Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency

In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Administration & society 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206
Hauptverfasser: van de Sande, Jolien, de Graaff, Bert, Delnoij, Diana, de Bont, Antoinette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1206
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1178
container_title Administration & society
container_volume 54
creator van de Sande, Jolien
de Graaff, Bert
Delnoij, Diana
de Bont, Antoinette
description In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00953997211057056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678319103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00953997211057056</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2678319103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2u0zAQhS0EEqXwAOxGYp2Lp67rmF1VXaDS5f_CNpo4TpqrXDv4Z5E34jFxKYgFwoux5HO-Y80MY8-RXyEq9ZJzLYXWaoPIpeJy94CtUMpNJbjQD9nqrFdnw2P2JMY7Xk5RVuzH0RkfZh8ojW6Aj7mdRgPfaMo2wu0p-Dyc4F2e0jhPFvbG-OwSteM0puUV7OFA0cKXlLsFvINPmc4CfLZDnkpiefI9XN_bMFhnluIOFkYH6WThvS01TOS6CO0C5ODoOjvbUlz6k-DDAvtf7FP2qKcp2me_7zX7-vr69vC2uvnw5njY31RGSJkqxa1AQUaR6BC3XGtJ0tT9tus3pFvkKGtJbYtdaV-IndTbjroaFZGouerFmr245M7Bfy9DSM2dz8GVL5vNTtUCNRZwzfDiMsHHGGzfzGG8p7A0yJvzQpp_FlKYqwsTabB_U_8P_AQOK4zM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678319103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00953997211057056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Case studies ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Emergency services ; Ethnography ; Health care ; Quality of care ; Regulation ; Regulatory agencies ; Values</subject><ispartof>Administration &amp; society, 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00953997211057056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00953997211057056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21821,27868,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoij, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><title>Administration &amp; society</title><description>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0095-3997</issn><issn>1552-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2u0zAQhS0EEqXwAOxGYp2Lp67rmF1VXaDS5f_CNpo4TpqrXDv4Z5E34jFxKYgFwoux5HO-Y80MY8-RXyEq9ZJzLYXWaoPIpeJy94CtUMpNJbjQD9nqrFdnw2P2JMY7Xk5RVuzH0RkfZh8ojW6Aj7mdRgPfaMo2wu0p-Dyc4F2e0jhPFvbG-OwSteM0puUV7OFA0cKXlLsFvINPmc4CfLZDnkpiefI9XN_bMFhnluIOFkYH6WThvS01TOS6CO0C5ODoOjvbUlz6k-DDAvtf7FP2qKcp2me_7zX7-vr69vC2uvnw5njY31RGSJkqxa1AQUaR6BC3XGtJ0tT9tus3pFvkKGtJbYtdaV-IndTbjroaFZGouerFmr245M7Bfy9DSM2dz8GVL5vNTtUCNRZwzfDiMsHHGGzfzGG8p7A0yJvzQpp_FlKYqwsTabB_U_8P_AQOK4zM</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>van de Sande, Jolien</creator><creator>de Graaff, Bert</creator><creator>Delnoij, Diana</creator><creator>de Bont, Antoinette</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><author>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoij, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Administration &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Sande, Jolien</au><au>de Graaff, Bert</au><au>Delnoij, Diana</au><au>de Bont, Antoinette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</atitle><jtitle>Administration &amp; society</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1178</spage><epage>1206</epage><pages>1178-1206</pages><issn>0095-3997</issn><eissn>1552-3039</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00953997211057056</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-3997
ispartof Administration & society, 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206
issn 0095-3997
1552-3039
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2678319103
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accountability
Case studies
Clinical decision making
Decision making
Emergency services
Ethnography
Health care
Quality of care
Regulation
Regulatory agencies
Values
title Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A02%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20Public%20Values%20Through%20Multiple%20Accountability:%20A%20Case%20Study%20on%20Quality%20Regulation%20of%20Emergency%20Care%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20by%20an%20Independent%20Regulatory%20Agency&rft.jtitle=Administration%20&%20society&rft.au=van%20de%20Sande,%20Jolien&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1206&rft.pages=1178-1206&rft.issn=0095-3997&rft.eissn=1552-3039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00953997211057056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678319103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678319103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00953997211057056&rfr_iscdi=true