Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments

Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marketing research 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796
Hauptverfasser: Sakaguchi, Hiroaki, Stewart, Neil, Gathergood, John, Adams, Paul, Guttman-Kenney, Benedict, Hayes, Lucy, Hunt, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 4
container_start_page 775
container_title Journal of marketing research
container_volume 59
creator Sakaguchi, Hiroaki
Stewart, Neil
Gathergood, John
Adams, Paul
Guttman-Kenney, Benedict
Hayes, Lucy
Hunt, Stefan
description Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00222437211070589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2680159564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00222437211070589</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2680159564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA67Rz5z1LifUBFV10HybJHUlpkjqTLPrvTYnQhXg3Z3G_cw4cQu6BLgG0XlHKGBNcMwCqqTT2giQghc40WH5JktM_OwHX5CbGHZ1uAhOyekLvxv2Qrr3Haohp79M8YN0Mae5Cnb43XdOObfrpji12Q7wlV97tI9796oJsn9fb_DXbfLy85Y-brBLAh0xyL6xhtCzrGkpReuasEEi91FIYroStmBKSW-4ADaJSVIuScYm0FIryBXmYYw-h_x4xDsWuH0M3NRZMGQrSSiUmCmaqCn2MAX1xCE3rwrEAWpxmKf7MMnnS2YNV3zXx7DBgpLRA2YQsZyS6LzwX_5_5A2KlaOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2680159564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00222437211070589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Credit cards ; Interest ; Payments ; Psychological aspects</subject><ispartof>Journal of marketing research, 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5369-3168 ; 0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00222437211070589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00222437211070589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathergood, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><title>Journal of marketing research</title><addtitle>Journal of Marketing Research</addtitle><description>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Credit cards</subject><subject>Interest</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><issn>0022-2437</issn><issn>1547-7193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AUhQdRMFZ_gLuA67Rz5z1LifUBFV10HybJHUlpkjqTLPrvTYnQhXg3Z3G_cw4cQu6BLgG0XlHKGBNcMwCqqTT2giQghc40WH5JktM_OwHX5CbGHZ1uAhOyekLvxv2Qrr3Haohp79M8YN0Mae5Cnb43XdOObfrpji12Q7wlV97tI9796oJsn9fb_DXbfLy85Y-brBLAh0xyL6xhtCzrGkpReuasEEi91FIYroStmBKSW-4ADaJSVIuScYm0FIryBXmYYw-h_x4xDsWuH0M3NRZMGQrSSiUmCmaqCn2MAX1xCE3rwrEAWpxmKf7MMnnS2YNV3zXx7DBgpLRA2YQsZyS6LzwX_5_5A2KlaOk</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Stewart, Neil</creator><creator>Gathergood, John</creator><creator>Adams, Paul</creator><creator>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creator><creator>Hayes, Lucy</creator><creator>Hunt, Stefan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-3168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</title><author>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki ; Stewart, Neil ; Gathergood, John ; Adams, Paul ; Guttman-Kenney, Benedict ; Hayes, Lucy ; Hunt, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-53f49820bbdd1b4bf2a944e0f575483649c2645393a1e8ee66074b235e0b4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Credit cards</topic><topic>Interest</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathergood, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakaguchi, Hiroaki</au><au>Stewart, Neil</au><au>Gathergood, John</au><au>Adams, Paul</au><au>Guttman-Kenney, Benedict</au><au>Hayes, Lucy</au><au>Hunt, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marketing research</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Marketing Research</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>775-796</pages><issn>0022-2437</issn><eissn>1547-7193</eissn><abstract>Credit card minimum payments are designed to ensure that individuals pay down their debt over time, and scheduling minimum automatic repayments helps people avoid forgetting to repay. Yet minimum payments have additional, unintended psychological default effects by drawing attention away from the card balance due. First, once individuals set the minimum automatic repayment as the default, they then neglect to make the occasional larger repayments they made previously. As a result, individuals incur considerably more credit card interest than late payment fees avoided. Using detailed transaction data, the authors show that approximately 8% of all of the interest ever paid is due to this effect. Second, manual credit card payments are lower when individuals are prompted with minimum payment information. In an experiment, the authors test two new interventions to mitigate this effect—a prompt for full repayment and a prompt asking those repaying little to pay more—yielding large counter effects. Thus, shrouding the minimum payment option for automatic and manual payments and directing attention to the full balance may remedy the unintended effects of default minimum payments.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00222437211070589</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-3168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-018X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2437
ispartof Journal of marketing research, 2022-08, Vol.59 (4), p.775-796
issn 0022-2437
1547-7193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2680159564
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Business Source Complete
subjects Consumer behavior
Credit cards
Interest
Payments
Psychological aspects
title Default Effects of Credit Card Minimum Payments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Default%20Effects%20of%20Credit%20Card%20Minimum%20Payments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marketing%20research&rft.au=Sakaguchi,%20Hiroaki&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=775-796&rft.issn=0022-2437&rft.eissn=1547-7193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00222437211070589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2680159564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2680159564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00222437211070589&rfr_iscdi=true