Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil

Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquatic conservation 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040
Hauptverfasser: Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira, Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler, Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos, Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo, Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1040
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1022
container_title Aquatic conservation
container_volume 32
creator Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira
Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler
Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos
Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo
Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz
description Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011. Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25). Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary. The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health. The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aqc.3804
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2679477529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679477529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMoqKvgIwS88cKuSfqT9nJd_ANBRL0u03biZukmNUmV9cpH0Ff0SWxdb4WBGc58MwcOIUecTTlj4gxe6mmcs2SL7HFWFBGTabo9zqmIZMbjXbLv_ZIxVmQ82yNfs6o3DZgaKZiGolJYB2oVXSC0YUF9gNB7ag2FrgOHJlDfu1f9Cu1IXfUaDNDGtt1CG39KH2yAVgN9HhdovB40PRwbajs0FFcVrFfjl0E01oXF98cngg_oDD138K7bA7KjoPV4-Ncn5Ony4nF-Hd3eXd3MZ7dRLYo4ifI4TqtaAZdV0QAwCYnEbCjeiDytCwFSciVUA4WIK0iaJBEC8lSlHHNMsnhCjjd_O2dfevShXNremcGyFJksEinTwWhCTjZU7az3DlXZOb0Cty45K8fAyyHwcgx8QKMN-qZbXP_LlbP7-S__A8mXhGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679477529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creator><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><description>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011. Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25). Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary. The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health. The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Accuracy ; Aquatic mammals ; Bays ; capture–recapture ; Cetacea ; cetacean ; CJS models ; closed‐population models ; Coefficient of variation ; demographics ; Dolphins ; Dolphins &amp; porpoises ; Enforcement ; Habitat selection ; Harbors ; Harbours ; Heterogeneity ; Marine mammals ; Marine parks ; Marine protected areas ; Marine technology ; Monitoring ; Population number ; population size ; Population statistics ; Protected areas ; Shallow water ; Site fidelity ; Sotalia guianensis ; Surveys ; Survival ; Tropical climate</subject><ispartof>Aquatic conservation, 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8238-4049 ; 0000-0001-5879-3064 ; 0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faqc.3804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faqc.3804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><title>Aquatic conservation</title><description>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011. Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25). Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary. The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health. The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic mammals</subject><subject>Bays</subject><subject>capture–recapture</subject><subject>Cetacea</subject><subject>cetacean</subject><subject>CJS models</subject><subject>closed‐population models</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>demographics</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Dolphins &amp; porpoises</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Harbours</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine technology</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Population statistics</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Shallow water</subject><subject>Site fidelity</subject><subject>Sotalia guianensis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><issn>1052-7613</issn><issn>1099-0755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1KxDAQhYMoqKvgIwS88cKuSfqT9nJd_ANBRL0u03biZukmNUmV9cpH0Ff0SWxdb4WBGc58MwcOIUecTTlj4gxe6mmcs2SL7HFWFBGTabo9zqmIZMbjXbLv_ZIxVmQ82yNfs6o3DZgaKZiGolJYB2oVXSC0YUF9gNB7ag2FrgOHJlDfu1f9Cu1IXfUaDNDGtt1CG39KH2yAVgN9HhdovB40PRwbajs0FFcVrFfjl0E01oXF98cngg_oDD138K7bA7KjoPV4-Ncn5Ony4nF-Hd3eXd3MZ7dRLYo4ifI4TqtaAZdV0QAwCYnEbCjeiDytCwFSciVUA4WIK0iaJBEC8lSlHHNMsnhCjjd_O2dfevShXNremcGyFJksEinTwWhCTjZU7az3DlXZOb0Cty45K8fAyyHwcgx8QKMN-qZbXP_LlbP7-S__A8mXhGo</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creator><creator>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creator><creator>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creator><creator>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creator><creator>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-4049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</title><author>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira ; Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler ; Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos ; Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo ; Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2934-8335bcfa17b9daa07a47e67e61d285c92a771f2fda923ba4d4422a85f51e8e463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic mammals</topic><topic>Bays</topic><topic>capture–recapture</topic><topic>Cetacea</topic><topic>cetacean</topic><topic>CJS models</topic><topic>closed‐population models</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>demographics</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Dolphins &amp; porpoises</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Harbours</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine technology</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Population statistics</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Shallow water</topic><topic>Site fidelity</topic><topic>Sotalia guianensis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meirelles, Ana Carolina Oliveira</au><au>Choi‐Lima, Katherine Fiedler</au><au>Vila Nova, Thaís Moura Campos</au><au>Monteiro‐Filho, Emygdio Leite de Araujo</au><au>Lotufo, Tito Monteiro da Cruz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Aquatic conservation</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1022</spage><epage>1040</epage><pages>1022-1040</pages><issn>1052-7613</issn><eissn>1099-0755</eissn><abstract>Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) inhabit shallow waters of the tropical western Atlantic, an area that is now mostly occupied by cities and harbours. Demographic studies have been concentrated in sheltered areas of south/south‐eastern Brazil. This study investigated site fidelity and estimated population abundance and apparent survival of Guiana dolphins in Mucuripe Embayment (ME), on the north‐eastern Brazilian coast, through photo‐identification surveys and closed and open population mark–recapture models, from October 2009 to September 2011. Forty‐six Guiana dolphin groups were recorded (in groups of between one and eight dolphins, with a mean ± SD of 3.49 ± 2.33) in 27 out of 40 surveys. Twenty‐five animals were photo‐identified, with eight considered to have a ‘poor health’ status. The standardized site fidelity index (SSFI) was low (0.25). Using the program capture, the time and heterogeneity model (Mth) resulted in a total abundance estimate of 39, with a Coefficient of Variation (CV) of 21% (95% CI 35–80%). In program mark, model averaging resulted in a total abundance estimate of 33 (CV 32%, 95% CI 30–100%). Using a CV of 21%, the power to detect a decline of 50% during the study period was 0.44 and the power to detect a decline of 5% a year was 0.11. To detect these declines with a 0.90 power, 12 years of monitoring would be necessary. The annual adult apparent survival rate was low (0.71; CV 19%; 95% CI 0.40–0.90), and differed for dolphins in ‘good’ (0.64; CV 28%, 95% CI 0.27–0.89) and ‘poor’ (0.85; CV 22%; 95% CI: 0.23–0.99) health. The low abundance of Guiana dolphins in ME indicates that conservation actions should start immediately, such as creating a marine protected area, continuing awareness campaigns, using by‐catch reduction technologies, developing new regulations, and promoting law enforcement. Monitoring studies must continue with increased effort to reduce uncertainty in estimates and to improve the power to detect trends of decline.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aqc.3804</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8238-4049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-1342</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-7613
ispartof Aquatic conservation, 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1022-1040
issn 1052-7613
1099-0755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2679477529
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abundance
Accuracy
Aquatic mammals
Bays
capture–recapture
Cetacea
cetacean
CJS models
closed‐population models
Coefficient of variation
demographics
Dolphins
Dolphins & porpoises
Enforcement
Habitat selection
Harbors
Harbours
Heterogeneity
Marine mammals
Marine parks
Marine protected areas
Marine technology
Monitoring
Population number
population size
Population statistics
Protected areas
Shallow water
Site fidelity
Sotalia guianensis
Surveys
Survival
Tropical climate
title Abundance and effect of health status on apparent survival of Guiana dolphins, Sotalia guianensis, in an open embayment in north‐eastern Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abundance%20and%20effect%20of%20health%20status%20on%20apparent%20survival%20of%20Guiana%20dolphins,%20Sotalia%20guianensis,%20in%20an%20open%20embayment%20in%20north%E2%80%90eastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Aquatic%20conservation&rft.au=Meirelles,%20Ana%20Carolina%20Oliveira&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1022&rft.epage=1040&rft.pages=1022-1040&rft.issn=1052-7613&rft.eissn=1099-0755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aqc.3804&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679477529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679477529&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true