Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study

While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467
Hauptverfasser: Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad, Qazi, Asad Ullah, Ahmed, Ali, Abbass, Wasim, Abbas, Safeer, Salmi, Abdelatif, Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7467
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad
Qazi, Asad Ullah
Ahmed, Ali
Abbass, Wasim
Abbas, Safeer
Salmi, Abdelatif
Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud
description While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su14127467
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2679841122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679841122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUD7oToPDKZjLtSfBSqFVpxGe5Mb9qUdFJnkkX_vSlV9GzuOfBxLhxCrjm7k9Kw-9jxlAudZvqMDATTPOFMsfN__pKMYtyyXlJyw7MBidPdHlxLm5LO9-grv4608bTdIJ365L0Gj3TRBvTrdnOEJo0vK48rCn5FP7z7ja8QGx8O9BPqOj7QMV10sYXKg62RvnU7DJWDuq_qVocrclFCHXH0c4dk-fS4nLwks_nzdDKeJU4I1SZKKGtBIwhhS8udZZiVYKRElVsGUnOtdKZM7pzR0mGuDMtt6sCgsaWTQ3Jzqt2H5qvD2Bbbpgu-_1iITJs85VyInro9US40MQYsi32odhAOBWfFcdbib1b5DWRMan4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679841122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creator><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><description>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14127467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Calcium silicates ; Comparative analysis ; Concrete construction ; Dimensional analysis ; Ductility ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Flexing ; Masonry ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Shear strength ; Simulation ; Stiffness ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4476-2384 ; 0000-0002-1120-8013 ; 0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbass, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Safeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmi, Abdelatif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</description><subject>Calcium silicates</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Flexing</subject><subject>Masonry</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUD7oToPDKZjLtSfBSqFVpxGe5Mb9qUdFJnkkX_vSlV9GzuOfBxLhxCrjm7k9Kw-9jxlAudZvqMDATTPOFMsfN__pKMYtyyXlJyw7MBidPdHlxLm5LO9-grv4608bTdIJ365L0Gj3TRBvTrdnOEJo0vK48rCn5FP7z7ja8QGx8O9BPqOj7QMV10sYXKg62RvnU7DJWDuq_qVocrclFCHXH0c4dk-fS4nLwks_nzdDKeJU4I1SZKKGtBIwhhS8udZZiVYKRElVsGUnOtdKZM7pzR0mGuDMtt6sCgsaWTQ3Jzqt2H5qvD2Bbbpgu-_1iITJs85VyInro9US40MQYsi32odhAOBWfFcdbib1b5DWRMan4</recordid><startdate>20220618</startdate><enddate>20220618</enddate><creator>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creator><creator>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creator><creator>Ahmed, Ali</creator><creator>Abbass, Wasim</creator><creator>Abbas, Safeer</creator><creator>Salmi, Abdelatif</creator><creator>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-2384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220618</creationdate><title>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</title><author>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad ; Qazi, Asad Ullah ; Ahmed, Ali ; Abbass, Wasim ; Abbas, Safeer ; Salmi, Abdelatif ; Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-525bba7ea22bfb1cb0e6fa933e58b0a3717576598cc973ce85908b4ca9e9bfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Calcium silicates</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Flexing</topic><topic>Masonry</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Asad Ullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbass, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Safeer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmi, Abdelatif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mughal, Ubaid Ahmad</au><au>Qazi, Asad Ullah</au><au>Ahmed, Ali</au><au>Abbass, Wasim</au><au>Abbas, Safeer</au><au>Salmi, Abdelatif</au><au>Sayed, Mohamed Mahmoud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-06-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7467</spage><pages>7467-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>While openings are an essential requirement in buildings as a source of access, fresh air and sunlight, these openings cause a reduction in the lateral stiffness and torsional resistance of masonry wall units. A detailed numerical investigation was carried out to explore the impact of the opening percentage on the in-plane stiffness and lateral strength of unconfined and confined masonry wall panels prepared using calcium silicate bricks, for sustainable masonry structures. A commercially available FEM package (ANSYS) was used to carry out comparative analysis of ten wall panels, five of each type (confined and unconfined masonry walls) with concentrically located openings of varying sizes (0% to 16.5%). A simplified micro-modeling technique following the Newton Raphson Algorithm was adopted. Results revealed that the confined masonry approach unveiled a more reliable anti-seismic response along with improved in-plane strength in the case of confined masonry walls. The failure type shifted from pure flexural to more of a blend of shear and flexure after the opening percentage increased to 10.09% in unconfined masonry walls, which was not the case where confinement was provided. Based on the outcomes, it is strongly recommended to adopt confined masonry in highly seismic-prone areas to avoid catastrophic damage caused by earthquakes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14127467</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-2384</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-3793</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-06, Vol.14 (12), p.7467
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2679841122
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Calcium silicates
Comparative analysis
Concrete construction
Dimensional analysis
Ductility
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Flexing
Masonry
Seismic activity
Seismic response
Shear strength
Simulation
Stiffness
Sustainability
title Impact of Openings on the In-Plane Strength of Confined and Unconfined Masonry Walls: A Sustainable Numerical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Openings%20on%20the%20In-Plane%20Strength%20of%20Confined%20and%20Unconfined%20Masonry%20Walls:%20A%20Sustainable%20Numerical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Mughal,%20Ubaid%20Ahmad&rft.date=2022-06-18&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7467&rft.pages=7467-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14127467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679841122%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679841122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true