Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study
While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 7467 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad Qazi, Asad Ullah Ahmed, Ali Abbass, Wasim Abbas, Safeer Salmi, Abdelatif Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud |
description | While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14127467 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2679841122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679841122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUD7oToPDKZjLtSfBSqFVpxGe5Mb9qUdFJnkkX_vSlV9GzuOfBxLhxCrjm7k9Kw-9jxlAudZvqMDATTPOFMsfN__pKMYtyyXlJyw7MBidPdHlxLm5LO9-grv4608bTdIJ365L0Gj3TRBvTrdnOEJo0vK48rCn5FP7z7ja8QGx8O9BPqOj7QMV10sYXKg62RvnU7DJWDuq_qVocrclFCHXH0c4dk-fS4nLwks_nzdDKeJU4I1SZKKGtBIwhhS8udZZiVYKRElVsGUnOtdKZM7pzR0mGuDMtt6sCgsaWTQ3Jzqt2H5qvD2Bbbpgu-_1iITJs85VyInro9US40MQYsi32odhAOBWfFcdbib1b5DWRMan4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679841122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creator><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><description>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14127467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Calcium silicates ; Comparative analysis ; Concrete construction ; Dimensional analysis ; Ductility ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Flexing ; Masonry ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Shear strength ; Simulation ; Stiffness ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4476-2384 ; 0000-0002-1120-8013 ; 0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbass, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Safeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmi, Abdelatif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</description><subject>Calcium silicates</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Flexing</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUD7oToPDKZjLtSfBSqFVpxGe5Mb9qUdFJnkkX_vSlV9GzuOfBxLhxCrjm7k9Kw-9jxlAudZvqMDATTPOFMsfN__pKMYtyyXlJyw7MBidPdHlxLm5LO9-grv4608bTdIJ365L0Gj3TRBvTrdnOEJo0vK48rCn5FP7z7ja8QGx8O9BPqOj7QMV10sYXKg62RvnU7DJWDuq_qVocrclFCHXH0c4dk-fS4nLwks_nzdDKeJU4I1SZKKGtBIwhhS8udZZiVYKRElVsGUnOtdKZM7pzR0mGuDMtt6sCgsaWTQ3Jzqt2H5qvD2Bbbpgu-_1iITJs85VyInro9US40MQYsi32odhAOBWfFcdbib1b5DWRMan4</recordid><startdate>20220618</startdate><enddate>20220618</enddate><creator>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creator><creator>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creator><creator>Ahmed, Ali</creator><creator>Abbass, Wasim</creator><creator>Abbas, Safeer</creator><creator>Salmi, Abdelatif</creator><creator>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-2384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220618</creationdate><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><author>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Calcium silicates</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Flexing</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbass, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Safeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmi, Abdelatif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</au><au>Qazi, Asad Ullah</au><au>Ahmed, Ali</au><au>Abbass, Wasim</au><au>Abbas, Safeer</au><au>Salmi, Abdelatif</au><au>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-06-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7467</spage><pages>7467-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14127467</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-2384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2679841122 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Calcium silicates Comparative analysis Concrete construction Dimensional analysis Ductility Earthquake damage Earthquakes Flexing Masonry Seismic activity Seismic response Shear strength Simulation Stiffness Sustainability |
title | Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Openings%20on%20the%20In-Plane%20Strength%20of%20Confined%20and%20Unconfined%20Masonry%20Walls:%20A%20Sustainable%20Numerical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Mughal,%20Ubaid%20Ahmad&rft.date=2022-06-18&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7467&rft.pages=7467-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14127467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679841122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679841122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |