Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula
Access to laboratory facilities and associated instrumentation represents a major barrier to learning in physical science education, due to constraints introduced by limited time and financial resources, cost of acquisition, and health and safety requirements. Virtualized laboratories offer some mit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical education 2022-06, Vol.99 (6), p.2277-2290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2290 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2277 |
container_title | Journal of chemical education |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Jeffery, Adam J. Rogers, Steven L. Pringle, Jamie K. Zholobenko, Vladimir L. Jeffery, Kelly L. A. Wisniewski, Kristopher D. Haxton, Katherine J. Emley, David W. |
description | Access to laboratory facilities and associated instrumentation represents a major barrier to learning in physical science education, due to constraints introduced by limited time and financial resources, cost of acquisition, and health and safety requirements. Virtualized laboratories offer some mitigation of these problems but may also introduce further problems such as limiting discussion and collaboration, inhibiting development of physical skills, and reducing engagement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulations of analytical instruments for applied science student learning and teaching. Two virtual instruments (X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and an ion chromatography system (IC)) were assembled on the Thinglink online virtual platform, with background theory, detailed animated instructions, and simulated data collection capabilities. The two simulations were disseminated to teachers and learners, with subsequent feedback gathered via questionnaires and four one-to-one interviews. Results showed that feedback was extremely positive from all users, with many expressing excitement for the accessibility and inclusivity implications and the freedom to engage asynchronously. Users found them to be high quality, highly accessible, and inclusive resources but generally felt that their application as supporting information would have greater benefit than using them in a standalone fashion. The most prominent concern was the time required to create materials. Study implications suggest that the style of online virtual learning resource presented here is viewed as beneficial by learners and teachers alike, if planned to be as efficient as possible and delivered as a supplement to physical equipment learning. The application of additional online resources to broader groups should be the subject of further investigation, with the potential benefits for academic performance being of utmost importance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678513432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678513432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-205bca87264944370922bf0af14bc5a0494dbe1460c75b56a3d2ffc4237a0ce03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKu_wE3A9bT5mi93pVRbKLhoXYdMJrGpM0lNMkL_vbGtW1cP3jv38jgAPGI0wYjgqZBhspc71at2giXCqCivwAjXtMowJdU1GKGEZXVesVtwF8IeIUzyuhqBbrsz9qMz9hMK28K4U3AtGudFdP74DFc2Ki9kNN8Kbkw_dCIaZwN0Gs6s6I7RSNElKkQ_9MrG0xlq5-FyATfSKCsVnA_eG5my9-BGiy6oh8scg_eXxXa-zNZvr6v5bJ0JWpCYEZQ3UlQlKVjNGC1RTUijkdCYNTIXKG3bRmFWIFnmTV4I2hKtJSO0FEgqRMfg6dx78O5rUCHyvRt8-jdwUpRVjimjJFH0TEnvQvBK84M3vfBHjhH_1cqTVn7Ryi9aU2p6Tp2Of7X_JX4AwRR_Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678513432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Jeffery, Adam J. ; Rogers, Steven L. ; Pringle, Jamie K. ; Zholobenko, Vladimir L. ; Jeffery, Kelly L. A. ; Wisniewski, Kristopher D. ; Haxton, Katherine J. ; Emley, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Adam J. ; Rogers, Steven L. ; Pringle, Jamie K. ; Zholobenko, Vladimir L. ; Jeffery, Kelly L. A. ; Wisniewski, Kristopher D. ; Haxton, Katherine J. ; Emley, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>Access to laboratory facilities and associated instrumentation represents a major barrier to learning in physical science education, due to constraints introduced by limited time and financial resources, cost of acquisition, and health and safety requirements. Virtualized laboratories offer some mitigation of these problems but may also introduce further problems such as limiting discussion and collaboration, inhibiting development of physical skills, and reducing engagement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulations of analytical instruments for applied science student learning and teaching. Two virtual instruments (X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and an ion chromatography system (IC)) were assembled on the Thinglink online virtual platform, with background theory, detailed animated instructions, and simulated data collection capabilities. The two simulations were disseminated to teachers and learners, with subsequent feedback gathered via questionnaires and four one-to-one interviews. Results showed that feedback was extremely positive from all users, with many expressing excitement for the accessibility and inclusivity implications and the freedom to engage asynchronously. Users found them to be high quality, highly accessible, and inclusive resources but generally felt that their application as supporting information would have greater benefit than using them in a standalone fashion. The most prominent concern was the time required to create materials. Study implications suggest that the style of online virtual learning resource presented here is viewed as beneficial by learners and teachers alike, if planned to be as efficient as possible and delivered as a supplement to physical equipment learning. The application of additional online resources to broader groups should be the subject of further investigation, with the potential benefits for academic performance being of utmost importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Easton: American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Accessibility ; Collaboration ; Curricula ; Data collection ; Educational Resources ; Feedback ; Instrumentation ; Instruments ; Internet resources ; Laboratories ; Learning ; Physical sciences ; Science Curriculum ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Simulation ; Teachers ; Teaching methods ; Virtual reality ; X-ray fluorescence</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical education, 2022-06, Vol.99 (6), p.2277-2290</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 14, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-205bca87264944370922bf0af14bc5a0494dbe1460c75b56a3d2ffc4237a0ce03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-205bca87264944370922bf0af14bc5a0494dbe1460c75b56a3d2ffc4237a0ce03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9812-4324 ; 0000-0002-6024-0503 ; 0000-0002-2069-4893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Jamie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zholobenko, Vladimir L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Kelly L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, Kristopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haxton, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emley, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula</title><title>Journal of chemical education</title><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><description>Access to laboratory facilities and associated instrumentation represents a major barrier to learning in physical science education, due to constraints introduced by limited time and financial resources, cost of acquisition, and health and safety requirements. Virtualized laboratories offer some mitigation of these problems but may also introduce further problems such as limiting discussion and collaboration, inhibiting development of physical skills, and reducing engagement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulations of analytical instruments for applied science student learning and teaching. Two virtual instruments (X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and an ion chromatography system (IC)) were assembled on the Thinglink online virtual platform, with background theory, detailed animated instructions, and simulated data collection capabilities. The two simulations were disseminated to teachers and learners, with subsequent feedback gathered via questionnaires and four one-to-one interviews. Results showed that feedback was extremely positive from all users, with many expressing excitement for the accessibility and inclusivity implications and the freedom to engage asynchronously. Users found them to be high quality, highly accessible, and inclusive resources but generally felt that their application as supporting information would have greater benefit than using them in a standalone fashion. The most prominent concern was the time required to create materials. Study implications suggest that the style of online virtual learning resource presented here is viewed as beneficial by learners and teachers alike, if planned to be as efficient as possible and delivered as a supplement to physical equipment learning. The application of additional online resources to broader groups should be the subject of further investigation, with the potential benefits for academic performance being of utmost importance.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Physical sciences</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><subject>X-ray fluorescence</subject><issn>0021-9584</issn><issn>1938-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEURYMoWKu_wE3A9bT5mi93pVRbKLhoXYdMJrGpM0lNMkL_vbGtW1cP3jv38jgAPGI0wYjgqZBhspc71at2giXCqCivwAjXtMowJdU1GKGEZXVesVtwF8IeIUzyuhqBbrsz9qMz9hMK28K4U3AtGudFdP74DFc2Ki9kNN8Kbkw_dCIaZwN0Gs6s6I7RSNElKkQ_9MrG0xlq5-FyATfSKCsVnA_eG5my9-BGiy6oh8scg_eXxXa-zNZvr6v5bJ0JWpCYEZQ3UlQlKVjNGC1RTUijkdCYNTIXKG3bRmFWIFnmTV4I2hKtJSO0FEgqRMfg6dx78O5rUCHyvRt8-jdwUpRVjimjJFH0TEnvQvBK84M3vfBHjhH_1cqTVn7Ryi9aU2p6Tp2Of7X_JX4AwRR_Cw</recordid><startdate>20220614</startdate><enddate>20220614</enddate><creator>Jeffery, Adam J.</creator><creator>Rogers, Steven L.</creator><creator>Pringle, Jamie K.</creator><creator>Zholobenko, Vladimir L.</creator><creator>Jeffery, Kelly L. A.</creator><creator>Wisniewski, Kristopher D.</creator><creator>Haxton, Katherine J.</creator><creator>Emley, David W.</creator><general>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</general><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-4324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-4893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220614</creationdate><title>Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula</title><author>Jeffery, Adam J. ; Rogers, Steven L. ; Pringle, Jamie K. ; Zholobenko, Vladimir L. ; Jeffery, Kelly L. A. ; Wisniewski, Kristopher D. ; Haxton, Katherine J. ; Emley, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-205bca87264944370922bf0af14bc5a0494dbe1460c75b56a3d2ffc4237a0ce03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Physical sciences</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><topic>X-ray fluorescence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pringle, Jamie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zholobenko, Vladimir L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffery, Kelly L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, Kristopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haxton, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emley, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeffery, Adam J.</au><au>Rogers, Steven L.</au><au>Pringle, Jamie K.</au><au>Zholobenko, Vladimir L.</au><au>Jeffery, Kelly L. A.</au><au>Wisniewski, Kristopher D.</au><au>Haxton, Katherine J.</au><au>Emley, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical education</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chem. Educ</addtitle><date>2022-06-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2277</spage><epage>2290</epage><pages>2277-2290</pages><issn>0021-9584</issn><eissn>1938-1328</eissn><abstract>Access to laboratory facilities and associated instrumentation represents a major barrier to learning in physical science education, due to constraints introduced by limited time and financial resources, cost of acquisition, and health and safety requirements. Virtualized laboratories offer some mitigation of these problems but may also introduce further problems such as limiting discussion and collaboration, inhibiting development of physical skills, and reducing engagement. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulations of analytical instruments for applied science student learning and teaching. Two virtual instruments (X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) and an ion chromatography system (IC)) were assembled on the Thinglink online virtual platform, with background theory, detailed animated instructions, and simulated data collection capabilities. The two simulations were disseminated to teachers and learners, with subsequent feedback gathered via questionnaires and four one-to-one interviews. Results showed that feedback was extremely positive from all users, with many expressing excitement for the accessibility and inclusivity implications and the freedom to engage asynchronously. Users found them to be high quality, highly accessible, and inclusive resources but generally felt that their application as supporting information would have greater benefit than using them in a standalone fashion. The most prominent concern was the time required to create materials. Study implications suggest that the style of online virtual learning resource presented here is viewed as beneficial by learners and teachers alike, if planned to be as efficient as possible and delivered as a supplement to physical equipment learning. The application of additional online resources to broader groups should be the subject of further investigation, with the potential benefits for academic performance being of utmost importance.</abstract><cop>Easton</cop><pub>American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9812-4324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-4893</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9584 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical education, 2022-06, Vol.99 (6), p.2277-2290 |
issn | 0021-9584 1938-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678513432 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Academic achievement Accessibility Collaboration Curricula Data collection Educational Resources Feedback Instrumentation Instruments Internet resources Laboratories Learning Physical sciences Science Curriculum Science education Science Instruction Simulation Teachers Teaching methods Virtual reality X-ray fluorescence |
title | Thinglink and the Laboratory: Interactive Simulations of Analytical Instrumentation for HE Science Curricula |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A27%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thinglink%20and%20the%20Laboratory:%20Interactive%20Simulations%20of%20Analytical%20Instrumentation%20for%20HE%20Science%20Curricula&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20education&rft.au=Jeffery,%20Adam%20J.&rft.date=2022-06-14&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2277&rft.epage=2290&rft.pages=2277-2290&rft.issn=0021-9584&rft.eissn=1938-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678513432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678513432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |