsKvw6uN4O4Rvv649j8Dg4vKn9EbsO723rgsUr17ZjV4faelx3eNnk_jO_RVdV3nh793vn6H2zPqyek93L03a13CWGMhWSQmUUQBWZiEtAVTZjiovYEGipBCuNMoJxQaTlhWWGFAbKEpiF2DUHRufoYfLtB_c1Wh_0yY1DFyM1cEkozYQgUcUmlRmc94OtdD_UbT5865ToMzHdWK2kBj0R0xOx-Jf9uZ-sCe3o7X-AZIxJot_OVM9QASBChIz-AND_bTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2680334770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Sutherland, Sara A ; Edwards, Eric C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Sara A ; Edwards, Eric C</creatorcontrib><description>Remote communities that rely on natural resource production may be differentially affected by changes in property rights to the resource. We examine the effect on remote fishing ports of the 1995 introduction of individual fishing quotas in the Alaskan halibut and sablefish fisheries, two of the first and largest adoptions. Using a two-way fixed effect difference-in-difference model, we find that affected remote communities see a 5%–13% decrease in population and declines in taxable sales revenue of 15%–19%. Quota allocation and market transfer rules, designed to address social objectives, generally failed to reduce these community effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-7639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-8325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3368/le.98.2.061520-0087R1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>Community ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Halibut ; Natural resources ; Population decline ; Ports ; Property rights ; Quotas ; Remote areas ; Sales</subject><ispartof>Land economics, 2022-05, Vol.98 (2), p.239-253</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press May 1, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b943229b47b47029fe4596732523d975dc9c756708e6be5c0bc2dd25e2767a253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Eric C</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska</title><title>Land economics</title><description>Remote communities that rely on natural resource production may be differentially affected by changes in property rights to the resource. We examine the effect on remote fishing ports of the 1995 introduction of individual fishing quotas in the Alaskan halibut and sablefish fisheries, two of the first and largest adoptions. Using a two-way fixed effect difference-in-difference model, we find that affected remote communities see a 5%–13% decrease in population and declines in taxable sales revenue of 15%–19%. Quota allocation and market transfer rules, designed to address social objectives, generally failed to reduce these community effects.</description><subject>Community</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Halibut</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Quotas</subject><subject>Remote areas</subject><subject>Sales</subject><issn>0023-7639</issn><issn>1543-8325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQj43JneNP8ex9h0MFDmfA5tmrrOtqlN-uC3N6Oilwv35dxzDj-E7lOyoJTLx8YulFzAgvCUAUkIkWKfXqBZyjKaSArsEs0IAZoITtU1uvH-ROIILmZofThavG373ATsKvw6uN4O4Rvv649j8Dg4vKn9EbsO723rgsUr17ZjV4faelx3eNnk_jO_RVdV3nh793vn6H2zPqyek93L03a13CWGMhWSQmUUQBWZiEtAVTZjiovYEGipBCuNMoJxQaTlhWWGFAbKEpiF2DUHRufoYfLtB_c1Wh_0yY1DFyM1cEkozYQgUcUmlRmc94OtdD_UbT5865ToMzHdWK2kBj0R0xOx-Jf9uZ-sCe3o7X-AZIxJot_OVM9QASBChIz-AND_bTM</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Sutherland, Sara A</creator><creator>Edwards, Eric C</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska</title><author>Sutherland, Sara A ; Edwards, Eric C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b943229b47b47029fe4596732523d975dc9c756708e6be5c0bc2dd25e2767a253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Community</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Halibut</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Quotas</topic><topic>Remote areas</topic><topic>Sales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Sara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Eric C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutherland, Sara A</au><au>Edwards, Eric C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska</atitle><jtitle>Land economics</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>239-253</pages><issn>0023-7639</issn><eissn>1543-8325</eissn><abstract>Remote communities that rely on natural resource production may be differentially affected by changes in property rights to the resource. We examine the effect on remote fishing ports of the 1995 introduction of individual fishing quotas in the Alaskan halibut and sablefish fisheries, two of the first and largest adoptions. Using a two-way fixed effect difference-in-difference model, we find that affected remote communities see a 5%–13% decrease in population and declines in taxable sales revenue of 15%–19%. Quota allocation and market transfer rules, designed to address social objectives, generally failed to reduce these community effects.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.3368/le.98.2.061520-0087R1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-7639 |
ispartof | Land economics, 2022-05, Vol.98 (2), p.239-253 |
issn | 0023-7639 1543-8325 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2680334770 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Community Fish Fisheries Fishing Halibut Natural resources Population decline Ports Property rights Quotas Remote areas Sales |
title | The Impact of Property Rights to Fish on Remote Communities in Alaska |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Property%20Rights%20to%20Fish%20on%20Remote%20Communities%20in%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=Land%20economics&rft.au=Sutherland,%20Sara%20A&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=239-253&rft.issn=0023-7639&rft.eissn=1543-8325&rft_id=info:doi/10.3368/le.98.2.061520-0087R1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2680334770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2680334770&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |