Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil
Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquatic conservation 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1040 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1022 |
container_title | Aquatic conservation |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz |
description | Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil.
This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011.
Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25).
Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary.
The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health.
The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aqc.3804 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2679477529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679477529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMoqKvgIwS88cKuSfqT9nJd_ANBRL0u03biZukmNUmV9cpH0Ff0SWxdb4WBGc58MwcOIUecTTlj4gxe6mmcs2SL7HFWFBGTabo9zqmIZMbjXbLv_ZIxVmQ82yNfs6o3DZgaKZiGolJYB2oVXSC0YUF9gNB7ag2FrgOHJlDfu1f9Cu1IXfUaDNDGtt1CG39KH2yAVgN9HhdovB40PRwbajs0FFcVrFfjl0E01oXF98cngg_oDD138K7bA7KjoPV4-Ncn5Ony4nF-Hd3eXd3MZ7dRLYo4ifI4TqtaAZdV0QAwCYnEbCjeiDytCwFSciVUA4WIK0iaJBEC8lSlHHNMsnhCjjd_O2dfevShXNremcGyFJksEinTwWhCTjZU7az3DlXZOb0Cty45K8fAyyHwcgx8QKMN-qZbXP_LlbP7-S__A8mXhGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679477529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creator><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><description>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil.
This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011.
Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25).
Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary.
The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health.
The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Accuracy ; Aquatic mammals ; Bays ; capture–recapture ; Cetacea ; cetacean ; CJS models ; closed‐population models ; Coefficient of variation ; demographics ; Dolphins ; Dolphins & porpoises ; Enforcement ; Habitat selection ; Harbors ; Harbours ; Heterogeneity ; Marine mammals ; Marine parks ; Marine protected areas ; Marine technology ; Monitoring ; Population number ; population size ; Population statistics ; Protected areas ; Shallow water ; Site fidelity ; Sotalia guianensis ; Surveys ; Survival ; Tropical climate</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8238-4049 ; 0000-0001-5879-3064 ; 0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.3804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.3804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil.
This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011.
Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25).
Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary.
The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health.
The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Bays</subject><subject>capture–recapture</subject><subject>Cetacea</subject><subject>cetacean</subject><subject>CJS models</subject><subject>closed‐population models</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>demographics</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Dolphins & porpoises</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Harbours</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine technology</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Population statistics</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Shallow water</subject><subject>Site fidelity</subject><subject>Sotalia guianensis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMoqKvgIwS88cKuSfqT9nJd_ANBRL0u03biZukmNUmV9cpH0Ff0SWxdb4WBGc58MwcOIUecTTlj4gxe6mmcs2SL7HFWFBGTabo9zqmIZMbjXbLv_ZIxVmQ82yNfs6o3DZgaKZiGolJYB2oVXSC0YUF9gNB7ag2FrgOHJlDfu1f9Cu1IXfUaDNDGtt1CG39KH2yAVgN9HhdovB40PRwbajs0FFcVrFfjl0E01oXF98cngg_oDD138K7bA7KjoPV4-Ncn5Ony4nF-Hd3eXd3MZ7dRLYo4ifI4TqtaAZdV0QAwCYnEbCjeiDytCwFSciVUA4WIK0iaJBEC8lSlHHNMsnhCjjd_O2dfevShXNremcGyFJksEinTwWhCTjZU7az3DlXZOb0Cty45K8fAyyHwcgx8QKMN-qZbXP_LlbP7-S__A8mXhGo</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creator><creator>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creator><creator>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creator><creator>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creator><creator>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-4049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><author>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Bays</topic><topic>capture–recapture</topic><topic>Cetacea</topic><topic>cetacean</topic><topic>CJS models</topic><topic>closed‐population models</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>demographics</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Dolphins & porpoises</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Harbours</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine technology</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Population statistics</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Shallow water</topic><topic>Site fidelity</topic><topic>Sotalia guianensis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</au><au>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</au><au>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</au><au>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</au><au>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1022</spage><epage>1040</epage><pages>1022-1040</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil.
This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011.
Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25).
Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary.
The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health.
The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3804</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-4049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-7613 |
ispartof | Aquatic conservation, 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040 |
issn | 1052-7613 1099-0755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2679477529 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abundance Accuracy Aquatic mammals Bays capture–recapture Cetacea cetacean CJS models closed‐population models Coefficient of variation demographics Dolphins Dolphins & porpoises Enforcement Habitat selection Harbors Harbours Heterogeneity Marine mammals Marine parks Marine protected areas Marine technology Monitoring Population number population size Population statistics Protected areas Shallow water Site fidelity Sotalia guianensis Surveys Survival Tropical climate |
title | Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abundance%20and%20effect%20of%20health%20status%20on%20apparent%20survival%20of%20Guiana%20dolphins,%20Sotalia%20guianensis,%20in%20an%20open%20embayment%20in%20north%E2%80%90eastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Meirelles,%20Ana%20Carolina%20Oliveira&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1022&rft.epage=1040&rft.pages=1022-1040&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3804&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679477529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679477529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |