Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments
Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the ca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of marketing research 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 775 |
container_title | Journal of marketing research |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Sakaguchi, Hiroaki Stewart, Neil Gathergood, John Adams, Paul Guttman-Kenney, Benedict Hayes, Lucy Hunt, Stefan |
description | Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00222437211070589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2680159564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00222437211070589</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2680159564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA67Rz5z1LifUBFV10HybJHUlpkjqTLPrvTYnQhXg3Z3G_cw4cQu6BLgG0XlHKGBNcMwCqqTT2giQghc40WH5JktM_OwHX5CbGHZ1uAhOyekLvxv2Qrr3Haohp79M8YN0Mae5Cnb43XdOObfrpji12Q7wlV97tI9796oJsn9fb_DXbfLy85Y-brBLAh0xyL6xhtCzrGkpReuasEEi91FIYroStmBKSW-4ADaJSVIuScYm0FIryBXmYYw-h_x4xDsWuH0M3NRZMGQrSSiUmCmaqCn2MAX1xCE3rwrEAWpxmKf7MMnnS2YNV3zXx7DBgpLRA2YQsZyS6LzwX_5_5A2KlaOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2680159564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00222437211070589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Credit cards ; Interest ; Payments ; Psychological aspects</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5369-3168 ; 0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00222437211070589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222437211070589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathergood, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><addtitle>Journal of Marketing Research</addtitle><description>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Credit cards</subject><subject>Interest</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA67Rz5z1LifUBFV10HybJHUlpkjqTLPrvTYnQhXg3Z3G_cw4cQu6BLgG0XlHKGBNcMwCqqTT2giQghc40WH5JktM_OwHX5CbGHZ1uAhOyekLvxv2Qrr3Haohp79M8YN0Mae5Cnb43XdOObfrpji12Q7wlV97tI9796oJsn9fb_DXbfLy85Y-brBLAh0xyL6xhtCzrGkpReuasEEi91FIYroStmBKSW-4ADaJSVIuScYm0FIryBXmYYw-h_x4xDsWuH0M3NRZMGQrSSiUmCmaqCn2MAX1xCE3rwrEAWpxmKf7MMnnS2YNV3zXx7DBgpLRA2YQsZyS6LzwX_5_5A2KlaOk</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Stewart, Neil</creator><creator>Gathergood, John</creator><creator>Adams, Paul</creator><creator>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creator><creator>Hayes, Lucy</creator><creator>Hunt, Stefan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-3168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><author>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Credit cards</topic><topic>Interest</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathergood, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</au><au>Stewart, Neil</au><au>Gathergood, John</au><au>Adams, Paul</au><au>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</au><au>Hayes, Lucy</au><au>Hunt, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Marketing Research</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>775-796</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><abstract>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00222437211070589</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-3168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2437 |
ispartof | Journal of marketing research, 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796 |
issn | 0022-2437 1547-7193 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2680159564 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Consumer behavior Credit cards Interest Payments Psychological aspects |
title | Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Default%20Effects%20of%20Credit%20Card%20Minimum%20Payments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=Sakaguchi,%20Hiroaki&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=775-796&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00222437211070589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2680159564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2680159564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00222437211070589&rfr_iscdi=true |