Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency
In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Administration & society 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1178 |
container_title | Administration & society |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | van de Sande, Jolien de Graaff, Bert Delnoij, Diana de Bont, Antoinette |
description | In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00953997211057056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678319103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00953997211057056</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2678319103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2u0zAQhS0EEqXwAOxGYp2Lp67rmF1VXaDS5f_CNpo4TpqrXDv4Z5E34jFxKYgFwoux5HO-Y80MY8-RXyEq9ZJzLYXWaoPIpeJy94CtUMpNJbjQD9nqrFdnw2P2JMY7Xk5RVuzH0RkfZh8ojW6Aj7mdRgPfaMo2wu0p-Dyc4F2e0jhPFvbG-OwSteM0puUV7OFA0cKXlLsFvINPmc4CfLZDnkpiefI9XN_bMFhnluIOFkYH6WThvS01TOS6CO0C5ODoOjvbUlz6k-DDAvtf7FP2qKcp2me_7zX7-vr69vC2uvnw5njY31RGSJkqxa1AQUaR6BC3XGtJ0tT9tus3pFvkKGtJbYtdaV-IndTbjroaFZGouerFmr245M7Bfy9DSM2dz8GVL5vNTtUCNRZwzfDiMsHHGGzfzGG8p7A0yJvzQpp_FlKYqwsTabB_U_8P_AQOK4zM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678319103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</creator><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00953997211057056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Case studies ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Emergency services ; Ethnography ; Health care ; Quality of care ; Regulation ; Regulatory agencies ; Values</subject><ispartof>Administration & society, 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00953997211057056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00953997211057056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21821,27868,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoij, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><title>Administration & society</title><description>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>0095-3997</issn><issn>1552-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2u0zAQhS0EEqXwAOxGYp2Lp67rmF1VXaDS5f_CNpo4TpqrXDv4Z5E34jFxKYgFwoux5HO-Y80MY8-RXyEq9ZJzLYXWaoPIpeJy94CtUMpNJbjQD9nqrFdnw2P2JMY7Xk5RVuzH0RkfZh8ojW6Aj7mdRgPfaMo2wu0p-Dyc4F2e0jhPFvbG-OwSteM0puUV7OFA0cKXlLsFvINPmc4CfLZDnkpiefI9XN_bMFhnluIOFkYH6WThvS01TOS6CO0C5ODoOjvbUlz6k-DDAvtf7FP2qKcp2me_7zX7-vr69vC2uvnw5njY31RGSJkqxa1AQUaR6BC3XGtJ0tT9tus3pFvkKGtJbYtdaV-IndTbjroaFZGouerFmr245M7Bfy9DSM2dz8GVL5vNTtUCNRZwzfDiMsHHGGzfzGG8p7A0yJvzQpp_FlKYqwsTabB_U_8P_AQOK4zM</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>van de Sande, Jolien</creator><creator>de Graaff, Bert</creator><creator>Delnoij, Diana</creator><creator>de Bont, Antoinette</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</title><author>van de Sande, Jolien ; de Graaff, Bert ; Delnoij, Diana ; de Bont, Antoinette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-70e313ac7a3d1140995a5c8f4df2a9b101585abb1d303336594dad817aa3807f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van de Sande, Jolien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaff, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delnoij, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bont, Antoinette</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Administration & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van de Sande, Jolien</au><au>de Graaff, Bert</au><au>Delnoij, Diana</au><au>de Bont, Antoinette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency</atitle><jtitle>Administration & society</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1178</spage><epage>1206</epage><pages>1178-1206</pages><issn>0095-3997</issn><eissn>1552-3039</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we explore how multiple accountability (MA) can enable an independent regulatory agency to deal with multiple conflicting public values in a complex and politically salient decision-making process. We examined the decision-making process of the Dutch National Health Care Institute on quality regulation of emergency care in the Netherlands. Using insights derived from ethnography, document analysis, and interviews, we show that MA resulted from strategic interactions between the Institute’s vertical and horizontal accountability forums. We argue that MA impeded efficiency but also enabled the Institute to deal with multiple conflicting public values.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00953997211057056</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3706</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-3997 |
ispartof | Administration & society, 2022-07, Vol.54 (6), p.1178-1206 |
issn | 0095-3997 1552-3039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678319103 |
source | Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accountability Case studies Clinical decision making Decision making Emergency services Ethnography Health care Quality of care Regulation Regulatory agencies Values |
title | Incorporating Public Values Through Multiple Accountability: A Case Study on Quality Regulation of Emergency Care in the Netherlands by an Independent Regulatory Agency |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A02%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20Public%20Values%20Through%20Multiple%20Accountability:%20A%20Case%20Study%20on%20Quality%20Regulation%20of%20Emergency%20Care%20in%20the%20Netherlands%20by%20an%20Independent%20Regulatory%20Agency&rft.jtitle=Administration%20&%20society&rft.au=van%20de%20Sande,%20Jolien&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1206&rft.pages=1178-1206&rft.issn=0095-3997&rft.eissn=1552-3039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00953997211057056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678319103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678319103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00953997211057056&rfr_iscdi=true |